K102608 · Suros Surgical Systems, Inc. A Hologic Company · NEU · Oct 8, 2010 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K102608
Device Name
SECURMARK BIOPSY SITE MARKING SYSTEM
Applicant
Suros Surgical Systems, Inc. A Hologic Company
Product Code
NEU · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Oct 8, 2010
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4300
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The SecurMark Biopsy Site Marking System is intended for use with the manual method of deployment. It can be visualized under various imaging modalities such as ultrasound, x-ray, magnetic resonance, direct visualization, and others. This system is intended for single patient use only.
Device Story
SecurMark Biopsy Site Marking System is a sterile, single-patient-use implantable device. It consists of a permanent radiographic marker (titanium or stainless steel) surrounded by a bioabsorbable suture-like material. A hand-held deployment device, comprising a flexible cannula, handle, push rod, and plunger, delivers the marker to the biopsy site in soft tissue. The device is used by clinicians to provide a permanent radiographic reference point for follow-up imaging. The marker is visualized via ultrasound, x-ray, or MRI to assist in locating the biopsy site for clinical decision-making. The system benefits patients by ensuring accurate identification of biopsy sites for subsequent monitoring or surgical intervention.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Evaluations included simulation, shelf life, tensile testing, functionality at specified temperatures, MRI compatibility and artifacts, X-ray visualization, calcification distinguishability, sterilization, biocompatibility, and tolerance analyses. The device met or exceeded all acceptance criteria.
Technological Characteristics
Implantable marker composed of titanium or 316 stainless steel surrounded by bioabsorbable material. Hand-held manual deployment system with flexible cannula, push rod, and plunger. Sterile, single-patient-use. MRI compatible. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for permanent radiographic marking of biopsy sites in soft tissue.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An implantable clip is a clip-like device intended to connect internal tissues to aid healing. It is not absorbable.
Predicate Devices
SecurMark Biopsy Site Identification System (K072913)
{0}------------------------------------------------
K102608
# SECTION 3 - 510(k) SUMMARY
DATE PREPARED: DATE REVISED:
ﮨﮯ
ﻣﯿ
August 27, 2010 (original submission) October 8, 2010
## OWNER/OPERATOR:
| Firm: | Hologic, Inc. | Contact Name: Alyssa M. Lobo |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | 6100 Technology Center Drive<br>Indianapolis, IN 46278 | Title: Senior Quality and Regulatory Consultant |
| | | (a full-time employee of Hologic, Inc.) |
| Phone Number: | 317-344-7500 | Phone Number: 317-344-7532 |
| Fax Number: | 317-344-7697 | E-mail: alyssa.lobo@hologic.com |
| Registration Number: | 3003862400 | |
## DEVICE NAME:
| Classification Name: | Marker, Implantable Radiographic |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------|
| Common/Usual Name: | Tissue Site Marking System |
| Proprietary Name: | SecurMark Biopsy Site Marking System |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Description: | Implantable Clip |
| Number: | NEU |
| 21 CFR Ref: | 878.4300 |
| Performance Standard: | None established |
## PREDICATE DEVICES:
| 510(k) Number | Device Name | Device Manufacturer | Location |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
| K072913 | SecurMark Biopsy Site<br>Identification System | Hologic, Inc.<br>(formerly Suros Surgical Systems, Inc.) | Indianapolis, IN |
| K062528 | Tissue Site Marking<br>System | Hologic, Inc.<br>(formerly Suros Surgical Systems, Inc.) | Indianapolis, IN |
# Description of the Device
The SecurMark Biopsy Site Marker is a sterile, single patient use device comprised of a single, biocompatible titanium or stainless steel marker surrounded by a bioabsorbable suture-like material and deployment device.
The deployment device is a hand-held device that delivers the marker from the distal tip. The deployment device consists of a flexible cannula, handle, flexible push rod, and plunger. The marker is located at the deployment device.
## Indications for Use and Intended Use
#### Indications for Use
The Tissue Site Marking System is indicated for the permanent radiographic marking of sites in soft tissue.
#### Intended Use
The SecurMark Biopsy Site Marking System is intended for use with the manual method of deployment. It can be visualized under various imaging modalities such as ultrasound, x-ray, magnetic resonance, direct visualization, and others. This system is intended for single patient use only.
{1}------------------------------------------------
# Comparison of 510(k) Cleared Tissue Site Marking Systems
The SecurMark Biopsy Site Marker that is the subject of this submission is comprised of two 510(k) cleared devices. The first is an implantable component, covered by K062528, held by Hologic, Inc. which is composed of a bioabsorbable component and a permanent marking component (316 stainless steel or titanium). The second is a deployment device, covered by K072913, held by Hologic, Inc. The subject of this 510(k) is similar to the predicate devices in the following areas: Indications for Use, Intended Use, Scientific Technology, biocompatibility, sterilization (dose, method, and SAL), marker materials, deployment device materials, packaging materials, deployment device manufacturing site, deployment device manufacturing methods, deployment device dimensions, marker dimensions, shelf life, and deployment method. The product is also supplied sterile for single patient use, like the predicate devices.
The subject of this 510(k) is different from the device cleared in K072913 in that the permanent marker material in that 510(k) was listed only as titanium. The subject of this 510(k) is different from the device cleared in K062528 in that the deployment device is constructed from different materials. The shapes of the permanent marking components in this submission are different from the shapes of the marking components that were cleared in both K072913 and K062528. All other aspects of the subject of this 510(k) submission are the legally marketed devices.
#### Non-Clinical Evaluation
The devices that are the subject of this submission have been evaluated through a number of test, or prior test results for predicate devices apply to the devices that are subject of this submission. Testing, evaluations, and/or analyses have been performed for: simulation, shelf life, tensile testing, functionality at specified temperatures, MRI compatibility and artifacts, X-ray distinctive visualization, calcification distinguishability, sterilization, biocompatibility, tolerance analyses, and viscosity and moisture.
The devices met or exceeded the acceptance criteria for all evaluations.
#### Conclusion
Based on the information presented in this Special 510(k) submission, the SecurMark Biopsy Site Marking System is substantially equivalent to the presently marketed Hologic, Inc. Tissue Site Marking System (K062528) and the SecurMark Biopsy Site Identification System (K072913).
No new safety or efficacy questions are raised with the SecurMark Biopsy Site Marking System that is the subject of this submission.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo consists of a circle with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the circumference. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles an eagle or bird in flight, composed of three stylized lines.
# DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Hologic, Inc. % Ms. Alyssa M. Lobo Senior Quality and Regulatory Consultant 6100 Technology Center Drive Indianapolis, Indiana 46278
OCT O & 2010
Re: K102608
Trade/Device Name: SecurMark Biopsy Site Marking System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4300 Regulation Name: Implantable clip Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NEU Dated: August 27, 2010 Received: September 13, 2010
Dear Ms. Lobo:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Alyssa M. Lobo
or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH0ffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Mark N. Melkerson
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic And Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
# Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K102608
Device Name: SecurMark Biopsy Site Marking System
Indications For Use: The SecurMark Biopsy Site Marking System is indicated for the permanent radiographic marking of sites in soft tissue.
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
· AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Daniel Kroeber for MXM
Division Sign Off
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
510(k) Number K102608
Page 1 of
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.