HUMAN CH50 REAGENT PACK FOR USE ON THE SPAPLUS, HUMAN CH50 CALIBRATOR SET FOR USE ON THE SPAPLUS, HUMAN CH50 CONTROLS FO
K113349 · The Binding Site Group , Ltd. · DAE · Jul 11, 2012 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K113349
Device Name
HUMAN CH50 REAGENT PACK FOR USE ON THE SPAPLUS, HUMAN CH50 CALIBRATOR SET FOR USE ON THE SPAPLUS, HUMAN CH50 CONTROLS FO
Applicant
The Binding Site Group , Ltd.
Product Code
DAE · Immunology
Decision Date
Jul 11, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5240
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
These reagents are intended for the quantification of total classical complement activity (CH50) in human serum on the Binding Site SPA PLUS analyser. Measurement of complement activity aids in the diagnosis of immunological disorders, especially those associated with deficiencies of complement components. The test results are to be used in conjunction with clinical findings and other laboratory tests.
Device Story
The Human CH50 system consists of a reagent pack, calibrator set, and controls designed for use on the Binding Site SPAPLUS analyzer. The device measures total classical complement activity in human serum samples. The system is intended for use in clinical laboratory settings by trained personnel. Results are used by clinicians alongside other diagnostic tests to identify immunological disorders and complement deficiencies. The system automates the quantification process, providing objective data to support clinical decision-making regarding patient immune status.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study evaluated 91 samples: 29 healthy controls and 62 CH50-deficient patients (autoimmune, kidney disease, and other pathologies). All 62 deficient samples were correctly identified as <41.6 U/mL, and all 29 healthy samples were >41.6 U/mL. Sensitivity: 100% (95% CI: 100-100%); Specificity: 100% (95% CI: 100-100%). Method comparison with predicate (n=110) showed Passing-Bablok regression y=1.15x-4.29, r=0.961, with 99.1% overall agreement.
Technological Characteristics
Turbidimetric assay. Reagents: liposomes with G6PDH, anti-DNP antibody (goat), G6P, NAD, maleate buffer. Measuring range: 12-95 U/mL. Instrumentation: SPA PLUS analyzer. Calibrators/controls: lyophilized, 6-level calibrator set, 3-level controls. Stability: 7 months unopened at 2-8°C; 30 days on-board. Analytical performance validated per CLSI EP-5A2, EP-6A, and EP-17A.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantification of total classical complement activity (CH50) in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of immunological disorders, particularly those associated with complement component deficiencies. Intended for use in adult populations.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A complement components immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques complement components C1q , C1r , C1s , C2 , C3 , C4 , C5 , C6 , C7 , C8 , and C9 , in serum, other body fluids, and tissues. Complement is a group of serum proteins which destroy infectious agents. Measurements of these proteins aids in the diagnosis of immunologic disorders, especially those associated with deficiencies of complement components.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k113349
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
CH50, total complement activity
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, turbidometric
E. Applicant:
The Binding Site Group, Ltd.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Human CH50 reagent pack for use on the SPA PLUS, Human CH50 calibrator set for use on the SPA PLUS, Human CH50 controls for use on the SPA PLUS
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 866.5240 Complement components immunological test system
21 CFR § 862.1150 Calibrator
21 CFR § 862.1660 Quality Control Material (Assayed and Unassayed) –
2. Classification:
Class II, Device and Calibrator
Class I, Quality Control Material
3. Product codes:
DAE, Complement 9, Antigen, Antisera, Control
{1}
JIX, Calibrator, Multi-Analyte Mixture
JJY, Multi-analyte controls, All kinds (Assayed and Unassayed)
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
Human CH50 reagent pack for use on the SPA PLUS:
These reagents are intended for the quantification of total classical complement activity (CH50) in human serum on the Binding Site SPA PLUS analyser.
Measurement of complement activity aids in the diagnosis of immunological disorders, especially those associated with deficiencies of complement components. The test results are to be used in conjunction with clinical findings and other laboratory tests.
Human CH50 calibrator set for use on the SPA PLUS:
The Human CH50 calibrator set is intended for use on the SPA PLUS in conjunction with the Binding Site Human CH50 reagent pack (product code: NK095.S) for the determination of total complement activity.
Human CH50 controls for use on the SPA PLUS:
The Human CH50 controls are intended for use in conjunction with the Binding Site Human CH50 reagent pack (product code: NK095.S).
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as Intended Use
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
The Binding Site SPAplus™
I. Device Description:
The device consists of the following:
CH50 reagent pack includes: CH50 Liposome reagent R1(Liquid reagent containing
2
{2}
G6PDH); CH50 Substrate R2 (lyophilized, containing anti-DNP antibody (goat), 24 mmol/L G6P and 9 mmol/L NAD); CH50 Substrate diluent R2a (Liquid reagent containing 10 mmol/L maleate buffer pH 5.0).
The CH50 calibrator set includes: Six levels, lyophilized.
The CH50 controls includes 3 level controls (low, high and elevated), 4x0.45 mL for each level, lyophilized.
# J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s) and K number(s):
WAKO Autokit CH50, WAKO CH50 Calibrator, WAKO Complement Control; k954145
2. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Binding Site Human CH50 reagent pack | WAKO Autokit CH50 |
| Intended Use: | Measurement of total complement activity | Same |
| Sample matrix | Serum | Same |
| Detection Method | Turbidimetric, absorbance | Same |
| Reagents | CH50 liposome reagent, substrate and substrate diluent | Same |
| CH50 anti-DNP antibody substrate mammalian source | Goat | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Binding Site Human CH50 reagent pack | WAKO Autokit CH50 |
| Instruments | SPA PLUS analyser | WAKO-30R analyzer |
| Measuring range | 12-95 U/mL | 10-60 U/mL |
| Expected values | 41.68-95.06 U/mL | 23-46 U/mL |
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Binding Site Human CH50 calibrator set and controls | WAKO CH50 Calibrators and Complement Controls |
| Reagents | Lyophilized | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Binding Site Human CH50 calibrator set and controls | WAKO CH50 Calibrators and Complement Controls |
| Traceability | Value assigned using Internal Reference which is compared to the predicate Internal Reference | Internal reference value assignment and determination per Mayer et al in Complement and complement fixation 1967 2nd ed. Springfield, Charles C. Thomas text book |
| Calibrator stability after reconstitution | Store on ice or 2-8°C and use within 10 hours | Store on ice and use within a day |
| Control stability after reconstitution | Store on ice or 2-8°C and use within 10 hours | Store on ice and use within 8 hours |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP-5A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
CLSI EP-6A: Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurements; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP-17A: Determinations of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation; Approved Guideline
# L. Test Principle:
Liposomes encapsulating glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) are used to mimic an invading microorganism. On addition of sample, antibodies in the reagent combine with dinitrophenyl groups on the surface of the liposomes. The resultant complex activates complement in the sample which lyses the liposome, releasing the
{4}
G6PDH to react with glucose-6-phosphate and NAD in the reagent. The change in absorbance can be measured and is proportional to the complement activity in the sample. Comparison to a calibration curve gives a value for the unknown patient sample.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The intra-assay and inter-assay precision was determined by testing four serum samples over 21 days with two runs per day on three different reagent lots. Results are summarized below.
| Sample | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV % | SD | CV % | SD | CV % | SD | CV % |
| Serum 1 | 78.73 | 1.67 | 2.1 | 3.04 | 3.90 | 3.26 | 4.1 | 4.76 | 6.0 |
| Serum 2 | 55.22 | 0.66 | 1.2 | 0.65 | 1.2 | 1.86 | 3.4 | 2.08 | 3.8 |
| Serum 3 | 46.05 | 0.84 | 1.8 | 1.03 | 2.2 | 1.00 | 2.2 | 1.66 | 3.6 |
| Serum 4 | 25.34 | 0.34 | 1.4 | 0.39 | 1.5 | 0.99 | 3.9 | 1.12 | 4.4 |
#### b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity across the assay range (12.68 – 95.47 U/mL) was confirmed by testing a serum pool with high range concentrations up to 95.9 U/mL. The samples were serially diluted 11 times with buffer (1:10) down to the lower measuring range (12.41 U/mL). All testing were performed three times. The regression plot equations where y is the measured level of CH50 concentration and x the theoretical concentration is as follows: y=0.996x – 2.709 (U/mL). r=0.994
#### c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Value assigned to the new device internal reference standard was compared to the predicate internal reference (IR) standard which was determined according to methods used by Mayer et al as described in Complement and complement fixation text book published in 1967 2nd ed. Springfield by Charles C. Thomas). The IR standard is used to assign values to the 6 calibrators and 3 controls.
{5}
6
**Stability:**
Stability studies demonstrated the following claims:
- Unopened reagent pack, calibrators and controls: 7 months at 2-8°C
- On-board reagent pack: 30 days at 2-8°C
- Reconstituted calibrator and controls: 10 hours stored on ice or at 2-8°C
**d. Detection limit:**
The detection limits were determined by testing 60 replicates of a blank sample, the lowest calibrator, and a sample with value close to the blank sample. The limit of blank claim for this assay is 0.272 U/mL as determined by testing 60 replicates of a blank sample. The limit of detection represents the lowest measurable analyte level that can be distinguished from zero and has been estimated at 1.654 U/mL. The limit of quantitation is defined as the lowest amount of analyte that can be quantitatively determined and has been estimated as 11/98 U/mL for this assay.
**e. Analytical specificity:**
Interference by endogenous and other substances:
No significant assay interference was demonstrated by 1500 formazine turbidity units (FTU) of chyle, 200 mg/L bilirubin, or 5 g/L hemoglobin and 0.5 g/L ascorbic acid using CH50 sample at 36.26 U/mL.
The package insert states that “turbidimetric assays are not suitable for measurement of highly lipemic or hemolyzed samples, or samples containing high levels of circulating immune complexes due to the unpredictable degree of non-specific scatter these sample types might generate. Unexpected results should be confirmed using alternative assay method”.
**f. Assay cut-off:**
The cut-off of 41.68 U/mL for the Binding Site Human CH50 assay was established from 120 serum samples from normal healthy adult blood donors. The CH50 results ranged from 36.295 to 98.210 U/mL. A non-parametric distribution of CH50 results was seen that gave a 95 percentile reference lower limit of 41.68 U/mL.
**2. Comparison studies:**
**a. Method comparison with predicate device:**
A method comparison study between Human CH50 reagent pack, calibrator and controls on a SPA PLUS™ analyzer and predicate device was performed using 110 samples (29 normal, 62 known suppressed CH50 samples and 19 moderate level mixed samples to obtain results between 14-59 U/mL (5 samples were between 14-21 U/mL and 14 samples were between 32-59 U/mL). A total of 62 samples with results “<13.88 U/mL*” results were
{6}
excluded from the regression analysis. The study demonstrated the following Passing-Bablok fit: $y = 1.15x - 4.29$ (U/mL) with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.961. ( $*< 13.88$ U/mL is the lowest point of the calibration curve of calibrator used.)
Percent agreements between CH50 Reagent pack, calibrator and controls on a $\mathrm{SPAPLUS}^{\mathrm{TM}}$ analyzer and predicate in identifying CH50 deficient samples were calculated and summarized in the table below.
| | WAKO Autokit CH50 | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Normal | CH50 deficient | Total |
| Binding Site Human CH50 | Normal | 42 | 0 | 42 |
| | CH50 deficient | 1 | 67 | 68 |
| | Total | 43 | 67 | 110 |
Positive percent agreement: $97.7\%$ (42/43) (95% CI: 93.2-102.2%)
Negative percent agreement: $100\%$ (67/67) (95% CI: 100-100%)
Overall percent agreement: $99.1\%$ (109/110) (95% CI: 97.3-100.9%)
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity:
A clinical study evaluated 91 samples on this kit: 29 normal and 62 CH50 deficient clinical samples. Of the 62 CH50 deficient samples, 33 were from autoimmune disease patients (19 SLE, 10 RA, 3 Sjögren's Syndrome, 1 Raynaud's syndrome), 8 from kidney disease patients (3 nephrotic syndrome, 3 nephritis, 1 nephropathy, 1 proteinuria), 21 other pathological disorders (1 neutropenia, 1 myelodysplasia, 1 bi-clonal gammopathy, 1 urticaria, 1 face swelling, 2 stroke, 14 undetermined). The 62 CH50 deficient clinical samples all had CH50 levels below $41.6~\mathrm{U / mL}$
{7}
8
| N=91 | Patient Group | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | CH50 Deficient Autoimmune (33), kidney (8) and other pathological disorders (21) | CH50 Sufficient Healthy controls | Total |
| Binding Site Human CH50 | <41.6 U/mL | 62 | 0 | 62 |
| | >41.6 U/mL | 0 | 29 | 29 |
| | Total | 62 | 29 | 91 |
Sensitivity: 100% (62/62) (95% CI: 100-100%)
Specificity: 100% (29/29) (95% CI: 100-100%)
b. Other clinical supportive data (when a. is not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Same as assay cut-off.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Adult reference range:
Adult reference range was assessed using a total of 120 serum samples from healthy adult UK blood donors. A non-parametric distribution of CH50 results was seen that gave a 95 percentile reference interval of 41.68-95.06 U/mL with a mean of 68.37 U/mL and a median of 68.70 U/mL.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.