SNAP MODEL 8 SNORING AND APNEA RECORDING AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM
Applicant
Snap Diagnostics, LLC
Product Code
MNR · Anesthesiology
Decision Date
Mar 18, 2011
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 868.2375
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The SNAP Model 8 device is indicated for use in the diagnostic evaluation of patients for apnea and snoring and to provide quantitative and qualitative analysis of apnea and snoring. The SNAP Model 8 system is not intended as a substitute for full polysomnography when additional parameters such as sleep stages or EEG activity are required. The target population consists of patients who are suspected of apnea and/or complain about snoring. The majority of the test procedures will take place at the patient's home, although some may take place in a sleep laboratory. Both pediatric and adult patients may be tested.
Device Story
SNAP Model 8 is a portable, DC-powered recorder for sleep/respiratory disorder evaluation. Input sensors collect sound, pulse oximetry (SaO2, pulse), respiratory effort (belt), and body position. Data is digitized and stored on a removable SD card. Device is used primarily in home settings by patients; physician office software (GUI/DLL) programs the recorder and uploads data via internet to a central SNAP Diagnostics facility. Central analysis software processes data to mark sleep/respiratory events (e.g., apnea), generate reports, and upload results to a secure website for physician review. Output assists clinicians in diagnosing apnea and snoring. Benefits include home-based diagnostic convenience and quantitative/qualitative analysis of respiratory events.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Comparison of signals and analysis reports between Model 8 and predicate device (Model 7) performed by qualified technicians. Results demonstrated clinical equivalence in signal quality, data presentation, and report generation. EMC/safety testing verified compliance with CISPR 11:2009 and IEC 60601-1-2 standards.
Technological Characteristics
Flame retardant ABS plastic housing. 4 respiratory channels (14 Hz flow/effort, 2240 Hz audio), 2 oximeter channels (14 Hz), 1 optional body position channel. Power: AC 100-240v with 3.6v Lithium Ion battery backup. Connectivity: USB interface to PC, internet-based data transfer to central server. Software: GUI/DLL for recorder interface and central analysis. Standards: EN 60601-1-2:2007, CISPR 11:2009, IEC 60601-1-2.
Indications for Use
Indicated for pediatric and adult patients suspected of apnea or complaining of snoring. Not intended as a substitute for full polysomnography when sleep stages or EEG activity are required.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A breathing (ventilatory) frequency monitor is a device intended to measure or monitor a patient's respiratory rate. The device may provide an audible or visible alarm when the respiratory rate, averaged over time, is outside operator settable alarm limits. This device does not include the apnea monitor classified in § 868.2377.
Predicate Devices
SNAP MODEL 7 SNORING AND APNEA RECORDING AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM (K080321)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
K110064
MAR 1 8 2011
### SNAP Model 8 - 510(k) Summary
### 510(k) Owner
SNAP Diagnostics, LLC 5210 Capitol Drive Wheeling, IL 60090 Telephone: (847) 777-0000 Fax: (847) 465-3401
### 510(k) Contact Person
Gil Raviv, PhD SNAP Diagnostics, LLC 5210 Capitol Drive Wheeling, IL 60090 Telephone: (847) 777-0000 x203 Fax: (847) 465-3401
#### Date Summary Prepared
January 7, 2011
#### Name of Device
SNAP Model 8 Snoring and Apnea Recording and Analysis System
#### . Common Name
SNAP Model 8
#### Classification Name
Ventilatory Effort Recorder (21 CFR 868.2375, Product Code MNR)
#### Predicate Device
510(k): K080321, SNAP MODEL 7 SNORING AND APNEA RECORDING AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### Description of the Device
The SNAP Model 8 system consists of several components. The Model 8 data recorder and associated sensors and accessories, the SNAP application software which run on a PC in the physician's office, and the SNAP data analysis software located on computers at the SNAP Diagnostics central location.
The SNAP Model 8 Data Recorder is a small DC powered device designed to be simple and easy to use by a patient. It is self-contained, with integrated microcontroller and LCD display and all necessary interface electronics to perform all system recording functions. It does not require connection to a host computer in order to perform the recording functions. The data recorder consists of the physical hardware and firmware that interfaces to the patient to collect the physiological data. The recorder has sensors to collect sound, pulse oximetry, respiration effort (belt), and body position. The information is digitized and stored on a removable solid state memory card (SD card). The data on the removable data card is accessed through a USB port on the device, connecting to a PC running the SNAP application software. The recorder is made from flame retardant ABS plastic and has the following specifications.
| Respiratory Channels | 4 |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Sample Rate | 14 Hz (flow, effort), 2240 Hz (audio) |
| Measurements | Air Flow, Effort(2), Audio |
| Oximeter Channels | 2 |
| Measurements | SaO2, Pulse (both sampled at 14 Hz) |
| Body Position Channel (optional) | 1 (sampled at 14 Hz) |
| Height | 1.375 inches (34.925 mm) |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Width | 5.5 inches (139.7 mm) |
| Depth | 4 inches (101.6 mm) |
| Weight (with power adapter) | 15.9 ounces (0.45 kg) |
| Power | AC 100-240v 50-60Hz |
| | Battery backup 3.6v Lithium Ion |
The SNAP application software consists of a DLL (dynamic link library) and GUI (graphical user interface) and provides the interface for all communication between the recorder and the computer in the doctor's office. The GUI calls DLL functions to interact with the data recorder. The GUI also interacts through the Internet with the central website to transfer the patient data, and provides various data entry functions. The GUI calls DLL functions to program the recorder, check status, clear memory, check USB connectivity, retrieve serial number, retrieve patient data, get time, etc.. The GUI interacts with the website to identify the patient for the programming step and to transfer the collected patient data to the web server.
The data analysis follows a pre-existing procedure that is already in place for earlier models. The patient data from the website is securely downloaded to analysis workstations at SNAP Diagnostics for analysis and processing. The SNAP data analysis software, which runs on PC computers at the SNAP Diagnostics central location, consists of a GUI and algorithms that allow SNAP to display the recorded
{2}------------------------------------------------
data and mark the recorded events that are characteristic of sleep and respiratory disorders such as apnea. The software summarizes the events and provides the data necessary to generate a report. The resulting report is then securely uploaded back to the website so it can be made available to the referring physician by a transfer mechanism of their choice.
### Intended Use
The SNAP Model 8 device is indicated for use in the diagnostic evaluation of patients for apnea and snoring and to provide quantitative and qualitative analysis of apnea and snoring.
The SNAP Model 8 system is not intended as a substitute for full polysomnography when additional parameters such as sleep stages or EEG activity are required.
The target population consists of patients who are suspected of apnea and/or complain about snoring. The majority of the test procedures will take place at the patient's home, although some may take place in a sleep laboratory. Both pediatric and adult patients may be tested.
#### Comparison to the Predicate Device
The SNAP Model 8 is an evolutionary design modification to the above-listed predicate device. The technological characteristics (i.e., design, material, electronic circuitry, energy source, software) are essentially the same as the predicate device. It is physically similar to the SNAP Model 7, in that it is a small, separate recorder located in the general vicinity of the patient, with all sleep sensors connected from the patient to the recorder box. As with the predicate device, there are no electrical connections to the patient. In addition, the Model 8 uses a medical grade power supply, and there are no exposed metal connectors or controls, further minimizing any electrical risk to the patient or the user. The Model 8 has been tested and certified to the International Standard EN 60601-1-2:2007, an accepted EMC/EMI standard for medical devices. The Model 8 has added a backup battery to the will allow the recorder to continue recording in case of a power outage. The sensors, transducers and accessories used with the Model 8 are similar to those used with the predicate device, and all instructions for use, for Recorder, oximeter, respiratory effort belt, etc., are appropriate for their intended use.
The PC computer interface to the Model 8 is via the USB interface and the same as the predicate device. The program running on the PC in the doctor's office (used for Recorder setup and data uploading from the Recorder) is the same as that used with the Model 7 predicate device. The Model 7 predicate device makes use of secure data transmission over the Internet for uploading patient data and demographic information to the SNAP Diagnostics central location for analysis and reporting. The Model 8 uses this same method, basically unchanged from that used with the Model 7, to enable the software running on the doctor's office computer to connect to the central data analysis site via the Internet. The secure https:// method for secure data transmission, using data encryption methods standard with most highsecurity financial transactions, is employed by the Model 8 software, the same as the Model 7 predicate
Special 510(k) - SNAP Model 8
{3}------------------------------------------------
device. The SNAP data analysis software, which runs on PC computers at the SNAP Diagnostics central location, has been updated with a new GUI to support Windows (the older software used a DOS interface). The software displays the recorded data and allows manual marking of events. The algorithms are essentially unchanged from that used with the predicate device. Analysis is performed and reports are generated at the SNAP Diagnostics central site, and these reports are faxed to the physician and/or placed onto the SNAP Diagnostics secure web site for access and retrieval by the referring physicians.
### Testing and Performance Data
The SNAP Model 8 has undergone medical electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing to verify compliance with CISPR 11:2009 and safety testing to verify compliance with IEC 60601-1-2 and any applicable particular standards in this family of international safety standards to ensure that there are no potential hazards to patients, operators, or the surroundings.
It was found that the SNAP Model 8 recorder meets the radio interference Power Line Conducted and Radiated emission requirements of CISPR 11 Group 1, Class B, Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) Radio-Frequency Equipment. It was found that the SNAP Model 8 recorder meets the requirements of European Standard EN 60601-1-2 Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1-2: General Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance Collateral Standard Electromagnetic Compatibility Requirements and Tests using the test procedures IEC 61000-4-2; IEC 61000-4-3; IEC 61000-4-4; IEC 61000-4-5; IEC 61000-4-6; IEC 61000-4-8; and IEC 61000-4-11.
No other specific guidance document on performance is required for this type of device.
The data recorded by the Model 8 was compared to data recorded from the predicate device and analyzed by qualified technicians. The result of the comparison is that the signals recorded by the Model 8 are in every respect clinically equivalent to those signals recorded by the predicate device. The presentation, analysis and reports generated by the analysis software were compared to those of the predicate device. The result of the comparison is that the analysis software is in every respect clinically equivalent to the presentation, analysis and reports generated by the predicate device.
### Substantial Equivalence
The modified device has the following similarities to the previously cleared predicate device.
- . Same intended use
- . Same operating principle
- Same technology .
- Same manufacturing process .
Design verification tests were performed on the SNAP Model 8 as a result of the product requirements and risk analysis. All tests were verified to meet the required acceptance criteria. The results of the
{4}------------------------------------------------
testing and verification lead SNAP Diagnostics to the conclusion that the modifications have no impact on safety and effectiveness. The modified device complies with the applicable standards referenced in the Guidance for FDA Reviewers and Industry "Guidance for the Content of Pre-market Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices", May 2005. In summary the device described in this submission is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
・
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The logo is a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract image of an eagle with three stylized lines representing its wings.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Mr. Gil Raviv President SNAP Diagnostics, L.L.C. 5210 Capitol Drive Wheeling. Illinois 60090
MAR 1 8 2011
Re: K110064
Trade/Device Name: SNAP Model 8 – Snoring and apnea Recording and Analysis System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.2375 Regulation Name: Breathing Frequency Monitor Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MNR Dated: February 16, 2011 Received: Febr17, 2011
Dear Mr. Raviv:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2- Mr. Raviv
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices /ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/ default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Jams L. Ruso
for D
Anthony D. Watson, B.S., M.S., M.B.A. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and
Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
## Section 4 - Indications for Use
#### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: SNAP Model 8 - Snoring and Apnea Recording and Analysis System
Indications for Use:
The SNAP Model 8 device is indicated for use in the diagnostic evaluation of patients for apnea and snoring and to provide quantitative and qualitative analysis of apnea and snoring.
The SNAP Model 8 system is not intended as a substitute for full polysomnography when additional parameters such as sleep stages or EEG activity are required.
The target population consists of patients who are suspected of apnea and/or complain about snoring. The majority of the test procedures will take place at the patient's home, although some may take place in a sleep laboratory. Both pediatric and adult patients may be tested.
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
L. Schuli
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital
Infection Control and Dental Devices
510(k) Number: K110664
Page 1 of 1
Special 510(k) - SNAP Model 8
Section 4
Page 1 of 1
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.