ELITECH CLINICAL SYSTEMS GLUCOSE PAP SL ELITECH CLINICAL SYSTEMS ELICAL 2, ELITECH CLINICAL SYSTEMS ELITROL 1 AND 2
Applicant
Seppim S.A.S.
Product Code
CGA · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Dec 15, 2010
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
ELITech Clinical Systems GLUCOSE PAP SL is intended for use with ELITech Clinical Systems ELICAL 2 and ELITech Clinical Systems ELITROL I and ELITROL II for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of glucose in human serum and plasma on Vital Scientific Selectra/Flexor analyzers. It is not intended for use in Point of Care settings. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma. ELITech Clinical Systems ELICAL 2 is a multi-parametric calibrator for in vitro diagnostic use in the calibration of quantitative ELITech Clinical Systems methods on the Vital Scientific Selectra Junior Analyzer and the Vital Scientific Flexor Junior Analyzer. ELITech Clinical Systems ELITROL I is a multi-parametric control serum for in vitro diagnostic use in accuracy control of quantitative ELITech Clinical Systems methods on the Vital Scientific Selectra Junior Analyzer and the Vital Scientific Flexor Junior Analyzer. ELITech Clinical Systems ELITROL II is a multi-parametric control serum for in vitro diagnostic use in accuracy control of quantitative ELITech Clinical Systems methods on the Vital Scientific Selectra Junior analyzer and the Vital Scientific Flexor Junior analyzers.
Device Story
Glucose PAP SL reagent; liquid ready-to-use; contains glucose oxidase, peroxidase, 4-aminoantipyrine, phenol. Input: human serum or plasma samples. Principle: enzymatic Trinder method; glucose oxidase oxidizes glucose to gluconic acid and H2O2; peroxidase catalyzes reaction of H2O2 with 4-AAP and phenol to form colored quinoneimine. Output: absorbance at 505 nm proportional to glucose concentration. Used on Vital Scientific Selectra/Flexor analyzers in clinical labs; operated by laboratory technicians. Output used by clinicians to diagnose/monitor carbohydrate metabolism disorders. Benefits: provides quantitative glucose levels for clinical decision-making.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision (CLSI EP5-A2) evaluated over 20 days (n=80 per level); total CV 2.1-2.9%. Linearity (CLSI EP6-A) confirmed 20.0-400.0 mg/dL (r2=0.999). Method comparison (CLSI EP9-A2) against predicate (k052007) using 100 samples yielded y=0.972x+2.4, r=0.999. Matrix comparison (serum vs. lithium-heparin plasma) yielded y=1.002x-0.8, r=0.998. Analytical specificity evaluated against common interferents.
Indicated for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of glucose in human serum and plasma for diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders (diabetes mellitus, neonatal/idiopathic hypoglycemia, pancreatic islet cell carcinoma). Intended for prescription use in clinical laboratory settings; not for Point of Care.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
HORIBA ABX PENTRA GLUCOSE PAP CP (k052007)
Roche Diagnostics Calibrator for Automated Systems (C.f.a.s) (k033501)
Roche Diagnostics Precinorm Universal and Precipath Universal Control Sera (k041227)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k100525
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Glucose
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative enzymatic assay
E. Applicant:
Seppim S.A.S.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ELITech Clinical Systems Glucose PAP SL
ELITech Clinical Systems ELICAL 2
ELITech Clinical Systems ELITROL 1 and ELITROL 2
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Device Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CGA – Glucose Oxidase, Glucose | Class II | 21 CFR § 862.1345, Glucose test system | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
| JIX - Calibrator, multi-analyte mixture | Class II | 21 CFR § 862.1150, Calibrator | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
| JJX - single (specified) analyte controls (assayed and unassayed) | Class I, reserved | 21 CFR § 862.1660, Quality control material (assayed and unassayed). | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
ELITech Clinical Systems GLUCOSE PAP SL is intended for use with ELITech Clinical Systems ELICAL 2 and ELITech Clinical Systems ELITROL I and
{1}
ELITROL II for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of glucose in human serum and plasma on Vital Scientific Selectra/Flexor analyzers. It is not intended for use in Point of Care settings.
Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
ELITech Clinical Systems ELICAL 2 is a multi-parametric calibrator for in vitro diagnostic use in the calibration of quantitative ELITech Clinical Systems methods on the Vital Scientific Selectra Junior Analyzer and the Vital Scientific Flexor Junior Analyzer.
ELITech Clinical Systems ELITROL I is a multi-parametric control serum for in vitro diagnostic use in accuracy control of quantitative ELITech Clinical Systems methods on the Vital Scientific Selectra Junior Analyzer and the Vital Scientific Flexor Junior Analyzer.
ELITech Clinical Systems ELITROL II is a multi-parametric control serum for in vitro diagnostic use in accuracy control of quantitative ELITech Clinical Systems methods on the Vital Scientific Selectra Junior analyzer and the Vital Scientific Flexor Junior analyzers.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
This device is intended for prescription use and in vitro diagnostic use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Performance was provided for Vital Scientific Selectra Junior Analyzer which is also trademarked as the Vital Scientific Flexor Junior Analyzer.
I. Device Description:
Glucose PAP SL reagent is composed exclusively of Reagent R, which is in liquid ready-to-use form and contains Phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), Phenol, 4-Aminoantipyrine (4-AAP), Glucose oxidase (Aspergillus sp), Peroxidase (horseradish) and sodium azide.
ELITech Clinical Systems ELICAL 2 is a lyophilized calibrator based on human serum containing constituents to ensure optimal calibration. ELICAL 2 is prepared exclusively from the blood of donors tested individually and found to be negative for HbsAg and to antibodies to HCV and HIV according to FDA-approved methods or methods in compliance with the European Directive 98/79/EC, Annex II, List A.
ELITech Clinical Systems ELITROL I and ELITROL II are normal and high levels of quality control solutions consisting of lyophilized human serum containing constituents at desired levels. Elitrol I and Elitrol II are prepared exclusively from the blood of donors tested individually and found to be negative for HbsAg and to
2
{2}
antibodies to HCV and HIV according to FDA-approved methods or methods in compliance with the European Directive 98/79/EC, Annex II, List A.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
| Predicate device name | Predicate 510(k) number |
| --- | --- |
| HORIBA ABX PENTRA GLUCOSE PAP CP | k052007 |
| Roche Diagnostics Calibrator for Automated Systems (C.f.a.s) | k033501 |
| Roche Diagnostics Precinorm Universal and Precipath Universal Control Sera | k041227 |
Comparison with predicate
| Glucose PAP SL Reagent Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate (k052007) ABX PENTRA GLUCOSE PAP CP |
| Indication(s) for use | Same | For the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of glucose in human serum and plasma |
| Methodology | Same | Enzymatic method using glucose oxidase coupled with peroxidase (Trinder method). |
| Sample Matrix | Same | Serum, Plasma |
| Measuring Range | 20.0 to 400.0 mg/dL | 1.8 to 432 mg/dL |
| Analyzer | Vital Scientific Selectra/Flexor analyzers | ABX PENTRA 400 Analyzer |
| ELICAL 2 Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate (k033501) Roche Calibrator f.a.s. |
| Indication(s) for use | Same | For in vitro diagnostic use in the calibration of quantitative clinical chemistry analyzers |
| Format | Same | Lyophilized calibrator based on human serum with constituents added as required to obtain desired components levels |
{3}
| ELITROL 1 and ELITROL 2 Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate (k041227) Roche Precinorm Universal and Precipath Universal Control Sera |
| Indication(s) for use | Same | For use in quality control by monitoring accuracy and precision for the quantitative methods |
| Format | Same | Lyophilized human sera with constituents added as required to obtain desired components levels |
| Level | Same | Two levels |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods.
CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures.
CLSI EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry.
CLSI EP9-A2: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples.
CLSI EP17-A: Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantification.
# L. Test Principle:
For Glucose PAP SL reagent, gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide $(\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_2)$ are formed when glucose oxidase enzymatically oxidizes glucose. $\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_2$ reacts with 4-aminoantipyrine (4-AAP) and phenol under the catalytic action of peroxidase to form a colored quinoneimine. The absorbance of the quinoneimine at 505 nanometers is proportional to the concentration of glucose in the sample.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Glucose PAP SL reagent: Within-run and Total precision results were obtained by performing two runs per day, two measures per run, on sera at low, medium and high concentrations on the Vital Scientific Selectra Junior Analyzer during twenty days according to CLSI protocol EP5-A2. The results are presented in the table below:
{4}
| Sample | n | Mean (g/dL) | Within-run | | Total precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Low level | 80 | 36.5 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.05 | 2.9 |
| Medium level | 80 | 107.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 2.73 | 2.5 |
| High level | 80 | 301.5 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 6.30 | 2.1 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
For Glucose PAP SL reagent, a linearity study was performed using ten samples ranging from 18.0 to $400\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , which were prepared by dilution of spiked high and low combination serum samples. All samples were assayed in triplicate. Data was analyzed using $1^{\mathrm{st}}$ , $2^{\mathrm{nd}}$ , and $3^{\mathrm{rd}}$ order least square regressions according to CLSI Protocol EP6-A. The sponsor selected a first order model since it demonstrated linearity; $1^{\mathrm{st}}$ order: $\mathrm{y} = \mathrm{x} + 2\mathrm{e}^{-13}$ , $\mathrm{r}^2 = 0.999$ . Based on the data, the sponsor claimed a linearity range from 20.0 to 400.0 mg/dL.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): Control material was purchased from commercial available sources. Elitrol I and II control solutions are value assigned using two Vital Scientific Flexor Junior Analyzers. Each sample is tested in triplicate over several days. The target value of Level I and II are the median of the observed values range $(n = 36)$ . After validation of the target value, a confidence range (high and low values) is calculated. The sponsor claimed an open vial stability of 12 hours at 15 to $25^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ , 5 days at 2 to $8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ or 4 weeks at -15 to $-25^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ .
Calibrator material was purchased from commercial available sources. Elical 2 calibrator is value assigned using multiple runs on two Vital Scientific Flexor Junior Analyzers. The target value of Elical 2 calibrator is the mean of the observed values range $(n = 42)$ . After validation of the target value, a confidence range (high and low values) is calculated. The sponsor claimed an open vial stability of 8 hours at 15 to $25^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ , 2 days at 2 to $8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ or 4 weeks at -15 to $-25^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ .
Real-time and on-board stability studies for the Glucose PAP SL reagent were conducted. The sponsor claims a shelf life of 27 months and on-board stability of 28 days.
d. Detection limit:
For Glucose PAP SL reagent, a detection limit study was evaluated according to CLSI EP17-A guideline. The limit of blank (LoB) was determined by running a blank sample 60 times on the Vital Scientific Selectra Junior analyzer. The limit of detection (LoD) was determined by 15 measurements of four low analyte samples ( $\sim 0.30\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ) on the Selectra Junior analyzer. Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) was determined by 15 measurements of four analyte samples ( $\sim 10\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ) on the Selectra Junior analyzer. Based on the data, the sponsor claimed the following LoB, LoD and LoQ.
{5}
| | LoB | LoD | LoQ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Limits | 0.1 mg/dL | 0.9 mg/dL | 10.0 mg/dL |
# d. Analytical specificity:
For Glucose PAP SL reagent, the sponsor evaluated the effect of triglycerides (0-1,018 mg/dL), unconjugated bilirubin (0-30 mg/dL), conjugated bilirubin (0-29.5 mg/dL), hemoglobin (0-500 mg/dL), uric acid (2.4 -24 mg/dL), ascorbic acid (0-20 mg/dL), Methyl dopa (0-1 mg/dL), L-Dopa (0-30 mg/dL), tolazamide (0-50 mg/dL) and acetaminophen (0-30 mg/dL) on sera at low, medium and high glucose concentrations (36, 108 and 400 mg/dL) spiked with the interferents, and then compared with unspiked control. The results are presented below.
| Interfering Substance | Low Glucose [36 mg/dL] | Medium Glucose [108 mg/dL] | High Glucose [400 mg/dL] |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Triglycerides | ≥ 814 mg/dL | - | - |
| Unconjugated bilirubin | ≥ 10 mg/dL | ≥ 22.5 mg/dL | - |
| Conjugated bilirubin | ≥ 8 mg/dL | ≥ 18 mg/dL | - |
| Hemoglobin | ≥ 250 mg/dL | - | - |
| Uric Acid | ≥ 19 mg/dL | - | - |
| Ascorbic Acid | > 2 mg/dL | ≥ 12 mg/dL | - |
| Methyl dopa | ≥ 0.9 mg/dL | - | - |
| L-Dopa | ≥ 0.6 mg/dL | ≥ 2 mg/dL | ≥ 5 mg/dL |
| Tolazamide | ≥ 50 mg/dL | - | - |
| Acetaminophen | - | - | - |
# f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
# 2. Comparison studies:
# a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The performance of the Glucose PAP SL reagent on the Vital Scientific Selectra Junior analyzer was compared with the predicate device, HORIBA ABX PENTRA Glucose PAP CP Reagent (k052007) on the HORIBA ABX PENTRA 400 Analyzer. This study was performed according to CLSI protocol EP9-A2 using 100 serum samples covering the measuring range. Data analysis was done using least-squares regression. The following linear regression was obtained.
$$
\mathrm {y} = 0. 9 7 2 \mathrm {x} + 2. 4, \mathrm {r} = 0. 9 9 9
$$
{6}
b. Matrix comparison:
To demonstrate comparable performance between serum and lithium-heparin plasma, the sponsor compared 40 paired samples ranging from 22.7 to 398.6 mg/dL for the Glucose PAP SL reagent using a Vital Scientific Selectra Junior analyzer. Linear regression analysis for the Glucose PAP SL reagent linear regression analysis yielded linear regression equation for lithium-heparin of y = 1.002x - 0.8; r = 0.998.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The expected serum levels for glucose are 74 – 106 mg/dL§.
§ Sacks, D.B., Carbohydrates. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry, 5th Ed., Burtis, C.A. & Ashwood, E.R. (W.B. Saunders eds. Philadelphia USA), (2001), 427.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.