K102565 · Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc · KWA · Dec 22, 2010 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K102565
Device Name
ANTERIOR APPROACH HIP SURGERY INSTRUMENTS
Applicant
Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc
Product Code
KWA · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Dec 22, 2010
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3330
Device Class
Class 3
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Wright Total Hip Implant Stems for use with these instruments are indicated for use in total hip arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved hip function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions: 1. non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, ankylosis, protrusio acetabuli, and painful hip dysplasia; 2. inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis; 3. correction of functional deformity; and, 4. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed
Device Story
Anterior Approach Hip Surgery Instruments consist of stainless steel surgical tools including broaches, inserters/impactors, chisels, and rasps. Used by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings to prepare the proximal femur and impact hip implants during total hip arthroplasty. Instruments feature specific geometries (e.g., lateral surface curvature) to facilitate access to the proximal femur via the anterior approach without interfering with the greater trochanter. Modular components allow for familiar orientation and handling. These manual instruments assist the surgeon in bone removal and implant positioning, directly impacting the accuracy of the arthroplasty procedure and potentially improving patient outcomes by facilitating less invasive surgical access.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Safety and effectiveness supported by substantial equivalence analysis and bench evaluation by design surgeons in a surgical setting.
Technological Characteristics
Manufactured from stainless steel. Manual surgical instruments including broaches, chisels, inserters, and rasps. Designed for anterior approach hip surgery. No energy source, connectivity, or software components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty for non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, ankylosis, protrusio acetabuli, painful hip dysplasia), inflammatory degenerative joint disease (rheumatoid arthritis), functional deformity correction, or revision procedures.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/metal semi-constrained, with an uncemented acetabular component, prosthesis is a two-part device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that consist of a femoral and an acetabular component, both made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum. The femoral component is intended to be fixed with bone cement. The acetabular component is intended for use without bone cement (§ 888.3027).
{0}------------------------------------------------
K102565 (pg 1/2)
## 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
DEC 2 2 2010
In accordance with the Food and Drug Administration Rule to implement provisions of the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 and in conformance with 21 CFR 807, this information serves as a Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for the Anterior Approach Hip Surgery Instruments.
| (a)(1) Submitted By<br>Submitter's Name: | Wright Medical Technology, Inc.<br>5677 Airline Rd. Arlington, TN 38002<br>800-238-7188 (phone), 901-867-4190 (fax) |
|---------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:<br>Contact Person: | December 20, 2010<br>Gregory Neal<br>Regulatory Affairs Specialist II |
| (a)(2) Device Name<br>Proprietary Name:<br>Common Name: | Anterior Approach Hip Surgery Instruments<br>Broach, Inserter/Impactor, Chisel, Rasp |
| Classification Name and Reference: | 21 CFR 888.3330 Hip joint metal/ metal<br>semi-constrained, with an uncemented<br>acetabular component prosthesis - Class III |
| Subject Device Product Code and Panel Code: | Orthopedics/87/KWA, JDI, JDL, LWJ, LZO |
| (a)(3) Predicate Device<br>Predicate Proprietary Name: | PROFEMUR® LX 5/8 Hip Stem (K081090)<br>PROFEMUR® TL Hip Stem (K060358) |
| Predicate Classification and Number: | Orthopedics/87/ KWA, 888.3330 |
#### (a)(4) Device Description
The design features of the Anterior Approach Hip Surgery Instruments are summarized below:
- Manufactured from Stainless Steel .
- Modular PROFEMUR® Starter Broach provides means to begin preparation of . proximal femur; overall size envelope is smaller than any existing PROFEMUR® stem, allowing usage with all designs; curvature of lateral surface allows insertion without interfering with greater trochanter; engagement with broach handle allows usage in familiar orientation
- Modular PROFEMUR® Box Chisel provides means to remove bone in calcar region, . creating opening for other instruments; curvature of lateral surface allows insertion without interfering with greater trochanter; engagement with broach handle allows usage in familiar orientation
{1}------------------------------------------------
- Modular PROFEMUR® Dimple Stem Inserter provides means by which implant may . be impacted via engagement of dimple on lateral shoulder; engagement with broach handle allows usage in familiar orientation
- Modular PROFEMUR® Pocket Stem Inserter provides means by which implant may . be impacted via engagement of modular neck pocket; engagement with broach handle allows usage in familiar orientation
- Lateralizing Rasp provides rigid, aggressively-toothed surface at end of handle that . can be used to contour the proximal region of the femoral canal.
- Dual-Offset Broach Handles Right and Left broach handles provide improved access . to the proximal femur
## (a)(5) Intended Use
The Wright Total Hip Implant Stems for use with these instruments are indicated for use in total hip arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved hip function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:
- 1. non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, ankylosis, protrusio acetabuli, and painful hip dysplasia;
- 2. inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis;
- 3. correction of functional deformity; and,
- 4. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed
#### (a)(6) Technological Characteristics of the Device
The indications for implants used with the Anterior Approach Hip Surgery Instruments are identical to instruments used with implants cleared by PROFEMUR® LX 5/8 Hip Stem and PROFEMUR® TL Hip Stem. Materials for the Anterior Approach Hip Surgery Instruments are identical to instruments used with implants cleared by PROFEMUR® TL Hip Stem. The design features of the Anterior Approach Hip Surgery Instruments are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. The fundamental scientific technology of the modified device has not changed relative to the predicate devices.
#### (b)(1) Nonclinical Testing
Prototypes were used and further evaluated by the design surgeons in a surgical setting.
#### (b)(2) Clinical Testing
Clinical data was not provided for the Class I instruments.
## (b)(3) Conclusions
The safety and effectiveness of the Anterior Approach Hip Surgery Instruments are adequately supported by the substantial equivalence information, materials information, and analysis data provided within this Premarket Notification.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized graphic of an eagle or bird-like figure with three curved lines representing its wings or body. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the graphic.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. % Mr. Gregory M. Neal Regulatory Affairs Specialist II 5677 Airline Road Arlington, TN 38002
DEC 2 2 2910
K102565 Trade/Device Name: Anterior Approach Hip Surgery Instruments Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3330 Regulation Name: Hip joint metal/metal semi-constrained, with an uncemented acetabular component, prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class III Product Code: KWA, JDI, JDL, LWJ, LZO Dated: November 24, 2010 Received: November 26, 2010
Dear Mr. Neal:
Re:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA), You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. Iisting of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Gregory M. Neal
CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
A.S. B. R.
fu
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
DEC 2 2 2010
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: Anterior Approach Hip Surgery Instruments
Indications For Use:
The Wright Total Hip Implant Stems for use with these instruments are indicated for use in total hip arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved hip function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:
- 1. non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, ankylosis, protrusio acetabuli, and painful hip dysplasia;
- 2. inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis;
- 3. correction of functional deformity; and,
- 4. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed
Modular necks can be used during either cemented or uncemented femoral and acetabular arthroplasty. .
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
for M. Melkersm
(Diviston/Sign-Oft) (Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
510(k) Number K102565
Page 1 of 1
l
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.