CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN, CAPILLARYS FLEX PIERCING SYSTEM
K112550 · Sebia · GKA · May 25, 2012 · Hematology
Device Facts
Record ID
K112550
Device Name
CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN, CAPILLARYS FLEX PIERCING SYSTEM
Applicant
Sebia
Product Code
GKA · Hematology
Decision Date
May 25, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 864.7415
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) kit is designed for the separation of the normal hemoglobins (A, A2 and F) in human blood samples, and for the detection of the major hemoglobin variants (S, C, E and D), by capillary electrophoresis in alkaline buffer (pH 9.4) with the SEBIA CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument. The CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) kit is designed for laboratory use. The CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument is an automated analyzer which performs a complete hemoglobin profile for the quantitative analysis of the normal hemoglobin fractions A, A2 and F and for the detection of major hemoglobin variants S, C, E and D. The assay is performed on the hemolysate of whole blood samples collected in tubes containing K₂EDTA or K₃EDTA as anticoagulant. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use.
Device Story
Device performs capillary electrophoresis to separate and quantify hemoglobin fractions (A, A2, F, S, C, D, E) in whole blood. Input: K2EDTA/K3EDTA anticoagulated whole blood samples. Process: Automated analyzer (CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING) performs sample hemolysis, dilution, and injection into eight parallel silica capillaries; separation occurs via electrophoretic mobility in alkaline buffer (pH 9.4); detection via spectrophotometry at 415 nm. Output: Electrophoregrams and relative quantification (corrected area percentage) of hemoglobin fractions. Used in clinical laboratories; operated by trained personnel. Software identifies hemoglobin fractions automatically and displays results for visual evaluation by clinicians. Output aids in identifying hemoglobinopathies and abnormal hemoglobin profiles, supporting clinical diagnosis of hemoglobin disorders.
Clinical Evidence
Bench-only; no clinical trials. Method comparison study analyzed 362 samples (226 normal, 136 abnormal) across three sites comparing subject device to predicate HPLC system. Results showed high correlation (r² > 0.90) for HbA, HbA2, HbF, and HbS. Reproducibility studies (n=120 per fraction) met acceptance criteria (CV < 10% for A, A2, F; < 20% for S). Linearity confirmed across reportable ranges.
Indicated for laboratory use in human patients (adults and children) for the quantitative analysis of normal hemoglobin fractions (A, A2, F) and detection of major hemoglobin variants (S, C, E, D) in whole blood samples collected in K2EDTA or K3EDTA tubes.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An abnormal hemoglobin assay is a device consisting of the reagents, apparatus, instrumentation, and controls necessary to isolate and identify abnormal genetically determined hemoglobin types.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A control intended for use with an abnormal hemoglobin assay is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 864.9.
{0}
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k112550
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Hemoglobin A, F, A2, S, C, D, E
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, Capillary electrophoresis
E. Applicant:
Sebia Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBINE (E) using the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 864.7415, Abnormal hemoglobin assay
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
GKA, Abnormal Hemoglobin Quantitation
4. Panel:
Hematology (81)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) kit is designed for the separation of the normal hemoglobins (A, A2 and F) in human blood samples, and for the detection of the major hemoglobin variants (S, C, E and D), by capillary electrophoresis in alkaline buffer (pH 9.4) with the SEBIA CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument. The CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) kit is designed for laboratory use.
The CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument is an automated analyzer which performs a complete hemoglobin profile for the quantitative analysis of the normal hemoglobin fractions A, A2 and F and for the detection of major hemoglobin variants S,
{1}
C, E and D. The assay is performed on the hemolysate of whole blood samples collected in tubes containing K₂EDTA or K₃EDTA as anticoagulant.
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as Intended Use
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
Prescription Use Only
4. Special instrument requirements:
For use with the SEBIA CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING Instrument
I. Device Description:
The CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN (E) kit consists of five components; (1) HEMOGLOBIN(E) buffer contains alkaline buffer (pH 9.4), supplied in 700 mL vials, (2) Hemolyzing Solution, supplied in 700 mL vials, (3) Washing Solution, supplied in 75 mL vials, (4) Dilution segments, supplied in pack of 90, (5) Filters, four per kit. The CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN (E) kit is used in conjunction with a SEBIA CAPILLARYS 2 Flex-Piercing instrument. The CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument has eight capillaries functioning in parallel allowing eight simultaneous analyses for hemoglobin quantification from whole blood samples. The hemoglobin, separated in capillaries, are directly detected at an absorbance wavelength of 415 nm, producing electrophoregrams which are visually evaluated for pattern abnormalities. Direct detection provides relative quantification of individual hemoglobin fractions.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
BIORAD VARIANT™ II β-thalassemia Short Program
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k991127
{2}
# 3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) with CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument | Predicate BIORAD VARIANT™ II β-thalassemia Short Program (k991127) |
| Intended Use | The CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) kit is designed for the separation of the normal hemoglobins (A, F and A2) in human blood samples, and for the detection of the major hemoglobin variants (S, C, E or D), by capillary electrophoresis in alkaline buffer (pH 9.4) with the SEBIA CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument. The CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) kit is designed for laboratory use. The CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument is an automated analyzer which performs hemoglobin profile for the quantitative analysis of the normal hemoglobin fractions A, A2 and F and for the detection of major hemoglobin variants S, C, E and D. The assay is performed on the hemolysate of whole blood samples collected in tubes containing K2EDTA or K3EDTA anticoagulant. For in vitro diagnostic use. | The VARIANT™ β-thalassemia Short Program is intended for the separation and area percent determinations of hemoglobins A2 and F and as an aid in the identification of abnormal hemoglobins in whole blood using ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The VARIANT™ II β-thalassemia Short Program is intended for use only with the Bio-Rad VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin Test System For in vitro diagnostic use. |
{3}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) with CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX PIERCING instrument | BIORAD VARIANT™ II β-thalassemia Short Program (k991127) |
| Separation system | Free solution capillary electrophoresis (FSCE) | Ion exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) |
| Absorbance wavelength | 415 nm | 415 nm and 690 nm |
| Number of separation units | 8 parallel capillaries | 1 parallel capillary |
| Number of analysis (throughput) | 43 samples/hour | 9-10 samples/hour |
| Introduction of sample into automatic system hemolysis | Continuous loading with sample racks | Sequential injection |
| Controls for migration | SEBIA Normal Hb A2 Control (sold separately) | Hemoglobin A2/F calibrator/diluent set |
| Use of hemolysis solution | Hemolysis solution is on board | Solution is the VARIANT II sampling solution |
| Use of other controls | Yes, SEBIA Pathological Hb A2, AFSC and AF Controls) | No |
| Kit components | All components provided together (boxed). | All components provided separately. |
| Hb variants library (on-board) | Yes, (displayed by the software and indicated in the package insert) | No |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- CLSI EP05-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods, 2nd Edition
- CLSI EP06-A2: Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach, Approved Guidelines
- CLSI EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline. 2nd Edition
- CLSI EP09-A2-1R: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples: Approved Guideline. 2nd Edition (Interim Edition)
- CLSI EP17-A: Protocols for the Limit of Detection ad Limit of Quantitation; Approved Guideline
- CLSI EP25-A: Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents: Approved Guideline
- FDA Use of Symbols on Labels and in Labeling of In-vitro Diagnostic Devices Intended for Professional Use
- FDA Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices - Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff
{4}
Test Principle:
The SEBIA CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) test in conjunction with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument utilizes the principle of capillary electrophoresis in free solution. With this technique, charged molecules are separated by their electrophoretic mobility in an alkaline buffer with a specific pH. Separation also occurs according to the electrolyte pH and electro-osmotic flow. The hemoglobins, separated in silica capillaries, are directly and specifically detected at an absorbance wavelength of 415 nm which is specific to hemoglobins. The Hb fractions are separated by absorbance spectrophotometry and identified automatically by the instrument software. The results are expressed as the corrected area percentage for each Hb fraction. The resulting electrophoregrams are evaluated visually for pattern abnormalities. Direct detection provides accurate relative quantification of individual hemoglobin fractions: A, F, A2, S, C, D, and E. By using alkaline pH buffer, normal and abnormal (or variant) hemoglobins are detected.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
A reproducibility study was performed using seven different blood samples, (4 blood samples and 3 controls identified in the table below). The samples were run using the CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) procedure on the same FLEX-PIERCING instrument using 3 lots of HEMOGLOBIN(E) kits. Each blood sample was run over 27 days, twice a day, and in duplicate for each run. A summary of data and acceptance criteria for the studies performed is found in the tables below. Acceptance criteria were met for HbA, HbA2 and HbS <10% and HbF <20%.
The tables below represent reproducibility between capillaries on the same instrument.
HbA reproducibility study summary
| HbA % | Normal blood | Blood sample with elevated HbA2 | Blood with low HbA2 level | Pathological blood with HbF & HbS | Normal HbA2 control | Pathological HbA2 control | Hb AF control |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n=120 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Sample # | | | | | | | |
| Mean Hb% | 97.2 | 95.4 | 98.1 | 54.9 | 97.4 | 93.8 | 34.3 |
| Repeatability (CV%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
| Between-run (CV%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 021 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Between-day (CV%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.9 |
| Total (CV%) | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.2 |
| SD | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.42 |
| 95% CI | 0.04-0.05 | 0.05-0.07 | 0.03-0.04 | 0.17-0.24 | 0.06-0.08 | 0.08-0.12 | 0.34-0.56 |
Acceptance criteria: $\% \mathrm{CV} < 10\%$
{5}
HbA2 reproducibility study summary
| HbA2 % | Normal blood | Blood sample with elevated HbA2 | Blood with low HbA2 level | Pathological blood with HbF & HbS | Normal HbA2 control | Pathological HbA2 control | Hb AF control |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n=120
Sample # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Mean Hb% | 2.8 | 4.7 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 6.2 | / |
| Repeatability (CV%) | 1.6 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 1.3 | / |
| Between-run (CV%) | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | / |
| Between-day (CV%) | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | / |
| Total (CV%) | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 1.6 | / |
| SD | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.10 | / |
| 95% CI | 0.04-0.05 | 0.05-0.07 | 0.03-0.04 | 0.04-0.06 | 0.06-0.08 | 0.08-0.12 | / |
Acceptance criteria: $\% \mathrm{CV} < 10\%$
HbF reproducibility study summary
| HbF % | Normal blood | Blood sample with elevated HbA2 | Blood with low HbA2 level | Pathological blood with HbF & HbS | Normal HbA2 control | Pathological HbA2 control | Hb AF control |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n=120
Sample # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Mean Hb% | / | / | / | 8.3 | / | / | 65.2 |
| Repeatability (CV%) | / | / | / | 0.7 | / | / | 0.3 |
| Between-run (CV%) | / | / | / | 0.8 | / | / | 0.4 |
| Between-day (CV%) | / | / | / | 0.3 | / | / | 0.5 |
| Total (CV%) | / | / | / | 1.1 | / | / | .07 |
| SD | / | / | / | 0.09 | / | / | 0.42 |
| 95% CI | / | / | / | 0.08-0.11 | / | / | 0.34-0.56 |
Acceptance criteria: $\% \mathrm{CV} < 10\%$
{6}
HbS study reproducibility summary
| HbS % | Normal blood | Blood sample with elevated Hb A2 | Blood with low HbA2 level | Pathological blood with HbF & HbS | Normal HbA2 control | Pathological Hb A2 control | Hb AF control |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n=120 | | | | | | | |
| Sample # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Mean Hb% | / | / | / | 33.9 | / | / | / |
| Repeatability (CV%) | / | / | / | 0.4 | / | / | / |
| Between-run (CV%) | / | / | / | 0.4 | / | / | / |
| Between-day (CV%) | / | / | / | 0.1 | / | / | / |
| Total (CV%) | / | / | / | 0.6 | / | / | / |
| SD | / | / | / | 0.19 | / | / | / |
| 95% CI | / | / | / | 0.16-0.24 | / | / | / |
Acceptance criteria: $\% \mathrm{CV} < 20\%$
# Reproducibility between-instruments and between lots:
This reproducibility study was conducted using 7 different blood samples (identified in table below) that were tested twice a day in duplicate for four days. Results were obtained using the CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) procedure with 3 lots of CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) kits and three CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX PIERCING instruments. Reproducibility values were within acceptance criteria for quantitative analysis for each hemoglobin component (A, A2, F, and S). The following table summarizes the total instrument/lot CV% for the individual hemoglobins A, A2, F and S fractions tested.
Between-instrument reproducibility study summary for HbA
| HbA % | Normal blood | Blood sample with elevated HbA2 | Blood with low HbA2 level | Pathological blood with HbF & HbS | Normal HbA2 control | Pathological HbA2 control | HbAF control |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n=48 | | | | | | | |
| Sample # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Mean Hb A% | 97.2 | 95.3 | 98.1 | 55.0 | 97.3 | 93.5 | 33.3 |
| Between-instrument (CV%) | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Total (CV%) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.9 |
| SD | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.24 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| 95% CI | 0.06-0.07 | 0.06-0.09 | 0.04-0.05 | 0.20-0.29 | 0.10-0.16 | 0.19-0.31 | 0.51-0.84 |
Acceptance criteria: $\% \mathrm{CV} < 10\%$
{7}
Between-instrument reproducibility study summary for HbA2
| HbA2 % | Normal blood | Blood sample with elevated HbA2 | Blood with low HbA2 level | Pathological blood with HbF & HbS | Normal HbA2 control | Pathological HbA2 control | Hb AF control |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n=48 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Sample # | | | | | | | |
| Mean Hb A% | 2.8 | 4.7 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 6.5 | / |
| Between-instrument (CV%) | 2.0 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.2 | / |
| Total (CV%) | 2.3 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 4.6 | 0.7 | / |
| SD | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.24 | |
| 95% CI | 0.06-0.07 | 0.06-0.09 | 0.04-0.05 | 0.04-.06 | 0.10-0.16 | 0.19-0.31 | / |
Acceptance criteria: $\% \mathrm{CV} < 10\%$
Between-instrument reproducibility study summary for HbF
| HbF % | Normal blood | Blood sample with elevated HbA2 | Blood with low HbA2 level | Pathological blood with HbF & HbS | Normal HbA2 control | Pathological HbA2 control | HbAF control |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n=48 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Sample # | | | | | | | |
| Mean Hb A% | / | / | / | 8.3 | / | / | 65.2 |
| Between-instrument (CV%) | / | / | / | 0.6 | / | / | 0.2 |
| Total (CV%) | / | / | / | 1.1 | / | / | |
| SD | / | / | / | 0.09 | / | / | 0.60 |
| 95% CI | / | / | / | 0.17-0.24 | / | / | 0.48-0.79 |
Acceptance criteria: $\% \mathrm{CV} < 10\%$
{8}
Between-instrument reproducibility study summary for HbS
| HbS % n=48 Sample # | Normal blood 1 | Blood sample with elevated HbA2 2 | Blood with low HbA2 level 3 | Pathological blood with Hb F & Hb S 4 | Normal HbA2 control 5 | Pathological HbA2 control 6 | Hb AF control 7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Mean Hb A% | / | / | / | 33.9 | / | / | / |
| Between-instrument (CV%) | / | / | / | 0.3 | / | / | / |
| Total (CV%) | / | / | / | 0.6 | / | / | / |
| SD | / | / | / | 0.08 | / | / | / |
| 95% CI | / | / | / | .06-0.12 | / | / | / |
Acceptance criteria: $\% \mathrm{CV} < 20\%$
A separate reproducibility study was conducted to demonstrate reproducibility for HbC, HbD and HbE using the CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) assay kit with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX PIERCING instrument. Nine different samples (three samples per hemoglobin variant) containing HbC, HbD or HbE were analyzed on three different CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX PIERCING instruments using three different lots of buffer and hemolysing solutions for four days (at two different times per day). Within each run samples were analyzed in duplicate. The quantitative results were analyzed to demonstrate reproducibility for HbC, HbD or HbE fractions (mean and CV). The results are provided below:
HbC reproducibility study summary
| Hb C % n=48 | Sample C1 Pathological Sample with HbC | Sample C2 Pathological Sample with HbC | Sample C3 Pathological Sample with HbC |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Mean Hb% | 44.9 | 31.8 | 69.4 |
| Repeatability (CV%) | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.5 |
| Between-run (CV%) | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1,0 |
| Between-day (CV%) | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| Total Between-instrument | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| SD/CV% | 0.64 | 0.71 | 1.09 |
| 95% CI | 0.73-1.33 | 0.73-1.33 | 0.73-1.33 |
Acceptance criteria: $\% \mathrm{CV} < 10\%$
{9}
Hb D reproducibility study summary
| Hb D % n=48 | Sample D1 Pathological Sample with Hb D | Sample D2 Pathological Sample with Hb D | Sample D3 Pathological Sample with Hb D |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Mean Hb% | 40.8 | 39.0 | 36.5 |
| Repeatability (CV%) | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Between-run (CV%) | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Between-day (CV%) | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 |
| Total Between-instrument | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| SD/CV% | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.26 |
| 95% CI | 0.32 - 0.70 | 0.32 - 0.70 | 0.32 - 0.70 |
Acceptance criteria: $\% \mathrm{CV} < 10\%$
Hb E reproducibility study summary
| Hb E % n=48 | Sample E1 Pathological Sample with Hb E | Sample E2 Pathological Sample with Hb E | Sample E3 Pathological Sample with Hb E |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Mean Hb% | 25.1 | 23.9 | 22.9 |
| Repeatability (CV%) | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| Between-run (CV%) | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Between-day (CV%) | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Total Between-instrument | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.3 |
| SD/CV% | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0.29 |
| 95% CI | 0.23 - 0.43 | 0.23 - 0.43 | 0.23 - 0.43 |
Acceptance criteria: $\% \mathrm{CV} < 10\%$
The reproducibility results of the CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) assay kit with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX PIERCING instrument met acceptance criteria for all hemoglobins tested (Hb A, HbA2, Hb F, Hb S, Hb C, Hb D and Hb E).
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Mixtures of two different blood samples (normal blood with hemoglobin fraction A, A2, S, F and umbilical cord samples) was serially diluted 12 times with saline and analyzed using the CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) assay kit using the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX PIERCING instrument. A separate linearity study was performed using different pathological blood samples with hemoglobin fraction C, D and E and serially diluted 11 times with normal whole and analyzed using the CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) assay kit. The linearity study was performed according to the guidelines in CLSI EP6-A. The tests were determined to be linear within the entire range studied for each of the following hemoglobin fractions: HbA: $0 - 97.5\%$ , HbA2: $0 - 9.9\%$ , HbF: $0 - 75.5\%$ , HbS: $0 - 90.7\%$ , HbC: $0 - 33.2\%$ , HbD: $0 - 40.9\%$ and HbE: $0 - 96.1\%$ .
{10}
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): Not applicable
d. Detection limit:
The reportable ranges for normal hemoglobin are:
Hemoglobin A (HbA): 96.7 – 97.8%
Hemoglobin F (HbF): < 0.5%
Hemoglobin A2 (HbA2): 2.2 – 3.2%
Major hemoglobin variants (S, C, E and D) should not be present in normal hemoglobin samples.
See the linearity study above for data on recovery of samples across the measuring range for all hemoglobin fractions.
e. Analytical specificity:
Interference studies were conducted on three different whole blood samples: a normal sample, an increased HbA2 level sample, and a pathological sample with abnormal HbS. Each sample was prepared as follows 1) whole blood, 2) its own hemolysate resuspended with its own plasma, 3) its own hemolysate re-suspended and spiked with a pre-determined amount of interferents. Each sample was analyzed 3 times to quantitatively detect hemoglobin variants A, A2, F and S for reproducibility. Study results indicate the maximum concentration for each interferent as follows:
| Interferents | Maximum Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Bilirubin | 17.9 mg/dL |
| Lipemia | 22.34 g/dL (triglycerides) |
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Comparison studies were performed using CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) assay kit using the CAPILLARYS FLEX 2 PIERCING instrument and compared to the predicate, BIO-RAD assay kit with the β-Thalassemia Short Program system, at three sites on blood samples with normal and abnormal levels for HbA, HbA2, HbF, HbS and hemoglobin variants C, D and E. The blood samples and their diagnosis assessments were provided by hospitals and laboratories in France and the United States. A total of 362 (226 normal/136 abnormal) donors and patients samples were analyzed at one internal and two external laboratory sites. The subjects included males and females within the age range of ≤1 year to adult (≥21). The CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument was not evaluated in the newborn/neonate population. The acceptance criterion was defined as the correlation coefficient (r²) >0.90. A regression analysis was calculated producing a slope, intercept and correlation coefficient (r²) for each hemoglobin fraction at each study site. Regression
{11}
analysis is not provided for abnormal hemoglobin variants HbC, HbD and HbE at each site due to the small sample size.
Site 1: The internal study included 56 different normal or pathological blood samples for the HbA2 fraction with or without hemoglobin variants (36 blood samples without abnormal hemoglobin (or Hb variants) and 20 blood samples with abnormal hemoglobin). Results were as follows:
| Hb fraction | n | r² | y-intercept | Slope | 95% CI | Range of values (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hb A | 56 | 0.996 | -11.42 | 1.33 | -13.52 to -9.32 | 21.0 – 98.2 |
| Hb A2 | 44 | 0.978 | -0.08 | 1.13 | -0.14 to -0.02 | 0.1 – 6.3 |
| Hb F | 56 | 1.000 | -0.38 | 0.93 | -0.48 to 0.27 | 0.00 – 79.0 |
| Hb S | 8 | 0.998 | -0.06 | 1.07 | -0.79 to 0.91 | 6.8 – 41.2 |
Acceptance criteria: $r^2 = >90\%$
Note: Additional data and supplemental statistical analyses were requested from the sponsor to assess the high y-intercept value for HbA at site 1. A higher overall test result for $\% \mathrm{HbA}$ in the new device when compared to the predicate was noted. Statistical review of the combined data for HbA at all sites indicated that this variant demonstrated a good fit to the linear model, with $\mathbf{R}^2$ above 0.97 for the new device as compared to the predicate. In addition, the sponsor cited literature to support higher device test results for $\% \mathrm{HbA}$ in the new device versus the predicate based on the differences between capillary electrophoresis and HPLC technology.
Site 1 included samples with 20 abnormal variants. Two HbC, four HbD and four HbE variants were detected and were in agreement with the comparative HPLC system and clinical diagnosis.
Site 2: The first external site included 123 different normal or pathological blood samples for the HbA2 fraction with or without hemoglobin variants (90 blood samples without abnormal hemoglobin (or Hb variants) and 33 blood samples with abnormal hemoglobin). Results were as follows:
| Hb fraction | n | r² | y-intercept | slope | 95% CI | Range of values (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hb A | 121 | 0.999 | -1.71 | 1.14 | 1.13 to 1.14 | 0.0 – 98.8 |
| Hb A2 | 93 | 0.986 | -0.31 | 1.16 | 1.12 to 1.20 | 0.4 – 6.5 |
| Hb F | 103 | 0.997 | -0.65 | 0.97 | 0.95 to 0.98 | 0.0 – 90.3 |
| Hb S | 26 | 0.998 | -0.10 | 1.05 | 1.02 to 1.08 | 14.2 – 54.8 |
| Hb C | 5 | 0.999 | -1.08 | 1.02 | 0.95 to 1.10 | 9.7 – 44.7 |
Acceptance criteria: $r^2 = >90\%$
Site 2 included samples with 33 abnormal variants. Five HbC and two HbE were detected and were in agreement with the comparative HPLC system and clinical diagnosis.
{12}
Site 3: The second external site included 183 different normal or pathological blood samples for the HbA2 fraction with or without hemoglobin variants (100 blood samples without abnormal hemoglobin (or Hb variants) and 83 blood samples with abnormal hemoglobin). Results were as follows:
| Hb fraction | n | r² | y-intercept | slope | 95% CI | Range of values (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hb A | 180 | 0.991 | -1.75 | 1.13 | 1.11 to 1.15 | 0.9 – 91.0 |
| Hb A2 | 113 | 0.926 | -0.18 | 1.04 | 0.96 to 1.11 | 0.4 – 6.0 |
| Hb F | 181 | 0.991 | -0.11 | 1.06 | 1.04 to 1.08 | 0.0-98.2 |
| Hb S | 67 | 0.996 | 0.66 | 1.0 | 0.98 to 1.02 | 5.0-93.9 |
| Hb C | 13 | 0.996 | 0.81 | 0.94 | 0.88 to 0.99 | 12.5-45.7 |
Acceptance criteria: $r^2 = >90\%$
Site 3 included samples with 83 abnormal hemoglobin variants. Thirteen HbC and three HbD variants were detected and were in agreement with the comparative HPLC system and clinical diagnosis.
The combined number of abnormal hemoglobin variants detected for all sites in the comparison study is as follows: HbS = 113, HbC = 20, HbD = 7, HbE = 6.
For all sites abnormal hemoglobins or abnormal levels of normal hemoglobins detected were in agreement with the comparative HPLC system and clinical diagnosis. There were no observed false positives (i.e., detection of an abnormal band or abnormal level of a normal band where no such abnormal existed).
b. Matrix comparison:
A study was performed with $\mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{EDTA}$ and $\mathrm{K}_3\mathrm{EDTA}$ using normal, increased HbA2, and pathological samples (with HbF and HbS) to determine whether an excess of EDTA anticoagulant interferes with analysis. The results obtained indicated no interference with an excess of EDTA anticoagulant in the collection tube of 4 times higher than the recommended concentration $(1.8\mathrm{mg / dL})$ . Testing of the samples was performed on the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument using 3 lots of CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) assay kit. A total of 20 (15 normal and 5 abnormal) samples were tested. The same samples were collected with both EDTA $\mathrm{K}_2$ and $\mathrm{K}_3$ anticoagulants and tested by one operator for quantitative detection of hemoglobin variants. Linear regression was performed on the test results. The acceptance criterion is $r^2 >0.90$ . The results of the study met the acceptance criterion demonstrating no performance difference between samples collected in either EDTA concentration. Results of the study were as follows:
{13}
| Hb fractions | n | r2 | y-intercept | slope | Range of Hb% variants |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hb A | 18 | 1.009 | 0.638 | 0.993 | 57.5 - 98.0 |
| Hb A2 | 20 | 0.997 | -0.009 | 1.007 | 1.8 – 6.2 |
| Hb F | 4 | 1.000 | -0.216 | 1.043 | 0.7 – 20.1 |
| Hb S | 5 | 1.000 | -0.637 | 1.009 | 39.5 – 91.3 |
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity: Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity: Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable): Not applicable
# 4. Clinical cut-off: Not applicable
# 5. Expected values/Reference range:
Reference values for individual major electrophoretic hemoglobin zones with the HEMOGLOBIN(E) assay kit and the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument was established from a healthy population of 113 adults with normal hemoglobin values using the CAPILLARY 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument and the HPLC technique. Results are found in the table below:
| Hemoglobin Variants | Reference range |
| --- | --- |
| Hemoglobin A (Hbg A) | 96.8 and 97.8% |
| Hemoglobin F (Hbg F) | < 0.5 % |
| Hemoglobin A2 (Hbg A2) | 2.2 and 3.2 % |
*It is recommended that each laboratory establish its own threshold values.
Normal (reference) values must be considered only when hemoglobin variants are absent.
# N. Instrument Name:
Sebia CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument
# O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Closed tube batch mode with the following automated steps:
Bar code reading of sample tubes (for up to 8 tubes) and sample racks
Mixing of blood before analysis
Sample hemolysis and dilution from primary tubes into dilution segments
Capillary washing
Injection of hemolyzed samples
Hemoglobin separation and direct detection of the separated hemoglobins on capillaries
{14}
2. Software:
The SEBIA CSCI CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING operating system software is designed to work with the instrumentation, CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING. The CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrumentation is directed by the PHORESIS 6.50 software and is fully automated in the performance of the sample identification by barcode labeling, dilution, testing, and calculation of results. The PHORESIS 6.50 software utilizes Windows XP as the operating system with Intel based processors with Visual Basic the programming language.
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
Barcode reader
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Red blood cells are allowed to precipitate at $2^{\circ} - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ or centrifuged at $5000~\mathrm{rpm}$ for 5 minutes. The maximum volume of plasma is removed and the tube is vortexed for 5 seconds. The closed or open tubes are placed in the sample racks.
5. Calibration:
Not applicable
6. Quality Control:
It is necessary to run two analysis sequences with the Normal Hb A2 Control (SEBIA) after having changed buffer lot numbers, after a capillary cleaning, and before starting a new analysis sequence. It is also advised to include into each run of samples an assayed blood control (AFSC Control, Normal Hb A2 Control – SEBIA).
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
The CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) using the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument is a modification of the previously cleared CAPILLARYS HEMOGLOBIN(E) procedure using the CAPILLARYS instrument (k052291) for separation and detection of Hemoglobin A, F, A2, S, C, E, and D. The BIO-RAD VARIANT™ II β-thalassemia Short Program (k991127) was used as a comparative method for detection of the hemoglobin variants S, C, E and D with this device.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.