K103251 · Aston Medical · PHX · Oct 28, 2011 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K103251
Device Name
DUOCENTRIC REVERSED
Applicant
Aston Medical
Product Code
PHX · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Oct 28, 2011
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3660
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K103251 · Oct 28, 2011
DUOCENTRIC REVERSED
Aston Medical
Post-market clinical data (European commercial experience)
The sponsor cites post-market data from European commercial use since 2003 to support the safety and effectiveness of the device in the context of a 510(k) substantial equivalence determination.
Post-market data; European commercial experience; Safety and effectiveness
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
European Post-market Experience; Post-market surveillance / Commercial experience; Follow-up/Duration: Since 2003; Study Period: 2003-2011
Patients treated with the Duocentric® Reversed shoulder prosthesis in Europe
Not applicable for this study
Safety and effectiveness
Indications for Use
Implantation of a joint prosthesis is to be considered only when all other surgical options have been carefully examined and found less appropriate. The Duocentric® Reversed shoulder prosthesis is indicated for use in case of gross rotator cuff deficiency including when it is associated with osteoarthritis, revision of previous arthroplasty or complex fracture of the humerus (3 fragments or more) in an older population (e.g. 65 years of age or older). The patient's joint must be anatomically and structurally suited to receive the selected implant(s), and a functional deltoid muscle is necessary to use the device. The humeral stem is intended for use with cement when polished or without cement when coated with Hydroxyapatite. All other components are intended for cementless use only. The glenoid baseplate is intended for cementless application with the addition of three screws for fixation. It is coated with a double layer of pure Titanium and Hydroxyapatite on its posterior side.
Device Story
Duocentric® Reversed shoulder prosthesis; reverse shoulder arthroplasty system based on Grammont biomechanical concepts. Components: humeral stem, humeral baseplate, humeral insert (UHMWPE), gleonosphere, glenoid baseplate. Humeral stem: cemented (polished) or cementless (HA-coated). Glenoid baseplate: cementless, fixed with three screws, Ti/HA-coated. Used by orthopedic surgeons in clinical/OR settings to replace shoulder joint. Device restores joint function in patients with rotator cuff deficiency; improves stability and mobility. Provided sterile.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data required. Bench testing confirmed finished product and components met all pre-determined specifications. Device has been commercialized in Europe since 2003 with post-market data supporting safety and effectiveness.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Wrought high nitrogen stainless steel (M30NW), UHMWPE humeral insert. Coatings: Pure Titanium and Hydroxyapatite (ASTM F1185, F1609, F1580). Fixation: Cemented or cementless (HA-coated stem), cementless glenoid baseplate with screws. Sterilization: Provided sterile.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients 65+ years old with gross rotator cuff deficiency, including those with osteoarthritis, revision arthroplasty, or complex humeral fractures (3+ fragments). Requires functional deltoid muscle and anatomically/structurally suitable joint. Contraindicated if other surgical options are appropriate or if deltoid function is absent.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a shoulder joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a humeral resurfacing component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a glenoid resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) FDA's:
(i) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ”
(ii) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance of 2/12/90 (K90-1),”
(iii) “Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants with Modified Metallic Surfaces Apposing Bone or Bone Cement,”
(iv) “Guidance Document for the Preparation of Premarket Notification (510(k)) Application for Orthopedic Devices,” and
(v) “Guidance Document for Testing Non-articulating, ‘Mechanically Locked’ Modular Implant Components,”
(2) International Organization for Standardization's (ISO):
(i) ISO 5832-3:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-aluminum 4-vandium Alloy,”
(ii) ISO 5832-4:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 4: Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum casting alloy,”
(iii) ISO 5832-12:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 12: Wrought Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy,”
(iv) ISO 5833:1992 “Implants for Surgery—Acrylic Resin Cements,”
(v) ISO 5834-2:1998 “Implants for Surgery—Ultra-high Molecular Weight Polyethylene—Part 2: Moulded Forms,”
(vi) ISO 6018:1987 “Orthopaedic Implants—General Requirements for Marking, Packaging, and Labeling,” and
(vii) ISO 9001:1994 “Quality Systems—Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing,” and
(3) American Society for Testing and Materials':
(i) F 75-92 “Specification for Cast Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Material,”
(ii) F 648-98 “Specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Powder and Fabricated Form for Surgical Implants,”
(iii) F 799-96 “Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy Forgings for Surgical Implants,”
(iv) F 1044-95 “Test Method for Shear Testing of Porous Metal Coatings,”
(v) F 1108-97 “Specification for Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Alloy Castings for Surgical Implants,”
(vi) F 1147-95 “Test Method for Tension Testing of Porous Metal,”
(vii) F 1378-97 “Standard Specification for Shoulder Prosthesis,” and
(viii) F 1537-94 “Specification for Wrought Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implants.”
{0}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles a stylized human figure or bird in flight.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
November 2, 2016
Aston Medical % Ms. Catherine Gloster Gloster Biomedical International 577 North Hope Avenue Santa Barbra, California 93110
Re: K103251
Trade/Device Name: Duocentric® Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3660 Regulation Name: Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PHX Dated: September 30, 2011 Received: October 3, 2011
Dear Ms. Gloster:
This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of October 28, 2011.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate for associated in the Merceans)76, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it If your device to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean I hat FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical (21 CFR 801); as only (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{1}------------------------------------------------
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
## Lori A. Wiggins -S
for
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indication for Use
#### 510(k): K103251
Duocentric® Reversed shoulder prosthesis: Aston® Medical
#### Indications for Use:
Implantation of a joint prosthesis is to be considered only when all other surgical options have been carefully examined and found less appropriate.
The Duocentric® Reversed shoulder prosthesis is indicated for use in case of gross rotator cuff deficiency including when it is associated with osteoarthritis, revision of previous arthroplasty or complex fracture of the humerus (3 fragments or more) in an older population (e.g. 65 years of age or older).
The patient's joint must be anatomically and structurally suited to receive the selected implant(s), and a functional deltoid muscle is necessary to use the device.
The humeral stem is intended for use with cement when polished or without cement when coated with Hydroxyapatite. All other components are intended for cementless use only. The glenoid baseplate is intended for cementless application with the addition of three screws for fixation. It is coated with a double layer of pure Titanium and Hydroxyapatite on its posterior side.
Prescription Use _ X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
AND/OR
/Concurrenceof CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Michael. Oues to mxm
Page 1 of l
ivision Sign-Off)
vision of Surgical, Orthopedic,
id Restorative Devices
ASTON® **Neer** Duocentric® Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis
Update October 2011
Page 1
{3}------------------------------------------------
# K103251
### SECTION 5: 510(k) Summary
This 510(k) summary is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA and 21CFR § 807.92
| Submitted by: | Aston® Medical<br>19, rue Victor Grignard<br>Zone Industrielle de Montreynaud<br>42000 Saint-Etienne<br>France |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Prepared By/Contact Person: | Catherine Gloster, M.Sc. RAC<br>Regulatory Consultant<br>Gloster Biomedical International<br>577 North Hope Ave<br>Santa Barbara, CA 93110 - USA<br>Phone: 805-679-1258<br>Email: c.gloster@GlosterBiomedical.com |
| Date Prepared: | October 28, 2011 |
| Proprietary Name: | DUOCENTRIC® Reversed |
| Common Name: | Reverse shoulder prosthesis |
| Classification: | Class II, 21 CFR 888.3660<br>Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained<br>cemented prosthesis<br>KWS |
| Predicate Devices: | K091751 - Depuy Orthopaedic, Inc. USA - Depuy<br>Delta Xtend Reverse Shoulder - cleared 7/14/2009<br>K021478 - Depuy Orthopaedic, Inc. USA - Delta<br>Shoulder - cleared 11/18/2003<br>K100142 - Tornier, France - Aequalis Reversed<br>Shoulder Prosthesis - cleared 5/6/2010<br>K053274 - Zimmer, Inc. USA - Anatomical |
Device Description:
The Duocentric® Reversed shoulder prosthesis is a prosthesis that uses the biomechanical concepts of reverse shoulder arthroplasty as originally described by Paul Grammont.
Shoulder™ Inverse/Reverse - cleared 1/25/2006
1 8 + 3
{4}------------------------------------------------
The Duocentric® Reversed shoulder prosthesis is composed of a humeral stem, a humeral baseplate, a humeral insert, a gleonosphere (Duoglene), and a glenoid baseplate. The humeral insert is made of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), while all other components are made of wrought high nitrogen stainless steel M30NW. The humeral stem is intended for cemented use unless coated with hydroxyapatite (HA). The glenoid baseplate is coated with a double coating of pure titanium and hydroxyapatite (Ti/HA), is intended for cementless use, and is fixated with wrought high nitrogen stainless steel screws. The device is provided sterile.
The HA and Ti/HA coatings conform to ASTM standards ASTM F1185, ASTM F1609, and ASTM F1580 and are performed by Medical Coating (Vault-en-Velin, FR) according to their Master File MAF-1633.
#### Indication for Use:
Implantation of a joint prosthesis is to be considered only when all other surgical options have been carefully examined and found less appropriate.
The Duocentric® Reversed shoulder prosthesis is indicated for use in case of gross rotator cuff deficiency including when it is associated with osteoarthritis, revision of previous arthroplasty or complex fracture of the humerus (3 fragments or more) in an older population (e.g. 65 years of age or older).
The patient's joint must be anatomically and structurally suited to receive the selected implant(s), and a functional deltoid muscle is necessary to use the device.
The humeral stem is intended for use with cement when polished or without cement when coated with Hydroxyapatite. All other components are intended for cementless use only. The glenoid baseplate is intended for cementless application with the addition of three screws for fixation. It is coated with a double layer of pure Titanium and Hydroxyapatite on its posterior side.
Page 2 of 3
{5}------------------------------------------------
K103251
Pose 3 of 3
Basis for substantial equivalence:
The Duocentric® Reversed shoulder prosthesis is substantially equivalent to the previously cleared devices: Depuy Delta Xtend Reversed Shoulder (K091751), Depuy Delta Shoulder (K021478), Tornier Aequalis Reverse Shoulder (K100142), and Zimmer Anatomical Reverse/Inverse Shoulder (K053274). This assessment is based on similarities in indications for use, materials, dimensions, design, packaging and sterilization processes and results of pre-clinical testing. The subject device does not raise any new issues of safety and effectiveness.
Performance Data:
Pre-clinical performance testing concluded that the Duocentric® Reversed shoulder finished product and its components met all pre-determined specifications and are adequate for their intended use.
Clinical data were not required for this device. This product has been commercialized since 2003 in Europe and has shown to be safe and effective as shown by post-market data.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.