K113012 · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · KWS · Jan 5, 2012 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K113012
Device Name
PROMOS MODULAR SHOULDER SYSTEM
Applicant
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Product Code
KWS · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jan 5, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3660
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Promos Modular Shoulder System is indicated for: - Advanced degeneration of the shoulder joint as a results of degenerative, post-traumatic or . inflammatory arthritis - Avascular necrosis of the humeral head . - . Complex fractures of the proximal humerus - Functional impairment especially in the case of post-traumatic loss of the joint configuration . The humeral component is intended for cementless use. The glenoid component is for use with bone cement only.
Device Story
Promos Modular Shoulder System is a modular shoulder prosthesis consisting of a glenoid component and a modular humeral component (distal stem, body, inclination set, humeral head). This submission modifies the inclination set (internal cone, sleeve, set screw) to improve construct strength and stability. The device is implanted by orthopedic surgeons in a clinical/surgical setting to replace or reconstruct the shoulder joint. The system provides structural support and joint articulation for patients with degenerative or traumatic shoulder conditions. The humeral component is designed for cementless fixation, while the glenoid component requires bone cement. The modification maintains the original design concept and mating interfaces with existing humeral head and body components.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Mechanical testing included static testing of the set screw, pre-fatigue taper strength, and construct fatigue testing (including post-fatigue taper evaluations). No clinical data was required.
Technological Characteristics
Modular shoulder prosthesis components. Inclination set components (internal cone, sleeve, set screw) manufactured from Ti-6Al-4V (ISO 5832-3). Humeral component designed for cementless use; glenoid component for cemented use. Mechanical testing performed to verify structural integrity under in vivo loading conditions.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with advanced shoulder joint degeneration (degenerative, post-traumatic, or inflammatory arthritis), avascular necrosis of the humeral head, complex proximal humerus fractures, or functional impairment due to post-traumatic joint configuration loss.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a shoulder joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a humeral resurfacing component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a glenoid resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) FDA's:
(i) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ”
(ii) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance of 2/12/90 (K90-1),”
(iii) “Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants with Modified Metallic Surfaces Apposing Bone or Bone Cement,”
(iv) “Guidance Document for the Preparation of Premarket Notification (510(k)) Application for Orthopedic Devices,” and
(v) “Guidance Document for Testing Non-articulating, ‘Mechanically Locked’ Modular Implant Components,”
(2) International Organization for Standardization's (ISO):
(i) ISO 5832-3:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-aluminum 4-vandium Alloy,”
(ii) ISO 5832-4:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 4: Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum casting alloy,”
(iii) ISO 5832-12:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 12: Wrought Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy,”
(iv) ISO 5833:1992 “Implants for Surgery—Acrylic Resin Cements,”
(v) ISO 5834-2:1998 “Implants for Surgery—Ultra-high Molecular Weight Polyethylene—Part 2: Moulded Forms,”
(vi) ISO 6018:1987 “Orthopaedic Implants—General Requirements for Marking, Packaging, and Labeling,” and
(vii) ISO 9001:1994 “Quality Systems—Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing,” and
(3) American Society for Testing and Materials':
(i) F 75-92 “Specification for Cast Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Material,”
(ii) F 648-98 “Specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Powder and Fabricated Form for Surgical Implants,”
(iii) F 799-96 “Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy Forgings for Surgical Implants,”
(iv) F 1044-95 “Test Method for Shear Testing of Porous Metal Coatings,”
(v) F 1108-97 “Specification for Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Alloy Castings for Surgical Implants,”
(vi) F 1147-95 “Test Method for Tension Testing of Porous Metal,”
(vii) F 1378-97 “Standard Specification for Shoulder Prosthesis,” and
(viii) F 1537-94 “Specification for Wrought Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implants.”
{0}------------------------------------------------
JAN - 5 2012 - We are smith&nephew
| Submitted by: | Smith & Nephew, Inc.<br>1450 Brooks Road<br>Memphis, Tennessee 38116 |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date of Summary: | January 4, 2012 |
| Contact Person: | Megan Bevill, Regulatory Affairs Project Manager<br>T (901) 399-5340<br>F (901) 566-7086 |
| Name of Device: | Promos Modular Shoulder System |
| Common Name: | Hemi or Total Shoulder |
| Device Classification Name and<br>Reference: | 21 CFR 888.3690 Prosthesis, shoulder, hemi-, humeral,<br>metallic uncemented - Class II<br>21 CFR 888.3660 Prosthesis, shoulder, semi-constrained,<br>metal/polymer cemented - Class II |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Panel Code: | Orthopaedics/87 |
| Product Code: | HSD, KWS |
### Device Description
The Promos Modular Shoulder System, as cleared via premarket notification K063578, consists of two primary components: the glenoid component and the modular humeral component. The modular humeral component consists of a distal stem, body, inclination set, and humeral head. Subject of this premarket notification is a review of changes to the Promos inclination set. No changes will be made to the glenoid, humeral head, body, or distal stem as a result of this premarket notification. Modifications to the inclination set components are intended to increase the overall strength and stability of the construct. The design concept remains the same, and the inclination set continues to mate with the humeral head and proximal body in the same way.
The modified devices consist of three components: internal cone, sleeve, and set screw. The subject inclination sets are manufactured from Ti-6Al-4V material conforming to ISO 5832-3 and are available in four sizes.
#### Technological Characteristics
A review of the mechanical data indicates that the Promos Modular Shoulder System is capable of withstanding expected in vivo loading without failure. The following mechanical testing of the Promos Modular Shoulder System was performed:
- Static testing of set screw .
- . Pre-fatigue taper strength
- Construct fatigue, including post-fatigue taper evaluations �
A review of this testing has demonstrated that there are no new issues related to the safety and effectiveness of the subject devices. Clinical data was not needed to support the safety and effectiveness of the subject devices.
Page 1 of 2
ર-1
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/0 description: The image contains a sequence of alphanumeric characters. The characters are 'K', 'I', 'I', '3', '0', '1', and '2'. The characters are written in a handwritten style.
### Intended Use
The Promos Modular Shoulder System is indicated for:
- Advanced degeneration of the shoulder joint as a results of degenerative, post-traumatic or . inflammatory arthritis
- Avascular necrosis of the humeral head .
- . Complex fractures of the proximal humerus
- Functional impairment especially in the case of post-traumatic loss of the joint configuration .
The humeral component is intended for cementless use. The glenoid component is for use with bone cement only.
# Substantial Equivalence Information
The subject devices are identical in function, intended use, indications for use, and material m ourition, and very similar in overall design to the Promos Modular Shoulder System Inclination Sets cleared via premarket notification K063578. They are also similar in intended use to the Cofield 2 Shoulder System cleared via premarket notification K955767.
#### Table 1: Substantially equivalent predicate devices
| Manufacturer | Description | Submission<br>Number | Clearance<br>Date |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------|
| Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG<br>(former Plus Orthopedics AG) | Promos Modular Shoulder<br>System | K063578 | 3/2/2007 |
| Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Cofield 2 Shoulder System | K955767 | 4/8/1996 |
#### Conclusion
As neeviously noted, this Traditional 510(k) Premarket Notification is being submitted to request clearance for the modified Inclination Sets of the Promos Modular Shoulder System. Based on the similarities to the predicate components and a review of the mechanical testing performed, the devices are substantially equivalent to above predicate shoulder system.
Page 2 of 2
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The seal is circular, with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" arranged around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is an abstract symbol that resembles an eagle or bird-like figure. The symbol is composed of three curved lines that converge to form the head and body of the bird.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
JAN - 5 2012
Smith & Nephew, Incorporated % Ms. Megan Bevill Regulatory Affairs Project Manager 1450 Brooks Road Memphis Tennessee 38116
Re: K113012
Trade/Device Name: Promos Modular Shoulder System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3660 Regulation Name: Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KWS, HSD Dated: October 7, 2011 Received: October 11, 2011
Dear Ms. Bevill:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ ーーーーー
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Page 2 - Ms. Megan Bevill
device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm
Sincerely yours,
Sincerely yours,
for
Mark N. Melkerson
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: Promos Modular Shoulder System
The Promos Modular Shoulder System is indicated for:
- Advanced degeneration of the shoulder joint as a result of degenerative, post-traumatic or . inflammatory arthritis '
- Avascular necrosis of the humeral head o
- Complex fractures of the proximal humerus �
- Complex freetarse of the precially in the case of post-traumatic loss of the joint configuration .
The humeral component is intended for cemented or cementless use. The glenoid component is for use with bone cement only
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(Please Do Not WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
BBhach
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
510(k) Number K113012
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.