Patient correlation studies were conducted at three independent POL sites to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System reagents compared to the predicate device using routine clinical samples.
POL correlation study; Clinical accuracy; Routine clinical samples
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
POL Patient Correlation Studies; Retrospective/Prospective comparative analysis of clinical samples; Follow-up/Duration: 5 days
Patients presenting at Physician Office Laboratories (POL); Sample Size: Not explicitly stated per site, but aggregate data across 3 sites; Number of Sites: 3
Alfa Wassermann ACE Clinical Chemistry System (predicate)
The ACE Cholesterol Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of cholesterol concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Cholesterol measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving excess cholesterol in the blood and lipid and lipoprotein metabolism disorders. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The ACE HDL-C Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Lipoprotein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis, and various liver and renal diseases. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The ACE LDL-C Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Lipoprotein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis, and various liver and renal diseases. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The ACE Triglycerides Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of triglyceride concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Triglyceride measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus, nephrosis, liver obstruction, other diseases involving lipid metabolism or various endocrine disorders. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
Device Story
Reagents for quantitative colorimetric assay of serum cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, and triglycerides; used on ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Input: serum samples. Operation: enzymatic reactions (esterase, oxidase, peroxidase) produce colored quinoneimine complex; absorbance measured at 505/647 nm. Output: concentration values (mg/dL). Used in clinical labs/physician offices by trained personnel. Results assist clinicians in diagnosing/managing lipid disorders, atherosclerosis, and metabolic conditions. Benefits: standardized, rapid lipid panel assessment for patient monitoring.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision and accuracy evaluated over 22 days and at three Physician Office Laboratory (POL) sites. Correlation studies (n=108-111) compared ACE Axcel to predicate system, yielding correlation coefficients >0.989. Detection limits reported for all assays (3.6-11.6 mg/dL).
Technological Characteristics
Quantitative colorimetric enzymatic assays. Reagents contain cholesterol esterase, cholesterol oxidase, peroxidase, lipase, glycerol kinase, and glycerol phosphate oxidase. Uses p-hydroxybenzoic acid or p-chlorophenol and 4-aminoantipyrine as chromogens. Form factor: liquid reagents in bottles. Platform: ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Calibration: GEMCAL or specific LDL-C calibrators. Traceable to NIST SRM 1951 or CDC reference methods.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative determination of cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, and triglycerides in serum. Used in clinical or physician office laboratories for diagnosis and treatment of lipid metabolism disorders, diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, liver, renal, and endocrine diseases.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cholesterol (total) test system is a device intended to measure cholesterol in plasma and serum. Cholesterol measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving excess cholesterol in the blood and lipid and lipoprotein metabolism disorders.
Predicate Devices
Alfa Wassermann ACE plus ISE/Clinical Chemistry System (K931786)
{0}
K113262
# SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k113262
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Cholesterol
HDL- Cholesterol
LDL- Cholesterol
Triglycerides
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, colorimetric assay
E. Applicant:
Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies, LLC
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ACE Cholesterol Reagent
ACE HDL-C Reagent
ACE LDL-C Reagent
ACE Triglycerides Reagent
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1175: Cholesterol (total) test system
21 CFR 862.1475: Lipoprotein test system
21 CFR 862.1475: Lipoprotein test system
21 CFR 862.1705: Triglyceride test system
2. Classification:
Class I (for all the four measurands), all meet limitations of exemption per 21 CFR
1
{1}
862.9(c)(4) and 21 CFR 862.9(c)(9)
3. Product code:
CHH: Enzymatic Esterase-Oxidase, Cholesterol
LBS: LDL & VLDL Precipitation, Cholesterol Via Esterase-Oxidase, HDL
MRR: System, Test, Low Density, Lipoprotein
CDT: Lipase Hydrolysis/Glycerol Kinase Enzyme, Triglycerides
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indication for use below
2. Indication(s) for use:
The ACE Cholesterol Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of cholesterol concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Cholesterol measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving excess cholesterol in the blood and lipid and lipoprotein metabolism disorders. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE HDL-C Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Lipoprotein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis, and various liver and renal diseases. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE LDL-C Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Lipoprotein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis, and various liver and renal diseases. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE Triglycerides Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of triglyceride concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Triglyceride measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus, nephrosis, liver obstruction, other diseases involving lipid metabolism
K113262
2
{2}
or various endocrine disorders. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For in vitro diagnostic use only. For prescription use.
4. Special instrument requirements:
ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System
I. Device Description:
The ACE Cholesterol Reagent is composed of a single reagent bottle containing 0.5 mmol/L 4-Aminoantipyrine (AAP), 25 mmol/L p-Hydroxybenzoic acid, >150 U/L Cholesterol oxidase (Nocardia), >240 U/L Cholesterol esterase (Porcine pancreas and Pseudomonas) >1600 U/L Peroxidase (Horseradish), stabilizers, preservatives, and fillers.
The ACE HDL-C Reagent is composed of two reagent bottles (Buffer and Color Reagent). The Buffer (R1) contains: Good's Buffer, <1000 U/L Cholesterol oxidase (E. coli), <1300 U/L Peroxidase (Horseradish), <1 mM N,N-bis(4-sulphobutyl)-m-toluidine-disodium salt (DSBmT), <1 mM Accelerator, <0.06% Preservative and <3000 U/L Ascorbic Oxidase (Curcubita sp.). The Color Reagent (R2) contains: <1500 U/L Cholesterol esterase (Pseudomonas sp.), <1 mM 4-Aminoantipyrine (4-AAP), <2% detergent and preservative.
The ACE LDL-C Reagent is composed of two reagent bottles (Buffer and Color Reagent). The Buffer (R1) contains: MES Buffer (pH 6.3), <1.0% Detergent 1, <1500 U/L Cholesterol oxidase (Pseudomonas sp.), <1300 ppg U/L Peroxidase (Horseradish), <0.1% 4-Aminoantipyrine (4-AAP), <3000 U/L Ascorbic acid oxidase (Curcubita sp.), <0.1% Preservative. The Color Reagent (R2) contains: MES Buffer (pH 6.3), <1.0% Detergent 2, <1.0 mmol/L N,N-bis(4-sulphobutyl)-m-toluidine-disodium salt (DSBmT) and <0.1% preservative.
The ACE Triglycerides Reagent is composed of a single reagent bottle. The reagent contains: 0.4 mmol/L 4-Aminoantipyrine (AAP), 2.6 mmol/L Adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP), 3.0 mmol/L p-Chlorophenol, >2400 U/L Glycerol phosphate oxidase (GPO) (Microorganism), >1000 U/L Lipase (Pseudomonas), >540 U/L Peroxidase (Horseradish), >400 U/L Glycerol kinase (Cellulomonas), buffer, stabilizers and preservatives.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
ACE Cholesterol Reagent
ACE HDL-C Reagent
ACE LDL-C Reagent
ACE Triglycerides Reagent
K113262
3
{3}
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
| ACE Reagent Kit | Reagent 510(k) |
| --- | --- |
| Cholesterol | k931786 |
| HDL-C | k971526 |
| LDL-C | k991733 |
| Triglycerides | k931786 |
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Characteristics | ACE Cholesterol Agent, (Candidate Device) | ACE Cholesterol Reagent (Predicate, k931786) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for Use | The ACE Cholesterol Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of cholesterol concentration in serum. Cholesterol measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving excess cholesterol in the blood and lipid and lipoprotein metabolism disorders. For in vitro diagnostic use only. | Same |
| Instrument/ Platform | ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System | ACE Clinical Chemistry System |
| Sample Type | Serum | Same |
| Measuring Range | 4 - 600 mg/dL | 2 - 600 mg/dL |
| Calibration | GEMCAL | Same |
| Calibration Stability | 30 Days | Same |
| On-Board Stability | 30 Days | Same |
| Characteristics | ACE HDL-C Agent, (Candidate Device) | ACE HDL-C Reagent (Predicate, k971526) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for Use | The ACE HDL-C Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration in serum. Lipoprotein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis, and various liver and renal diseases. | Same |
K113262
{4}
| Instrument/Platform | ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System | ACE Clinical Chemistry System |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sample Type | Serum | Same |
| Reportable | 8 -125 mg/dL | Same |
| Calibration | GEMCAL | Same |
| Calibration Stability | 30 Days | Same |
| On-Board Stability | 30 Days | Same |
| Characteristics | ACE LDL-C Agent (Candidate Device) | ACE LDL-C Reagent (Predicate, k991733) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for Use | The ACE LDL-C Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration in serum. Lipoprotein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis, and various liver and renal diseases. For in vitro diagnostic use only. | Same |
| Instrument/Platforms | ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System | ACE Clinical Chemistry Systems |
| Sample Type | Serum | Same |
| Reportable Range | 4 to 430 mg/dL | 3 -500 mg/dL |
| Calibration | ACE LDL-C Calibrators | Same |
| Calibration Stability | 30 Days | Same |
| On-Board Stability | 30 Days | Same |
| Characteristics | ACE Triglycerides Agent (Candidate Device) | ACE Triglycerides Reagent (Predicate, k931786) |
| --- | --- | --- |
K113262
{5}
| Indications for Use | The ACE Triglycerides Reagent is intended for quantitative determination of triglycerides concentration in serum. It is intended for in vitro diagnostic use only. | Same |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Instrument/ Platforms | ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System | ACE Clinical Chemistry Systems |
| Sample Type | Serum | Same |
| Reportable Range | 12 -1000 mg/dL | 6 -1000 mg/dL |
| Calibration | GEMCAL | Same |
| Calibration Stability | 30 Days | Same |
| On-Board Stability | 30 Days | Same |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced:
CLSI EP6-A Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach (2003),
CLSI EP5-A2 Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Second Edition (2004),
CLSI EP7-A2 Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline; Second Edition (2005),
CLSI EP9-A2-IR Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline- Second Edition (2002),
CLSI EP17-A Protocol for Determination of Limits of Detection; Approved Guideline (2004)
# L. Test Principle:
The ACE Cholesterol Reagent: Cholesterol esters in serum are completely hydrolyzed by cholesterol esterase to free cholesterol and free fatty acids. The cholesterol liberated by the esterase, plus any endogenous free cholesterol, are oxidized by cholesterol oxidase to yield hydrogen peroxide $(\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_2)$ , which then reacts oxidatively with p-hydroxybenzoic acid and 4-aminoantipyrine (AAP) in a reaction catalyzed by peroxidase, producing a red colored quinoneimine complex. The amount of chromogen formed, determined by quantitatively measuring the increase in absorbance at $505~\mathrm{nm} / 647~\mathrm{nm}$ , is directly proportional to the cholesterol concentration in the sample.
The ACE HDL-C Reagent is composed of two bottles: Buffer Reagent (R1) and Color Reagent (R2). R2 contains a unique detergent, which solubilizes only the HDL lipoprotein particles; the detergent also inhibits the reaction of the cholesterol enzymes with LDL and VLDL lipoproteins and chylomicrons by adsorbing to their surfaces. The solubilized HDL cholesterol is released and reacts with cholesterol esterase and cholesterol oxidase and a chromogen 4-Aminoantipyrine to produce a color product measurable by the increase of
K113262
{6}
absorbance at 505/647 nm, which is directly proportional to the cholesterol concentration in the sample.
The ACE LDL-C Reagent: There are two detergents, Detergent 1 and Detergent 2, in the ACE LDL-C Reagents R1 and R2 respectively. In the first reaction, Detergent 1 solubilizes non-LDL lipoprotein particles (HDL, VLDL and chylomicrons) and releases cholesterol. The cholesterol is consumed by cholesterol esterase and cholesterol oxidase in a non-color forming reaction. In a second reaction, detergent 2 solubilizes the remaining LDL particles and forms peroxide, via the enzymes cholesterol esterase and cholesterol oxidase. The peroxide, in the presence of peroxidase and two peroxidase substrates, 4-aminoantipyrine and DSBmT, results in a purple-red color product measurable by the increase of absorbance at 505/647 nm, which is directly proportional to the cholesterol concentration in the sample.
The ACE Triglycerides Reagent: The ACE Triglycerides Reagent is composed of a single reagent bottle. Triglycerides in serum are hydrolyzed by lipase to form glycerol and free fatty acids. In the presence of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and glycerol kinase (GK), the glycerol is converted to glycerol-I-phosphate (G-I-P) and the ATP to adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Glycerol-I-phosphate is oxidized by glycerol phosphate oxidase (GPO) to yield hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂). The hydrogen peroxide then acts to oxidatively couple p-chlorophenol and 4-aminoantipyrine (AAP) in a reaction catalyzed by peroxidase, producing a red colored quinoneimine complex which absorbs strongly at 505 nm.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
**In-House: ACE Cholesterol Reagent**
Three serum based pools and one normal human serum sample, were tested on one ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System two times per run, two runs per day, for a total of 20 or more days. The results are summarized in the table below:
| Sample 1
Mean 87.7 mg/dL
Cholesterol | Within
Run | Between
Run | Between
Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 1.6% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 1.8% |
| Sample 2
Mean 261.5 mg/dL
Cholesterol | Within
Run | Between
Run | Between
Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 4.3 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 1.6% |
K113262
{7}
| Sample 3
Mean 430.4 mg/dL Cholesterol | Within Run | Between Run | Between Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 8.7 | 0.0 | 3.7 | 9.4 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 2.0% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 2.2% |
| Sample 4
Mean 176.4 mg/dL Cholesterol | Within Run | Between Run | Between Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 2.2 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 3.1 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 1.3% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 1.8% |
## Point of Care Laboratory: ACE Cholesterol Reagent
Three serum based pools were tested on three ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry Systems (one at each POL site) at least three times per run, one run per day, for a total of 5 days. The mean, standard deviations and % coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated for each sample.
| Cholesterol | | | Within Run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lab | Sample | Mean mg/dL | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| POL 1 | 1 | 84.6 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.7 |
| POL 2 | 1 | 89.3 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| POL 3 | 1 | 85.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| | | | | | | |
| POL 1 | 2 | 255.6 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 1.6 |
| POL 2 | 2 | 270.3 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 3.3 | 1.2 |
| POL 3 | 2 | 256.4 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 1.0 |
| | | | | | | |
| POL 1 | 3 | 423.6 | 6.2 | 1.5 | 6.4 | 1.5 |
| POL 2 | 3 | 441.6 | 5.1 | 1.2 | 6.1 | 1.4 |
| POL 3 | 3 | 423.2 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 6.6 | 1.6 |
## In-House: ACE HDL-C Reagent
Three serum based pools and one normal human serum sample, were tested on one ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System two times per run, two runs per day, for a total of 20 or more days. The results are summarized in the table below:
K113262
{8}
| Sample 1
Mean 27.8 mg/dL HDL-C | Within
Run | Between
Run | Between
Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.3 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 2.7% | 2.3% | 3.4% | 4.8% |
| Sample 2
Mean 63.0 mg/dL HDL-C | Within
Run | Between
Run | Between
Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 2.2 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 1.7% | 0.0% | 3.0% | 3.4% |
| Sample 3
Mean 98.3 mg/dL HDL-C | Within
Run | Between
Run | Between
Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 1.6 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 3.1 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 1.7% | 1.3% | 2.4% | 3.2% |
| Sample 4
Mean 73.9 mg/dL HDL-C | Within
Run | Between
Run | Between
Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 2.4 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 1.4% | 1.2% | 2.6% | 3.2% |
Point of Care Laboratory: ACE HDL-C Reagent
Three serum based pools were tested on three ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry Systems (one at each POL site) at least three times per run, one run per day, for a total of 5 days. The mean, standard deviations and % coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated for each sample.
| HDL-C | | | Within Run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lab | Sample | Mean mg/dL | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| POL 1 | 1 | 25.8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 2.3 |
| POL 2 | 1 | 27.0 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 3.5 |
| POL 3 | 1 | 26.8 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| | | | | | | |
| POL 1 | 2 | 59.4 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.1 |
| POL 2 | 2 | 61.5 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 2.2 |
K113262
{9}
K113262
10
| POL 3 | 2 | 31.3 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | | |
| POL 1 | 3 | 93.5 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| POL 2 | 3 | 97.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| POL 3 | 3 | 97.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
**In-House: ACE LDL-C Reagent**
Three serum based pools and one normal human serum sample, were tested on one ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System two times per run, two runs per day, for a total of 20 or more days. The results are summarized in the table below:
| **Sample 1**
Mean 45.1 mg/dL LDL-C | Within
Run | Between
Run | Between
Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.2 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 4.6% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 4.9% |
| **Sample 2**
Mean 181.7 mg/dL LDL-C | Within
Run | Between
Run | Between
Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 4.7 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 6.6 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 2.6% | 1.8% | 1.9% | 3.6% |
| **Sample 3**
Mean 328.5 mg/dL LDL-C | Within
Run | Between
Run | Between
Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 8.7 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 2.7% | 0.0% | 1.8% | 3.2% |
| **Sample 4**
Mean 86.3 mg/dL LDL-C | Within
Run | Between
Run | Between
Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 2.2 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 3.0 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 2.5% | 2.2% | 1.0% | 3.5% |
**Point of Care Laboratory: ACE LDL-C Reagent**
Three serum-based pools were tested on three ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry Systems (one at each POL site) at least three times per run, one run per day, for a total of 5 days. The mean, standard deviations and % coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated for each sample.
{10}
| LDL-C | | | Within Run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lab | Sample | Mean mg/dL | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| POL 1 | 1 | 45.9 | 2.0 | 4.4 | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| POL 2 | 1 | 41.9 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 5.9 |
| POL 3 | 1 | 46.0 | 1.9 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 5.2 |
| | | | | | | |
| POL 1 | 2 | 185.9 | 4.9 | 2.6 | 7.0 | 3.8 |
| POL 2 | 2 | 164.0 | 6.2 | 3.8 | 8.2 | 5.0 |
| POL 3 | 2 | 180.9 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 4.9 | 2.7 |
| | | | | | | |
| POL 1 | 3 | 336.7 | 8.0 | 2.4 | 8.0 | 2.4 |
| POL 2 | 3 | 307.6 | 6.9 | 2.2 | 10.5 | 3.4 |
| POL 3 | 3 | 328.7 | 5.7 | 1.7 | 8.6 | 2.6 |
In-House: ACE Triglycerides Reagent
Three serum-based pools and one normal human serum sample were tested on one ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System two times per run, two runs per day, for a total of 20 or more days. The results are summarized in the table below:
| Sample 1 Mean 73.3 mg/dL Triglycerides | Within Run | Between Run | Between Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.5 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 1.8% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 2.1% |
| Sample 2 Mean 138.9 mg/dL Triglycerides | Within Run | Between Run | Between Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 2.9 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 1.8% | 0.8% | 0.6% | 2.1% |
| Sample 3 Mean 950.4 mg/dL Triglycerides | Within Run | Between Run | Between Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 11.5 | 7.4 | 9.6 | 16.7 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 1.2% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.8% |
K113262
{11}
| Sample 4
Mean 58.6 mg/dL
Triglycerides | Within
Run | Between
Run | Between
Day | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Deviation, mg/dL | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.8 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 2.9% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 3.2% |
Point of Care Laboratory: ACE Triglycerides Reagent
Four serum-based pools were tested on three ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry Systems (one at each POL site) at least three times per run, one run per day, for a total of 5 days. The mean, standard deviations and % coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated for each sample.
| Triglycerides | | | Within Run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lab | Sample | Mean mg/dL | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| POL 1 | 1 | 70.5 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.3 |
| POL 2 | 1 | 73.0 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| POL 3 | 1 | 72.7 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 4.1 |
| | | | | | | |
| POL 1 | 2 | 136.0 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 1.7 |
| POL 2 | 2 | 137.9 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 1.8 |
| POL 3 | 2 | 136.5 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| | | | | | | |
| POL 1 | 3 | 182.1 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 4.6 | 2.5 |
| POL 2 | 3 | 185.4 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 1.5 |
| POL 3 | 3 | 182.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| | | | | | | |
| POL 1 | 4 | 933.4 | 4.3 | 0.5 | 6.4 | 0.7 |
| POL 2 | 4 | 933.4 | 8.4 | 0.9 | 9.0 | 1.0 |
| POL 3 | 4 | 944.0 | 7.8 | 0.8 | 16.6 | 1.8 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
ACE Cholesterol Reagent
Linearity studies were carried out using dilutions of a spiked serum samples. Eleven concentrations were prepared by mixing spiked serum samples in known proportion
K113262
{12}
with blank samples. All samples were measured in triplicate. The sample range tested was 3 to 966 mg/dL.
| Claimed Measuring Range | Intercept | Slope | r² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4 to 600 mg/dL | -1.1 | 1.016 | 0.9993 |
Based on the linearity data, the measuring range claimed from 4 to 600 mg/dL was supported.
## ACE HDL-C Reagent
Linearity studies were carried out using dilutions of a spiked serum samples. Eleven concentrations were prepared by mixing spiked serum samples in known proportion with blank samples. All samples were measured in triplicate. The sample range tested was 7.6 to 137.7 mg/dL.
| Claimed Measuring Range | Intercept | Slope | r² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8 to 125 mg/dL | 0.1 | 1.011 | 0.9986 |
Based on the linearity data, the measuring range claimed from 8 to 125 mg/dL was supported.
## ACE LDL-C Reagent
Linearity studies were carried out using dilutions of a spiked serum samples. Eleven concentrations were prepared by mixing spiked serum samples in known proportion with blank samples. All samples were measured in triplicate. The sample range tested was 0.3 to 430 mg/dL.
| Claimed Measuring Range | Intercept | Slope | r² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4 to 430 mg/dL | -4.5 | 0.985 | 0.9981 |
Based on the linearity data, the measuring range claimed from 4 to 430 mg/dL was supported.
## ACE Triglycerides Reagent
Linearity studies were carried out using dilutions of a spiked serum samples. Eleven concentrations were prepared by mixing spiked serum samples in known proportion with blank samples. All samples were measured in triplicate. The sample range tested was 12.3 to 1249.3 mg/dL.
| Claimed Measuring Range | Intercept | Slope | r² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12 to 1000 mg/dL | 8.6 | 0.9915 | 0.9995 |
Based on the linearity data, the measuring range claimed from 12 to 850 mg/dL was supported.
K113262
{13}
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
## Traceability
ACE Cholesterol Reagent is traceable to NIST SRM 1951. The calibrator (GEMCAL) was previously cleared under k931786.
ACE HDL-C Reagent is traceable to a CDC certified method. The calibrator (GEMCAL) was previously cleared under k931786.
ACE LDL-C Reagent is traceable to the CDC LDL cholesterol reference method. The ACE LDL-C Calibrators were previously cleared under k931733.
ACE Triglycerides Reagents is traceable to NIST SRM 1951. The calibrator (GEMCAL) was previously cleared under k931786
## On-Board stability:
The stability protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and determined to be adequate. All ACE reagent in this submission demonstrated on-board stability of 30 days.
The real-time close-vial stability study protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and determined to be adequate. The stability for each reagent is shown in the table below:
| Reagent | Closed-Vial Stability (months) |
| --- | --- |
| Cholesterol | 15 |
| HDL-C | 24 |
| LDL-C | 24 |
| Triglycerides | 15 |
## d. Detection limit:
Protocols for the determination of the limit of the blank (LoB) and the limit of detection (LoD) were performed in accordance with the recommendations in the CLSI Guideline EP17-A. Testing was carried out using true blanks and low level samples (total 60 each) over three days on two ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry Systems.
The resulting LoB and LoD for the four measurands are summarized below:
| Reagent | Limit of Blank (LoB) | Limit of Detection (LoD) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cholesterol | 2.9 mg/dL | 3.6 mg/dL |
| HDL-C | 1.0 mg/dL | 1.5 mg/dL |
| LDL-C | 2.7 mg/dL | 3.9 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | 10.4mg/dL | 11.6 mg/dL |
K113262
{14}
e. Analytical specificity:
ACE Cholesterol Reagent
Interference studies were performed by using serum pools containing Cholesterol with individual interferents at a range of concentrations. The sera were assayed for Cholesterol (n = 3 replicates) and the mean result calculated. Interference was considered to be significant by the sponsor if the analyte recovery changed by ± 10%. The results reported were obtained on the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System analyzer.
| Interferent | Cholesterol Concentrations Tested (mg/dL) | No Significant Interference At or Below: |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | Low Pool: 182 | 30 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 405 | |
| Hemoglobin | Low Pool: 159 | 500 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 445 | |
| Triglycerides | Low Pool: 170 | 2180 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 378 | |
| Ascorbic Acid | Low Pool: 185 | 6 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 417 | |
ACE HDL-C Reagent:
Interference studies were performed by using serum pools containing HDL with individual interferents at a range of concentrations. The sera were assayed for HDL (n = 3 replicates) and the mean result calculated. Interference was considered to be significant by the sponsor if the analyte recovery changed by ± 10%. The results reported were obtained on the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System analyzer.
| Interferent | HDL Concentrations Tested (mg/dL) | No Significant Interference At or Below: |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | Low Pool: 43 | 59 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 98 | |
| Hemoglobin | Low Pool: 64 | 1000 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 91 | |
K113262
{15}
| Triglycerides | Low Pool: 30 | 652 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | High Pool: 101 | |
| Ascorbic Acid | Low Pool: 45 | 6 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 105 | |
## ACE LDL-C Reagent:
Interference studies were performed by using serum pools containing LDL with individual interferents at a range of concentrations. The sera were assayed for LDL (n = 3 replicates) and the mean result calculated. Interference was considered to be significant by the sponsor if the analyte recovery changed by ± 10%. The results reported were obtained on the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System analyzer.
| Interferent | LDL Concentrations Tested (mg/dL) | No Significant Interference At or Below: |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | Low Pool: 116 | 59 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 374 | |
| Hemoglobin | Low Pool: 74 | 1000 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 273 | |
| Triglycerides | Low Pool: 113 | 1233 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 352 | |
| Ascorbic Acid | Low Pool: 122 | 6 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 396 | |
## ACE Triglycerides Reagent:
Interference studies were performed by using serum pools containing Triglycerides with individual interferents at a range of concentrations. The sera were assayed for Triglycerides (n = 3 replicates) and the mean result calculated. Interference was considered to be significant by the sponsor if the analyte recovery changed by ± 10%. The results reported were obtained on the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System analyzer.
K113262
{16}
| Interferent | Triglycerides Concentrations Tested (mg/dL) | No Significant Interference At or Below: |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | Low Pool: 78 | 7 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 726 | |
| Hemoglobin | Low Pool: 50 | 125 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 270 | |
| Ascorbic Acid | Low Pool: 75 | 0.75 mg/dL |
| | High Pool: 716 | |
The following limitations are stated in the labeling for ACE Triglyceride Reagent:
“Use clear, unhemolyzed serum. Hemolyzed and icteric samples cannot be used.”
“Advice patients not to take any alcohol or vitamin supplements 24 hours prior to fasting blood work.”
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
g. Cleaning and Disinfection
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
Studies were carried out according to CLSI EP09-A2-IR.
In house: ACE Cholesterol Reagent
One hundred ten serum samples were assayed in parallel by both the test and predicate methods. The results were analyzed by using Deming regression. The range tested was 7 to 527 ng/dL. Altered samples were included in the study (no more than 10%).
The comparison by Deming regression resulted in a slope of 1.012 (95%CI = 0.999 to 1.026), an intercept of -3.3 (95%CI = -6.2 to -0.5), correlation coefficient (R²) = 0.9977, and a standard error of 5.0.
Point of Care Laboratory: ACE Cholesterol Reagent
Serum samples were assayed in parallel by both the test and predicate methods at three POC sites. The results were analyzed by using Deming regression. (Some altered samples were used among all three sites.)
K113262
{17}
| POL | n | Range | Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | Standard Error | Confidence Interval Slope | Confidence Interval Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 57 | 22-571 | Y = 1.003x - 2.7 | 0.9995 | 3.0 | 0.995 to 1.012 | -4.6 to -0.7 |
| 2 | 60 | 17-515 | Y = 1.017x - 1.9 | 0.9978 | 6.9 | 0.999 to 1.034 | -6.1 to 2.3 |
| 3 | 46 | 62-538 | y = 0.996x - 0.3 | 0.9945 | 8.4 | 0.964 to 1.028 | -7.3 to 6.7 |
In house: ACE HDL-C Reagent
One hundred eight serum samples were assayed in parallel by both the test and predicate methods. The results were analyzed by using Deming regression. The range tested was 8 to 122 ng/dL. Altered samples were included in the study (no more than 10%).
The comparison by Deming regression resulted in a slope of 0.972 (95%CI = 0.9564 to 0.989), an intercept of 0.5 (95%CI = -0.4 to 1.5), correlation coefficient (R²) = 0.9957, and a standard error of 1.7.
Point of Care Laboratory: ACE HDL-C Reagent
Serum samples were assayed in parallel by both the test and predicate methods at three POC sites. The results were analyzed by using Deming regression. Some altered samples were used among all three sites.
| Lab | n | Range | Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | Standard Error | Confidence Interval Slope | Confidence Interval Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| POL 1 | 60 | 13-110 | y = 0.959x - 2.6 | 0.9961 | 1.8 | 0.937 to 0.981 | -4.0 to -1.3 |
| POL 2 | 56 | 20-110 | y = 0.969x - 1.8 | 0.9964 | 1.7 | 0.947 to 0.991 | -3.1 to -0.4 |
| POL 3 | 43 | 21-117 | y = 1.015x - 0.5 | 0.9898 | 2.4 | 0.970 to 1.061 | -3.0 to 2.0 |
In house: ACE LDL-C Reagent
One hundred eight serum samples were assayed in parallel by both the test and predicate methods and the results were analyzed by using Deming regression. The range tested was 32 to 422 ng/dL. Altered samples were included in the study (no more than 10%).
K113262
{18}
The comparison by Deming regression resulted in a slope of 0.982 (95%CI = 0.968 to 0.996), an intercept of -1.0 (95%CI = -3.1 to 1.0), correlation coefficient (R²) = 0.9973, and a standard error of 4.7.
## Point of Care Laboratory: ACE LDL-C Reagent
Serum samples were assayed in parallel by both the test and predicate methods at three POC sites. The results were analyzed by using Deming regression. Some altered samples were used among all three sites.
| POL | N | Range | Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | Standard Error | Confidence Interval Slope | Confidence Interval Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 74 | 4-395 | y = 1.012x + 1.4 | 0.9970 | 6.0 | 0.994 to 1.031 | -1.3 to 4.0 |
| 2 | 58 | 9-397 | y = 1.010x - 2.5 | 0.9974 | 5.9 | 0.991 to 1.030 | -5.5 to 0.4 |
| 3 | 47 | 30-417 | y = 1.037x - 3.2 | 0.9940 | 9.0 | 1.002 to 1.071 | -8.4 to 2.1 |
## In house: ACE Triglycerides Reagent
One hundred eleven serum samples were assayed in parallel by both the test and predicate methods and the results compared by Deming regression. The range tested was 24 to 975 µg/dL. Altered samples were included in the study (no more than 10%).
The comparison by Deming regression resulted in a slope of 1.031 (95%CI = 1.025 to 1.037), an intercept of -0.8 (95%CI = -2.7 to 1.1), correlation coefficient (R²) = 0.9995, and a standard error of 6.6.
## Point of Care Laboratory: ACE Triglycerides Reagent
Serum samples were assayed in parallel by both the test and predicate methods at three POC sites. The results were analyzed by using Deming regression. Some altered samples were used among all three sites.
| POL | N | Range | Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | Standard Error | Confidence Interval Slope | Confidence Interval Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 54 | 23-976 | y = 1.008x - 1.6 | 0.9996 | 6.6 | 1.000 to 1.016 | -3.9 to 0.7 |
| 2 | 60 | 20-910 | y = 0.997x - 4.0 | 0.9996 | 5.9 | 0.989 to 1.004 | -6.3 to -1.7 |
| 3 | 47 | 37-978 | y = 1.012x - 2.8 | 0.9992 | 8.4 | 1.000 to 1.024 | -6.3 to 0.6 |
K113262
{19}
3. Clinical studies:
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Cholesterol: Desirable: <200 mg/dL, Borderline: 200-239 mg/dL, High: >239 mg/dL)
HDL: <40 mg/dL = Low, ≥60 mg/dL = High
LDL: Optimal: <100 mg/dL, Near optimal: 100 – 129 mg/dL, Borderline high: 130 – 159 mg/dL, High: 160 – 189, Very high: >189 mg/dL
Triglycerides: <150 = normal, 150 – 199 = borderline high, 200-499 = high, ≥500 = very high
NCEP, Third Report of National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III); Executive Summary. NIH Publication No. 02-5215. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, Maryland: September 2002.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K113262
20
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.