K102425 · Zeus Scientific, Inc. · MID · Dec 12, 2011 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K102425
Device Name
ZEUS ELISA CARDIOLIPIN IGG/IGM/IGA TEST SYSTEM
Applicant
Zeus Scientific, Inc.
Product Code
MID · Immunology
Decision Date
Dec 12, 2011
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5660
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA Test System is intended for the in vitro, qualitative measurement of IgG, IgM and/or IgA antibodies directed to cardiolipin in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (SAPS) in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
Device Story
The ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA Test System is an in vitro diagnostic assay used in clinical laboratories. It detects IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies against cardiolipin in human serum samples. The device utilizes an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) principle; patient serum is incubated in microtiter wells coated with cardiolipin antigen. If specific antibodies are present, they bind to the antigen. After washing, an enzyme-labeled conjugate is added, followed by a substrate to produce a colorimetric signal proportional to the amount of bound antibody. Results are interpreted by laboratory personnel to assist clinicians in diagnosing primary or secondary antiphospholipid syndrome. The test provides qualitative data that, when combined with other clinical findings, supports the diagnostic process for patients suspected of having these syndromes.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence is based on bench testing and performance comparisons to the predicate device.
Technological Characteristics
ELISA-based immunoassay; microtiter plate format; colorimetric detection; qualitative measurement of IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies. Standard laboratory equipment required for incubation and spectrophotometric reading.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of IgG, IgM, and/or IgA anti-cardiolipin antibodies in human serum to aid in diagnosis of primary and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS/SAPS). For prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A multiple autoantibodies immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the autoantibodies (antibodies produced against the body's own tissues) in serum and other body fluids. Measurement of multiple autoantibodies aids in the diagnosis of autoimmune disorders (disease produced when the body's own tissues are injured by autoantibodies).
Predicate Devices
ZEUS Scientific Cardiolipin IgA ELISA Reagents (k973196)
ZEUS Scientific Anti-Cardiolipin IgG ELISA Test System (k981014)
ZEUS Scientific Anti-Cardiolipin IgM ELISA Test System (k981021)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k102425
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Human anti-cardiolipin IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative immunoassay
E. Applicant:
ZEUS Scientific, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA Test System
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR §866.5660, Multiple autoantibodies immunological test system
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
MID – System, Test, Anti-Cardiolipin Immunological
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA Test System is intended for the in vitro, qualitative measurement of IgG, IgM and/or IgA antibodies directed to cardiolipin in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (SAPS) in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
2. Indication(s) for use:
See intended use above.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
ELISA microwell reader capable of reading at wavelength 450 nm.
I. Device Description:
The ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA Test System contains components in sufficient quantities to perform the number of tests indicated on the packaging label. The components are as follows: a 96-well plate configured in twelve 1x8 well strips coated with cardiolipin antigen from bovine heart; one 15-mL ready-to-use vial of conjugated (horseradish peroxidase, HRP) goat anti-human IgG/IgM/IgA; one 0.35-mL vial of positive control (human serum); one 0.5-mL vial of calibrator (human
{1}
serum); one 0.35mL-vial of negative control (human serum); one ready-to-use 30-mL bottle of SAVe diluent (sample diluent) containing Tween 20, bovine serum albumin and phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.2 ± 0.2); one ready-to-use 15-mL bottle of 3,3',5,5', tetramethylbenzidine (TMB); one ready-to-use 15-mL bottle of stop solution containing 1M H₂SO₄ and 0.7M HCl and wash buffer concentrate.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s) and Predicate k number(s):
ZEUS Scientific Cardiolipin IgA ELISA Reagents k973196
ZEUS Scientific Anti-Cardiolipin IgG ELISA Test System, k981014
ZEUS Scientific Anti-Cardiolipin IgM ELISA Test System, k981021
2. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | In vitro measurement of antibodies to cardiolipin | Same |
| Assay | Colorimetric Immunoassay | Same |
| Antigen | Cardiolipin antigen from bovine heart | Same |
| Sample Matrix | Serum | Same |
| Substrate | TMB | Same |
| Controls | One Positive Control, one Negative Control | Same |
| Calibration | Includes Calibrator | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Indications for Use | The ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA Test System is intended for the in vitro, qualitative measurement of IgG, IgM and/or IgA antibodies directed to cardiolipin in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (SAPS) in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. | The Zeus Scientific, Inc. Cardiolipin Antibody Test Systems are enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) designed for the semi-quantitative measurement of circulating IgA (IgM or IgG) autoantibodies to cardiolipin. |
| Assay type | Qualitative | Semi-quantitative |
{2}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Analyte | Human IgA, IgM and IgG antibodies to cardiolipin | Human IgA, IgM or IgG antibodies to cardiolipin (depending on specific kit used) |
| Conjugate | HRP goat anti-human IgA, IgM, and IgG | HRP goat anti-human IgA, IgM, or IgG |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
None
## L. Test Principle:
The ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA is designed to detect IgG/IgM/IgA class antibodies to Cardiolipin in human sera. Wells of plastic microwell strips are coated by passive absorption with Cardiolipin antigens. The test procedure involves three incubation steps:
1. Test sera (properly diluted) are incubated in antigen coated microwells. Any antigen specific antibody in the sample will bind to the immobilized antigen. The plate is washed to remove unbound antibody and other serum components.
2. HRP Conjugated goat anti-human IgG/IgM/IgA is added to the wells and the plate is incubated. The Conjugate will react with antibody immobilized on the solid phase in step 1. The wells are washed to remove unreacted Conjugate.
3. The microwells containing immobilized Conjugate are incubated with Substrate Solution. Hydrolysis of the Substrate by peroxidase produces a color change. After a period of time the reaction is stopped and the color intensity of the solution is measured photometrically. The color intensity of the solution depends upon the antibody concentration in the original test sample.
Assay results are calculated as an Index Value (IV), a ratio of the sample optical density to the optical density of the Calibrator multiplied by a correction factor determined by the manufacturer. The correction factor is determined for each lot of kit components and is printed on the Component List located in the kit box. An IV of $\geq 1.0$ indicates a positive assay.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Reproducibility of the assay was evaluated at the sponsor’s laboratory and at two external clinical sites. Twelve samples were chosen to represent a range of sample IVs from negative to high positives, including a sample near the cut-off.
Each original serum sample was diluted 1:21 (as per assay directions) separately twice and then tested in triplicate. A second technologist repeated this process. Therefore, 12 results were obtained per day and the samples were tested for five days so that the total number of results was 60. Results are presented below by site:
{3}
| Site | Sample | Mean IV | Result Expected | % Positive | % Negative | Result Range (IV) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | | Low | High |
| 1 | 1 | 5.43 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 4.70 | 6.11 |
| | 2 | 5.58 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 4.66 | 6.27 |
| | 3 | 2.49 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 2.07 | 2.80 |
| | 4 | 2.32 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 1.90 | 2.85 |
| | 5 | 1.45 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 1.12 | 1.77 |
| | 6 | 1.38 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 1.09 | 1.64 |
| | 7 | 0.97 | Negative | 36.7% | 63.3% | 0.73 | 1.15 |
| | 8 | 0.86 | Negative | 2% | 98.3% | 0.69 | 1.02 |
| | 9 | 0.54 | Negative | 0% | 100.0% | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| | 10 | 0.60 | Negative | 0% | 100% | 0.43 | 0.77 |
| | 11 | 0.23 | Negative | 0% | 100% | 0.15 | 0.42 |
| | 12 | 0.30 | Negative | 0% | 100% | 0.21 | 0.58 |
| 2 | 1 | 5.48 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 4.54 | 6.48 |
| | 2 | 5.54 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 4.71 | 6.38 |
| | 3 | 2.50 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 2.10 | 2.95 |
| | 4 | 2.40 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | 3.27 |
| | 5 | 1.53 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 1.28 | 2.27 |
| | 6 | 1.46 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 1.06 | 1.72 |
| | 7 | 1.06 | Positive | 73.3% | 26.7% | 0.89 | 1.18 |
| | 8 | 0.96 | Negative | 75% | 25.0% | 0.80 | 1.10 |
| | 9 | 0.64 | Negative | 0% | 100% | 0.48 | 0.82 |
| | 10 | 0.64 | Negative | 0% | 100% | 0.48 | 0.83 |
| | 11 | 0.23 | Negative | 0% | 100% | 0.17 | 0.29 |
| | 12 | 0.31 | Negative | 0% | 100% | 0.24 | 0.53 |
| 3 | 1 | 5.30 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 4.50 | 6.29 |
| | 2 | 5.20 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 4.53 | 5.73 |
| | 3 | 2.29 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 1.84 | 2.57 |
| | 4 | 2.23 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 1.82 | 2.88 |
| | 5 | 1.28 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 1.07 | 1.61 |
| | 6 | 1.32 | Positive | 100% | 0% | 1.04 | 1.56 |
| | 7 | 0.94 | Negative | 25.0% | 75.0% | 0.77 | 1.12 |
| | 8 | 0.84 | Negative | 2% | 98.3% | 0.70 | 1.02 |
| | 9 | 0.56 | Negative | 0% | 100% | 0.45 | 0.67 |
| | 10 | 0.55 | Negative | 0% | 100% | 0.42 | 0.68 |
| | 11 | 0.19 | Negative | 0% | 100% | 0.11 | 0.24 |
| | 12 | 0.24 | Negative | 0% | 100% | 0.18 | 0.31 |
# Lot-to-Lot Reproducibility:
To assess the reproducibility of the assay across manufacturing lots, 90 clinical samples were obtained and tested once with each lot. The samples were chosen as follows: 30 negative samples (IV: $\leq 0.7$ ), 30 positive samples (IV: $\geq 1.3$ ), and 30 samples around the assay cut-off (target IV to range from 0.8 to 1.2). All positive samples were tested with all three lots on one day, all negative samples were tested with all three lots on another day, and all
{4}
samples around the cut-off were tested with all three lots on a third day to minimize non-lot-to-lot factors.
| Group | Sample IV range (all lots) | Consensus* | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Lot 1 and Lot 2 | Lot 1 and Lot 3 | Lot 2 and Lot 3 |
| Negative | 0.01 – 0.63 | 30/30 | 30/30 | 30/30 |
| Positive | 1.52 – 10.59 | 30/30 | 30/30 | 30/30 |
| Near Cut-Off | 0.74 – 1.55 | 22/30 | 22/30 | 24/30 |
*Consensus = agreement between results (e.g., positive and positive)
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
An international reference standard for anti-cardiolipin antibodies is not available.
Calibrators and Controls:
Calibrators and Controls are manufactured by diluting human serum containing anti-cardiolipin antibodies into a serum diluent. A target concentration is achieved through trial dilutions on a small scale. Once a dilution is selected, the control is bulked, tested, and adjusted, and the final value is determined.
Unopened kit stability:
Ongoing real-time stability testing currently supports a 12 month shelf-life claim. A kit is opened and tested for a baseline reading on the controls, calibrators and a positive sample and a negative sample. Every three months an unopened kit with the same lot number and an aliquot of the samples are re-tested. Mean and drift are calculated. The sponsor's acceptance criteria were met at all time points.
Opened kit stability:
A stability study supports the claim that the antigen-coated well strips are stable for 60 days after the envelope has been opened and properly resealed and the indicator strip on the desiccant pouch remains blue. A kit is opened and tested for a baseline reading on the controls and calibrators. After a minimum of 60 days, the same kit and an aliquot of the samples are re-tested. Drift is calculated. The sponsor's acceptance criteria were met at all time points. Other components are stable until the stated expiration date is stored per the instructions.
Sample stability:
The package insert claim that serum samples should be stored at 2° – 8°C for no longer than 8 hours and refrigerated for no longer than 48 hours is based on CLSI Document H18-A2 "Procedures for the Handling and Processing of Blood Specimens".
d. Detection limit:
Not applicable for a qualitative assay.
e. Analytical specificity:
{5}
6
# Endogenous interferents:
Interfering Substances: The effect of potentially interfering substances on test results generated using the ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA Test System was evaluated with the following possible interfering substances: albumin, bilirubin, cholesterol, hemoglobin, triglycerides and intralipids. The level of each potentially interfering substance is as follows:
- Bilirubin: 1 mg/dL (low), 15 mg/dL (high)
- Albumin: 3.5 g/dL (low), 5 g/dL (high)
- Cholesterol: 150 mg/dL (low), 250 mg/dL (high)
- Triglycerides: 150 mg/dL (low), 500 mg/dL (high)
- Hemoglobin: 10 g/dL (low), 20 g/dL (high)
- Intralipid: 300 mg/dL (low), 750 mg/dL (high)
The possible interfering substances were added to three samples (1 positive, 1 borderline and 1 negative) and then tested according to the instructions. All positive samples showed a change of signal less than 20% compared to the unspiked sample. All borderline samples showed a change of signal less than 20% with the exception of the high spike of hemoglobin (25.2%). The negative sample showed a change of signal (>20%) with the high and low spikes of albumin, hemoglobin, intralipid, bilirubin, cholesterol, and triglycerides, but the negative sample results in each instance stayed below the cut-off and the change in signal did not affect the qualitative result.
# Reactivity to samples with known antibody status:
Ten samples each that were known to be seropositive for the following antibodies were tested with the ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA Test System: ANA, dsDNA, RF, Rubella, HSV 1, HSV 2, VZV, Measles, Mumps, HCV and syphilis. None of the samples tested positive (Index Value range 0.02 – 0.72).
f. Assay cut-off:
The assay cut-off is 1.0.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA Test System was compared to commercially marketed individual antibody ELISA test systems for detection of IgG, IgM and IgA antibody to Cardiolipin. The comparative study consisted of 806 serum samples, including 303 samples from patients for which cardiolipin antibody testing was requested, and 503 samples from patients with various autoimmune diseases (e.g., thrombocytopenia, preeclampsia and sera requested to be cardiolipin antibody positive but not otherwise defined). Testing was performed at three sites; each site tested a third of the samples from each population group:
| | Predicate Assay | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| ZEUS ELISA | Positive | 78 | 20 | 98 |
| Cardiolipin | Negative | 12 | 696 | 708 |
| IgG/IgM/IgA | Total | 90 | 716 | 806 |
{6}
Positive agreement = 86.7% (95% C.I. = 77.9 – 92.9%)
Negative agreement = 97.2% (95% C.I. = 95.7 – 98.3%)
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity:
A total of 922 clinically defined samples were available for an analysis of the clinical sensitivity of PAPS and an analysis of the clinical sensitivity of SAPS. Both analyses included 303 samples from patients for which cardiolipin antibody testing was requested and 496 samples from patients with various autoimmune diseases (e.g., thrombocytopenia, pre-eclampsia). 98 samples from patients with clinically diagnosed PAPS were included in the analysis of PAPS, and 25 samples from patients with clinically diagnosed SAPS were included in the analysis of SAPS. The PAPS samples were not included in the SAPS analysis and vice versa. Results from the ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA Test System were compared to the clinical diagnosis:
PAPS samples (SAPS not included):
| | Diagnosis | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | PAPS | non-PAPS | Total |
| ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA | Positive | 83 | 90 | 173 |
| | Negative | 15 | 709 | 724 |
| | Total | 98 | 799 | 897 |
Sensitivity = 84.7% (95% C.I. = 74.0 – 91.2%)
Specificity = 88.7% (95% C.I. = 86.4 – 90.8%)
SAPS samples (PAPS not included):
| | Diagnosis | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SAPS | non-SAPS | Total |
| ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA | Positive | 23 | 90 | 113 |
| | Negative | 2 | 709 | 711 |
| | Total | 25 | 799 | 824 |
Sensitivity = 92.0% (95% C.I. = 74.0 – 99.0%)
Specificity = 88.7% (95% C.I. = 86.4 – 90.8%)
The results for non-APS subjects are shown below:
| Population | ZEUS ELISA Cardiolipin IgG/IgM/IgA Results | | | Observed % Prevalence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Negative | total | Cardiolipin Antibodies |
| Sera Submitted for Cardiolipin Antibody Testing | 47 | 256 | 303 | 15.5% |
| Sera from Healthy Population of Blood Donors | 10 | 284 | 294 | 3.4% |
{7}
| Sera from Other Autoimmune Diseases | 43 | 453 | 496 | 8.7% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Thrombocytopenia | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% |
| Pre-eclampsia | 0 | 25 | 25 | 0.0% |
| MCTD | 4 | 39 | 43 | 9.3% |
| PSS | 2 | 74 | 76 | 2.6% |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis | 22 | 249 | 271 | 8.1% |
| Sjorgen’s Syndrome | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0.0% |
| SLE | 13 | 30 | 43 | 30.2% |
| Vasculitis | 0 | 17 | 17 | 0.0% |
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The expected value in the normal population is negative.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.