K112725 · DiaSorin, Inc. · MRG · Jan 20, 2012 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K112725
Device Name
LIAISON 25 OH VITAMIN D TOTAL ASSAY
Applicant
DiaSorin, Inc.
Product Code
MRG · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jan 20, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1825
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K112725 · Jan 20, 2012
LIAISON 25 OH VITAMIN D TOTAL ASSAY
DiaSorin, Inc.
Clinical reference laboratory samples
The device performance was validated by comparing results from 587 clinical samples tested on the LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL assay against a predicate RIA method.
Clinical samples from a reference laboratory; Sample Size: 587
DiaSorin 25 OH Vitamin D RIA
Linear regression analysis (LIAISON® = 1.047 (RIA) + 2.41; R = 0.936)
Indications for Use
The LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay uses chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) technology for the quantitative determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and other hydroxylated vitamin D metabolites in human serum to be used in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency. Assay results should be used in conjunction with other clinical or laboratory data to assist the clinician in making individual patient management decisions in an adult population.
Device Story
The LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay is an in vitro diagnostic chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) used on the LIAISON® Analyzer family. It measures 25-hydroxyvitamin D and other hydroxylated metabolites in human serum. The assay uses a direct competitive binding principle: 25 OH Vitamin D is dissociated from binding proteins and captured by specific antibodies on a solid phase; a vitamin D-isoluminol tracer is added; unbound material is washed away. Starter reagents initiate a flash chemiluminescent reaction. A photomultiplier measures the light signal (RLU), which is inversely proportional to the analyte concentration. The device is used in clinical laboratory settings by trained personnel. Results assist clinicians in assessing vitamin D sufficiency and managing adult patients. Modifications in this version include changes to the magnetic particle surface and assay buffer to reduce interference from rare heterophilic antibodies.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision/reproducibility study (N=160 replicates per sample across 3 sites) showed total CVs ranging from 9.5% to 12.6%. Linearity confirmed across 4–150 ng/mL range (R²=0.997). Method comparison with RIA predicate (N=587) yielded slope 1.047, intercept 2.41, correlation 0.936. Reference range study (N=396) established baseline values across diverse US populations.
Technological Characteristics
Quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). Components: magnetic particles coated with anti-25 OH Vitamin D antibody, assay buffer (ethanol, surfactants, ProClin® 300), and isoluminol-conjugated 25 OH Vitamin D tracer. Measuring range: 4–150 ng/mL. Instrument: LIAISON® Analyzer. Standards referenced: CLSI EP5-A2 (precision), EP6-A (linearity), EP7-A2 (interference).
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and other hydroxylated vitamin D metabolites in human serum for the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency in an adult population.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A vitamin D test system is a device intended for use in clinical laboratories for the quantitative determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) and other hydroxylated metabolites of vitamin D in serum or plasma to be used in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Vitamin D test systems must comply with the following special controls:(1) Labeling in conformance with 21 CFR 809.10 and
(2) Compliance with existing standards of the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.
Predicate Devices
LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay (k071480)
Reference Devices
DiaSorin 25-hydroxyVitamin D 125I RIA (k983617)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k112725
B. Purpose for Submission:
Modifications to a previously cleared device
C. Measurand:
25-OH Vitamin D and other hydroxylated Vitamin D metabolites
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative Chemiluminescent immunoassay
E. Applicant:
DiaSorin Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1825, Vitamin D Test System
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
MRG
4. Panel:
Chemistry (75)
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay uses chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) technology for the quantitative determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and other hydroxylated vitamin D metabolites in human serum to be used in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency. Assay results should be used in conjunction with other clinical or laboratory data to assist the clinician in making individual patient management decisions in an adult population.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
For use on the Liaison Analyzer
I. Device Description:
The device consists of:
- Magnetic particles coated with antibody against 25 OH Vitamin D, protein, phosphate buffer, < 0.1% sodium azide.
- Assay Buffer with 10% ethanol, surfactants and 0.1% ProClin® 300.
- 25 OH Vitamin D conjugated to an isoluminol derivative, in phosphate buffer with 10% ethanol, EDTA, surfactant and preservatives.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k071480
3. Comparison with predicate:
The intended use and assay principle are the same as for the predicate device. Changes include modifications to the magnetic particle surface and buffer
{2}
formulation. The predicate device was indicated for serum and plasma. This device is only for use with serum.
| Feature | New device | Predicate device |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | Same | For the quantitative determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and other hydroxylated vitamin D metabolites to be used in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency using the LIAISON® Analyzer family. |
| Matrix | Serum only | Serum and plasma |
| Methodology | Same | Chemiluminescent immunoassay |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
EP5-A2; Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods
EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures
EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry.
# L. Test Principle:
The LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D assay is a direct competitive chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) for quantitative determination of total 25 OH vitamin D in serum. During the first incubation, 25 OH Vitamin D is dissociated from its binding protein and binds to the specific antibody on the solid phase. After 10 minutes the tracer, (vitamin D linked to an isoluminol derivative) is added. After a second 10 minute incubation, the unbound material is removed with a wash cycle. Subsequently, the starter reagents are added to initiate a flash chemiluminescent reaction. The light signal is measured by a photomultiplier as relative light units (RLU) and is inversely proportional to the concentration of 25 OH vitamin D present in calibrators, controls, or samples.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
Performance was evaluated on the LIAISON® Analyzer.
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
A twenty day reproducibility/precision validation study was performed at DiaSorin Inc. and 2 external sites, on one LIAISON® Analyzer per site. Samples included a coded panel of 2 low, 2 medium, 1 moderately high, and 1 high Vitamin D concentration serum samples. The LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL serum controls (2 levels) also were included in the study. Samples and kit controls were tested on two lots of modified
{3}
LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay at each of three sites in 2 replicates per run, 2 runs per day for 20 operating days. A total of 160 replicate results were generated per sample at each site. The mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (%CV) of the results were computed by Nested Analysis of Variance for each of the tested specimens. Results of this analysis across three sites are shown below:
| Mean (ng/mL) | Intra-Run | | Run-to-Run | | Day-to-Day | | Total/Within-Lot/Within-Site | | Total/Across-Lots/Across-Sites | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 7.9 | 0.6 | 7.7% | 0.2 | 3.2% | 0.7 | 9.3% | 1.0 | 12.5% | 1.0 | 12.6% |
| 12.0 | 0.7 | 5.8% | 0.4 | 2.9% | 1.0 | 8.7% | 1.3 | 10.8% | 1.3 | 11.1% |
| 18.0 | 0.9 | 5.0% | 0.6 | 3.1% | 1.3 | 7.4% | 1.7 | 9.5% | 1.7 | 9.7% |
| 20.4 | 1.0 | 5.0% | 0.5 | 2.2% | 1.6 | 7.8% | 1.9 | 9.5% | 2.1 | 10.4% |
| 24.3 | 1.2 | 5.0% | 0.5 | 2.1% | 1.8 | 7.5% | 2.2 | 9.2% | 2.6 | 10.6% |
| 56.8 | 2.9 | 5.0% | 1.3 | 2.3% | 3.9 | 6.8% | 5.0 | 8.8% | 5.8 | 10.3% |
| 61.8 | 3.0 | 4.9% | 1.6 | 2.6% | 4.2 | 6.8% | 5.4 | 8.8% | 5.8 | 9.5% |
| 112.1 | 5.4 | 4.8% | 3.0 | 2.7% | 9.3 | 8.3% | 11.1 | 9.9% | 12.2 | 10.8% |
Results within one representative site are shown below:
| Lot 1 | | | Lot 2 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Within-run | Total | | Within-run | Total |
| Mean (ng/mL) | %CV | %CV | Mean | %CV | %CV |
| 8.2 | 6.1 | 11.1 | 7.7 | 5.9 | 12.3 |
| 12.3 | 5.3 | 9.9 | 11.7 | 3.6 | 9.6 |
| 18.4 | 5.4 | 9.5 | 17.4 | 2.8 | 10.7 |
| 21.0 | 4.8 | 8.0 | 19.8 | 3.6 | 9.6 |
| 25.4 | 4.2 | 9.3 | 23.3 | 4.2 | 8.5 |
| 58.8 | 3.3 | 8.4 | 54.1 | 3.3 | 8.0 |
| 62.5 | 3.3 | 8.7 | 58.6 | 2.5 | 8.8 |
| 115.5 | 5.2 | 9.2 | 106.0 | 3.6 | 8.9 |
## b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
A linearity study was performed using samples slightly above the upper measuring limit of the modified LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay, following CLSI EP6-A. Separate serum and SST (serum separator tubes) pools that met this criterion were diluted with the assay's Specimen Diluent to yield multiple dilutions with Vitamin D levels spanning the
{4}
assay's full measuring range of 4 – 150 ng/mL. Each dilution was analyzed in replicates of 4 with one lot of the modified Vitamin D Assay on one LIAISON® Analyzer.
Expected concentrations for the dilutions were determined by (Vitamin D value of high pool) x (dilution factor).
The results were analyzed by simple linear regression (slope, intercept and R² value) of observed results versus expected results, recovery versus expected concentrations, and the linear, second degree and third degree polynomial fits of the data. Results are shown below for the three analyses:
Linear regression equation: y=0.997x-0.411
Recoveries (serum samples are shown below; similar results were shown for SST samples)
| Expected concentration (ng/mL) | Observed concentration (ng/mL) | %recovery (observed/expected) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 151 | 151 | 100% |
| 132 | 130 | 98% |
| 113 | 110 | 97% |
| 94.3 | 95.2 | 101% |
| 75.4 | 78.4 | 104% |
| 56.6 | 56.5 | 100% |
| 37.7 | 36.2 | 96% |
| 18.9 | 17.0 | 90% |
| 9.43 | 8.49 | 90% |
| 3.77 | 3.84 | 102% |
A polynomial regression fit of the serum data yielded statistically insignificant second and third order terms
These results support the sponsor's claimed measuring range of 4 to 150 ng/mL.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Calibrators and control materials were cleared under k071480
d. Detection limit:
The DiaSorin LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay measures
{5}
between 4.0 and 150 ng/mL. The lowest reportable value is 4.0 ng/mL which is based on an inter-assay precision ≤ 20% CV. Values below 4.0 ng/mL are reported as < 4.0 ng/mL.
The sponsor performed a detection limit study to support their low end measuring range claim. For LoB and LoD determination, study was performed on 4 reagent lots on each of the 2 analyzers and 30 replicates of zero calibrator and 20 replicates of Calibrator A were evaluated. The LoD was calculated to be 2 ng/mL. For LoQ determination, 8 samples with concentrations above the LoD were tested on three reagent lots and 2 analyzers, with 5 replicates per sample i.e., n=30). The LoQ was calculated to be 4 ng/mL based on an inter-assay precision of ≤ 20% CV.
e. Analytical specificity:
Cross-reactivity:
Aliquots of samples of low, moderate and high Vitamin D were spiked with 25 OH D metabolites. Vitamin D concentrations were near 10, 30, and 70 ng/mL. Metabolite concentrations of 30 ng/mL and 100 ng/mL were spiked into the vitamin D samples and analyzed. Percent Cross-Reactivity was determined based on:
(Measured Value/Concentration Spiked)*100
Cross-reactivity results are shown below:
25 OH D2 100%
25 OH D3 100%
Vitamin D2 1.9%
Vitamin D3 1.9%
1,25-(OH)2-Vitamin D2 6.7%
1,25-(OH)2-Vitamin D3 9.3%
3-epi-25OH Vitamin D3 1.3%
Interference:
Vitamin D samples containing concentrations of 30 ng/mL and 60 ng/mL were spiked with hemoglobin, triglycerides, cholesterol, and bilirubin, uric acid, albumin, and IgG. Replicate samples (n=6 for each test and control sample) were tested and results were compared to control samples without the potentially interfering substances added. The highest concentrations at which no interference, or minimal interference (defined by the sponsor as ≤ 10% bias relative to the control) are shown below.
300 mg/dL cholesterol
590 mg/dL triglycerides
20 mg/dL uric acid
6
{6}
12.9 g/dL human serum albumin
12.9 g/dL IgG
40 mg/dL Bilirubin (conjugated and unconjugated tested separately)
200 mg/dL hemoglobin
The sponsor has the following limitations in the labeling:
The limitations section states that heterophilic antibodies in human serum can react with reagent immunoglobulins or other reagent material, interfering with in vitro immunoassays.
The specimen collection section states that hemolyzed or grossly lipemic samples should not be used.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable – this is a quantitative assay.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Serum samples from a reference laboratory spanning the assay range (N=587) were tested with the modified LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay and the DiaSorin 25-hydroxyVitamin D 125I RIA (k983617). The samples, ranging in concentration from 4 to 150 ng/mL spanned the claimed measuring range of the modified assay. Only neat patient samples (no spiked samples) were used in the study.
Results of regression analysis are presented in the following table.
| N | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | Correlation Coefficient | range (ng/mL) | Mean Bias | SD of differences (ng/mL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 587 | 1.047 (1.02 – 1.07) | 2.41 (1.43 – 3.40) | 0.936 | 4-150 | 4.083 | 7.212 |
b Matrix comparison:
One hundred thirty seven (137) matched sets of Serum and SST samples were tested in singlet across 5 LIAISON® Analyzers and 2 lots of the modified assay. In order to obtain analyte values across the reportable range of the assay (4 to 140 ng/mL), it was necessary to dilute one sample and to spike 19 samples with Vitamin D.
{7}
Results of linear regression are shown below. Recoveries for individual samples were also provided and found to be adequate.
| Number of Samples | Linear Regression | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Slope | Intercept | R² value |
| 137 matched sets | 0.99 | -0.43 | 0.988 |
Only plain serum tubes and serum separator tubes (SST) are acceptable tube types for the modified assay, plasma samples are unacceptable for the modified assay and this information was stated clearly in the labeling.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity: Not applicable; Clinical sensitivity and specificity is not typically provided in 510(k)s for this type of assay.
b. Clinical specificity: See a, above.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable): Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable; this is a quantitative assay.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
A new reference range study was performed for the modified assay in accordance with CLSI Guideline C28-A2. Participant enrollment took place at four sites in the contiguous US, representing a wide distribution of sun strength: northern, southern, and central US. Blood collection occurred over two seasons, with 136 collected from 3 sites during the winter months (February and March) and 260 collected from 4 sites during the summer months (June, July and August).
The collection was conducted on adults (ages 21 – 90 years) in summer and winter, including light and dark skin individuals, and males and females. Three hundred and ninety six (396) samples met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were tested with the modified LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay.
The determination of apparently healthy for this study was based on the following definition:
- Normal serum levels of:
- Total calcium
- Intact parathyroid hormone (PTH)
- Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)
{8}
- No personal history of kidney, gastrointestinal or liver disease
- No personal history of parathyroid, thyroid, or chronic disease (defined by severity of condition which is linked to treatment and frequency as stated on subject’s CRF)
- No personal history of seizures
- No bariatric surgery
- No family history of parathyroid or calcium regulatory disease
Other criteria were: at least 50% of subjects NOT taking ANY Vitamin D supplementation, and of the less than 50% of subject taking Vitamin D supplementation, level of supplementation must be <2000 IU/day. Subjects were not currently taking any medications known to affect absorption (drugs that inhibit cholesterol absorption) or increase catabolism, such as anticonvulsants, glucocorticoids, HAART (AIDS treatment) and anti-rejection medications
1. Current use of dietary or alternative therapies containing high concentrations of Vitamin D (e.g. adults ≥ 2,000 IU/day)
2. More than 50% of subjects are taking Vitamin D supplementation
3. Family history of parathyroid or calcium regulatory disease
4. Personal history of the following diseases: kidney, gastrointestinal, liver, thyroid, or parathyroid
5. Personal history of seizures
6. Bariatric surgery
7. Pregnancy or lactation
| Site | n | Females | Males | Light Skin | Dark Skin | Age Group ≥ 21 to ≤ 35 Yrs | Age Group >35 to ≤ 50 Yrs | Age Group >50 to ≤ 90 Yrs |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Northern Site Buffalo, NY | 123 | 74 | 49 | 105 | 18 | Total = 30
Female = 16
Male = 14 | Total = 49
Female = 29
Male = 20 | Total = 44
Female = 29
Male = 15 |
| Central Site Oklahoma City, OK | 116 | 67 | 49 | 73 | 43 | Total = 33
Female = 18
Male = 15 | Total = 38
Female = 23
Male = 15 | Total = 45
Female = 26
Male = 19 |
| Southern Site Orange City, FL | 88 | 59 | 29 | 71 | 17 | Total = 27
Female = 18
Male = 9 | Total = 34
Female = 23
Male = 11 | Total = 27
Female = 18
Male = 9 |
| 2nd | 69 | 32 | 37 | 36 | 33 | Total = 32 | Total = 22 | Total = 15 |
{9}
| Site | n | Females | Males | Light Skin | Dark Skin | Age Group ≥ 21 to ≤ 35 Yrs | Age Group >35 to ≤ 50 Yrs | Age Group >50 to ≤ 90 Yrs |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Southern Site Delray Beach, FL (Summer only) | | | | | | Female = 19 Male = 13 | Female = 6 Male = 16 | Female = 7 Male = 8 |
| TOTAL | 396 | 232 | 164 | 285 | 111 | Total = 122 Female = 71 Male = 51 | Total = 143 Female = 81 Male = 62 | Total = 131 Female = 80 Male = 51 |
| Percent of Total | | 59% | 41% | 72% | 28% | 31% | 36% | 33% |
| Category | n | Range (ng/mL) | Mean (ng/mL) | Median (ng/mL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Modified LIAISON® 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay | | | | |
| All data | 396 | 9.3 – 47.9 | 26.0 | 24.9 |
| | | | | |
| Northern | 123 | 8.9 – 47.2 | 26.6 | 25.5 |
| Central | 116 | 8.0 – 44.3 | 22.1 | 20.9 |
| Southern | 157 | 11.0 – 56.1 | 28.3 | 27.1 |
| | | | | |
| Winter | 136 | 8.1 – 47.2 | 23.4 | 22.4 |
| Summer | 260 | 10.4 – 49.3 | 27.3 | 26.1 |
| | | | | |
| Light skin | 284 | 11.3 – 50.4 | 28.3 | 27.8 |
| Dark skin | 112 | 7.8 – 39.0 | 20.1 | 19.7 |
| | | | | |
{10}
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
11
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.