K100951 · Medtox Diagnostics, Inc. · DJG · Oct 18, 2010 · Clinical Toxicology
Device Facts
Record ID
K100951
Device Name
MEDTOX BUPRENORPHINE TEST
Applicant
Medtox Diagnostics, Inc.
Product Code
DJG · Clinical Toxicology
Decision Date
Oct 18, 2010
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.3650
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K100951 · Oct 18, 2010
MEDTOX BUPRENORPHINE TEST
Medtox Diagnostics, Inc.
Clinical urine samples from MEDTOX Laboratories
Clinical urine samples were used to evaluate the accuracy of the device by comparing the test results against LC/MS/MS confirmatory methods.
Clinical urine samples; Accuracy study; Retrospective clinical data
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Accuracy study of MEDTOX Buprenorphine Test; Retrospective evaluation of clinical urine samples
Clinical urine samples containing varying concentrations of buprenorphine and its metabolites; Sample Size: Not explicitly stated (total count not provided, though stratified groups are listed); Number of Sites: 1 (MEDTOX Laboratories)
LC/MS/MS
Accuracy/Agreement with LC/MS/MS
Indications for Use
The MEDTOX Buprenorphine Test uses immunochromatographic test strips for the rapid, qualitative detection of buprenorphine and its metabolites in human urine. It is intended for prescription use only. The MEDTOX Buprenorphine Test is not for over-the-counter sale. It is not intended for use in point-of-care settings.
Device Story
The Medtox Buprenorphine Test is a qualitative, membrane-based immunochromatographic assay for detecting buprenorphine and its metabolites in human urine. The device consists of a cup and lid containing test strips impregnated with mouse monoclonal antibody-colloidal gold and drug conjugate. Operation involves tilting the cup to allow urine to wick onto the test strips. In the presence of buprenorphine, the drug binds to the antibody-colloidal gold, preventing it from binding to the immobilized drug conjugate on the strip, resulting in the absence of a test line (non-negative result). The test is intended for use in reference laboratories by professional operators. Results are read visually at 5 to 15 minutes. As a preliminary screening tool, positive results require confirmation via LC/MS/MS. The device aids healthcare providers in identifying buprenorphine presence, supporting clinical decision-making regarding medication adherence or substance use, though it cannot distinguish between abused drugs and prescribed medications.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Method comparison study using 154 clinical urine samples compared the device against LC/MS/MS. Results showed 80/80 (100%) agreement for positive samples and 74/77 (96.1%) agreement for negative samples. Discrepant samples were near the cutoff concentration (5-9 ng/mL). Precision and reproducibility were established across 5 days with 3 operators, showing consistent results at 50% above and below the 10 ng/mL cutoff.
Technological Characteristics
Lateral flow immunochromatographic assay; gold-conjugated reagents; visual readout. Single-use test strip format. No electronic components, energy sources, or software algorithms. Sterilization method not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the rapid, qualitative detection of buprenorphine and its metabolites in human urine. Intended for prescription use only; not for over-the-counter sale or point-of-care settings. Provides preliminary analytical results requiring confirmation by alternate chemical methods (e.g., LC/MS/MS).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An opiate test system is a device intended to measure any of the addictive narcotic pain-relieving opiate drugs in blood, serum, urine, gastric contents, and saliva. An opiate is any natural or synthetic drug that has morphine-like pharmocological actions. The opiates include drugs such as morphine, morphine glucoronide, heroin, codeine, nalorphine, and meperedine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of opiate use or overdose and in monitoring the levels of opiate administration to ensure appropriate therapy.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). An opiate test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (*e.g.,* programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).
Predicate Devices
Acon BUP One Step Buprenorphine Test (k060466)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k100951
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Buprenorphine
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative immunochromatographic assay
E. Applicant:
Medtox Diagnostics Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Medtox Buprenorphine Test
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section: 21 CFR 862.3650, Opiate Test System
2. Classification: Class II
3. Product code: DJG
4. Panel: 91, Toxicology
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for use, below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
{1}
The MEDTOX Buprenorphine Test uses immunochromatographic test strips for the rapid, qualitative detection of buprenorphine and its metabolites in human urine. It is intended for prescription use only. The MEDTOX Buprenorphine Test is not for over-the-counter sale. It is not intended for use in point-of-care settings.
MEDTOX Buprenorphine detects buprenorphine and its metabolites at the following cutoff concentrations:
BUP Buprenorphine (Buprenorphine) 10 ng/mL
The MEDTOX Buprenorphine Test provides only a preliminary analytical test result. A more specific alternate chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) is the preferred confirmatory method. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any test result.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
As noted in the indications for use, the device is not intended for over the counter sale and is not intended for use in point of care settings.
Tests for buprenorphine cannot distinguish between abused drugs and certain prescribed medications.
4. Special instrument requirements:
None
I. Device Description:
The MEDTOX Buprenorphine Test contains a device with competitive, membrane-based immunochromatographic test strips, a cup and a lid. Each test strip contains mouse monoclonal antibody-colloidal gold, a drug conjugate and an internal procedural control line. Each Test Kit contains all the reagents necessary to test one urine sample for buprenorphine. A bag contains 25 test kits.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s): Acon BUP One Step Buprenorphine Test
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s): k060466
3. Comparison with predicate:
The intended use and method principles are the same as that of the predicate. The specific reagents (e.g., antibodies) and details of the procedure (e.g., read time) differ.
{2}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New device | Predicate |
| Intended use | Determines a preliminary qualitative positive or negative result for the presence of buprenorphine and its metabolite sin human urine. | Same |
| Cutoff | 10 ng/mL | Same |
| Measurement method | Visually read | Same |
| Results | Provides preliminary results. Results must be confirmed by a more specific analytical method | Same |
| Difference | | |
| Sample application | Urine is applied by tilting the cup | Strip is dipped into urine |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
None referenced.
## L. Test Principle:
When the test system cup is tipped urine flows into the sample pads of the device, the dried antibody-colloidal gold on the sample pad dissolves and the urine wicks up the white test strips carrying the red antibody colloidal gold with it. When a drug is present in the sample the antibody-colloidal gold binds the drug before it migrates up the test strip. However, when the antibody-colloidal gold binds the drug in the urine, the antibody-colloidal gold cannot bind to the drug conjugate immobilized on the test strip. When the drug concentration is at or above the cutoff concentration, the majority of the antibody colloidal gold is bound to the drug from the urine. Therefore, as drug bound antibody-colloidal gold migrates up the test strip, it is unable to bind to the drug conjugate immobilized on the membrane. Therefore no line is generated at the "T" location on the device for a non-negative sample.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Samples containing commercial buprenorphine calibrator spiked into a drug-free urine pool to the concentrations shown in the table below were tested with the MEDTOX Buprenorphine Test. Sample concentrations > 5 ng/mL were also confirmed by LCMS. Reproducibility testing was performed by three operators. Each ran masked randomized samples across five days, using one lot, 3 operators;
{3}
3 samples; 5 days = 45 reps per level. Results are tabulated below, and demonstrate that test results at concentrations 50% above and 50% below the cutoff were all consistently correct.
BUP (10)
| ng/ml | % | | Operator #1 | Operator #2 | Operator #3 | All Operators | Precision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0 | NEG | #Pos | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| | | #Neg | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45 | |
| | | %Neg | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2.5 | 25% | #Pos | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| | | #Neg | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45 | |
| | | %Neg | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | 50% | #Pos | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| | | #Neg | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45 | |
| | | %Neg | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 7.5 | 75% | #Pos | 7 | 4 | 6 | 17 | |
| | | #Neg | 8 | 11 | 9 | 28 | |
| | | %Neg | 53% | 73% | 60% | 62% | 78% |
| 12.5 | 125% | #Pos | 14 | 15 | 12 | 41 | |
| | | #Neg | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | |
| | | %Pos | 93% | 100% | 80% | 91% | 91% |
| 15 | 150% | #Pos | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45 | |
| | | #Neg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| | | %Pos | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable. This is a qualitative test. There is no high dose hook effect with the MEDTOX Buprenorphine Test. Testing with spiked samples demonstrated that the MEDTOX Buprenorphine Test provides positive results at concentrations above those attainable in human urine.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Both real time and accelerated stability studies were performed. The manufacturer's acceptance criteria require that the control materials, including those containing 5 and 15 ng/mL buprenorphine, must give the expected qualitative result at the expiration date under the recommended storage conditions (25 degrees C). Controls are prepared by adding known quantities of drug or metabolite to a stabilized urine matrix. Levels of drug in each lot of controls are confirmed by GC/MS or LC/MS/MS methods.
{4}
Control materials are listed as required but are not included with the kit.
## d. Detection limit:
Evaluations were performed to determine the test detection limit, using multiple lots and operators.
Buprenorphine (with purity certified by the manufacturer) was spiked into a negative urine pool to the concentration levels shown in the table below. Each concentration was tested 30 times in each of three lots by a total of 10 operators. Results across lots are similar to those observed for the precision study (above).
| Bup concentration (ng/mL) | # Positive results/# total results | | | All lots - results combined |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Lot 1 | Lot 2 | Lot 3 | |
| 0 | 0/30 | 0/30 | 0/30 | 0/90 |
| 2.5 | 0/30 | 0/30 | 0/30 | 0/90 |
| 5 | 1/30 | 0/30 | 0/30 | 1/90 |
| 7.5 | 10/30 | 2/30 | 9/30 | 21/90 |
| 10 | 16/30 | 14/30 | 19/30 | 49/90 |
| 12.5 | 28/30 | 27/30 | 26/30 | 81/90 |
| 15 | 30/30 | 30/30 | 30/30 | 90/90 |
## e. Analytical specificity:
Studies were performed to test the effect of (1) potentially cross reactive compounds and (2) potentially interfering endogenous and exogenous substances. All compounds tested were obtained from commercial suppliers.
## Potential Cross-reacting compounds:
The following potential cross-reactants and metabolites were prepared in negative urine samples. Results are expressed as the minimum concentration expected to produce a positive result in the indicated assay. The non-reacting opiate compounds were also tested in the presence of 5 ng/mL (50% of the cutoff) and 15 ng/mL (150% of the cutoff) of Buprenorphine. Samples were evaluated in triplicate by in-house operators. None of the nonreactive opiate listed in the following table affected the expected results.
| Buprenorphine (BUP) (Buprenorphine) 10 ng/mL | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Compound | Result | % Cross-Reactive |
| Buprenorphine- | Positive at 7.5 ng/mL | 133% |
{5}
6
| glucuronide | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Norbuprenorphine | Positive at 50 ng/mL | 20% |
| Norbuprenorphine-glucuronide | Positive at 75 ng/mL | 13% |
| | | |
| Codeine | Negative at 100,000 ng/mL | None Detected |
| Diacetylmorphine | Negative at 100,000 ng/mL | None Detected |
| Hydrocodone | Negative at 100,000 ng/mL | None Detected |
| Hydromorphone | Negative at 100,000 ng/mL | None Detected |
| Levorphanol | Negative at 50,000 ng/mL | None Detected |
| 6-Monoacetylmorphine | Negative at 100,000 ng/mL | None Detected |
| Morphine | Negative at 100,000 ng/mL | None Detected |
| Naloxone | Negative at 100,000 ng/mL | None Detected |
| Naltrexone | Negative at 100,000 ng/mL | None Detected |
| Oxycodone | Negative at 100,000 ng/mL | None Detected |
| Oxymorphone | Negative at 100,000 ng/mL | None Detected |
| Thebaine | Negative at 100,000 ng/mL | None Detected |
## Endogenous Compounds:
Interference by endogenous compound was evaluated in the presence of 5 ng/mL and 15 ng/mL buprenorphine. Most of the compounds were evaluated for interference at 100 µg/mL (albumin was evaluated at 20 mg/mL and bilirubin was evaluated at 200 µg/mL). Samples were evaluated in triplicate by in-house operators. None of the endogenous compounds listed below affected the expected results.
| Acetaldehyde | Creatinine | Sodium Chloride |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Acetone | Epinephrine | Tetrahydrocortisone |
| Albumin, human | B-estradiol | d,1-Thyroxine Uric Acid |
| Ascorbic Acid | Estriol | Uric Acid |
| Bilirubin | Glucose Std. Solution | |
| Cholesterol | Hemoglobin, Human | |
## Common prescription and OTC medications
Potential interference from common drugs was evaluated by adding 100,000 ng/mL of each drug tested into urine containing reference calibrator at buprenorphine levels of 50% of cutoff and 150% of the cutoff concentration (5 and 15 ng/mL). Samples were evaluated in triplicate. None of the common drugs listed in the table below affected the expected results.
| Acetylsalicylic Acid | Cocaine | Phenobarbital |
| --- | --- | --- |
{6}
| Acetaminophen | Dextromethorphan | d-Pseudoephedrine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Amitriptyline | Diphenylhydantoin | Rifampin |
| Brompheniramine maleate | Doxylamine | Salicylic Acid |
| Caffeine | Fluoxetine | Vancomycin |
| Carbamazepine | Ibuprophen | |
| Chlorpheniramine | Morphine | |
pH and specific gravity:
Interference from pH was tested fortifying negative urine samples adjusted to pH 5.0, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 (± 0.1) with buprenorphine added at the 5 ng/mL of cutoff and 15 ng/mL. These buprenorphine levels correspond to those at which >95% negative and >95% positive results were observed, respectively. Interference from specific gravity was tested by fortifying three negative urine samples, adjusted to specific gravity values of 1.003, 1.015, and 1.030 ± 0.001, with buprenorphine added at concentrations of 5 ng/mL and 15 ng/mL.
All samples were assayed in triplicate. No effect of pH or specific gravity was observed in this evaluation.
f. Assay cut-off:
See Detection Limit Section, above.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Samples used in the method comparison studies were leftover (de-linked) and randomized clinical urine samples that had been submitted for drug testing and contained varying concentrations of buprenorphine. Samples were assayed and selected using both screening and confirmatory (LC/MS/MS) methods. All samples containing buprenorphine (whether above or below the cutoff concentration), were confirmed by LC/MS/MS. The LC/MS/MS determination included buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine. There was one specimen obtained per patient and one measurement taken per specimen.
The MEDTOX Buprenorphine Tests results were interpreted at both 5 minutes and 15 minutes (covering the recommended read-time range), and identical results were obtained at both time intervals.
The operator who performed the method comparison testing was representative of those expected to perform such testing at the intended use sites, including reference laboratories.
{7}
Results are shown in the table below:
Clinical Samples - Method Comparison
| Concentration determined by LC/MS/MS | | No Drug | Near Cutoff Negative (between -50% and cutoff) | Near Cutoff Positive (between cutoff and +50%) | High Positive (greater than +50%) | # Correct/# Observed | Score 95% Confidence Limits |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Medtox result BUP (10) | Positive | 0 | 3 | 8 | 72 | 80/80 | 95.4% - 100% |
| | Negative | 70 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 74/77 | 89.2% - 98.7% |
The three discrepant samples shown in the table had concentrations between 50% below the cutoff concentration (5 ng/mL) and the cutoff concentration (10 ng/mL) according to LC/MS/MS. The total buprenorphine concentrations determined by LC/MS/MS for these three samples were 5, 7, and 9 ng/mL.
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable. The test is only for urine specimens.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable; the device is for determining positive or negative. See Section above on Detection Limits and Precision for analytical cutoff information.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable.
{8}
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
9
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.