The ARCHITECT iGentamicin assay is an in vitro chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) for the quantitative determination of gentamicin, an antibiotic drug, in human serum or plasma on the ARCHITECT i System with STAT protocol capability. The measurements obtained are used in the diagnosis and treatment of gentamicin overdose and in monitoring levels of gentamicin to help ensure appropriate therapy. The ARCHITECT iGentamicin Calibrators are for the calibration of the ARCHITECT i System with STAT protocol capability when used for the quantitative determination of gentamicin, an antibiotic drug, in human serum or plasma.
Device Story
The ARCHITECT iGentamicin assay is a one-step chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) performed on the ARCHITECT i System. The device processes human serum or plasma samples by combining them with anti-gentamicin coated paramagnetic microparticles and gentamicin acridinium-labeled conjugate. The microparticles bind to gentamicin in the sample and the labeled conjugate. Following a wash step, pre-trigger and trigger solutions are added to initiate a chemiluminescent reaction. The system measures the resulting relative light units (RLUs). An indirect relationship exists between the gentamicin concentration and the detected RLUs. The assay is intended for use by clinical laboratory professionals to monitor drug levels and assist in therapeutic decision-making, helping ensure appropriate antibiotic therapy and managing potential overdose.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Analytical performance was demonstrated through bench testing, including precision, limit of blank, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, linearity, interferences, recovery, manual dilution, matrix comparison, and method comparison (correlation).
Technological Characteristics
CMIA technology; paramagnetic microparticles; acridinium-labeled conjugate; chemiluminescent detection; automated system (ARCHITECT i System); quantitative measurement; in vitro diagnostic use.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative determination of gentamicin in human serum or plasma for the diagnosis and treatment of gentamicin overdose and therapeutic drug monitoring.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A gentamicin test system is a device intended to measure gentamicin, an antibiotic drug, in human specimens. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of gentamicin overdose and in monitoring levels of gentamicin to ensure appropriate therapy.
Predicate Devices
AxSYM Gentamicin Assay (k935376)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k102699
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Gentamicin
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Abbott Laboratories Diagnostics Division
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ARCHITECT iGentamicin
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Enzyme Immunoassay, Gentamicin (LCD) | Class II | 21 CFR 862.3450 | Toxicology (91) |
| Calibrators, Drug Specific (DLJ) | Class II | 21 CFR 862.3200 | Toxicology (91) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
Reagents:
The ARCHITECT iGentamicin assay is an in vitro chemiluminescent
{1}
microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) for the quantitative determination of gentamicin, an antibiotic drug, in human serum or plasma on the ARCHITECT i System with STAT protocol capability. The measurements obtained are used in the diagnosis and treatment of gentamicin overdose and in monitoring levels of gentamicin to help ensure appropriate therapy.
## Calibrators:
The ARCHITECT iGentamicin Calibrators are for the calibration of the ARCHITECT i System with STAT protocol capability when used for the quantitative determination of gentamicin, an antibiotic drug, in human serum or plasma.
2. Indication(s) for use:
See intended use, above.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Evaluations represented in the 510(k) were performed on the ARCHITECT i2000st with STAT protocol capability.
## I. Device Description:
The in vitro diagnostic device consists of the following reagents:
Microparticles (1 bottle with 7.11 mL) - Anti-gentamicin (mouse, monoclonal) coated microparticles in TRIS buffer with protein (bovine) stabilizers and preservatives (ProClin 950 and sodium azide). Conjugate (1 bottle with 11.75 mL) - A conjugate solution containing gentamicin acridinium-labeled conjugate in MES buffer and ProClin 300 as a preservative.
ARCHITECT iMulti-Assay Manual Diluent containing a phosphate buffered saline solution and an antimicrobial agent as a preservative. ARCHITECT iPre-Trigger Solution containing 1.32% (w/v) hydrogen peroxide. ARCHITECT iTrigger Solution containing 0.35 N sodium hydroxide. ARCHITECT iWash Buffer containing phosphate buffered saline solution and antimicrobial agents to preserve wash buffer solution.
Calibrator:
The ARCHITECT iGentamicin Calibrators set contains a six level set (0.00, 0.30,
2
{2}
1.50, 5.00, 8.00, 10.00 µg/mL or Calibrators A to F) of a single analyte (gentamicin) calibrators in recalcified human plasma and contains ProClin 950 and sodium azide as preservatives. The human plasma used in the calibrators were tested and found to be nonreactive for HBsAg, HIV-1 Ag or HIV-1 RNA, anti-HIV-1/HIV-2, and anti-HCV Testing was performed by a FDA licensed method.
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s): AxSYM Gentamicin Assay
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s): k935376
3. Comparison with predicate:
Similarities:
| Reagents | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Characteristics | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | Same | a reagent system for the quantitative measurement of gentamicin, an antibiotic drug, in serum or plasma. |
| Product Type | Immunoassay | Same |
| Methodology | Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay (CMIA) | Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay (FPIA) |
| Where Used | Clinical Laboratories | Same |
| Assay Protocol | Competitive | Same |
| Calibration Curve Type | 6-point | Same |
| Measuring Interval | 0.3 μg/mL – 10.0 μg/mL | Same |
| Specimen Type | Serum or Plasma | Same |
| Instrumentation | ARCHITECT i2000SR | AxSYM |
| Calibrator Materials | | |
| Intended Use | Same | for the calibration of the quantitative measurement of gentamicin, an antibiotic drug, in serum or plasma. |
| Calibrator Levels | 6 levels | Same |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
1. EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline
{3}
2. EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
3. EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Testing; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
4. EP9-A2: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
5. EP17-A: Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation; Approved Guideline
L. Test Principle:
The ARCHITECT iGentamicin assay is an in vitro chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) for the quantitative measurement of gentamicin in human serum or plasma. Anti-gentamicin coated paramagnetic microparticles, and gentamicin acridinium-labeled conjugate are combined to create a reaction mixture. The anti-gentamicin coated microparticles bind to the gentamicin present in the sample and to the acridinium-labeled conjugate. After washing, pre-trigger and trigger solutions are added to the reaction mixture. The resulting chemiluminescent reaction is measured as relative light units (RLUs). An indirect relationship exists between the amount of gentamicin in the sample and the RLUs detected by the ARCHITECT iSystem optics.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
Performance was validated on the ARCHITECT $i2000_{\mathrm{SR}}$ with STAT protocol capability.
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision was evaluated on two ARCHITECT $i2000_{\mathrm{SR}}$ instruments using two lots of reagent, one lot of calibrators, and one lot of commercially available controls. Serum panels were prepared by spiking USP gentamicin gravimetrically into human serum resulting in the following gentamicin concentrations: $\leq 0.3~\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$, $1.0~\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$, $4.0~\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$, and $\geq 8.5~\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$. A single calibration per reagent was performed in replicates of two (stored for the duration of the study) and controls and serum panels were run in three replicates, twice daily for 20 days. Results are shown below.
4
{4}
| Sample | Instrument | Reagent Lot | N | Mean (μg/mL) | Within Run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Control Level 1 | 1 | 1 | 120 | 1.2 | 0.03 | 2.3 | 0.03 | 2.4 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 1.2 | 0.03 | 2.3 | 0.03 | 2.4 |
| | 2 | 1 | 120 | 1.3 | 0.03 | 2.0 | 0.03 | 2.3 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 1.3 | 0.03 | 2.2 | 0.03 | 2.4 |
| Control Level 2 | 1 | 1 | 120 | 3.7 | 0.08 | 2.3 | 0.10 | 2.7 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 3.7 | 0.11 | 2.9 | 0.12 | 3.2 |
| | 2 | 1 | 120 | 3.8 | 0.12 | 3.1 | 0.12 | 3.1 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 3.9 | 0.11 | 2.9 | 0.12 | 3.1 |
| Control Level 3 | 1 | 1 | 120 | 6.5 | 0.20 | 3.1 | 0.23 | 3.5 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 6.8 | 0.28 | 4.1 | 0.36 | 5.3 |
| | 2 | 1 | 120 | 6.9 | 0.25 | 3.7 | 0.29 | 4.2 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 6.8 | 0.26 | 3.8 | 0.27 | 4.0 |
| Panel 1 | 1 | 1 | 120 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 2.7 | 0.01 | 4.3 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 2.7 | 0.01 | 4.4 |
| | 2 | 1 | 120 | 0.3 | 0.01 | 2.8 | 0.01 | 3.1 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 0.3 | 0.01 | 2.8 | 0.01 | 3.1 |
| Panel 2 | 1 | 1 | 120 | 1.0 | 0.03 | 2.8 | 0.03 | 3.5 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 1.0 | 0.02 | 2.0 | 0.03 | 3.2 |
| | 2 | 1 | 120 | 1.0 | 0.02 | 1.9 | 0.02 | 2.0 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 1.0 | 0.02 | 2.5 | 0.03 | 2.8 |
| Panel 3 | 1 | 1 | 120 | 3.6 | 0.10 | 2.9 | 0.14 | 3.9 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 3.6 | 0.13 | 3.6 | 0.14 | 3.9 |
| | 2 | 1 | 120 | 3.8 | 0.10 | 2.6 | 0.11 | 2.9 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 3.7 | 0.10 | 2.6 | 0.11 | 3.1 |
| Panel 4 | 1 | 1 | 120 | 8.2 | 0.31 | 3.7 | 0.35 | 4.3 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 8.4 | 0.37 | 4.4 | 0.44 | 5.2 |
| | 2 | 1 | 120 | 8.6 | 0.31 | 3.6 | 0.33 | 3.8 |
| | | 2 | 120 | 8.3 | 0.38 | 4.5 | 0.42 | 5.0 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The claimed measurement range of the ARCHITECT iGentamicin assay is $0.3\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ to $10.0~\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$
To demonstrate linearity across the assay range, three sets of 11 samples with expected gentamicin concentrations ranging between $0\mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{mL}$ and 11.21 $\mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{mL}$ were prepared. The samples were tested in four replicates using one lot of ARCHITECT iGentamicin reagents and calibrators, and one lot of commercially available controls on one instrument. Three sample sets were tested each within a single run. The results were averaged and compared to the expected concentrations. The individual $\%$ differences were calculated and support the sponsor's claimed measuring range. A summary of observed vs.
{5}
expected concentrations are presented in the following table:
| Pool No. | Expected Concentration (μg/mL) | Observed Mean (μg/mL) | % Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 10.95 | 10.95 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 9.86 | 9.82 | -0.33 |
| 3 | 8.76 | 8.73 | -0.31 |
| 4 | 6.57 | 6.64 | 1.10 |
| 5 | 4.38 | 4.24 | -3.20 |
| 6 | 2.19 | 2.14 | -2.51 |
| 7 | 1.10 | 1.07 | -2.51 |
| 8 | 0.55 | 0.54 | -1.83 |
| 9 | 0.22 | 0.22 | -0.68 |
| 10 | 0.11 | 0.10 | -8.68 |
| 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
# Recovery Study:
A study was conducted to demonstrate that gentamicin spiked into human serum can be accurately recovered by the ARCHITECT iGentamicin assay. Twelve normal human specimens were obtained which contained no detectable amounts of gentamicin. These specimens were spiked with gentamicin stock solution to create test samples at concentrations of 2.5, 4.0, 6.0, and $8.0~\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ . Reference samples were created by spiking the twelve normal human specimens with diluent at the same volume used to create the test samples. The test (spiked) and reference (pre-spiked) samples were tested in four replicates The percent recovery was calculated by the equation:
$\%$ Recovery $= \frac{\text{Mean Spiked Test Conc.} - \text{Mean Pre-Spiked Conc.}}{\text{Added (Spiked) Analyte Conc.}}$ X100%
The mean $\%$ recovery was 95.7 and the individual $\%$ recovery results ranged from 91.1 to 99.2. Results are summarized in the following table:
| Known analyte concentration (μg/mL) | Observed Mean (μg/mL) | Average (N=4) % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2.5 | 2.49 | 99.2 |
| 2.5 | 2.45 | 98.0 |
| 2.5 | 2.46 | 98.3 |
| 4.00 | 3.81 | 95.2 |
| 4.00 | 3.83 | 95.6 |
{6}
7
| 4.00 | 3.86 | 96.4 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6.00 | 5.93 | 98.9 |
| 6.00 | 5.59 | 93.2 |
| 6.00 | 5.71 | 95.1 |
| 8.00 | 7.63 | 95.4 |
| 8.00 | 7.38 | 92.3 |
| 8.00 | 7.29 | 91.1 |
Validation of the manual dilution procedure:
A study was conducted to verify the use of ARCHITECT iMulti-Assay Manual Diluent as the manual diluent for routine 1:5 dilutions of a sample tested with the ARCHITECT iGentamicin assay. Twelve serum/plasma samples were tested in replicates of three. The median % recoveries ranged between 91% and 109%.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The ARCHITECT iGentamicin calibrators are traceable to United States Pharmacopeia (USP) gentamicin.
The ARCHITECT iGentamicin Calibrators are prepared by gravimetric dilution of Gentamicin Reference Standard (USP) into recalcified plasma free of gentamicin. Each calibrator is tested by Relative Light Units (RLU) matching against the corresponding primary calibrator. The uncertainty in value assignments ranged in +/- 0.001 to 0.042 µg/mL.
**Calibrator Stability:**
The stability of the calibrators was established through real time testing conducted at multiple time points. For the real time closed vial testing, three lots of calibrators were stored continuously at 2 to 8 °C prior to testing at designated time points. At time point zero, all calibrator bottles were opened and closed, and then stored at 2-8 °C for the duration of the study. The serum panels were stored at -20°C or colder. Real time studies are on-going and scheduled to continue for 25 months (with a minimum of 6 months). Protocols and acceptance criteria were found adequate as presented in the 510(k).
d. Detection limit:
The Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD), and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) were determined based on guidance from CLSI EP17-A.
Limit of Blank and Limit of Detection:
{7}
The limit of blank (LoB) and limit of detection (LoD) of the Architect iGentamicin assay were determined based on CLSI Protocol EP17-A. These evaluations were performed using one blank $(N = 200)$ and four low level gentamicin samples $(N = 320)$ . Analysis yielded an $\mathrm{LoB} = 0.00\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ and $\mathrm{LoD} = 0.05\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ . Two instruments, two lots of reagents, one lot of calibrators and one lot of controls were used for this study.
# Limit of Quantitation:
Five zero-level samples and six samples with gentamicin concentrations (0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.2, and $0.3\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ ) were tested in five separate runs over a minimum of 3 days using two reagent lots and two instruments. The LoQ was determined as the smallest concentration at which the total error was approximately $15\%$ . The LoQ was determined to be $0.2\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ .
LoQ Summary
| N | Target Conc. (μg/mL) | Mean Conc. (μg/mL) | % Bias | %CV | Observed % Total Error | LoQ (μg/mL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 200 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 7.4 | 4.0 | 15.4 | 0.20 |
| 200 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 7.6 | 3.2 | 14.0 | |
# e. Analytical specificity:
The following compounds were tested for cross-reactivity or interference in samples containing $0\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ , $2.5\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ , and $7\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ gentamicin.
Test samples were prepared by spiking each drug at the interferent concentration into each of the three gentamicin samples to yield test samples with different analyte levels (0, 2.5, $7.0~\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ ). To compensate for any dilution effect, reference samples were prepared by adding diluent into human recalcified plasma that had been spiked with gentamicin to the target concentrations. The test and reference samples were tested with a minimum of 17 replicates using one lot of ARCHITECT iGentamicin reagents and calibrators and one lot of commercially available controls on one ARCHITECT i2000SR instrument. Results are shown below and in the package insert:
| Test Compound | Test Compound Concentration (μg/mL) | Gentamicin Concentration (μg/mL) | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | 0.0 | 2.5 | | 7.0 | |
| | | Conc. Diff. | Conc. Diff. | %difference | Conc. Diff. | % difference |
| Acetaminophen | 200 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.0 | 0.08 | 0.0 |
{8}
| Acetylcysteine | 1,000 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.0 | 0.01 | 0.0 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 300 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.0 | -0.34 | -0.1 |
| Amikacin | 300 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.0 | 0.32 | 0.1 |
| Amphotericin B | 100 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.11 | 0.1 |
| Ampicillin | 50 | 0.00 | -0.02 | 0.0 | -0.36 | -0.6 |
| Ascorbic acid | 30 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.0 | -0.03 | -0.1 |
| Carbenicillin | 2,500 | 0.00 | -0.33 | 0.0 | -0.83 | 0.0 |
| Cefamandole | 250 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.0 | -0.08 | 0.0 |
| Cefoxitin | 1,000 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.0 | -0.21 | 0.0 |
| Cephalexin | 320 | 0.01 | 0.91 | 0.3 | 2.34 | 0.7 |
| Cephalosporin C | 1,000 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.0 | 0.06 | 0.0 |
| Cephalothin | 1,000 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.0 | 0.18 | 0.0 |
| Chloramphenicol | 250 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.0 | 0.03 | 0.0 |
| Clindamycin | 2,000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 |
| Cyclosporine | 6,000 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.0 | 0.59 | 0.0 |
| Erythromycin | 500 | 0.00 | -0.12 | 0.0 | 0.24 | 0.0 |
| Ethacrynic acid | 400 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.0 | -0.28 | -0.1 |
| 5-Fluorocytosine | 30 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.0 | -0.01 | 0.0 |
| Furosemide | 100 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.0 | -0.40 | -0.3 |
| Fusidic acid | 1,000 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.0 | -0.01 | 0.0 |
| Ibuprofen | 2,000 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.0 | -0.34 | 0.0 |
| Kanamycin A | 400 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.0 | 0.45 | 0.1 |
| Kanamycin B | 400 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.1 | 0.87 | 0.2 |
| Levodopa | 1,000 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.0 | -0.03 | 0.0 |
| Lincomycin | 2,000 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.0 | -0.02 | 0.0 |
| Methicillin | 200 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.0 | -0.15 | -0.1 |
| Methotrexate | 50 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.0 | -0.10 | -0.2 |
| Methylprednisolone | 200 | 0.00 | -0.02 | 0.0 | -0.03 | 0.0 |
| Metronidazole | 1,000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.19 | 0.0 |
| Neomycin | 100 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.1 | 1.01 | 0.9 |
| Netilmicin | 10 | 4.41 | 4.58 | 45.8 | 4.93 | 49.3 |
| Oxytetracycline | 2,000 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.0 | 0.02 | 0.0 |
| Penicillin V | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.08 | 0.7 |
| Phenylbutazone | 1,000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.0 | -0.06 | 0.0 |
| Prednisolone | 12 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.2 | -0.04 | -0.3 |
| Rifampin | 50 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 |
| Sisomicin | 10 | 3.29 | 3.29 | 27.4 | 3.78 | 31.5 |
| Spectinomycin | 100 | 0.00 | -0.09 | -0.1 | -0.23 | -0.2 |
| Streptomycin | 400 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.0 | 0.21 | 0.0 |
| Sulfadiazine | 1,000 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.0 | -0.02 | 0.0 |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 400 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.0 | 0.20 | 0.0 |
| Tetracycline | 2,000 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.0 | 0.59 | 0.0 |
| Theophylline | 200 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.0 | 0.14 | 0.1 |
| Ticarcillin | 100 | 0.00 | -0.02 | -0.2 | -0.09 | -0.1 |
| Tobramycin | 100 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.2 | 0.84 | 0.7 |
9
{9}
Cephalexin, Netilmicin, and Sisomicin are included in the Limitations section of the ARCHITECT iGentamicin package insert as drugs that will yield falsely elevate values for gentamicin. Although Sagamicin was not available for testing, it is also included in the Limitations section because it is structurally similar to gentamicin.
Interference from endogenous compounds was evaluated based on the CLSI EP7-A2 document. Two levels of gentamicin were tested: 2.5 and 7.0 µg/mL. The spiked samples were compared to the control samples. Results are summarized in the following table:
| Potentially Interfering Endogenous Substance | Interferent Concentration | % Interference | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | 2.5 µg/mL | 7.0 µg/mL |
| Bilirubin | 20 mg/dL | -0.6 | 0.7 |
| Hemoglobin | 500 mg/dL | 2.7 | 3.4 |
| Total Protein | 12 g/dL | 0.9 | 4.8 |
| Triglycerides | 3000 mg/dL | -1.6 | 0.4 |
## Evaluation of other potentially interfering compounds:
Normal human serum pool and samples containing the clinical conditions listed below were spiked at two levels of gentamicin (2.5 and 7.0 µg/mL). Gentamicin concentrations of the spiked samples were compared to the samples without gentamicin. Results are summarized in the following table:
| Potentially Interfering Clinical Condition | N | % Recovery Range (Individual) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | 2.5 µg/mL | 7.0 µg/mL |
| Human Anti-Mouse Antibodies (HAMA) | 12 | 99.4-107.1 | 91.2-103.7 |
| Heterophilic Antibodies | 12 | 97.6-107.9 | 87.6-105.2 |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 12 | 95.8-105.6 | 93.2-101.5 |
$$
\% \text{Recovery} = \frac{\text{Post-Spike Result} - \text{Pre-Spike Result}}{X 100}
$$
Result of Spiked Normal Serum Samples
{10}
f. Assay cut-off:
Not Applicable. This is a quantitative assay.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Method comparison was performed based on the CLSI EP9A-2 guideline. Samples used for the method comparison study were de-identified, leftover samples obtained from external vendors with gentamicin concentrations between 0.3 to 10.0 µg/mL. For the ARCHITECT iGentamicin assay, the specimens were tested using three lots of reagents, one lot of calibrators, and one lot of commercially available controls and two ARCHITECT i2000SR instruments. A total of 146 samples were tested in replicates of two. For the predicate method, specimens were tested using one lot of reagents, calibrators, and controls using one AxSYM instrument. Results ranged from 0.31 to 8.82 µg/mL with the ARCHITECT iGentamicin assay and from 0.46 to 9.23 µg/mL with the AxSYM gentamicin assay. Results are summarized in the table below:
| ARCHITECT | AxSYM | R | Intercept (µg/mL) | Slope |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0.31 – 8.82 µg/mL | 0.46-9.23 µg/mL | 0.993 | -0.04 | 0.96 |
b. Matrix comparison:
A study was conducted to evaluate different anticoagulant tube types that can be used with the ARCHITECT iGentamicin assay. Twenty sample sets were collected for this study and a comparison was performed between the control tube (serum, plastic tube) and each of the blood collection tube types. The following blood collection tube types were tested: Glass tubes: serum, sodium EDTA; Plastic tubes: serum, lithium heparin, sodium heparin, and K2EDTA. Sample sets were spiked with gentamicin stock solution to yield the following target concentrations: 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0 µg/mL. The sample sets were tested on one ARCHITECT i2000SR instrument in replicates of four using one lot of reagents, calibrators, and commercially available controls. The 95% confidence intervals around the mean % recovery for each tube type fell within 90-110% recovery.
The individual recoveries for each tube type are as follows:
{11}
Serum (glass) : 93.6 to 103.3%
Sodium heparin : 87.6 to 103.1%
Lithium heparin : 89.6 to 103%
Sodium EDTA : 90.3 to 99.1%
Dipotassium EDTA : 87.7 to 98.2%
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not Applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not Applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
In the labeling, the sponsor provided values cited from the literature* as follows:
Peak serum levels of gentamicin in the range of 5 to 10 µg/mL are suggested for optimal therapeutic effectiveness. Sponsor states that trough levels greater than 2 µg/mL have been associated with renal failure in some patients.
*Keller F, Borner K, Schwarz A, Offermann G, Lode H. Therapeutic Aminoglycoside Monitoring in Renal Failure Patients, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 9(2):148-153, June 1987
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
12
{12}
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
13
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.