ADVIA CHEMISTRY LIQUID SPECIFIC PROTEIN CALIBRATORS
K103701 · Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. · JIX · Feb 18, 2011 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K103701
Device Name
ADVIA CHEMISTRY LIQUID SPECIFIC PROTEIN CALIBRATORS
Applicant
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.
Product Code
JIX · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Feb 18, 2011
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Abbreviated
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1150
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The ADVIA Chemistry Liquid Protein Calibrator is for in vitro diagnostic use in the calibration of ADVIA® Chemistry systems for the Alpha-Acid-Glycoprotein (AAG), Alpha-1-Antitrypsin (AAT), Anti-streptolysin-O_2 (ASO_2), Complement C3 (C3), Complement C4 (C4), Haptoglobin (HAPT), Immunoglobulin A_2 (IGA_2), Immunoglobulin G_2 (IGG_2), Immunoglobulin M_2 (IGM_2), Prealbumin (PREALB), Rheumatoid Factor (RF), Transferrin (TRF) methods
Device Story
ADVIA Chemistry Liquid Specific Protein Calibrator is a multi-analyte, liquid, buffered product containing human-derived proteins. It consists of 6 vials across 6 levels (level 1 is zero). Used in clinical chemistry laboratories to calibrate ADVIA Chemistry systems for specific protein assays. The calibrator is ready-to-use with no preparation required. By establishing a known concentration reference point on the analyzer, it enables accurate quantification of patient samples, supporting clinical diagnosis and monitoring of protein-related conditions.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Stability testing confirmed 24-month unopened and 28-day opened shelf life. Traceability established to ERM-DA470 international reference material.
Technological Characteristics
Multi-analyte, liquid, buffered product. Contains human-derived proteins. Six levels (including zero level). 1.0 mL fill volume per vial. 24-month shelf-life. Traceability for AAG established via International Reference Material CRM 470.
Indications for Use
Indicated for in vitro diagnostic calibration of ADVIA Chemistry systems for specific protein assays (AAG, AAT, ASO, C3, C4, Haptoglobin, IgA, IgG, IgM, Prealbumin, Rheumatoid Factor, Transferrin).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A calibrator is a device intended for medical purposes for use in a test system to establish points of reference that are used in the determination of values in the measurement of substances in human specimens. (See also § 862.2 in this part.)
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
Randox Liquid Protein Calibrators (k031608)
Randox Liquid Protein Calibrators (k061056)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k103701
B. Purpose for Submission:
Modification of existing calibration material
C. Measurand:
Protein analytes: Alpha-Acid-Glycoprotein (AAG), Alpha-1-Antitrypsin (AAT), Anti-streptolysin-O, Complement C3, Complement C4, Haptoglobin, Immunoglobulin A, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin M, Prealbumin, Rheumatoid Factor, Transferrin
D. Type of Test:
Calibrator
E. Applicant:
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ADVIA Chemistry Liquid Specific Protein Calibrator
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 862.1150 - Calibrator
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
JIX, Calibrator, Multi-Analyte Mixture
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use, below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The ADVIA Chemistry Liquid Protein Calibrator is for in vitro diagnostic use in the calibration of ADVIA® Chemistry systems for the Alpha-Acid-Glycoprotein (AAG), Alpha-1-Antitrypsin (AAT), Anti-streptolysin-O_2 (ASO_2), Complement C3 (C3), Complement C4 (C4), Haptoglobin (HAPT), Immunoglobulin A_2 (IGA_2), Immunoglobulin G_2 (IGG_2), Immunoglobulin M_2 (IGM_2), Prealbumin (PREALB), Rheumatoid Factor (RF), Transferrin (TRF) methods
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use
4. Special instrument requirements:
ADVIA® Chemistry systems 1650, 1800, 2400, and 1200
I. Device Description:
ADVIA Chemistry Liquid Specific Protein Calibrator is a multi-analyte, liquid, buffer based product containing multiple analytes derived from human source. The kit consists of 1 vial each of 6 calibrator levels (6 vials total in the package) which are
{1}
ready for use (no preparation is required). The volume per vial is 1.0 mL. The low level (level 1) is a zero-level calibrator with no analytes present in the formulation. The target concentrations of Levels 2 – 6 are: 40, 80, 150, 300, and 640 mg/dL.
# J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Randox Liquid Protein Calibrators
2. Predicate K number(s):
k031608 (IgA, IgG, IgM, ASO, Prealbumin, C3, C4)
k061056 (Haptoglobin, IgA, IgG, IgM, Transferrin, C3, C4)
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicates |
| Intended Use | for in vitro diagnostic use in the calibration of ADVIA® Chemistry system for the Alpha-Acid-Glycoprotein (AAG), Alpha-1-Antitrypsin (AAT), Anti-streptolysin-O_2 (ASO_2), Complement C3 (C3), Complement C4 (C4), Haptoglobin (HAPT), Immunoglobulin A_2 (IGA_2), Immunoglobulin G_2 (IGG_2), Immunoglobulin M_2 (IGM_2), Prealbumin (PREALB), Rheumatoid Factor (RF), Transferrin (TRF) methods | k031608: For the calibration of ASO, Complement C3, Complement C4, CRP, Ferritin, IgA, IgG, IgM, Prealbumin and Transferrin assays (all neat sample assays). These calibrators also contain a-1-Antitrypsin (AAT) and Rheumatoid Factor (RF) for use in the calibration of AAT and RF assays on the Bayer Advia 1650 analyzer only. For the calibration of a-1-antitrypsin, a-1-acid glycoprotein, IgA, IgG, IgM and Transferrin assays which require sample pre-dilution. k061056: for in vitro diagnostic use in the calibration of ASO, Complement C3, Complement C4, CRP, Ferritin, Haptoglobin, IgA, IgG, IgM, Prealbumin, and Transferrin assays on Clinical Chemistry and Immunoassay systems |
| Analytes Present | Anti-streptolysin-O, Alpha-1-Antitrypsin, Prealbumin, Rheumatoid Factor, Immunoglobulin A | Same |
{2}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicates |
| | Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin M, Complement C3, Complement C4, Haptoglobin, Transferrin, Ferritin, Alpha-acid-glycoprotein, CRP | |
| Format | Liquid buffered base (1.0 ml vials) | Same |
| Levels | 6 (lowest level is a zero-level without analytes present) | Same |
| Stability | 24 months unopened 28 days opened | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicates |
| Value assigned analytes | Anti-streptolysin-O, Alpha-1-Antitrypsin, Prealbumin, Rheumatoid Factor, Immunoglobulin A Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin M, Complement C3, Complement C4, Haptoglobin, Transferrin, Alpha-acid-glycoprotein | ASO AAT Prealbumin RF IgA IgG IgM Complement C3 Complement C4 Haptoglobin Transferrin Alpha-acid-glycoprotein Ferritin CRP |
| Instrument Systems Supported | ADVIA® Chemistry Systems (1200, 1650, 1800, 2400) | Abbott Spectrum, Abbott Aeroset, Abbott Architect i2000, Architect i 2000sr, Ace analyser, Bayer Advia 1650, Advia 2400, Advia 1200, Dade Dimension RXL, Dimension AR, Hitachi 704, Hitachi 717, Hitachi 911, Hitachi 917, Hitachi 912, Hitachi 747, Kone progress, AU800, AU600, AU400, AU2700, AU5400, Selectra Vitalab, Synchron CX4, Synchron CX5, Synchron CX7, Synchron LX20, ILAB300, ILAB900, ILAB1800, ILAB600, RX Daytona, RX Imola, Cobas Mira, Cobas Mira S, Cobas Mira Plus |
{3}
There are no changes to the existing products except the addition of AAG value assignment process and the addition of the AAG analyte to the intended use of the device. The product has the same formulation, part number, manufacturing, packaging, and labeling as the current ADVIA Chemistry Liquid Specific Protein Calibrator. All of the analytes in k031608 and k061056 are present but may not have a value assignment (Ferritin and CRP) in this iteration of the ADVIA Chemistry Liquid Specific Protein Calibrators.
**K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):**
Guidance for Industry - Abbreviated 510(k) Submissions for In Vitro Diagnostic Calibrators; Final
**L. Test Principle:**
Not applicable
**M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):**
1. **Analytical performance:**
a. **Precision/Reproducibility:**
Not applicable for this device type.
b. **Linearity/assay reportable range:**
Not applicable.
c. **Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):**
Traceability:
The Alpha-Acid Glycoprotein (AAG) analyte in ADVIA Chemistry systems Liquid Specific Protein calibrator is traceable to the International Reference Material for Serum Proteins, serum-based lyophilized ERMDA-470 (previously known as CRM470).
**Value Assignment:**
Assigned lot-specific values will be utilized for the AAG calibration (and other analytes) on ADVIA Chemistry systems. The lot-specific calibrator values are generated via value assignment on the ADVIA 1650 Chemistry system using Master Lot calibrators. These values are also used on the other ADVIA Chemistry platforms (1650, 1800, 1200, and 2400).
**Stability:**
Unopened vials stored as directed in the package insert (2 – 8 °C) were shown to be stable for 24 months in a real-time stability experiment. Opened vials were shown to be stable for 28 days when stored at as directed in the package insert (2 – 8 °C). The acceptance criterion for each method is expressed in terms of a drift in recovery versus time. Each analyte must meet the predetermined acceptance criteria for storage conditions recommended by the manufacturer.
d. **Detection limit:**
Not applicable.
e. **Analytical specificity:**
Not applicable.
f. **Assay cut-off:**
Not applicable.
4
{4}
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not applicable
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The assigned values are provided in the labeling.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports substantial equivalence decision.
5
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.