ACE ALBUMIN REAGENT ACE TOTAL PROTEIN REAGENT ACE CALCIUM-ARSENAZO REAGENT ACE PHOSPHORUS U.V. REAGENT
Applicant
Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies, Inc.
Product Code
CIX · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jul 13, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1035
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The ACE Albumin Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of albumin concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases involving primarily the liver or kidneys. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The ACE Total Protein Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of total protein concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Total protein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of diseases involving the liver, kidney, or bone marrow as well as other metabolic or nutritional disorders. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of calcium concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Calcium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disease, a variety of bone diseases, chronic renal disease and tetany (intermittent muscular contractions or spasms). This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of inorganic phosphorus concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Measurements of inorganic phosphorus are used in the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases and vitamin D imbalance. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
Device Story
Reagents for quantitative photometric analysis of serum samples; used on ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Reagents contain specific chemical components (e.g., Bromcresol Green for albumin; copper sulfate/tartrate for total protein; Arsenazo III for calcium; ammonium molybdate for phosphorus). System performs endpoint reactions at 37°C. Operated by laboratory personnel in clinical or physician office settings. Output is concentration value (g/dL or mg/dL) displayed to clinician; used to aid diagnosis/treatment of liver, kidney, bone, and metabolic diseases. Benefits include standardized, automated diagnostic testing.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP5-A2 (n=88 per level; POL sites n=15 per level). Linearity evaluated per CLSI EP6-A. Interference evaluated per CLSI EP7-A2. Method comparison against predicate (k930104) using Deming regression showed high correlation (r² > 0.98) across all analytes in both in-house and POL studies.
Technological Characteristics
Single-reagent bottle format. Albumin: Bromcresol green/acetate buffer. Total Protein: Copper sulfate, sodium potassium tartrate, potassium iodide, sodium hydroxide. Calcium: Arsenazo III. Phosphorus: Ammonium molybdate, sulfuric acid. Bichromatic spectrophotometric sensing. Standalone reagent kits for use on the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative serum analysis of albumin, total protein, calcium, and inorganic phosphorus in patients with suspected liver, kidney, bone marrow, parathyroid, or metabolic/nutritional disorders. Intended for use in clinical or physician office laboratories.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An albumin test system is a device intended to measure the albumin concentration in serum and plasma. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases involving primarily the liver or kidneys.
Predicate Devices
Alfa Wassermann ACE plus ISE/Clinical Chemistry System ACE Reagents (K931786)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k113374
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Albumin
Total Protein
Calcium
Phosphorus
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative photometric test
E. Applicant:
Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies, LLC
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ACE Albumin Reagent
ACE Total Protein Reagent
ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent
ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 862.1035, Albumin test system
21 CFR § 862.1635, Total protein test system
21 CFR § 862.1145, Calcium test system
21 CFR § 862.1580, Phosphorus (inorganic) test system
2. Classification:
Class II: Albumin test system and Calcium test system
Class II, for Total protein test system, meets limits of exemptions per 21 CFR § 862.9 (c)(9)
Class I, reserved for Phosphorus (inorganic) test system
3. Product code:
CIX, bromcresol green dye-binding, albumin
CEK, biuret (colorimetric), total protein
CJY, azo dye, calcium
CEO, phosphomolybdate (colorimetric), inorganic phosphorus
{1}
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The ACE Albumin Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of albumin concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases involving primarily the liver or kidneys. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE Total Protein Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of total protein concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Total protein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of diseases involving the liver, kidney, or bone marrow as well as other metabolic or nutritional disorders. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of calcium concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Calcium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disease, a variety of bone diseases, chronic renal disease and tetany (intermittent muscular contractions or spasms). This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of inorganic phosphorus concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Measurements of inorganic phosphorus are used in the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases and vitamin D imbalance. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
2. Indication(s) for use:
See Intended use(s).
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For in vitro diagnostic use only. For prescription and point-of-care use.
4. Special instrument requirements:
ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System
{2}
3
I. Device Description:
The ACE Albumin Reagent consists of a single reagent bottle containing 0.39 mmol/L Bromcresol Green, acetate buffer, preservative and surfactant.
The ACE Total Protein Reagent consists of a single reagent bottle containing 12 mmol/L copper sulfate, 32mmol/L sodium potassium tartrate, 30 mmol/L potassium iodide, 600 mmol/L sodium hydroxide and non-reactive ingredients.
The ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent consists of a single reagent bottle containing ≥ 0.15 mmol/L Arsenazo III, buffer and surfactant.
The ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent consists of a single reagent bottle containing 0.48 mmol/L ammonium molybdate, 220 mmol/L sulfuric acid and surfactant.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Alfa Wassermann ACE plus ISE Clinical Chemistry System
2. Predicate K number(s):
k930104
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Item | Candidate Device | Predicate Device |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Similarities and Differences for Albumin | | |
| Intended Use | Intended for the quantitative determination of albumin concentration in serum. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases involving primarily the liver or kidneys. | Same |
| Instrument | ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System | ACE Clinical Chemistry System |
| Calibration | GEMCAL calibrators | Same |
| Calibration Stability | 30 days | Same |
| Basic Principle | Fiske/Subbarow method | Same |
| Analysis Temperature | 37°C | Same |
| Reaction Type | Endpoint | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum | Same |
| Expected Values | 3.5 to 5.0 g/dL | Same |
| Reportable Range | 0.3 to 7.0 g/dL | 0.1 to 7.0 g/dL |
{3}
| Item | Candidate Device | Predicate Device |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Similarities and Differences for Total Protein | | |
| Intended Use | Intended for the quantitative determination of total protein concentration in serum. Total protein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of diseases involving the liver, kidney, or bone marrow as well as other metabolic or nutritional disorders. | Same |
| Instrument | ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System | ACE Clinical Chemistry System |
| Calibration | GEMCAL calibrators | Same |
| Calibration Stability | 30 days | Same |
| Basic Principle | Chemical method for total protein | Same |
| Analysis Temperature | 37°C | Same |
| Reaction Type | Endpoint | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum | Same |
| Expected Values | 6.0 to 8.3 g/dL | Same |
| Reportable Range | 0.4 to 14.0 g/dL | 0.0 to 14.0 g/dL |
| Item | Candidate Device | Predicate Device |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Similarities and Differences for Calcium | | |
| Intended Use | Intended for the quantitative determination of calcium concentration in serum. Calcium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disease, a variety of bone diseases, chronic renal disease and tetany (intermittent muscular contractions or spasms). | Same |
| Instrument | ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System | ACE Clinical Chemistry System |
| Calibration | GEMCAL calibrators | Same |
| Calibration Stability | 30 days | Same |
| Basic Principle | Chemical method for calcium | Same |
| Analysis Temperature | 37°C | Same |
| Reaction Type | Endpoint | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum | Same |
| Expected Values | 8.5 to 10.5 mg/dL | Same |
| Reportable Range | 0.4 to 15 mg/dL | 0.3 to 15.0 mg/dL |
{4}
| Item | Candidate Device | Predicate Device |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Similarities and Differences for Phosphorus | | |
| Intended Use | Intended for the quantitative determination of inorganic phosphorus concentration in serum. Measurements of inorganic phosphorus are used in the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases and vitamin D imbalance. | Same |
| Instrument | ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System | ACE Clinical Chemistry System |
| Calibration | GEMCAL calibrators | Same |
| Calibration Stability | 20 days | Same |
| Basic Principle | Phosphomolybdate method | Same |
| Analysis Temperature | 37°C | Same |
| Reaction Type | Endpoint | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum | Same |
| Expected Values | 2.7 to 4.5 mg/dL | Same |
| Reportable Range | 0.3 to 20 mg/dL | 0.2 to 20.0 mg/dL |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- CLSI, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline (EP5-A2)
- CLSI, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline (EP6-A)
- CLSI, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline (EP7-A2),
- CLSI, Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline (EP9-A2-IR)
- CLSI, Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation; Approved Guideline (EP17-A)
# L. Test Principle:
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The precision of the Albumin, Total Protein, Calcium and Phosphorus tests on the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System was evaluated in accordance with CLSI EP5-A2 in-house. Four levels were assayed 2 times per run, 2 runs per day, for a total of 22 days on 1 analyzer for a total of 88 measurements (n) per level. A set of three serum based pools (samples 1-3) and one normal human
{5}
serum pool (sample 4) were used. The results are summarized below:
Albumin:
| Sample | Mean (g/dL) | Within run | | Between run | | Between day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| 1 | 2.30 | 0.04 | 1.7% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.02 | 1.0% | 0.05 | 2.0% |
| 2 | 4.05 | 0.04 | 0.9% | 0.03 | 0.6% | 0.03 | 0.9% | 0.06 | 1.4% |
| 3 | 5.63 | 0.05 | 1.0% | 0.01 | 0.2% | 0.04 | 0.7% | 0.07 | 1.2% |
| 4 | 4.34 | 0.05 | 1.1% | 0.01 | 0.2% | 0.03 | 0.7% | 0.06 | 1.4% |
Total Protein:
| Sample | Mean (g/dL) | Within run | | Between run | | Between day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| 1 | 3.46 | 0.08 | 2.4% | 0.04 | 1.2% | 0.04 | 1.1% | 0.10 | 2.9% |
| 2 | 6.86 | 0.11 | 1.6% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.07 | 1.0% | 0.13 | 1.9% |
| 3 | 10.01 | 0.08 | 0.8% | 0.05 | 0.5% | 0.01 | 0.1% | 0.10 | 1.0% |
| 4 | 6.58 | 0.10 | 1.4% | 0.05 | 0.7% | 0.01 | 0.2% | 0.11 | 1.6% |
Calcium:
| Sample | Mean (mg/dL) | Within run | | Between run | | Between day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| 1 | 6.52 | 0.15 | 2.3% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.15 | 2.3% |
| 2 | 9.71 | 0.13 | 1.4% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.03 | 0.3% | 0.13 | 1.4% |
| 3 | 12.46 | 0.19 | 1.5% | 0.06 | 0.4% | 0.06 | 0.5% | 0.21 | 1.7% |
| 4 | 8.99 | 0.12 | 1.3% | 0.16 | 1.7% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.20 | 2.2% |
Phosphorus:
| Sample | Mean (mg/dL) | Within run | | Between run | | Between day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| 1 | 3.75 | 0.06 | 1.6% | 0.02 | 0.5% | 0.02 | 0.5% | 0.07 | 1.7% |
| 2 | 8.24 | 0.12 | 1.4% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.05 | 0.6% | 0.13 | 1.5% |
| 3 | 12.60 | 0.24 | 1.9% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.05 | 0.4% | 0.24 | 1.9% |
| 4 | 4.51 | 0.08 | 1.7% | 0.08 | 1.8% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.11 | 2.5% |
Additional precision studies were performed at 3 physical office lab (POL) sites. Studies consisted of running 3 serum based pools on 3 analyzers (one at each POL site) by one POL operator at site 1 and 2 and 2 POL operators at site 3, at least 3 times per run, 1 run per day, for a total of 5 days for a total n of 15 for each level at each site. The results are summarized below:
{6}
Albumin:
| Lab | Sample | Mean (g/dL) | Within run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| POL 1 | 1 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| POL 2 | 1 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.05 | 2.3% |
| POL 3 | 1 | 2.29 | 0.04 | 1.6% | 0.04 | 1.6% |
| POL 1 | 2 | 4.01 | 0.06 | 1.6% | 0.06 | 1.6% |
| POL 2 | 2 | 4.12 | 0.05 | 1.2% | 0.08 | 2.0% |
| POL 3 | 2 | 4.01 | 0.05 | 1.2% | 0.06 | 1.5% |
| POL 1 | 3 | 5.61 | 0.06 | 1.2% | 0.06 | 1.2% |
| POL 2 | 3 | 5.73 | 0.04 | 0.7% | 0.09 | 1.6% |
| POL 3 | 3 | 5.57 | 0.04 | 0.7% | 0.10 | 1.9% |
Total Protein:
| Lab | Sample | Mean (g/dL) | Within run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| POL 1 | 1 | 3.49 | 0.04 | 1.1% | 0.05 | 1.5% |
| POL 2 | 1 | 3.63 | 0.04 | 1.1% | 0.05 | 1.4% |
| POL 3 | 1 | 3.52 | 0.04 | 1.1% | 0.06 | 1.6% |
| POL 1 | 2 | 6.89 | 0.05 | 0.7% | 0.06 | 0.9% |
| POL 2 | 2 | 7.13 | 0.09 | 1.3% | 0.11 | 1.6% |
| POL 3 | 2 | 6.97 | 0.06 | 0.9% | 0.11 | 1.6% |
| POL 1 | 3 | 10.17 | 0.08 | 0.8% | 0.08 | 0.8% |
| POL 2 | 3 | 10.51 | 0.11 | 1.0% | 0.12 | 1.1% |
| POL 3 | 3 | 10.27 | 0.11 | 1.0% | 0.11 | 1.0% |
Calcium:
| Lab | Sample | Mean (mg/dL) | Within run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| POL 1 | 1 | 6.50 | 0.06 | 0.9% | 0.08 | 1.2% |
| POL 2 | 1 | 6.43 | 0.09 | 1.4% | 0.11 | 1.8% |
| POL 3 | 1 | 6.46 | 0.06 | 0.9% | 0.19 | 2.9% |
| POL 1 | 2 | 9.68 | 0.10 | 1.0% | 0.13 | 1.3% |
| POL 2 | 2 | 9.65 | 0.08 | 0.8% | 0.11 | 1.1% |
| POL 3 | 2 | 9.69 | 0.13 | 1.4% | 0.13 | 1.4% |
| POL 1 | 3 | 12.43 | 0.16 | 1.3% | 0.20 | 1.6% |
| POL 2 | 3 | 12.33 | 0.15 | 1.2% | 0.15 | 1.2% |
| POL 3 | 3 | 12.55 | 0.12 | 1.0% | 0.14 | 1.1% |
{7}
Phosphorus:
| Lab | Sample | Mean (mg/dL) | Within run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| POL 1 | 1 | 3.65 | 0.06 | 1.6% | 0.10 | 2.6% |
| POL 2 | 1 | 3.95 | 0.10 | 2.6% | 0.10 | 2.6% |
| POL 3 | 1 | 3.77 | 0.12 | 3.2% | 0.15 | 3.9% |
| POL 1 | 2 | 8.03 | 0.10 | 1.2% | 0.12 | 1.5% |
| POL 2 | 2 | 8.53 | 0.11 | 1.3% | 0.11 | 1.3% |
| POL 3 | 2 | 8.15 | 0.05 | 0.6% | 0.08 | 1.0% |
| POL 1 | 3 | 12.41 | 0.13 | 1.0% | 0.17 | 1.4% |
| POL 2 | 3 | 13.12 | 0.27 | 2.0% | 0.27 | 2.0% |
| POL 3 | 3 | 12.69 | 0.08 | 0.6% | 0.13 | 1.0% |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The linearity of the Albumin, Total Protein, Calcium and Phosphorus tests on the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System was evaluated in accordance with CLSI EP6-A. Serum samples were spiked and dilutions of the spiked serum were then prepared by mixing the spiked serum in known proportions with saline (for albumin, total protein and phosphorus or diluted serum for calcium. Twelve levels were prepared for each analyte and each level was run in triplicate on one analyzer. The mean value of each set of triplicate determinations was calculated and the $\%$ recovery was calculated for each sample. The execution of first, second and third order linear regression did not indicate statistically significant non linear regression coefficients in either the $2^{\mathrm{nd}}$ order or $3^{\mathrm{rd}}$ order models. Linear regression analysis of the assigned values (x axis) versus the measured values (y axis) was also evaluated. The results of these studies are summarized below:
Albumin:
Linear regression analysis demonstrated that the assay is linear from 0.1 to 7.1 g/dL (y = 0.997x + 0.12; r² = 0.9979). The sponsor claims the reportable range for the assay is from 0.3 to 7.0 g/dL.
Total Protein:
Linear regression analysis demonstrated that the assay was linear from 0.37 to $15.4\mathrm{g / dL}$ $(y = 1.015x + 0.01; r^2 = 0.9984)$ . The sponsor claims that the reportable range for the assay is from 0.4 to $14\mathrm{g / dL}$ .
Calcium:
Linear regression analysis demonstrated that the assay was linear from 0.37 to $15.9\mathrm{mg / dL}$ $(y = 1.019x - 0.11; r^2 = 0.9994)$ . The sponsor claims that the reportable range of the assay is from 0.4 to $15\mathrm{mg / dL}$ .
Inorganic Phosphorus:
{8}
Linear regression analysis demonstrated that the assay was linear from 0.3 to 20.0 mg/dL (y = 1.016x - 0.10; r² = 0.9890). The sponsor claims that the reportable range of the assay is from 0.3 to 20 mg/dL.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): The GEMCAL calibrators recommended for use with these reagents were cleared under k930104.
Alfa Wassermann Level 1 and level 2 Chemistry Controls recommended for use with these reagents were cleared under k930104.
d. Detection limit:
The limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD) and limit of quantitation (LoQ) studies were performed in accordance to CLSI EP17-A. These determinations were performed using 60 replicates of a true blank (BSA, 7.5% solution in saline) for the LoB and 60 replicates of five low level sample values for the LoD. The true blank results were ranked from lowest to highest. The LoB was calculated as the mean of the 57th and 58th highest values for the true blank. The standard deviation of the 60 results for the low samples was calculated. The LoD was calculated using the following equation:
$$
\mathrm{LoD} = \mathrm{LoB} + (1.645 * \mathrm{SD} \text{ low samples})
$$
The LoQ was determined using 40 replicates of 5 low level specimens and defined as the lowest concentration for which the CV is less than 20%.
The estimate for LoB is 0.07 g/dL (Albumin), 0.10 g/dL (Total Protein), 0.05 mg/dL (Calcium) and 0.04 mg/dL (Phosphorus)
The estimate for LoD is 0.09 g/dL (Albumin), 0.15 g/dL (Total Protein), 0.11 mg/dL (Calcium) and 0.07 mg/dL (Phosphorus).
The estimate for LoQ is 0.09 g/dL (Albumin), 0.31 g/dL (Total Protein), 0.20 mg/dL (Calcium) and 0.22 mg/dL (Phosphorus).
e. Analytical specificity:
The interference studies were performed in accordance to CLSI EP7-A2. Various concentrations of the potential interfering compounds were added to aliquots of normal and abnormal serum pools. The control samples consisted of aliquots of the same serum pools diluted with an equivalent volume of diluent containing no interfering compound. All samples were tested in triplicate on the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. The following interference studies were performed:
9
{9}
| Interferent | Concentrations tested (mg/dL) | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Low | High |
| Ascorbic acid | 0.188 | 6 |
| Unconjugated bilirubin | 1.56 | 50 |
| Hemoglobin | 31.3 | 1000 |
| Intralipid (lipemia) | 62.5 | 2000 |
| Analyte | Analyte concentration | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Low pool | High pool |
| Albumin | 3.0 – 4.0 g/dL | 5.2 – 5.7 g/dL |
| Total Protein | 5.8 – 6.6 g/dL | 8.5 – 11.9 g/dL |
| Calcium | 7.6 – 8.5 mg/dL | 11.0 – 13.5 mg/dL |
| Phosphorus | 2.9 – 4.3 mg/dL | 8.9 – 13.7 mg/dL |
The sponsor states that interferences are considered to be non-significant if the bias between the tested and control samples are within $\pm 10\%$ for all the analytes. The tested ranges, analyte concentrations and interference claims are listed in the tables below:
| Interferent | Assay | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Albumin | Total | Calcium | Phosphorus |
| Unconjugated bilirubin | 58 mg/dL | 30 mg/dL | 55 mg/dL | 8 mg/dL |
| Hemolysis | 250 mg/dL | 250 mg/dL | 1000 mg/dL | 31.3 mg/dL |
| Lipemia (Intralipid) | 2000 mg/dL | 615 mg/dL | 1000 mg/dL | 554 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic Acid | 6 mg/dL | 6 mg/dL | 6 mg/dL | 6 mg/dL |
Other limitations:
- The product insert for the Inorganic Phosphorus Reagent includes a limitation that hemolyzed, icteric or lipemic samples should not be used.
- Each product insert states that clear unhemolyzed serum should be used.
- Each product insert refers to literature for a comprehensive list of drugs and other substances that can affect the analyte concentrations in serum.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
In-House Studies:
Serum samples were evaluated in singlicate on the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. For comparison, the same samples were evaluated in singlicate using the predicate device. Diluted and spiked samples were
{10}
included in the studies (no more than 10% of total samples). Results from samples under or over the reportable range for either the proposed device or the predicate device were not included in the regression analyses. Least-squares regression analysis (Deming) yielded the following results:
Albumin
| n | Range (g/dL) | Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | 95% CI Slope | 95% CI Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 118 | 0.4 to 6.4 | y = 0.996x + 0.03 | 0.9959 | 0.980 to 1.013 | -0.04 to 0.10 |
Total Protein
| n | Range (g/dL) | Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | 95% CI Slope | 95% CI Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 121 | 0.4 to 13.5 | y = 0.990x - 0.03 | 0.9977 | 0.978 to 1.002 | -0.12 to 0.06 |
Calcium
| n | Range (mg/dL) | Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | 95% CI Slope | 95% CI Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 111 | 0.7 to 14.5 | y = 1.020x - 0.29 | 0.9935 | 0.998 to 1.042 | -0.50 to -0.08 |
Phosphorus
| n | Range (mg/dL) | Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | 95% CI Slope | 95% CI Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 110 | 0.6 to 19.6 | y = 1.005x - 0.01 | 0.9983 | 0.994 to 1.017 | -0.06 to 0.05 |
POL studies:
Serum samples were evaluated in singlicate on the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System at 3 POLs. For comparison, the same samples were evaluated in singlicate using the predicate device. Diluted and spiked samples were included in the studies. One operator performed the studies at sites 1 and 2 and 2 operators performed the study at site 3. Results from samples under or over the reportable range for either the proposed device or the predicate device were not included in the regression analyses. Least-squares regression analysis (Deming) yielded the following results:
Albumin:
| Lab | n | Range (g/dL) | Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | 95% CI Slope | 95%CI Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 60 | 1.2-6.1 | y = 0.992x + 0.07 | 0.9944 | 0.964 to 1.019 | -0.05 to 0.19 |
| 2 | 57 | 0.5-6.3 | y = 1.014x - 0.04 | 0.9966 | 0.991 to 1.037 | -0.14 to 0.06 |
| 3 | 45 | 1.1-6.7 | y = 0.991x + 0.20 | 0.9894 | 0.946 to 1.035 | 0.02 to 0.39 |
{11}
Total Protein:
| Lab | n | Range (g/dL) | Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | 95% CI Slope | 95% CI Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 60 | 1.4-13.2 | y = 0.986x + 0.01 | 0.9987 | 0.973 to 0.999 | -0.09 to 0.10 |
| 2 | 58 | 0.7-12.6 | y = 1.022x + 0.02 | 0.9966 | 1.000 to 1.045 | -0.14 to 0.19 |
| 3 | 45 | 1.5-13.7 | y = 1.011x - 0.14 | 0.9932 | 0.974 to 1.047 | -0.41 to 0.13 |
Calcium:
| Lab | n | Range (mg/dL) | Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | 95% CI Slope | 95% CI Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 62 | 1.6-14.0 | y = 1.003x - 0.02 | 0.9977 | 0.985 to 1.021 | -0.19 to 0.14 |
| 2 | 59 | 0.6-13.6 | y = 0.991x - 0.21 | 0.9965 | 0.969 to 1.013 | -0.42 to 0.00 |
| 3 | 46 | 3.1-14.0 | y = 1.030x + 0.00 | 0.9895 | 0.985 to 1.075 | -0.43 to 0.42 |
Inorganic Phosphorus:
| Lab | n | Range (mg/dL) | Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | 95% CI Slope | 95% CI Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 52 | 0.9-18.9 | y = 1.047x - 0.24 | 0.9977 | 1.027 to 1.067 | -0.33 to -0.15 |
| 2 | 48 | 0.3-18.9 | y = 1.031x + 0.01 | 0.9996 | 1.022 to 1.039 | -0.05 to 0.06 |
| 3 | 48 | 1.3-19.8 | y = 1.028x + 0.01 | 0.9990 | 1.014 to 1.041 | -0.06 to 0.09 |
b. Matrix comparison:
The device is being cleared for serum use only.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
{12}
13
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The sponsor cites the following expected values from literature:
| Analyte | Expected values |
| --- | --- |
| Albumin^{2} | 3.5 to 5 g/dL |
| Total Protein^{2} | 6.4 to 8.3 g/dL (ambulatory) |
| | 6.0 to 7.8 g/dL (recumbent) |
| Calcium^{1} | 8.5 to 10.2 mg/dL |
| Inorganic Phosphorus^{2} | 2.7 to 4.5 mg/dL |
¹ Burtis, C.A., Ashwood, E.R. (Eds.), Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry, 4th Edition, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA (1996).
² Tietz, N.W. (Ed.), Clinical Guide to Laboratory Tests, 3rd Edition, W.B. Sanders Co., Philadelphia, PA (1995).
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.