The Series II X3® Large Diameter Acetabular Insert is a sterile, single-use device intended for the replacement of the bearing and/or articulating surfaces of the acetabulum to relieve pain and the restriction of motion.
Device Story
Series II X3® Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts are sterile, single-use UHMWPE components for total hip arthroplasty. Used with Howmedica Osteonics metal acetabular shells, femoral bearings, and femoral hip stems. Modifications include larger head sizes, 4mm lateralization options, and additional hood designs. Device functions as a bearing surface to replace articulating surfaces of the acetabulum, relieving pain and restoring motion. Implanted by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings. Snap-fit mechanism secures insert into the shell. Benefits include improved joint function and pain relief for patients with degenerative or disabling hip conditions.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by bench testing including poly thickness analysis, engineering analysis of locking mechanisms, and evaluation of inner diameter/head center/liner head clearance. Predicate testing included lever-out, push-out, and wear characteristics.
Technological Characteristics
Material: UHMWPE. Design: Acetabular insert with snap-fit locking mechanism. Sizes: 26mm to 44mm ID; 0° and 10° hood angles; 4mm and 6mm lateralization. Sterilization: Gas Plasma. Connectivity: None (mechanical implant).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring total hip arthroplasty (cemented or cementless) due to painful, disabling joint disease (degenerative, rheumatoid, or post-traumatic arthritis, or late-stage avascular necrosis), revision of failed previous procedures, clinical management where alternative techniques are less likely to succeed, or poor/inadequate bone stock in the acetabulum.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across the joint. This generic type of device has a femoral component made of a cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) alloy or a titanium-aluminum-vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy and an acetabular component composed of an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene articulating bearing surface fixed in a metal shell made of Co-Cr-Mo or Ti-6Al-4V. The femoral stem and acetabular shell have a porous coating made of, in the case of Co-Cr-Mo substrates, beads of the same alloy, and in the case of Ti-6Al-4V substrates, fibers of commercially pure titanium or Ti-6Al-4V alloy. The porous coating has a volume porosity between 30 and 70 percent, an average pore size between 100 and 1,000 microns, interconnecting porosity, and a porous coating thickness between 500 and 1,500 microns. The generic type of device has a design to achieve biological fixation to bone without the use of bone cement.
{0}------------------------------------------------
KVOZ24 * -My
NCV 1 9 2010
# Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Series II X30 Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts
Series II X3® Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts
uncemented prosthesis, 21 CFR §888.3353
prosthesis, 21 CFR §888.3358
Proprietary Name:
Common Name:
Classification Name and Reference:
Regulatory Class:
Product Codes:
Class II
888.3350
Hip prosthesis
87 MEH - prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, nonporous, calcium-phosphate
Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous
Hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous coated uncemented
Hip joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis 21 CFR
87 LZO - prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented
87 LPH - prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, porous uncemented
87 JDI - prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented
Predicate Devices:
Series II X3 Acetabular Inserts and Trident® X3® Acetabular Insert
For Information contact:
Estela Celi, Regulatory Affairs Associate Howmedica Osteonics Corp. 325 Corporate Drive Mahwah, NJ 07430 Phone: (201) 831-6461 Fax: (201) 831-6038 estela.celi@stryker.com
Date Prepared:
October 21st, 2010
{1}------------------------------------------------
Klogl24. *-24
#### Description
This Special 510(k) submission is a line extension to address modifications made to the Series II X3ª Acetabular Inserts. The modifications made to the previously cleared Series II X3® Acetabular Inserts (K052748) are as follows: new larger head sizes, an alternate 4mm lateralization (with 0 and 10 degree hood), and additional 0 degree hood design to the existing 6mm lateralization.
#### Intended Use
The Series II X3® Large Diameter Acetabular Insert is a sterile, single-use device intended for the replacement of the bearing and/or articulating surfaces of the acetabulum to relieve pain and the restriction of motion.
## Indications for Use:
The Series II X3® Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts are single use sterile components, intended for use in conjunction with an associated Howmedica Osteonics metal acetabular shell, femoral bearing, and femoral hip stem as part of a cemented or cementless total hip arthroplasty.
- Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, theumatic 1) arthritis, or late stage avascular necrosis.
- Revision of previous unsuccessful femoral head replacement, cup arthroplasty or other procedure. 2)
- Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative techniques are less likely to achieve 3) satisfactory results.
- Where bone stock is of poor quality or inadequate for other reconstructive techniques as indicated of 4) the acetabulum.
#### Substantial Equivalence:
The Series II X3º Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts are substantially equivalent to the Series II X3º Acetabular Inserts cleared under K052748 and Trident® X3® Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts cleared under K062419 in regards to intended use, design, materials, and operational principles as a hip prosthesis.
{2}------------------------------------------------
K108224-#3/4
:
# Substantial Equivalence Table with comparison of Technological Characteristics:
| Substantial Equivalence Table with Comparison of Technological Characteristics | | | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Series II Comparison of Subject to Predicate | | | |
| | Series II X3® Large<br>Diameter Acetabular<br>Inserts | Series II X3®<br>Acetabular Inserts | Trident® X3® Large Diameter<br>Acetabular Insert |
| 510(k) | Pending | K052748 | K062419 |
| Product Type | Polyethylene Insert<br>Components for Total<br>Hip Arthroplasty | Polyethylene Insert<br>Components for Total<br>Hip Arthroplasty | Polyethylene Insert Components<br>for Total Hip Arthroplasty |
| Intended Use | Painful, disabling joint<br>disease of the hip<br>resulting from: non-<br>inflammatory<br>degenerative arthritis,<br>rheumatoid arthritis,<br>post-traumatic arthritis,<br>or late stage avascular<br>necrosis; revision of<br>previous failed femoral<br>head replacement, cup<br>arthroplasty or other<br>procedure; clinical<br>management problems<br>where arthrodesis or<br>alternative<br>reconstructive<br>techniques are less<br>likely to achieve<br>satisfactory results; and<br>where bone stock is of<br>poor quality or<br>inadequate for other<br>reconstructive<br>techniques as indicated<br>by deficiencies of the<br>acetabulum. | Painful, disabling joint<br>disease of the hip<br>resulting from: non-<br>inflammatory<br>degenerative arthritis,<br>rheumatoid arthritis,<br>post-traumatic arthritis,<br>or late stage avascular<br>necrosis; revision of<br>previous failed femoral<br>head replacement, cup<br>arthroplasty or other<br>procedure; clinical<br>management problems<br>where arthrodesis or<br>alternative<br>reconstructive<br>techniques are less<br>likely to achieve<br>satisfactory results; and<br>where bone stock is of<br>poor quality or<br>inadequate for other<br>reconstructive<br>techniques as indicated<br>by deficiencies of the<br>acetabulum. | Painful, disabling joint disease<br>of the hip resulting from: `non-<br>inflammatory degenerative<br>arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis,<br>post-traumatic arthritis, or late<br>stage avascular necrosis;<br>revision of previous failed<br>femoral head replacement, cup<br>arthroplasty or other procedure,<br>clinical management problems<br>where arthrodesis or alternative<br>reconstructive techniques are<br>less likely to achieve<br>satisfactory results, where bone<br>stock is of poor quality or<br>inadequate for other<br>reconstructive techniques as<br>indicated by deficiencies of the<br>acetabulum |
| Anatomical Placement | Hip - Acetabular<br>Bearing surface | Hip - Acetabular<br>Bearing surface | Hip - Acetabular Bearing<br>surface |
| Sizes Standard | 0°, 10°<br>26mm to 44mm ID | Similar Hood Angle<br>Similar Inner Diameter | Similar Hood Angle<br>Similar Inner Diameter |
| Sizes Eccentric | 0°, 10°<br>4 & 6mm lateralization<br>26mm to 44mm ID | Similar Hood Angle<br>Similar Lateralization<br>Similar Inner Diameter | N/A |
| Compatible Acetabular<br>Shells | Secur-Fit, Secur-Fit<br>Xtra, Omnifit, PSL,<br>Dual Geometry,<br>Microstructured,<br>Osteonics HA Threaded | Secur-Fit, Secur-Fit<br>Xtra, Omnifit, PSL,<br>Dual Geometry,<br>Microstructured,<br>Osteonics HA Threaded | Trident Hemispherical Solid<br>Back Shells, Trident PSL HA<br>Solid Back Shells, Trident<br>Hemispherical Cluster Shells,<br>Trident PSL HA Cluster Shells,<br>Trident Hemispherical Multi-<br>Hole Shells |
| Insert Component Material | UHMWPE | UHMWPE | UHMWPE |
| Locking Mechanism | Snap-fit mechanism | Snap-fit mechanism | Press-Fit Mechanism |
| Minimum Nominal Dome | 6.43 mm | 5.56 mm | 3.8 mm |
| Thickness | | | |
| Sterilization Method | Gas Plasma | Gas Plasma | Gas Plasma |
{3}------------------------------------------------
K1D312.4 # 4/4
## Summary of Non-Clinical Testing and Evaluation:
The risk analysis method used to assess the impact of the modifications was a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA).The risk analysis was performed according to the requirements of ISO 14971:2007 "Medical Devices -Application of risk management to medical devices". Records of the risk analysis process are retained in the design history file.
Predicate preclinical testing that was performed:
1) Lever Out Testing (Series II X3® and Trident® X3® Large Diameter)
2) Push Out Testing (Series II X3® and Trident® X3® Large Diameter)
3) Evaluation of Wear Characteristics (Trident® X3® Large Diameter)
Based upon the fact that the new Series II X3% Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts represent a line extent Series II X30 Acetabular Inserts the following preclinical testing/evaluation was preformed:
Preclinical evaluations performed for the new Series II X3® Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts:
1 ) Poly thickness analysis (Series II X3 and Series II X3 % Large Diameter)
2) Engineering analysis of locking mechanism (Series II X3® and Series II X3® Large Diameter)
3) Engineering analysis of inner diameter, head center, and liner head clearance (Series II X3 ° Large Diameter)
The results of the above testing verify that the new device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows a circular logo with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized graphic of an eagle or bird-like figure with three curved lines representing its body or wings. The logo is black and white and appears to be a seal or emblem.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Stryker Corporation % Ms. Estela Celi 325 Corporate Drive Mahwah, New Jersey 07430
NOV 1 9 2010
Re: K103124
Trade/Device Name: Series II X3® Acetabular Inserts Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3358 Regulation Name: Hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated uncemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LPH, JDI, LZO, MEH Dated: October 21, 2010 Received: October 22, 2010
Dear Ms. Celi:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 – Ms. Estela Celi
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH0ffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Mark N. Melkerson
Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K10324
NOV 1 9 2010
Device Name: Series II X3® Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts
Indications for Use:
The Series II X30 Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts are single use sterile components, intended for use in conjunction with an associated Howmedica Osteonics metal acetabular shell, femoral bearing, and femoral hip stem as part of a cemented or cementless total hip arthroplasty.
The indications for use of total hip replacement prostheses include:
- Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, l) post-traumatic arthritis, or late stage avascular necrosis.
- 2) Revision of previous unsuccessful femoral head replacement, cup arthroplasty or other procedure.
- 3) Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative techniques are less likely to achieve satisfactory results.
- Where bone stock is of poor quality or inadequate for other reconstructive techniques as indicated by 4) deficiencies of the acetabulum.
Prescription Use X Over-The-Counter Use AND/OR (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) (21 CFR 807 Subpart C) (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Omtu for nxm
(Division Sig Off)
Division of Surgical, Orthopedic,
and Restorative Devices
510(k) Number K103124
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.