FREESTYLE INSULINX BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEMS
Applicant
Abbott Laboratories
Product Code
LFR · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Feb 16, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertip. The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes or for neonatal use. The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Test Strips are for use with the FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meter to quantitatively measure glucose in capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertip. FreeStyle Control Solutions are for use with the FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood glucose test results.
Device Story
System uses coulometric biosensor technology to measure glucose in capillary whole blood via electrochemical reaction with glucose dehydrogenase (GDH). Meter detects blood via trigger current on test strip; integrates electrical current over time to calculate glucose concentration. Device features large touch screen, automated logbook, and programmable reminders. Integrated 'FreeStyle Auto-Assist' software (plug-and-play via USB) generates graphical/textual reports (Snapshot, Modal Day, Logbook, Daily Statistics, Meal Event Averages) for patient/HCP review. Used at home by patients for diabetes management; aids in identifying glucose patterns and therapy adjustments. Benefits include simplified data tracking and guided interpretation of historical results.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance verified through precision (SD ≤ 5mg/dL for <75mg/dL; CV ≤ 5% for ≥75mg/dL) and accuracy (95% of results within ±15mg/dL for <75mg/dL and ±20% for ≥75mg/dL compared to reference method).
Technological Characteristics
Coulometric biosensor; GDH-FAD enzyme; electrochemical sensing; USB connectivity; touch screen interface; plug-and-play software; operating range 40°F-104°F; hematocrit range 15%-65%.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the fingertip by people with diabetes at home to monitor diabetes control effectiveness. Not for diagnosis, screening, or neonatal use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
FreeStyle Tracker Diabetes Management (k020866)
Reference Devices
FreeStyle Connect Blood Glucose Monitoring System (k051802)
FreeStyle Lite Test Strip (k092602)
FreeStyle Control Solutions (k070850)
FreeStyle Control Solutions (k013147)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k111874
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Capillary whole blood glucose
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, Amperometric Method, Glucose Dehydrogenase (FAD)
E. Applicant:
Abbott Laboratories
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LFR
Glucose dehydrogenase, glucose | Class II | 21 CFR §
862.1345 | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
| NBW
system, test, blood glucose, over the counter | Class II | 21 CFR §
862.1345 | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
1. Indication(s) for use:
The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertip. The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared.
{1}
The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes or for neonatal use.
The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Test Strips are for use with the FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meter to quantitatively measure glucose in capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertip.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
- For over-the-counter use.
- Not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus.
- Not intended for use on neonates.
- For in vitro diagnostic use only
- Not for use on patients who are dehydrated, hypotensive, in shock, or for individuals in hyperglycemic-hyperosmolar state, with or without ketosis.
- Critically ill patients should not be tested with a blood glucose meter.
- The meter and its accessories are for use by a single person.
4. Special instrument requirements:
FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meter.
I. Device Description:
The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System is comprised of the FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meter, FreeStyle InsuLinx Test Strips, Freestyle Auto-Assist software (resides in the FreeStyle InsuLinx Meter) and USB cable for data transmission.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
| Predicate device name | Predicate 510(k) number |
| --- | --- |
| FreeStyle Tracker Diabetes Management | k020866 |
Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Proposed Device
FreeStyle InsuLinx
Blood Glucose Meter | Predicate Device
(k020866) |
| Intended Use | The quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood | Same |
| Enzyme-Cofactor | GDH-FAD | GDH-PQQ |
| Detection Method | Same | Amperometric method |
| Measurement Range | Same | 20 to 500 mg/dL |
{2}
| Hematocrit Range | 15 to 65% | 0 to 60% |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sample Type | Capillary whole blood | Capillary whole blood |
| Test Sites | Finger | Finger, forearm, upper arm, thigh, calf and hand |
| Sample Volume | Same | >0.3 μl |
| Measurement Time | 5 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Altitude Limit | 0 to 10,000 feet | 0 to 20,000 feet |
| Meter Operating Temperature | 40 to 104°F | 50 to 95°F |
| Operating Humidity | Same | 5 to 90% |
| Data Management | FreeStyle Auto-Assist | FreeStyle Connect Blood Glucose Monitoring System (k051802) |
| Application Software | Software provides the User with an Electronic Logbook and Data Management. | Software provides the User with an Electronic Logbook, Data Management and Diabetes Management tools |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods
CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement
CLSI EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry.
ISO 15197: In Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems-Requirements for Blood Glucose Test Systems for Self Managing Diabetes Mellitus.
L. Test Principle:
The FreeStyle InsuLinx Meter, in conjunction with FreeStyle InsuLinx Test Strips, utilizes coulometric biosensor technology to quantitatively measure the glucose concentration in whole blood samples and in FreeStyle Control Solutions. The FreeStyle InsuLinx Meter measures glucose electrochemically. The glucose biosensor is capable of recognizing the glucose present in whole blood or control solutions by virtue of the glucose specificity of the enzyme glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) present on the glucose test strip. The electrons liberated by this reaction are transferred via a co-factor and mediator to the meter where they are read as a small electrical current. The current is integrated over the analysis time to generate charge which is directly proportional to the level of the glucose in the applied sample.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Within-run precision was measured by using five spiked venous whole blood
{3}
samples (hematocrit ranging from $35\%$ to $50\%$ ). Each sample was tested on three lots of test strips on ten meters. Ten replicates were tested per meter, test strip lot, and glucose concentration, $(n = 100$ tests per test strip lot). Results are summarized below:
| Strip Lot | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 50 | 1.8 | 3.5 |
| 2 | 46 | 1.5 | 3.3 |
| 3 | 47 | 1.4 | 3.1 |
| 1 | 97 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 2 | 96 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
| 3 | 94 | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| 1 | 149 | 3.6 | 2.4 |
| 2 | 145 | 4.9 | 3.4 |
| 3 | 143 | 4.0 | 2.8 |
| 1 | 246 | 7.2 | 2.9 |
| 2 | 245 | 10.4 | 4.2 |
| 3 | 237 | 7.2 | 3.0 |
| 1 | 410 | 13.4 | 3.3 |
| 2 | 405 | 20.7 | 5.1 |
| 3 | 393 | 15.2 | 3.9 |
Between-day precision was measured by reading three levels of control solutions. Each sample was tested on three lots of test strips, twenty replicates per day for ten days using ten meters, (n=200 tests per test strip lot). Results are summarized below:
| Strip Lot | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 55 | 1.3 | 2.3 |
| 2 | 53 | 1.7 | 3.2 |
| 3 | 52 | 1.6 | 3.1 |
| 1 | 103 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| 2 | 101 | 2.8 | 2.7 |
| 3 | 99 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| 1 | 306 | 7.0 | 2.3 |
| 2 | 296 | 7.6 | 2.6 |
| 3 | 297 | 7.8 | 2.6 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
A linearity study was performed using nine spiked venous whole blood samples that covered the claimed measuring range. All samples were tested on six lots of test strips, ten measurements per test strip lot, on the FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meter. Glucose concentrations were tested on the
{4}
YSI 2300 analyzer to generate the expected values. The observed values were plotted against the expected values and an appropriate line fitted by standard linear regression was generated with results summarized below:
Linear Regression Analysis:
Lot 1: $\mathrm{y} = 0.98\mathrm{x} + 4.2,\mathrm{r}^2 = 0.997.$
Lot 2: $\mathrm{y} = 1.00\mathrm{x} + 2.6,\mathrm{r}^2 = 0.997.$
Lot 3: $\mathrm{y} = 0.99\mathrm{x} + 5.2,\mathrm{r}^2 = 0.997.$
Lot 4: $\mathrm{y} = 0.96\mathrm{x} + 0.9,\mathrm{r}^2 = 0.998.$
Lot 5: $\mathrm{y} = 0.99\mathrm{x} + 1.3,\mathrm{r}^2 = 0.996.$
Lot 6: $\mathrm{y} = 0.99\mathrm{x} + 3.9,\mathrm{r}^2 = 0.995.$
Based upon the results, the sponsor claims a measurement range of 20 to 500 mg/dL for the FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meter.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): The FreeStyle Control Solutions were previously cleared under k070850. Ranges for each control level are on the test strip vial labels.
FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Test Strip used for the FreeStyle InsuLinx System is the renamed brand name for "FreeStyle Lite Test Strip" which was cleared under k092602. The test strip stability was assessed in real time study. The testing supports the claimed shelf life of 24 months when stored at $4-30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ in desiccated vials.
d. Detection limit:
The reportable range is 20 to $500\mathrm{mg / dL}$ based on linearity/reportable range studies above (section M.1.b.).
e. Analytical specificity:
The sponsor performed interference studies with spiked venous blood samples at two glucose concentrations (100 and $300\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ) that were prepared and divided into a test (dosed) pool and a control pool. Studies were conducted using three FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meters and three lots of test strips. Significant interference is defined as a bias $\geq 10\%$ from the control group as measured on YSI 2300 analyzer. The sponsor claims no significant interference ( $\leq 10\%$ difference) for the substances and concentrations shown in the table below:
| Compound | Concentration with <10% interference (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 20 |
| Ascorbate | 5 |
| Beta-Hydroxybutyrate | 100 |
| Bilirubin (unconjugated) | 20 |
| Cholesterol | 500 |
| Creatinine | 30 |
{5}
| Dopamine | 13 |
| --- | --- |
| Ephedrine | 10 |
| Galactose | 100 |
| Ibuprofen | 50 |
| L-Dopa | 5 |
| Lactate | 100 |
| Lactose | 100 |
| Maltose | 100 |
| Methyl-Dopa | 2.5 |
| Pyruvate | 10 |
| Salicylic acid | 50 |
| Tetracycline | 4 |
| Tolazamide | 100 |
| Tolbutamide | 100 |
| Triglyceride | 3000 |
| Uric acid | 40 |
Interference was observed with xylose at 100 mg/dL and is indicated in the test strip labeling.
f. Assay cut-off: Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The sponsor conducted a combined accuracy and consumer study at two sites with trained operators and a total of 146 lay-users. Each lay user participant performed their own finger stick and tested their blood on the FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose meter using only the instructions in the Owner's Booklet and test strip insert. A trained operator then performed a second finger stick and tested the blood on the same meter. A whole blood sample from the subject's fingertip was collected by the trained operator for hematocrit determination and analysis on the YSI 2300 analyzer. The total range of samples tested was 33 to 471 mg/dL for lay users and 30 to 495 mg/dL for trained operators. Seven altered samples were tested by trained operators only. Linear regression results are presented below:
Linear Regression Analysis:
Lay user vs. YSI $y = 1.00x + 2.7, r = 0.990, n = 146$
Professional vs. YSI $y = 1.03x + 0.7, r = 0.995, n = 153$
The study results met the ISO 15197 accuracy criteria where ninety-five percent (95%) of the individual glucose results fell within ±15mg/dL of the YSI results at glucose concentrations <75mg/dL and within ±20% at glucose concentrations ≥75mg/dL.
{6}
7
| For glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| User | Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| Lay User | 11/13 (85%) | 12/13 (92%) | 13/13 (100%) |
| Professional | 13/16 (81%) | 15/16 (94%) | 16/16 (100%) |
| For glucose concentrations >75 mg/dL | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| User | Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| Lay User | 72/133 (54%) | 120/133 (90%) | 130/133 (98%) | 131/133 (98%) |
| Professional | 88/137 (64%) | 123/137 (90%) | 134/137 (98%) | 137/137 (100%) |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The expected glucose range for a non-diabetic, non-pregnant fasting adult is less than 100 mg/dL. Two hours after meals, levels should be less than 140 mg/dL. The healthcare professional determines the range that is appropriate for the patient.
Reference:
American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2011. Diabetes Care 2011; 34 (Suppl.1) S11-S61.
N. Instrument Names:
The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meter,
O. Systems Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
{7}
Each test strip is single use and requires a sample volume of $0.3\ \mu\mathrm{l}$ or greater.
Does the applicant's device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?:
Yes ☐ X or No ☐
Does the applicant's device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?:
Yes ☐ or No ☐ X
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant's Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
For single patient home users, the device is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the fingertip, which is directly applied to the test strip.
5. Calibration:
The FreeStyle InsuLinx meter is programmed with a predetermined calibration slope and intercept of the FreeStyle Lite Blood Glucose Test Strip and therefore does not require user interface coding activities. The FreeStyle InsuLinx meter does not require coding of the device.
6. Quality Control:
The FreeStyle Control Solutions were previously cleared under k013147. There are three levels of Control Solution; Low (40 to $70\ \mathrm{mg/dL}$), Medium (83 to 125 mg/dL) and High (248 to $372\ \mathrm{mg/dL}$). The control ranges are listed on the test strip vial.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
1. A usability study was performed to assess the readability of the labeling by 146 U.S. lay users (aged 19-81 yrs old) who were provided with the test kit containing labeling in English for the US market. Participants varied in age, education, and were evenly divided between men and women. These lay users also completed a questionnaire to indicate whether the device is easy to use and the instructions for use were written in a way that makes it easy to use.
{8}
2. Flesch-Kincaid readability assessment was conducted and the results showed that the labeling Owner's Booklet and test strip package insert were written at less than an 8th grade level.
3. A sample volume study was performed to verify the test strip sample volume requirement and the test strip fill error requirement established for the FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose meter. Whole blood adjusted to three glucose concentrations (48, 105 and 400 mg/dL) were measured with three meters and two test strip lots. Protocols and acceptance criteria were provided and found to be acceptable. Insufficient volume of less than 0.3 μL will not produce a result.
4. Infection Control studies: The FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for single-patient use only. Disinfection efficacy studies were performed on the materials comprising the meter by an outside commercial testing facility demonstrating complete inactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) with the chosen disinfectant, Dispatch Hospital Cleaner Disinfectant Towels with Bleach (EPA Reg. No: 56392-8). Robustness studies were performed by the sponsor demonstrating that there was no change in performance or external materials for the meter and lancing device after 522 cleanings and 522 disinfection steps with Dispatch Hospital Cleaner Disinfectant Towels. The robustness studies were designed to simulate 5 years of single-patient use. Labeling was reviewed for adequate instructions for the validated cleaning and disinfection procedures.
5. The data transmission capability, data transmission port, software and USB connection cable was evaluated in usability study and found to be acceptable. Additionally, verification and validation of these functions were conducted and found to be acceptable.
6. A test certificate for EMC testing and compliance with the relevant regulations was issued by Elliott Laboratories on February 9, 2011.
7. Hematocrit Study: The effect of different hematocrit levels on the accuracy of the device was evaluated on the FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Monitoring System with ten meters and three test strip lots. Venous blood samples at seven hematocrit levels (15, 20, 25, 40, 55, 60 and 65%) were adjusted to five concentrations of glucose of 47, 113, 217, 341 and 453 mg/dL. Results of samples at each hematocrit level (N=30) were compared to samples with the same glucose concentration at normal (40%) hematocrit as well as to the corresponding YSI value. All individual results for each meter were within ±15% of the YSI, supporting the claimed hematocrit range of 15 to 65%.
8. Altitude Study: A venous blood sample was adjusted to three different glucose concentrations (48, 105 and 400 mg/dL). Each venous blood sample was tested using ten meters and three lots of test strips. Tests were performed at two elevations (sea level and 10,742 feet). All individual results for each meter were
9
{9}
within ±10% of the YSI, supporting the claimed altitude range of up to 10,000 feet for the glucose meter.
9. The sponsor claims an operating condition range of 4 to 40°C (40 to 104°F) and 5 to 90% relative humidity. Combinations of the claimed temperature and humidity operating conditions were evaluated by measuring whole blood samples at target glucose concentrations of 45, 100, and 400 mg/dL and comparing the meter results to a reference method. The results demonstrated that the system produces accurate results over the claimed range of operating conditions.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.