STA(R) - LIQUID ANTI-XA, MULTI HEP CALIBRATOR, QUALITY HNF / UFH, QUALITY HBPM / LMWH
K111822 · Diagnostica Stago, Inc. · KFF · Oct 26, 2011 · Hematology
Device Facts
Record ID
K111822
Device Name
STA(R) - LIQUID ANTI-XA, MULTI HEP CALIBRATOR, QUALITY HNF / UFH, QUALITY HBPM / LMWH
Applicant
Diagnostica Stago, Inc.
Product Code
KFF · Hematology
Decision Date
Oct 26, 2011
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 864.7525
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The STA® Liquid Anti-Xa kits are intended for use with STA-R®, STA Compact® and STA Satellite® analyzers, for the quantitative determination of the plasma levels of unfractionated (UFH) and low molecular weight (LMWH) heparins by measuring their anti-Xa activity on antithrombin in a competitive assay using a synthetic chromogenic substrate. The STA® Multi Hep Calibrator is a set of calibrator plasmas intended for use with STA-R®, STA Compact® and STA Satellite® analyzers, for the calibration of heparin (UFH and LMWH) activity assay by measuring the anti-Xa activity. The STA® Quality HNF/UFH kit is a set of two plasmas intended for the quality control of unfractionated heparin (UFH) activity assay by measuring the anti-Xa activity performed on STA-R®, STA Compact® and STA Satellite® analyzers. The STA® Quality HBPM/LMWH kit is a set of two plasmas intended for the quality control of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) activity assay by measuring the anti-Xa activity performed on STA-R®, STA Compact® and STA Satellite® analyzers.
Device Story
STA® Liquid Anti-Xa is a chromogenic assay for quantitative measurement of UFH and LMWH in citrated human plasma. Input: patient plasma sample; Reagents: bovine factor Xa and chromogenic substrate. Principle: competitive assay where heparin-antithrombin complex inhibits factor Xa; residual factor Xa hydrolyzes substrate, releasing paranitroaniline; color intensity at 405 nm is inversely proportional to heparin concentration. Used in clinical laboratories on STA-R®, STA Compact®, and STA Satellite® analyzers. Output: heparin concentration (IU/mL). Results assist clinicians in monitoring anticoagulant therapy. Benefits: provides standardized, liquid-reagent-based monitoring of heparin activity to guide dosing decisions.
Clinical Evidence
Method comparison study conducted at 5 sites with 1017 patients (623 UFH, 394 LMWH). Compared subject device to predicate (STA-Rotachrom Heparin). Results: UFH slope 0.993 (95% CI 0.975-1.011), intercept -0.046, r=0.974; LMWH slope 1.004 (95% CI 0.995-1.014), intercept 0.008, r=0.995. Precision: repeatability %CV <7%, reproducibility %CV <10%. Linearity confirmed up to 1.10 IU/mL (UFH) and 2.0 IU/mL (LMWH).
Technological Characteristics
Chromogenic assay; lyophilized human plasma calibrators/controls; synthetic chromogenic substrate. Analyzers: STA-R®, STA Compact®, STA Satellite®. Connectivity: Integrated with Stago analyzers. Sterilization: Not applicable (reagents).
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative determination of unfractionated (UFH) and low molecular weight (LMWH) heparin levels in human plasma. Used for monitoring heparin activity in patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy. Contraindications not specified.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A heparin assay is a device used to determine the level of the anticoagulant heparin in the patient's circulation. These assays are quantitative clotting time procedures using the effect of heparin on activated coagulation factor X (Stuart factor) or procedures based on the neutralization of heparin by protamine sulfate (a protein that neutralizes heparin).
Predicate Devices
STA®-Rotachrom® Heparin (k010455)
STA®-Calibrator HBPM/LMWH (k010350)
STA®-Hepanorm H Calibrator Plasma Set (k854762)
STA®-Heparin Control (k943520)
STA®-Quality HBPM/LMWH (k010324)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k111822
B. Purpose for Submission:
Clearance of a new device
C. Measurand:
Heparin
D. Type of Test:
Chromogenic assay
E. Applicant:
Diagnsotica Stago Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
STA®-Liquid Anti-Xa
STA®-Multi Hep Calibrator
STA®-Quality NHF/UFH
STA®-Quality HBPM/LMWH
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR §864.7525, Heparin Assay
21 CFR §864.5425, Multipurpose system for in vitro coagulation studies
21 CFR §862.1150, Calibrator
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
KFF, Assay, Heparin
GGN, Plasma, Coagulation Control
JIS, Calibrator, Primary
4. Panel:
81 Hematology
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The STA® Liquid Anti-Xa kits are intended for use with STA-R®, STA Compact® and STA Satellite® analyzers, for the quantitative determination of the plasma levels of unfractionated (UFH) and low molecular weight (LMWH) heparins by measuring their anti-Xa activity on antithrombin in a competitive assay using a synthetic chromogenic substrate.
The STA® Multi Hep Calibrator is a set of calibrator plasmas intended for use with STA-R®, STA Compact® and STA Satellite® analyzers, for the calibration of heparin (UFH and LMWH) activity assay by measuring the anti-Xa activity.
The STA® Quality HNF/UFH kit is a set of two plasmas intended for the quality control of unfractionated heparin (UFH) activity assay by measuring the anti-Xa activity performed on STA-R®, STA Compact® and STA Satellite® analyzers.
{1}
The STA® Quality HBPM/LMWH kit is a set of two plasmas intended for the quality control of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) activity assay by measuring the anti-Xa activity performed on STA-R®, STA Compact® and STA Satellite® analyzers.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as above
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
STA® line of analyzers: STA Satellite®, STA-R® and STA Compact®
I. Device Description:
The STA® Liquid Anti-Xa kit is available in two sizes. A 4 mL kit consists of 6x4 mL vials of liquid chromogenic substrate and 6x4 mL vials of bovine factor Xa, buffers and preservative. The 8 mL kit has the same reagents as the 4 mL kit.
The STA® Multi Hep Calibrator kit consists of 5 levels of lyophilized human plasma containing a defined quantity of both UFH and LMWH. Calibrator 1 has no heparin, calibrators 2 and 4 contain different concentrations of UFH and calibrators 3 and 5 contain different concentrations of LMWH.
The STA® Quality HBPM/LMWH Controls come as reagent 1 and reagent 2 sets, each consisting of six (6) 1 mL vials. Reagent sets 1 and 2 contain different known concentrations of LMWH.
The STA® Quality HNF/UFH Controls come as reagent 1 and reagent 2 sets, each consisting of six (6) 1 mL vials. Reagent sets 1 and 2 contain different known concentrations of UFH.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s) and 510(k) number(s):
STA®-Rotachrom® Heparin, k010455
STA®-Calibrator HBPM/LMWH, k010350
STA®-Hepanorm H Calibrator Plasma Set, k854762
STA®-Heparin Control k943520
STA®-Quality HBPM/LMWH, k010324
2. Comparison with predicate:
{2}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device STA®-Liquid Anti-Xa | Predicate STA®-Rotachrom® Heparin (k010455) |
| Intended Use | Quantitative determination of unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in citrated human plasma. | Assay of UFH and LMWH on STA analyzers |
| Assay Method | Chromogenic method (measurement of the chromogenic substrate at 405 nm) | Same |
| Test Principle | Measurement of anti-Xa activity in terms of antithrombin-heparin complex. The activity of the complex is a function of the level of heparin | Same |
| Sample type | Citrated human plasma | Same |
| Analyzers | STA® Satellite, STA-R® and STA®-Compact | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device STA®-Liquid Anti-Xa | Predicate STA®-Rotachrom® Heparin (k010455) |
| Assay Form | Liquid Reagents | Lyophilized (reagents 1 & 2) Liquid (reagent 3) |
| Packaging Content | Two reagents Reagent 1 is the chromogenic substrate Reagent 2 contains bovine Factor Xa | Three reagents Reagent 1 is the chromogenic substrate. Reagent 2 and 3 consist of bovine Factor Xa and its solvent, respectively. |
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device STA®-Multi Hep Calibrator | Predicate STA®-Calibrator HBPM/LMWH (k010350) |
| Intended Use | The STA® - Multi Hep Calibrator is a set of calibrator plasmas intended for use with STA-R®, STA Compact® and STA Satellite® analyzers for the calibration of heparin (UFH and LMWH) activity assay by measuring the anti-Xa activity using the chromogenic method, STA® - Liquid Anti-Xa. | The STA® - Calibrator HBPM/LMWH kit provides a set of calibrator plasmas intended for use by analyzers of the STA® line suitable with these reagents, for the calibration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) assays based on the anti-Xa principle, STA® - Rotachrom® Heparin. |
| Design | Lyophilized human plasmas reconstituted with distilled water, used in IVD analyzers. Stored at 2-8°C | Same |
{3}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device STA®-Multi Hep Calibrator | Predicate STA®-Calibrator HBPM/LMWH (k010350) |
| Traceability | The UFH levels are determined against the 07/328 International Standard for UFH established in 2009. The LMWH levels are determined against the 01/608 International Standard for LMWH established in 2003. | The LMWH levels are determined against a secondary standard of the 01/608 International Standard for LMWH established in 2003. |
| Kit Contents | Five reagents Reagent 1 is free of heparin. Reagents 2 and 4 contain different quantities of UFH. Reagents 3 and 5 contain different quantities of LMWH. | Three reagents Reagent 1 is free of heparin. Reagents 2 and 3 contain different quantities of LMWH. |
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device STA®-Multi Hep Calibrator | Predicate STA®-Hepanorm H (k854762) |
| Intended Use | The STA®-Multi Hep Calibrator is a set of calibrator plasma intended for use with the STA-R®, STA Compact® and STA Satellite® analyzers for the calibration of heparin (UFH and LMWH) activity assay by measuring the anti-XA activity using the chromogenic method, STA® Liquid Anti-Xa. | The STA® Hepanorm H kit provides a set of calibrator plasma intended for use by analyzers of the STA® line suitable with these reagents, for the calibration of unfractionated heparin (UFH) assays based on the anti-Xa principle (STA Rotachrom® Heparin, STA Staclot® Heparin, Stachrom® Heparin. |
| Design | Lyophilized human plasmas reconstituted with distilled water, used in IVD analyzers. Stored at 2-8°C. | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device STA®-Multi Hep Calibrator | Predicate STA®-Hepanorm H (k854762) |
| Principles of Operation | Chromogenic | Chromogenic and clotting methods |
| Kit Contents | Five reagents Reagent 1 is free of heparin. Reagents 2 and 4 contain different quantities of UFH. Reagents 3 and 5 contain different quantities of LMWH. | Three reagents Reagent 1 is free of heparin. Reagents 2 and 3 contain different quantities of UFH. |
| Traceability | The UFH levels are determined against the 07/328 International Standard for UFH established in 2009. The LMWH levels are determined against the 01/608 International Standard for LMWH established in 2003. | The LMWH levels are determined against a secondary standard of the 07/328 International Standard for UFH established in 2009. |
{4}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device STA®-Quality NHF/UFH | Predicate STA®-Heparin Control (k943520) |
| Intended Use | The STA® - Quality HNF/UFH is a set of two plasmas intended for the quality control of unfractionated heparin (UFH) activity assay by measuring the anti-Xa activity using the chromogenic method, STA® - Liquid Anti-Xa. | The STA® - Heparin Control kit provides a set of two plasmas intended for the quality control of unfractionated heparin (UFH) activity assay by measuring the anti-Xa activity using clotting assay (STA® - Staclot® Heparin) and chromogenic assays (STA® - Rotachrom® Heparin, Stachrom® Heparin). |
| Design | Lyophilized human plasmas reconstituted with distilled water, used in IVD analyzers. Stored at 2-8°C. | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device STA®-Quality HBPM/LMWH | Predicate STA®-Heparin Control (k010324) |
| Analyzers | STA-R®, STA Compact® and STA Satellite® analyzers | STA-R®, STA Compact® and STA Satellite® analyzers (STA® - Rotachrom® Heparin, STA® - Staclot® Heparin). Water bath (STA® - Staclot® Heparin and Stachrom® Heparin) |
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device STA®-Quality HBPM/LMWH | Predicate STA®-HBPM/LMWH (k010324) |
| Intended Use | The STA® - Quality HBPM/LMWH is a set of two plasmas intended for the quality control of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) activity assay by measuring the anti-Xa activity using the chromogenic method, STA® - Liquid Anti-Xa. | The STA® - Quality HBPM/LMWH kit is a set of two plasmas intended for the quality control of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) activity assay by measuring the anti-Xa activity performed on analyzers of the STA® line suitable with these reagents. |
| Design | Lyophilized human plasmas reconstituted with distilled water, used in IVD analyzers. Stored at 2-8°C. | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device STA®-Quality HBPM/LMWH | Predicate STA®-HBPM/LMWH (k010324) |
| Assay Reagent | STA®- Liquid Anti-Xa and STA® - Rotachrom® Heparin. | STA® - Rotachrom® Heparin |
{5}
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- CLSI EP05-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods, 2nd Edition, 08/20/2004.
- CLSI EP06-A2: Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach, Approved Guidelines, 01/01/2003
- CLSI EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline. 2nd Edition, 01/01/2005
- CLSI EP09-A2-1R: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples: Approved Guideline. 2nd Edition (Interim Edition), 07/01/2010
- CLSI EP17-A: Protocols for the Limit of Detection ad Limit of Quantitation; Approved Guideline, 01/01/2004
- CLSI EP25-A: Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents: Approved Guideline, 01/01/2009
L. Test Principle:
The normal function of a molecule of factor Xa, when present in plasma, is to cleave its natural substrate, prothrombin, to generate thrombin. Thrombin is the enzyme responsible for the formation of the fibrin clot. In the presence of heparin, competition occurs between this mechanism and the inhibitory mechanism exerted by the heparin-antithrombin complex. This inhibitory mechanism is largely responsible for the anticoagulant action of heparin.
The proposed method is a one-step reaction based on a similar principle: as soon as factor Xa is added to the plasma-substrate mixture, two reactions take place simultaneously, namely,
- Hydrolysis of the substrate by factor Xa
- Inhibition of factor Xa by the heparin-antithrombin complex*.
After the necessary period of time for the competitive reaction to reach equilibrium, the quantity of paranitroaniline that is released is inversely proportional to the concentration of heparin present in the test medium.
* The heparin-antithrombin complex is made up from the heparin and the antithrombin (AT) specific to the patient.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility
Reproducibility and repeatability studies were performed using six human plasma samples spiked with various known concentrations of UF and LMW heparin. All samples are lyophilized human plasmas reconstituted. Samples 1, 2 and 3 were spiked with UFH and samples 4, 5 and 6 were spiked with LMWH. Within each run, the raw data results obtained were processed using one of two different calibrators (3 or 5 point). Testing included using 2 different lots of the assay on alternating days at two sites. Each sample was tested for 22 operating days, twice a day with one operator at each of the two laboratory sites.
For repeatability (within-day precision), each sample was run twice a day for 22 days with one operator per site. The overall mean, SD and %CV were calculated for each sample tested.
For reproducibility (between-run and total-run precision), for each day, two separate runs were performed alternating two reagent lots of STA Liquid Anti Xa
6
{6}
on two analyzers (STA-R and STA Compact) with one operator at each site over 22 days.
The within-run, between-run and total-run performance was assessed. The mean SD, $\% \mathrm{CV}$ were calculated for each of the 6 samples tested. The overall $\% \mathrm{CV}$ for repeatability was $< 7\%$ and reproducibility was $< 10\%$ . These results were within the acceptance criteria of $\leq 12\%$ for repeatability and $\leq 14\%$ for reproducibility.
| Sample/ Calibrator | Repeatability %CV | | Total-Run Precision %CV | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | UHF | LMWH | UHF | LMWH |
| Sample 1-5pt | 6.1 | | 8.7 | |
| Sample 1-3pt | 5.7 | | 8.0 | |
| Sample 2-5pt | 3.4 | | 6.0 | |
| Sample 2-3pt | 3.2 | | 5.6 | |
| Sample 3-5pt | 3.2 | | 5.5 | |
| Sample 3-3pt | 3.2 | | 4.9 | |
| Sample 4-5pt | | 3.0 | | 4.6 |
| Sample 4-3pt | | 3.0 | | 5.0 |
| Sample 5-5pt | | 2.6 | | 4.6 |
| Sample 5-3pt | | 2.6 | | 4.0 |
| Sample 6-5pt | | 2.9 | | 5.0 |
| Sample 6-3pt | | 2.4 | | 5.1 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Assay linearity was determined using separate WHO International LMW and UF Heparin standards diluted with normal pooled plasma. The WHO standards and normal pooled plasma were mixed and diluted to 5 levels of concentration ranging from 0 to $1.10\mathrm{IU / mL}$ for UFH and 0 to $2.0\mathrm{IU / mL}$ for LMWH. Each dilution level was analyzed 10 times on representative STA® analyzers (STA-Compact®, STA-R® and STA Satellite®) with the STA-Liquid Anti-Xa assay and the mean value was plotted against the expected values. Results demonstrated acceptable linearity up to $1.10\mathrm{IU / mL}$ for UHF and up to $2.0\mathrm{IU / mL}$ for LMWH on all the analyzers in the study.
# c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): Traceability:
Each lot of calibrator and control are prepared from citrated plasma, and are traceable to the $2^{\mathrm{nd}}$ International WHO Standards 07/328 (established in 2009) and 01/608 (established in 2003) for UFH and LMWH respectively.
# Stability
A real-time stability study for STA-Liquid Anti-Xa heparin reagent was performed using three lots of heparin reagent with four different control samples and calibrators. Heparin reagents were tested at time zero and stored at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . Stability testing was conducted at 6, 12, 15 and 16 months with LMWH and UFH controls and analyzed 10 times on STA-R® analyzer using the stored reagents and calibrators. The mean results were compared to the mean result at time zero with a maximum shift of $< 0.07$ IU/mL which met the acceptance criteria of $< 0.15$ IU/mL. Real-time stability data are available for up to 16 months and the study is ongoing to support a 24 month claim.
{7}
The accelerated stability study for STA-Quality NHF/UHF control and Multi Hep Calibrator was performed on 3 lots at elevated temperature of $30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 21 days for estimating 24 month stability at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . Overall change compared to time zero at 3 weeks was $< 0.04$ IU/mL which met the acceptance criteria of $< 0.10$ IU/mL for the control and calibrators. Data supported a stability claim of 24 months.
# d. Detection limit:
Detection limit was determined by spiking each of 6 human plasma samples with a known concentration (0.03-0.16 IU/mL) of UFH and LMWH. Testing was performed on four replicates over 3 runs on 3 different STA® analyzers (2-STA-R® and 1-STA Compact®) using 2 lots of Liquid Anti-Xa assay. The detection limit was determined for each test lot using the calculation LoD = LoB + cβ SDs. The UFH detection threshold is 0.07 IU/mL and the LMWH detection threshold is 0.10 IU/mL.
# e. Analytical specificity:
Interference studies were determined on the STA® instrument line (STA-R®, STA-Satellite® and STA-Compact®) for STA-Liquid-Xa, STA-Multi Hep, STA-Quality HNF/UFH and STA Quality HBPM/LMWH. Normal pooled plasma was spiked with two levels of UFH and LMWH. Interferents were spiked into the 2 levels of spiked UFH and LMWH plasma resulting in 5 concentrations and each concentration was tested five times. Acceptance criterion was $<0.25$ IU/mL when compared to the un-spiked sample results. The maximum tolerated concentrations were:
| Interferents | Max tolerated concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Hemoglobin | 1.5 g/L |
| Unconjugated bilirubin | 236 μmol/L or 138 mg/L |
| Conjugated bilirubin | 342 μmol/L or 288 mg/L |
| Triglyceride | 8 mmol/L or 6.9 g/L |
# f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
# 2. Comparison studies:
# a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A method comparison study was conducted at 5 sites (1-internal, 1-US and 3 European), comparing STA-Liquid Anti Xa assay, controls and calibrator with the predicate device (STA-Rotachrom Heparin). A total of 1017 patients (623 on UFH and 394 on LMWH) participated in the study. Patients used the following LMWH in the study as part of their therapy: Lovenox, Fragmin, and Innohep. Acceptance criteria were established as the following:
| UHF-Linear Regression | LMWH-Linear Regression |
| --- | --- |
| 0.85 ≤ Slope ≤1.10 | 0.90 ≤ Slope ≤1.10 |
| Y-intercept ≤0.010 IU/mL | Y-intercept ≤0.010 IU anti-Xa/mL |
| r ≤ 0.95 | r ≤ 0.95 |
{8}
The results of the studies are as follows:
| Sites | N | Slope 95% confidence interval | | Intercept 95% confidence interval | | Correlation Coefficient | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | LMWH/UFH | LMWH | UFH | LMWH | UFH | LMWH | UFH |
| Internal | 110/62 | 0.988 (0.974-1.001) | 0.905 (0.835-.976) | -0.008 (-0.015-(-0.001)) | -0.051 (-0.077-(-0.024)) | 0.997 | .0957 |
| Site 1 | 41/150 | 1.032 (0.993-1.071) | 1.026 (0.994-1.059) | -0.015 (-0.043-(-0.012)) | -0.074 (-0.089-(-0.058)) | 0.993 | 0.981 |
| Site 2 | 134/124 | 0.998 (0.983-1.013) | 1.059 (1.018-1.099) | 0.024 (0.013-0.035) | -0.068 (-0.085-(-0.051)) | 0.996 | .0978 |
| Site 3 | 109/148 | 0.985 (0.966-1.004) | 0.995 (0.962-1.028) | 0.027 (0.018-0.035) | -0.029 (-0.041-(-0.018)) | 0.995 | 0.980 |
| Site 4 | 0/139 | Not applicable | 1.014 (0.977-1.051) | Not applicable | -0.047 (-0.061-(-0.034)) | Not applicable | 0.977 |
| Total | 394/623 | 1.004 (0.995-1.014) | 0.993 (0.975-1.011) | 0.008 (0.002-0.014) | -0.046 (-0.054-(-0.039)) | 0.995 | 0.974 |
Based on the above results from the study sites, the acceptance criteria were met.
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.