K112497 · C.R. Bard, Inc. · DTK · Oct 24, 2011 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K112497
Device Name
MERIDIAN FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL DELIVERY KIT
Applicant
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Product Code
DTK · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Oct 24, 2011
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 870.3375
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The MERIDIAN™ Filter System - Femoral Delivery Kit is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism via permanent placement in the vena cava in the following situations: - Pulmonary thromboembolism when anticoagulants are contraindicated. - Failure of anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease. - Emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced. - Chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed or is contraindicated. MERIDIAN™ Filter may be removed according to the instructions supplied under the section labeled: Optional Procedure for Filter Removal.
Device Story
The MERIDIAN™ Filter System is an intravascular device for permanent placement in the inferior vena cava (≤28 mm diameter) to prevent pulmonary embolism. The filter consists of 12 electropolished shape-memory nitinol wires (6 legs with hooks, 6 arms with anchors) for filtration and fixation. The Femoral Delivery Kit includes an 8 French introducer sheath, dilator with radiopaque marker bands for sizing, storage tube, and pusher system. Used in clinical settings by physicians; the device is delivered via the femoral vein. The introducer sheath features a hemostasis valve and side port for contrast injection. Fluoroscopy guides the placement and deployment of the filter. The device provides mechanical filtration of emboli; the filter design resists migration. The system is a modification of existing delivery kits to accommodate the MERIDIAN filter geometry.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing (in vitro) and in vivo performance testing. In vitro testing included dimensional inspection, tensile, torque, flushability, component compatibility, attachment/detachment, filter dislodgement, pushability, trackability, removability, filter centering, entanglement, deployment force/accuracy, liquid leakage, burst, air aspiration, and biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1). In vivo testing evaluated delivery system trackability, pushability, ease of deployment, deployment accuracy, filter centering, entanglement, and fluoroscopic visibility of marker bands and sheath tip.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Electropolished shape-memory nitinol (filter), polycarbonate tubing with ABS overmold (storage tube). Sensing/Actuation: Mechanical filtration via nitinol wire geometry; fluoroscopic guidance via radiopaque marker bands. Dimensions: 8 French introducer sheath. Connectivity: None. Sterilization: Not specified. Software: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring permanent vena cava filtration to prevent recurrent pulmonary embolism, specifically those with contraindications to anticoagulants, failure of anticoagulant therapy, or emergency cases of massive pulmonary embolism where conventional therapy benefits are reduced.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cardiovascular intravascular filter is an implant that is placed in the inferior vena cava for the purpose of preventing pulmonary thromboemboli (blood clots generated in the lower limbs and broken loose into the blood stream) from flowing into the right side of the heart and the pulmonary circulation.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) “Use of International Standards Organization's ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ” and
(2) FDA's:
(i) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance and Revision of 2/12/90 (K90-1)” and
(ii) “Guidance for Cardiovascular Intravascular Filter 510(k) Submissions.”
Predicate Devices
ECLIPSE® Filter System - Femoral Delivery Kit (K101431)
MERIDIAN™ Filter System - Jugular/Subclavian Delivery Kit (K102511)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
OCT 24 2011 K112497
p. 1 of 4
Page 7
# MERIDIAN™ Filter System - Femoral Delivery Kit 510(k) Summary 21 CFR 807.92
As required by the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, coded under Section 513, Part (I)(3)(A) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, a 510(k) summary upon which substantial equivalence determination is based is as follows:
# Submitter Information:
| Applicant: | Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc<br>1625 West 3rd Street<br>Tempe, Arizona 85281 |
|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Phone: | 480-638-2906 |
| Fax: | 480-449-2546 |
| Contact: | Joni Creal, Regulatory Affairs Specialist II |
| Date: | September 30, 2011 |
#### Subject Device Name:
| Device Trade Name: | MERIDIAN™ Filter System - Femoral<br>Delivery Kit (MD800F) |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Filter, Intravascular, Cardiovascular |
| Classification: | Class II |
| Classification Panel: | Cardiovascular Devices |
| Product Code: | DTK |
| Predicate Devices: | ECLIPSE® Filter System - Femoral Delivery Kit (K101431;<br>Clearance June 24, 2010) |
| | MERIDIAN™ Filter System - Jugular/Subclavian Delivery<br>Kit (K102511; Clearance August 24, 2011) |
# Summary of Change:
The modifications from the predicate devices, compared to the subject MERIDIAN™ Filter System - Femoral Delivery System, are changes to the delivery system only. The following delivery system components were upsized to accommodate the addition of the
{1}------------------------------------------------
filter arm anchors of the cleared MERIDIAN™ Filter (K102511, August 24, 2011): spline, introducer sheath, introducer hub, introducer hub cap, introducer valve, dilator hub, dilator marker bands, safety cap and storage tube. All materials are identical, with the exception of the storage tube, which is now polycarbonate tubing with ABS overmold (the predicate storage tube is only polycarbonate tubing). No changes have been made to the MERIDIAN™ Filter as cleared under K102511 on August 24, 2011. Minor changes have been made to the device labeling.
# Device Description:
The MERIDIAN™ Filter consists of twelve electropolished shape-memory nitinol wires emanating from a central electropolished nitinol filter hook. These 12 wires form two levels of embolic filtration: the six legs provide the lower level of filtration and the six arms provide the upper level of filtration. The legs contain hooks and the arms contain anchors to resist filter movement. The MERIDIAN™ Filter is intended to be used in the inferior vena cava with diameters less than or equal to 28 mm.
The MERIDIAN™ Filter System - Femoral Delivery Kit consists of a 8 French inner diameter (I.D.) introducer sheath and dilator set, a storage tube preloaded with the MERIDIAN™ Filter and pusher system. The dilator is fitted with 2 radiopaque marker bands spaced 28 mm apart for caval sizing. The introducer sheath contains a radiopaque tip and hemostasis valve with a side port for injecting contrast medium via a syringe. The storage tube and pusher system attach to the introducer and allow for delivery and deployment of the MERIDIAN™ Filter.
# Indications for Use of Device:
The subject device, the MERIDIAN™ Filter System - Femoral Delivery Kit, is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism via permanent placement in the vena cava in the following situations:
- Pulmonary thromboembolism when anticoagulants are contraindicated. .
- Failure of anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease. .
- . Emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced.
- Chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed . or is contraindicated.
{2}------------------------------------------------
K122497
P. 3 of 4
Page 9
MERIDIAN™ Filter may be removed according to the instructions supplied under the section labeled: Optional Procedure for Filter Removal.
# Technological Comparison to Predicate Devices:
The technological characteristics of the subject device, the MERIDIAN™ Filter System -Femoral Delivery Kit, are substantially equivalent to those of the predicate devices, in terms of following:
- Intended use (both predicates) .
- Indications for use (both predicates) .
- Target population (both predicates) .
- Operating principle (both predicates) .
- Delivery system design (ECLIPSE® Filter System Femoral Delivery Kit) ●
- Filter design and material (MERIDIAN™ Filter System Jugular/Subclavian . Delivery Kit)
- Fundamental scientific technology (both predicates) .
- Packaging configuration (ECLIPSE® Filter System Femoral Delivery Kit) ●
- Sterility Assurance and method of Sterilization (both predicates) .
# Performance Testing Summary:
To demonstrate substantial equivalence of the subject device to the predicate device, the technological characteristics and performance criteria were evaluated using in vitro and in vivo testing performed as outlined below:
#### In Vitro Delivery System Testing
- Dimensional and Visual Inspection .
- Tensile .
- Torque .
- Flushability .
- Component compatibility .
- Attachment/Detachment .
- Filter Dislodgement .
{3}------------------------------------------------
K112497
p. 4 of 4
Page 10
- . Pushability
- Trackability ●
- . Removability
- Filter Centering (Tilt) �
- Arm and Leg Entanglement (Filter Configuration) .
- Deployment Force .
- Deployment Accuracy .
- . Liquid Leakage
- Leakage during power injection .
- . Burst
- Air Aspiration .
- . Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1
#### In Vivo Delivery System Testing
- . Delivery System Trackability and Pushability
- Dilator and Introducer Sheath Trackability and Pushability .
- Ease of Deployment (Deployment Force) .
- Deployment Accuracy
- Filter Centering (Tilt) .
- Arm and Leg Entanglement (Filter Configuration) .
- Dilator Marker Band Visibility Under Fluoroscopy .
- Introducer Sheath Tip Visibility Under Fluoroscopy .
The results from these tests demonstrate that the technological characteristics and performance of the MERIDIAN™ Filter System – Femoral Delivery Kit is comparable to the predicate devices and that the subject device can perform in a manner substantially equivalent to the predicates devices with the same intended use.
# Conclusion:
The MERIDIAN™ Filter System – Femoral Delivery Kit is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate devices.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three lines representing its body and wings. The eagle is facing to the right. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
OCT 2 4 2011
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. c/o Ms. Joni Creal Regulatory Affairs Associate 1625 West Third Street Tempe, AZ 85281
Re: K112497
Trade Name: Meridian Filter System - Femoral Delivery Kit Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.3375 Regulation Name: Cardiovascular intravascular filter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DTK Dated: September 30, 2011 Received: October 3, 2011
Dear Ms. Creal:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Joni Creal
CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Bram Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): צו ו 2497
Device Name: MERIDIAN™ Filter System - Femoral Delivery Kit
Indications for Use:
The MERIDIAN™ Filter System - Femoral Delivery Kit is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism via permanent placement in the vena cava in the following situations:
- . Pulmonary thromboembolism when anticoagulants are contraindicated.
- . Failure of anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease.
- . Emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced.
- . Chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed or is contraindicated.
MERIDIAN™ Filter may be removed according to the instructions supplied under the section labeled: Optional Procedure for Filter Removal.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH; Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
510(k) Number
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.