K110620 · Meridian Bioscience, Inc. · MCB · May 3, 2011 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K110620
Device Name
PREMIER C. DIFFICILE GDH
Applicant
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
Product Code
MCB · Microbiology
Decision Date
May 3, 2011
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.2660
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
Real-World Evidence, Pediatric
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K110620 · May 3, 2011
PREMIER C. DIFFICILE GDH
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
Clinical patient samples from independent clinical test sites
The clinical performance of the Premier C. difficile GDH assay was evaluated by comparing results against bacterial culture in 733 patient samples collected from symptomatic patients at multiple clinical sites.
Clinical performance evaluation compared to bacterial culture; Study Period: November 2011
Symptomatic persons suspected of having C. difficile infection (CDI); age range 22 days to 99 years; Sample Size: 733; Number of Sites: 5
Bacterial C. difficile culture
Sensitivity (92.3%) and Specificity (95.8%)
Indications for Use
Premier™ C. difficile GDH is a qualitative enzyme immunoassay screening test to detect Clostridium difficile antigen, glutamate dehydrogenase, in fecal specimens from symptomatic persons suspected of having C. difficile infection (CDI). This test does not distinguish between toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of C. difficile. Samples from symptomatic patients that produce positive results with this test must be further tested with an assay designed to detect toxigenic C. difficile strains and assist with the diagnosis of CDI.
Device Story
Premier™ C. difficile GDH is a qualitative enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detecting glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) antigen in fecal specimens. The device uses breakaway microwells coated with polyclonal rabbit anti-GDH antibodies. The process involves adding diluted patient stool and HRP-conjugated anti-GDH antibody to the wells; incubating; washing to remove unbound material; and adding a chromogenic substrate. The presence of GDH forms an antibody-enzyme complex, resulting in a blue color that turns yellow upon addition of stop solution. Results are interpreted spectrophotometrically. The test is performed in clinical laboratories by professional staff. It serves as a screening tool; positive results require follow-up testing for toxigenic strains to assist in CDI diagnosis. The device aids clinicians in identifying patients requiring further diagnostic workup for C. difficile infection.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical trial evaluated 733 patient samples (ages 22 days to 99 years) across multiple US sites. Compared to bacterial culture, the assay demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 92.3% (95% CI: 86.0-95.9%) and specificity of 95.8% (95% CI: 93.9-97.1%). No performance differences were observed based on age, gender, or geographic location.
Technological Characteristics
Qualitative enzyme immunoassay; breakaway microwells coated with polyclonal rabbit anti-GDH antibodies; HRP-conjugated detection antibody; chromogenic substrate (urea peroxide/tetramethylbenzidine); stop solution (1M phosphoric acid). Spectrophotometric readout (OD450 or OD450/630). Preservatives: ProClin® and gentamicin. Manual or automated microplate washer/incubator compatible.
Indications for Use
Indicated for symptomatic persons suspected of having C. difficile infection (CDI), including all ages (22 days to 99 years).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A microorganism differentiation and identification device is a device intended for medical purposes that consists of one or more components, such as differential culture media, biochemical reagents, and paper discs or paper strips impregnated with test reagents, that are usually contained in individual compartments and used to differentiate and identify selected microorganisms. The device aids in the diagnosis of disease.
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K110620
B. Purpose for Submission:
To seek clearance for the Premier™ C. difficile GDH Assay
C. Measurand:
Clostridium difficile antigen, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative enzyme immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Premier™ C. difficile GDH Assay
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section: 21 CFR 866.2660- Microorganism Differentiation and Identification Device
2. Classification: Class I
3. Product code: MCB- Antigen, C. difficile
4. Panel: 83, Microbiology
1
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
Premier™ C. difficile GDH is a qualitative enzyme immunoassay screening test to detect Clostridium difficile antigen, glutamate dehydrogenase, in fecal specimens from symptomatic persons suspected of having C. difficile infection (CDI). This test does not distinguish between toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of C. difficile. Samples from symptomatic patients that produce positive results with this test must be further tested with an assay designed to detect toxigenic C. difficile strains and assist with the diagnosis of CDI.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Premier™ C. difficile GDH is a qualitative enzyme immunoassay screening test to detect Clostridium difficile antigen, glutamate dehydrogenase, in fecal specimens from symptomatic persons suspected of having C. difficile infection (CDI). This test does not distinguish between toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of C. difficile. Samples from symptomatic patients that produce positive results with this test must be further tested with an assay designed to detect toxigenic C. difficile strains and assist with the diagnosis of CDI.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
Not Applicable
I. Device Description:
Premier™ C. difficile GDH is a qualitative enzyme immunoassay screening test to detect Clostridium difficile antigen, glutamate dehydrogenase, in fecal specimens from symptomatic persons suspected of having C. difficile infection (CDI). Breakaway microwells are coated with polyclonal rabbit anti-GDH antibodies. Diluted patient specimen and a horseradish peroxidase conjugated (HRP) anti-GDH antibody are added to the microwells and incubated to allow any antigen in the patient sample to bind the antibody conjugate and immobilized microwell antibody. Upon completion of the incubation, a wash step is performed to remove unbound material. If C. difficile GDH is present, an antibody-enzyme complex is formed. A chromogenic substrate is added to the microwells and incubated. A blue color develops in the presence of bound enzyme. Stop solution is added, changing the initial blue reaction to yellow. Test results are interpreted spectrophotometrically.
2
{2}
Reagents and Test Components provided:
- Premier™ C. difficile GDH Microwells: Polyclonal antibody-coated Microwells, specific to C. difficile GDH
- Premier™ C. difficile GDH Enzyme Conjugate: HRP-conjugated polyclonal antibodies specific to C. difficile GDH in a buffered protein solution containing 0.1% ProClin® and 0.03% gentamicin as preservatives
- Premier™ 20X Wash Buffer II: Concentrated wash buffer containing 0.2% thimerosal as a preservative. Reagent is diluted before use
- Premier™ Substrate I: Buffered solution containing urea peroxide and tetramethylbenzidine at pH 5.0
- Premier™ Stop Solution I: 1M Phosphoric acid
- Premier™ C. difficile GDH Sample Diluent/Negative Control: Buffered protein solution containing 0.1% ProClin® and 0.03% gentamicin as preservatives
- Premier™ C. difficile GDH Positive Control: C. difficile GDH in a buffered protein solution containing 0.1% ProClin® and 0.03% gentamicin as preservatives
- Transfer pipettes
- Microwell strip holder
- Microwell plate sealer
- General laboratory microplate washers and the StatFax™ incubator/shaker can be used with this assay. Use of this equipment is optional.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
TechLab C diff. Chek-60 ELISA
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K030992
{3}
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | K110620 | K030992 |
| Intended Use | Qualitative enzyme immunoassay screening test to detect Clostridium difficile glutamate dehydrogenase in fecal specimens from symptomatic persons suspected of having C. difficile infection (CDI). For professional use in a clinical laboratory setting. For use as an aid in diagnostic testing of samples from patients suspected of having C. difficile infection. | Same |
| Capture Reagents | Polyclonal antibodies specific to C. difficile GDH | Same |
| Specimen Preparation | 1. Add 200 uL of Sample Diluent/Negative Control to a test tube 2. Add 50 uL of thoroughly mixed stool to the Sample Diluent/Negative Control test tube. 3. Vortex tube. Add 100uL of diluted stool to microwell. | Same |
| Test Procedure | Add 1 drop (50 uL) Conjugate to each well Add 2 drops (100 uL) Substrate to each well. 2 drops of Positive Control and 100 uL of Sample Diluent/Negative Control are added to the microwells | Same |
| Interpretation of Results | Assay defines OD readings for positive and negative interpretations | Same |
{4}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | K110620 | K030992 |
| Detection Reagents | Rabbit polyclonal antibodies specific to C. difficile GDH conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) | Antigen-specific mouse monoclonal antibody conjugated to HRP. |
| Test Procedure | Microwells are washed 5-7 times with diluted Wash Buffer
2 drops (100 uL) of Stop Solution are added to the Microwells
Reaction must be read within 30 minutes of addition of Stop Solution | Microwells are washed 4 times with diluted Wash Buffer
1 drop (50 uL) of Stop Solution is added to the Microwells
Reaction must be read within 10 minutes of adding Stop Solution |
| OD Reader | Automatic | Automatic with Visual Read option |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
1. Guidance on Informed Consent for In Vitro Diagnostic Device Studies Using Leftover
Human Specimens that are Not Individually Identifiable - Guidance for Sponsors, Institutional Review Boards., Clinical Investigators and FDA Staff
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1588.html
2. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Statistical Guidance on Reporting Results from Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Tests.
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/osb/guidance/1620.html
## L. Test Principle:
Premier C. difficile GDH is a qualitative enzyme immunoassay screening test to detect Clostridium difficile antigen, glutamate dehydrogenase, in fecal specimens from symptomatic persons suspected of having C. difficile infection (CDI). Breakaway microwells are coated with polyclonal rabbit anti-GDH antibodies. Diluted patient specimen and a horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-GDH antibody are added to the microwells and incubated to allow any antigen in the patient sample to bind the antibody conjugate and the immobilized microwell antibody. Upon completion of the incubation, a wash step is performed to remove unbound material. If C. difficile GDH is present, an antibody-enzyme complex is formed. A chromogenic substrate is added to the microwells and incubated. A blue color develops in the
{5}
presence of bound enzyme. Stop solution is added, changing the initial blue reaction to yellow. Test results are interpreted spectrophotometrically.
Premier C. difficile GDH is based on the well-established, widely used microplate enzyme immunoassay platform. The predicate device, TECHLAB C. DIFF CHEK-60, is also built on this platform.
Premier C. difficile GDH Positive Control: Non-toxigenic C. difficile strain 11186 is grown in liquid media, harvested, and filtered to remove organisms. Bulk manufacture of Positive Control includes dilution of C. difficile GDH antigen in a buffered protein solution containing Gentamicin and ProClin™ as preservatives.
Rabbit polyclonal anti-C. difficile Common Antigen antibody is used in the manufacture of Premier C. difficile GDH Enzyme Conjugate and Premier C. difficile GDH Microwells. The antibody is specific for C. difficile Common Antigen (GDH) and is internally manufactured at Meridian Bioscience. The antibody is purified using Protein-A, and is qualified for use by Meridian using internally qualified enzyme immunoassay (EIA) methods.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Reproducibility:
Reproducibility studies were performed by three clinical laboratories using blind coded panels. Samples were randomly sorted within each panel to mask identities. Each panel consisted of three contrived moderately positive specimens, three contrived low-positive specimens, three contrived high-negative specimens, and one natural negative specimen. The moderately-positive, low-positive, and high-negative samples were prepared from negative stool spiked with C. difficile GDH antigen. Panels were tested at three independent laboratories by two operators at each laboratory, twice each day over 5 non-consecutive days. Results were read at single (OD₄₅₀) and dual (OD₄₅₀/₆₃₀) wavelengths. The expected results were obtained with all samples by all technologists at all test sites at each time interval. Reproducibility of the assay is 100% for moderate positives, low-positives, high-negatives, and weak negatives.
#### b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable
#### c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
No calibrators are supplied or used with this assay.
6
{6}
7
External Controls:
Two External Control reagents are included with the Premier C. difficile GDH assay. External Controls aid the user in detection of reagent deterioration, adverse environmental or test conditions, washing failures, or variance in operator performance that can cause test errors. External Controls are required for routine Quality Control and should be included with each test run.
Positive Control:
C. difficile GDH antigen is in a buffered protein solution containing 0.1% ProClin®
and
0.03% gentamicin as preservatives. Non-toxigenic C. difficile 11186 is grown in liquid media, harvested, and filtered to remove organisms. Bulk manufacture of Positive Control includes dilution of C. difficile antigen in a buffered protein solution containing Gentamicin and ProClin® as preservatives. Negative Control: Buffered protein solution containing 0.1% ProClin® and 0.03% Gentamicin as preservatives.
Storage Conditions:
A Sample Storage study was designed to verify the adequacy of the sample age, preservation, handling, and storage criteria included in the Premier C. difficile GDH package insert. Aliquots of unpreserved contrived positive and negative samples were stored at the following temperatures to determine the worst case storage time for each temperature range: room (19-30 C), refrigerated (2-8 C), conventional freezer (-16 to -28 C), and ultralow freezer (-66 to -84 C). A total of 10 samples were tested, with the Limit of Detect (LoD), Low Positive (LP), and High Negative (HN) samples consisting of manufactured specimens. Results suggest that the Control reagents should optimally be stored at 2-8 C when not in use.
Stability:
Dating is provisionally set with data derived from accelerated stability studies. Results are confirmed with real-time shelf-life studies. Accelerated Stability performed with three lots of Positive and Negative Controls has verified the stability for at least 18 months under normal conditions of use and storage. Real-time studies are ongoing.
Expected Values:
Expected Values for OD₄₅₀:
Positive Control: ≥ 0.600
Negative Control: < 0.150
Expected Values for OD₄₅₀/₆₃₀:
Positive Control: ≥ 0.600
{7}
Negative Control: < 0.100
**Validation:**
The performance of the Positive and Negative Controls was validated as part of clinical trials.
**d. Detection limit:**
In order to determine the analytical limit of detection (LoD) of *C. difficile* GDH antigen diluted in a human stool matrix, purified GDH antigen was spiked into negative stool matrix and diluted serially two-fold. A minimum of 45 replicates of each concentration were tested to determine the concentration that represents the Limit of Blank, or the dilution that produces approximately 50% positive and 50% negative results. The next higher two-fold concentration from the Limit of Blank that produced a minimum of 95% positive results was determined to be the Limit of Detection. The next lower two-fold concentration from the Limit of Blank that produced a minimum of 95% negative results was determined to be the High Negative value.
Results: Limit of Blank = 4 ng/mL
Limit of Detection = 8 ng/mL
High Negative = 2 ng/mL
**e. Analytical specificity:**
**Interference Studies:**
Selected drugs and other non-microbial substances that might be present in stool samples from healthy persons or patients suspected of having *C. difficile* associated disease were added to three negative stool samples and three positive stool samples. The contrived positive specimens were prepared from a pool of donor stools that were confirmed as negative. The samples were inoculated with *C. difficile* strain 11186 at 8 ng/mL, which is the limit of detection for this assay. Potentially interfering substances were added at final concentrations of 5% V/V or greater. Dilution Controls for each sample were prepared by adding a phosphate-buffered saline solution in place of the potentially interfering substance. Each sample was tested in triplicate.
The following substances, at the specified saturated solvent/diluent concentrations, do not interfere with Premier *C. difficile* GDH test results in the final concentrations listed: Barium sulfate (5 mg/mL), Fecal fat (2.65 mg stearic acid and 1.3 mg palmitic acid/mL), Hemoglobin (3.2 mg/mL), Imodium AD® (Loperamide HCl) (6.67 x 10-3 mg/mL), Kaopectate® (Bismuth subsalicylate) (0.87 mg/mL), Metronidazole (12.5 mg/mL), Mucin (3.33 mg/mL), Mylanta® (Aluminum hydroxide w/ magnesium hydroxide) (4.2 mg/mL), Pepto-Bismol® (Bismuth subsalicylate) (0.87 mg/mL), Polyethylene glycol (79.05 mg/mL), Prilosec® (Omeprazole) (0.5 mg/mL), Simethicone (0.625 mg/mL), Tagamet® (Cimetidine) (0.5 mg/mL), Tums® (Calcium carbonate) (0.5 mg/mL), Vancomycin HCl (2.5 mg/mL), Whole blood (25%), White
8
{8}
blood cells (5%).
## Cross-reactivity Studies:
Potentially cross-reactive microorganisms that might be present in stool samples from healthy persons or patients suspected of having *C. difficile* associated disease were added to a natural negative and contrived positive sample. The contrived positive specimens were prepared from a pool of donor stools that was confirmed negative. The contrived positive sample was prepared by spiking a confirmed negative sample with *C. difficile* strain 11186 at 8 ng/mL, which is the limit of detection for this assay. Potentially cross-reactive microorganisms were added at final concentrations of 1.2 × 10⁸ CFU/mL (bacteria or fungi) or final concentrations greater than 1 × 10⁵ TCID₅₀/mL (viruses). Dilution controls for each sample were prepared by adding a 0.85% saline solution in place of the potentially cross-reactive organisms.
The following microorganisms, at the indicated concentrations, do not interfere with Premier *C. difficile* GDH test results: *Aeromonas hydrophila*, *Bacillus cereus*, *Bacillus subtilis*, *Bacteroides fragilis*, *Campylobacter coli*, *Campylobacter fetus*, *Campylobacter jejuni*, *Candida albicans*, *Citrobacter freundii*, *Clostridium butyricum*, *Clostridium bifermentans*, *Clostridium histolyticum*, *Clostridium novyi*, *Clostridium perfringens*, *Clostridium septicum*, *Clostridium sordellii*, *Clostridium tetani*, *Enterobacter aerogenes*, *Enterobacter cloacae*, *Enterococcus faecalis*, *Escherichia coli*, *Escherichia coli O157:H7*, *Escherichia hermannii*, *Escherichia fergusonii*, *Helicobacter pylori*, *Klebsiella pneumoniae*, *Lactococcus lactis*, *Listeria monocytogenes*, *Peptostreptococcus anaerobius*, *Plesiomonas shigelloides*, *Porphyromonas asaccharolytica*, *Proteus vulgaris*, *Pseudomonas aeruginosa*, *Pseudomonas fluorescens*, *Salmonella Group B*, *Salmonella Group C*, *Salmonella Group D*, *Salmonella Group E*, *Serratia liquefaciens*, *Serratia marcescens*, *Shigella boydii*, *Shigella flexneri*, *Shigella sonnei*, *Staphylococcus aureus*, *Staphylococcus epidermidis*, *Vibrio parahaemolyticus*, *Yersinia enterocolitica*, Adenovirus Type 40, Adenovirus Type 41, Coxsackievirus Strain B4, Echovirus Strain 11, Rotavirus Strain WA.
Stools spiked with *Staphylococcus aureus* (Cowan strain I) and *Clostridium sporogenes* were found to be cross-reactive with Premier *C. difficile* GDH.
## Strain Reactivity Studies:
*C. difficile* stock cultures from different sources were tested and produced positive reactions at a concentration of 5.7 × 10⁷ cells/mL with the Premier *C. difficile* GDH assay. Strains tested were as follows: 8864, 10463, 43598, 2004052, 2004111, 2004118, 2004205, 2004206, 2005070, 2005257, 2005325, 2006240, 2007431, 2007435, 2007858, 2008016, 2008029, 2008162, 2008188, 2008341, 2008351, 2009018, 2009065, 2009066, 2009099, 2009132, 2009155, 2009277, 11186, B1, BI8, BI17, BK6, CF1, G1, J7, K12, Y1, 234, 586, 611, 620, 2C62, 2C165, C122, UNC 19904, X15076.
9
{9}
f. Assay cut-off:
Premier C. difficile GDH is manufactured with a fixed cut-off with cut-off values of 0.200 at A450 or 0.150 at A450/630. This is accomplished on a lot to lot basis with specific procedures for optimizing solid phase and conjugate reagents. The validity of this cutoff was proven in verification studies on three lots of fully manufactured product and clinical trials performed on three lots of fully manufactured product.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not applicable
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Clinical trials for the Premier C. difficile GDH assay were conducted from November 2010 to February 2011. Performance characteristics of the Premier C. difficile assay were determined by comparison to bacterial C. difficile culture. Independent clinical test sites located in the Midwestern, Southeastern and Southwestern regions of the United States evaluated a total of 733 qualified patient samples. Samples were prospectively collected from 337 (46.0%) males and 390 (53.2%) females. Gender was not defined for 6 (1%) patients. The age groups of patients ranged from 22 days to 99 years. No differences in test performance were observed based on patient age, gender, or geographic location. Overall sensitivity was determined to be 92.3% (95% CI: 86.0 - 95.9%). Overall specificity was determined to be 95.8% (95% CI: 93.9 - 97.1%).
Performance Characteristics for Premier C. difficile GDH (by Site)
| | Positive Samples | | | Negative Samples | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Site | Premier GDH/ Culture | Sensitivity % | 95% CI | Premier GDH/ Culture | Specificity % | 95% CI |
| Total Sites | 108/117 | 92.3% | 86.0 – 95.9% | 590/616 | 95.8% | 93.9 – 97.1% |
| Site 1 | 13/16 | 81.3% | 57.0 – 93.4% | 84/87 | 96.6% | 90.3 – 98.8% |
| Site 2 | 28/30 | 93.3% | 78.7 – 98.2% | 132/140 | 94.3% | 89.1 – 97.1% |
| Site 3 | 44/46 | 95.7% | 85.5 – 98.8% | 147/153 | 96.1% | 91.7 – 98.2% |
{10}
11
| Site 4 | 15/15 | 100.0% | 79.6 – 100.0% | 169/175 | 96.6% | 92.7 – 98.4% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Site 5 | 8/10 | 80.0% | 49.0 – 94.3% | 58/61 | 95.1% | 86.5 – 98.4% |
- Discrepant specimens were evaluated using an FDA-cleared ELISA test for the detection of *C. difficile* GDH. This evaluation was not used to change the initial study results.
- Sixteen of the 26 false positive specimens were positive when tested with another FDA cleared GDH assay.
- Eight of the nine false negative specimens were negative when tested with another FDA cleared GDH assay
Performance Characteristics for Premier *C. difficile* GDH (by Patient Age)
| | Positive Samples | | | Negative Samples | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Patient Age | Premier GDH/ Culture | Sensitivity % | 95% CI | Premier GDH/ Culture | Specificity % | 95% CI |
| 0-28 days | 0/0 | N/A | N/A | 1/1 | 100.0% | 20.7 – 100.0% |
| 29 days to 2 years | 22/24 | 91.7% | 74.2 – 97.7% | 56/60 | 93.3% | 84.1 – 97.4% |
| > 2 years to < 12 years | 24/25 | 96.0% | 80.5 – 99.3% | 106/109 | 97.2% | 92.2 – 99.1% |
| 12 years to < 18 years | 9/11 | 81.8% | 52.3 – 94.9% | 59/61 | 96.7% | 88.8 – 99.1% |
| 18 years to 21 years | 3/4 | 75.0% | 30.1 – 95.4% | 22/23 | 95.7% | 79.0 – 99.2% |
| > 21 years | 50/53 | 94.3% | 84.6 – 98.1% | 345/361 | 95.6% | 92.9 – 97.3% |
| Not Defined | 0/0 | N/A | N/A | 1/1 | 100.0% | 20.7 – 100.0% |
b. Clinical specificity:
See 3a) above
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
{11}
The frequency of antibiotic-associated diarrhea caused by *C. difficile* is dependent on several factors including: patient population, type of institution and epidemiology. The reported incidence of *C. difficile* infection in patients suspected of having antibiotic-associated diarrhea is 15-25% although different facilities may find positivity rates outside this range.
**N. Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
**O. Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
12
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.