The ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine assay is an in vitro chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) for the quantitative measurement of carbamazepine, an anticonvulsant drug, in human serum or plasma (collected in lithium heparin, sodium heparin, dipotassium EDTA or sodium EDTA tubes) on the ARCHITECT i System with STAT protocol capability. The measurements obtained are used in monitoring levels of carbamazepine to help ensure appropriate therapy. The ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine Calibrators are for the calibration of the ARCHITECT i System with STAT protocol capability when used for the quantitative measurement of carbamazepine, an anticonvulsant drug, in human serum or plasma.
Device Story
Device is an in vitro CMIA assay for quantitative measurement of carbamazepine in human serum or plasma. Input: patient serum/plasma sample. Operation: sample combined with anti-carbamazepine coated paramagnetic microparticles and acridinium-labeled conjugate; reaction mixture washed; pre-trigger and trigger solutions added; chemiluminescent reaction measured as relative light units (RLUs). Output: quantitative carbamazepine concentration. Used in clinical laboratory settings on Abbott ARCHITECT i 2000 SR System. Healthcare providers use output to monitor drug levels and adjust therapy for seizure control. Benefits: provides accurate drug monitoring to optimize therapeutic efficacy.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated over 20 days (n=720 per sample) with CVs ranging 3.2%–4.3%. Linearity (r²=0.999) and recovery (96–108% for ≥5 µg/mL) confirmed. Method comparison against predicate (n=276) showed Passing-Bablok slope 0.97 and correlation coefficient 0.95. Interference testing performed for drugs, endogenous substances, and clinical conditions (HAMA, RF, heterophilic antibodies).
Technological Characteristics
Chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) technology. Uses anti-carbamazepine coated paramagnetic microparticles and acridinium-labeled conjugate. Analyzed on ARCHITECT i System. Quantitative measurement based on chemiluminescent reaction (RLUs).
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative measurement of carbamazepine in human serum or plasma to monitor drug levels and ensure appropriate therapy in patients prescribed anticonvulsant medication.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A neuroleptic drugs radioceptor assay test system is a device intended to measure in serum or plasma the dopamine receptor blocking activity of neuroleptic drugs and their active metabolites. A neuroleptic drug has anti-psychotic action affecting principally psychomotor activity, is generally without hypnotic effects, and is a tranquilizer. Measurements obtained by this device are used to aid in determining whether a patient is taking the prescribed dosage level of such drugs.
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k103627
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Carbamazepine
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Abbott Laboratories
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine reagents and calibrators
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.3645, Neuroleptic drugs radioreceptor assay test system
21 CFR 862.3200, Clinical toxicology calibrator
2. Classification:
Both Class II
3. Product code:
KLT, Enzyme Immunoassay, Carbamazepine
DKB, Clinical Toxicology Calibrator
{1}
4. Panel:
Toxicology (91)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indication(s) for use below
2. Indication(s) for use:
Reagents: The ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine assay is an in vitro chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) for the quantitative measurement of carbamazepine, an anticonvulsant drug, in human serum or plasma collected in lithium heparin, sodium heparin, dipotassium EDTA or sodium EDTA tubes on the ARCHITECT i System with STAT protocol capability. The measurements obtained are used in monitoring levels of carbamazepine to help ensure appropriate therapy.
Calibrators: The ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine Calibrators are for the calibration of the ARCHITECT i System with STAT protocol capability when used for the quantitative measurement of carbamazepine, an anticonvulsant drug, in human serum or plasma.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
Abbott ARCHITECT i 2000 SR System
I. Device Description:
The ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine assay consists of the iCarbamazepine Reagent Kit and six calibrators A through F. Calibrators contain carbamazepine and preservatives in a human serum matrix. Other reagents such as trigger solution and wash buffer are required but not provided. All individual materials derived from human source were tested with FDA cleared/approved methods and found nonreactive for HBsAg, HIV-1 Ag or HIV-1 RNA, anti-HCV, HCV RNA, and anti-HIV-1/HIV-2.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
2
{2}
Abbott AxSYM Carbamazepine
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k935374
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Indications for Use | Same | Immunoassay for the quantitative measurement of carbamazepine in human serum or plasma |
| Calibrators (μg/mL) | Same | A (0.0), B (2.0), C (4.0), D (8.0), E (12.0), F (20.0) |
| Measuring Range (μg/mL) | 2.0 – 15.0 | 0.5 – 20.0 |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Analyzer | Abbott ARCHITECT i System | Abbott AxSym |
| Methodology | Chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) | Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay (FPIA) |
| Detection Limit (μg/mL) | LoQ: 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Controls (μg/mL) | Not provided with the reagent kit | L (3.0), M (6.0), H (16.0) |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2; Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
CLSI EP6-A; Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP7-A2; Interference Testing in Clinical Testing; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
CLSI EP9-A2; Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
{3}
CLSI EP17-A; Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation; Approved Guideline
Points to Consider for Collection of Data in Support of In-Vitro Device Submissions for 510(k) Clearance
Format for Traditional and Abbreviated 510(k)s - Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff
L. Test Principle:
The ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine assay is a one-step immunoassay for the quantitative measurement of carbamazepine in human serum or plasma using CMIA technology, with flexible assay protocols, referred to as Chemiflex.
In the ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine assay, the sample, anti-carbamazepine (mouse, monoclonal) coated paramagnetic microparticles, and carbamazepine acridinium-labeled conjugate are combined to create a reaction mixture. The anti-carbamazepine coated microparticles bind to carbamazepine present in the sample and to the carbamazepine acridinium-labeled conjugate. After washing, pre-trigger and trigger solutions are added to the reaction mixture. The resulting chemiluminescent reaction is measured as relative light units (RLUs). An indirect relationship exists between the amount of carbamazepine in the sample and the RLUs detected by the ARCHITECT i System optics.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision was evaluated by analyzing two control levels and two serum panels. Testing was performed on three ARCHITECT i 2000SR using two lots each of ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine Reagents and Calibrators (for a total of two reagent lot/calibrator lot combinations) and one lot of commercially available controls. A single calibration per reagent lot was performed on each instrument and used for the duration of the study. The controls and panels were tested in replicates of two, twice per day (separated by a minimum of two hours), for a total of 20 testing days. The mean concentration, within-run SD and % CV, between-run SD and % CV were calculated for the controls and panels for each reagent lot/instrument combination. The total (within-laboratory) SD and % CV were estimated using the summation of the within-run, between-run, and between-day variance components.
4
{4}
| | | | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Within-Laboratory | | Overall | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | N | Mean (μg/mL) | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| Low Control | 720 | 3.93 | 0.066 | 1.7 | 0.053 | 1.4 | 0.095 | 2.4 | 0.133 | 3.4 |
| Medium Control | 720 | 9.65 | 0.179 | 1.9 | 0.124 | 1.3 | 0.233 | 2.4 | 0.313 | 3.2 |
| Panel 2 | 720 | 2.20 | 0.046 | 2.1 | 0.033 | 1.5 | 0.063 | 2.9 | 0.094 | 4.3 |
| Panel 3 | 720 | 12.55 | 0.247 | 2.0 | 0.193 | 1.5 | 0.371 | 3.0 | 0.472 | 3.8 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity
To evaluate linearity, high and low concentration carbamazepine samples were prepared and combined in a dilution series to produce 7 sample pools with an expected carbamazepine concentration between approximately 1 and $16~\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ . Pools were tested in replicates of four on one ARCHITECT i 2000SR using one lot each of ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine Reagents and Calibrators and one lot of commercially available controls. All samples were tested as a set within a single run.
Linear regression analysis produced the following:
slope: 0.969
y-intercept -0.21
$\mathbf{r}^2$ 0.999
The sponsor claims a reportable range of $2.0 - 15.0~\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ , based on the linearity and LoQ data.
Recovery
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of the ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine assay to recover known concentrations of carbamazepine spiked into human specimens.
Varying concentrations of carbamazepine ranging from approximately 2 to $12\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ were spiked into 50 separate serum samples that did not contain carbamazepine.
{5}
Samples were tested in replicates of 4 on one ARCHITECT i 2000SR using one lot each of ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine Reagents and Calibrators and one lot of commercially available controls. The mean of the four replicates was compared to the amount of carbamazepine spiked into each sample to calculate the recovery. For samples with target values of <5 µg/mL biases were ± 0.49 µg/mL or less. For samples with target values ≥ 5 µg/mL, the recoveries ranged from 96 – 108%.
## Manual Dilution
To evaluate the manual dilution feature, serum samples that did not contain carbamazepine were spiked with carbamazepine to target concentrations of 22, 30, 50, and 60 µg/mL. Three samples were prepared at each of the four levels. A manual dilution (1:4) of each spiked sample was prepared by adding 50 µL of the prepared sample to 150 µL of Calibrator A (0.00 µg/mL). The spiked samples and manual dilutions were tested in a minimum of two replicates on one ARCHITECT i 2000SR using one lot each of ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine Reagents and Calibrators, and one lot of commercially available controls. The manually diluted concentration was then compared to the target concentration. The individual percent recovery results ranged from 91.6% to 94.2%.
### c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
#### Traceability
Calibrators are traceable to a USP certified Carbamazepine Reference Standard. The sponsor estimates the uncertainty of the assigned values to be ≤ ± 2.2% compared to the Reference Standard.
The sponsor manufactures internal reference standards (designated Primary Calibrators) for this assay using Carbamazepine Reference Standard (USP). Carbamazepine calibrators (market calibrators) are manufactured gravimetrically and tested against these internal reference standards.
Primary Calibrator A is prepared with normal human serum with a carbamazepine concentration of 0.00 µg/mL. Preservatives are added and Primary Calibrator A is stored at -20°C or colder. Primary Calibrators B through F are prepared from Primary Stock Standard. The Primary Stock Standard (at 40 µg/mL) is prepared as follows: A super stock solution is prepared gravimetrically using Carbamazepine USP Reference Standard powder, and the material is mixed. Primary Calibrator A is gravimetrically added, and the solution is mixed. To prepare the Primary Stock Standard, the super stock solution is gravimetrically diluted to batch size with Primary Calibrator A to a concentration of 40 µg/mL, and the material is mixed and stored. Each Primary Calibrator B through F is gravimetrically prepared with Primary Stock Standard and Primary Calibrator A to a target concentration of
6
{6}
2.00, 4.00, 8.00, 12.00, and 20.00 µg/mL, respectively. The material is mixed, filled into final containers, labeled, and stored at -20°C or colder.
Preparation of Market Calibrator A. Preservatives are added to normal human serum not containing carbamazepine, and the material is mixed, filtered, added to final containers, and stored at 2 to 8°C.
Preparation of Market Calibrators B through F. Preparation of Stock Standard: Anhydrous methyl alcohol is added to a gravimetrically measured amount of Carbamazepine USP grade powder, and the material is mixed. The solution is gravimetrically diluted to batch size with serum not containing carbamazepine, and the material is mixed. Concentration determination testing is performed. Each Calibrator B through F is gravimetrically prepared with stock standard and negative serum to a target concentration of 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 12.0, and 20.0 µg/mL, respectively. The material is mixed.
## Stability
The closed-vial (shelf life) stability claim is 12 months at 2 – 8°C, as demonstrated by accelerated stability testing. Protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable. Real-time stability testing is ongoing. The open-vial stability claim is 12 months at 2 – 8°C, as demonstrated by accelerated stability testing. Protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable. Real-time stability testing is ongoing.
## Value Assignment
Each Calibrator B through F is tested by Relative Light Units (RLU) by matching against the corresponding primary calibrator by analyzing multiple replicates on the ARCHITECT i System instrument. The on-test calibrator is compared to the corresponding primary calibrator using a sample/reference ratio of the mean RLU results. If necessary, the concentration is adjusted by adding either stock standard or negative serum and the material is mixed. The material is filled into final containers, labeled, and stored at 2 to 8°C.
Customer Release Testing is performed with the ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine Calibrators A through F. The calibrators and reference high and low panels are tested in multiple replicates in one run on each of two ARCHITECT i System instruments. The calibrators generate the calibration curve used to calculate the panel concentration results. For each panel, the mean concentration is calculated for each instrument, and the grand mean concentration is calculated from the two instrument mean concentrations. The grand mean concentration values are evaluated against the acceptance criteria. The components are kit packed and stored at 2 to 8°C.
7
{7}
8
d. Detection limit:
The sponsor performed a study based on guidance from the CLSI document EP17-A to determine the Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) of the ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine assay on the ARCHITECT i 2000 SR. The LoQ was calculated to be 0.30 µg/mL. The % CV at the LoQ was 11.3 % with a recovery ranging from 104 – 112%.
The sponsor claims 2.0 µg/mL as the lowest reportable value.
e. Analytical specificity:
Potential interference from drugs was evaluated at carbamazepine concentrations of 4 and 12 µg/mL.
Normal human serum was used as the zero-level carbamazepine sample. The low-level and high-level carbamazepine samples were each prepared by spiking carbamazepine stock solution into normal human serum to target the lower (4 µg/mL) and upper (12 µg/mL) therapeutic medical decision points.
Compounds with structures similar to carbamazepine or likely to be co-administered were obtained from commercial vendors.
Test samples were prepared by spiking each drug at the concentration level listed below into an aliquot of each level of carbamazepine.
Reference samples were prepared by adding diluent to an aliquot of each level of carbamazepine. The diluent that was used to prepare the reference samples was the same as the diluent used to prepare the drug stock and was added at the same volume as was used to prepare the test samples.
The test and reference samples were tested with multiple replicates on one ARCHITECT i 2000SR using one lot each of ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine Reagents and Calibrators and one lot of commercially available controls.
All of the drugs in the table below caused a bias of 10% or less at the concentrations tested:
| Drug | Concentration (µg/mL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10-Hydroxycarbamazepine | 22 |
| 5-(p-Hydroxyphenyl-5-phenylhydantoin | 1000 |
| Acetaminophen | 200 |
| Acetylcysteine | 150 |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 1000 |
{8}
| Drug | Concentration (μg/mL) |
| --- | --- |
| Amitriptyline | 100 |
| Amobarbital | 50 |
| Ampicillin-Na | 100 |
| Ascorbic acid | 30 |
| Carbamazepine-10,11- epoxide | 6 |
| Cefoxitin | 2500 |
| Cetirizine dihydrochloride | 3 |
| Chlordiazepoxide | 30 |
| Chlorpromazine | 100 |
| Clonazepam | 12 |
| Cyclosporine | 5 |
| Desipramine | 5 |
| Diazepam | 25 |
| Eslicarbazepine | 170 |
| Ethosuximide | 1000 |
| Ethotoin | 50 |
| Glutethimide | 50 |
| Ibuprofen | 500 |
| Imipramine | 200 |
| K-Dobesilate (hydroquinonesulfonic acid potassium salt) | 200 |
| Levodopa | 20 |
| Mephenytoin | 150 |
| Methsuximide | 50 |
| Methyldopa sesquihydrate | 20 |
| Metronidazole | 200 |
| Nortriptyline | 50 |
| Oxcarbazepine | 10 |
| Phenobarbital | 50 |
| Phenothiazine | 200 |
| Phenylbutazone | 400 |
| Phenytoin | 1000 |
| p-Hydroxyphenobarbital | 50 |
| Primidone | 1000 |
| Probenecid | 500 |
| Promethazine | 1000 |
| Rifampicin | 60 |
| Secobarbital | 50 |
| Tetracycline | 50 |
| Theophylline | 100 |
| Valproic acid | 1000 |
9
{9}
One drug, Hydroxyzine dihydrochloride, showed interference of up to -15% when tested at a concentration of 1 µg/mL.
Potential interference from endogenous substances was evaluated at carbamazepine concentrations of 4 and 12 µg/mL. The potential interferents evaluated were bilirubin (conjugated and unconjugated), hemoglobin, total protein, and triglycerides.
The test and reference samples were tested with multiple replicates on one ARCHITECT i 2000SR using one lot each of ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine Reagents and Calibrators and one lot of commercially available controls.
All of the endogenous substances in the table below caused a bias of 10% or less at the concentrations tested:
| Endogenous substance | Concentration Tested | Recovery observed at 4 ug/mL Carbamazepine | Recovery observed at 12 ug/mL Carbamazepine |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bilirubin (conjugated) | 20 mg/dL | 104% | 103% |
| Bilirubin (unconjugated) | 20 mg/dL | 105 | 105% |
| Hemoglobin | 500 mg/dL | 106% | 104% |
| Total protein | 12 g/dL | 103% | 109% |
| Triglycerides | 3000 mg/dL | 98% | 100% |
Potential interference from clinical conditions was evaluated at carbamazepine concentrations of 4 and 12 µg/mL. The clinical conditions evaluated were Human Anti-Mouse Antibodies (HAMA), Rheumatoid Factor (RF), and Heterophilic Antibodies. Results were as follows:
| Potentially Interfering Clinical Condition | n | 4 µg/mL carbamazepine | 12 µg/mL carbamazepine |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Human Anti-Mouse Antibodies (HAMA) | 12 | -6.6% to 7.4% | -7.8% to 13.9% |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 12 | -4.5% to 8.7% | -6.7% to 8.5% |
| Heterophilic Antibody | 12 | -2.5% to 9.8% | -8.4% to 4.3% |
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
{10}
11
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A total of 276 serum samples containing carbamazepine were evaluated with the ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine and AxSYM Carbamazepine assays. The concentrations tested ranged from 2.22 – 14.97 µg/mL.
For the ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine assay, two lots of ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine Reagents, one lot of ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine Calibrators, and one lot of commercially available controls were used. The specimens were tested using both lots of reagents on one of two ARCHITECT i 2000sr instruments.
For the AxSYM Carbamazepine assay, the specimens were tested in replicates of two on one AxSYM instrument using one lot of reagents, calibrators, and controls. The specimens were tested within 24 hours of each other.
Simple linear regression analysis with 95% confidence intervals produced the following:
slope: 0.93 [0.91 to 0.97]
y-intercept: 0.02 [-0.2 to 0.3]
corr. coeff. (r): 0.95
Passing-Bablok regression analysis with 95% confidence intervals produced the following:
slope: 0.97 [0.93 to 1.00]
y-intercept: -0.22 [-0.48 to 0.03]
corr. coeff. (r): 0.95
b. Matrix comparison:
A study was performed to evaluate which blood collection tube types are acceptable for use with the ARCHITECT iCarbamazepine assay.
There were 50 donors from whom specimens were collected in the following blood collection tube types: plastic plain (serum), glass plain (serum), plastic lithium heparin (plasma), plastic sodium heparin (plasma), plastic dipotassium EDTA (plasma), and glass sodium EDTA (plasma). The approximate concentrations tested were 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15 µg/mL.
{11}
The prepared samples of each sample set were tested on one ARCHITECT $i$ 2000SR in replicates of four using one lot each of ARCHITECT $i$ Carbamazepine Reagents and Calibrators and one lot of commercially available controls.
The plain plastic serum tube was used as the control (reference measurement) against which the other tube types were compared. Four tubes of each type were drawn from each donor. Individual replicates of each tube type were compared to the mean of four measurements of the plain plastic serum tube.
99% of the samples had recoveries within $\pm 10\%$ of the reference tube.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
¹ Therapeutic range: Plasma concentrations between 4 and $12~\mu \mathrm{g/mL}$ of carbamazepine have been associated with optimal seizure control in adults.
¹ Arroyo S, Sander JWAS. Carbamazepine in comparative trials: pharmacokinetic characteristics too often forgotten. *Neurology* 1999;53(6):1170-1174.
12
{12}
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
13
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.