K100304 · Tosoh Bioscience, Inc. · LCP · Aug 27, 2010 · Hematology
Device Facts
Record ID
K100304
Device Name
ST AIA PACK HBA1C
Applicant
Tosoh Bioscience, Inc.
Product Code
LCP · Hematology
Decision Date
Aug 27, 2010
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 864.7470
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
ST AIA-PACK HbA1c is designed for In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only for the quantitative measurement for percent concentration of Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in EDTA whole blood on Tosoh AIA System Analyzer. HbA1c measurement is used in the management and treatment of diabetes. The ST AIA-PACK HbA1c CALIBRATOR SET is intended for In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only for the calibration of ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Assay. The ST AIA-PACK HbA1c CONTROL SET is intended for In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only for performing quality control procedures with the ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Assay. The ST AIA-PACK HbA1c PRETREATMENT SOLUTION is intended for In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only for the pretreatment of the patient samples or ST AIA-PACK HbA1c CONTROL SET for the ST AIA-PACK HbA1c assay.
Device Story
ST AIA-PACK HbA1c is an enzyme immunoassay (IEMA) performed on Tosoh AIA System Analyzers. Whole blood samples undergo pretreatment to hemolyze erythrocytes and expose HbA1c. Pretreated samples are incubated in test cups where HbA1c is captured on magnetic beads and bound with enzyme-labeled sheep anti-HbA1c polyclonal antibody. After washing, a fluorogenic substrate (4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate) is added. Fluorescence intensity, proportional to HbA1c concentration, is measured. A standard curve aligned to NGSP % is used to calculate results. Used in clinical laboratories to assist healthcare providers in diabetes management and treatment monitoring.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP5-A2 (N=80). Linearity (3.0-14.0%) per CLSI EP6-A (r=0.999). Method comparison (N=126) against predicate showed Deming regression slope 1.027, intercept -0.168, r=0.99. Interference studies performed for endogenous substances and hemoglobin variants (C, D, S, E, F).
Technological Characteristics
Immuno-enzymometric assay (IMEA) using fluorescence detection. Components: magnetic beads coated with polyclonal sheep antibody conjugated to bovine alkaline phosphatase; 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (4MUP) substrate. Form factor: test cups for automated analyzer. Connectivity: standalone analyzer (Tosoh AIA-1800). Calibration: 6-point, traceable to IFCC/NGSP. Reagents stored at 8-12°C.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative measurement of HbA1c in EDTA whole blood for the management and treatment of diabetes in patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glycosylated hemoglobin assay is a device used to measure the glycosylated hemoglobins (A1a , A1b , and A1c ) in a patient's blood by a column chromatographic procedure. Measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin is used to assess the level of control of a patient's diabetes and to determine the proper insulin dosage for a patient. Elevated levels of glycosylated hemoglobin indicate uncontrolled diabetes in a patient.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k100304
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Tosoh Bioscience, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ST AIA-PACK HbA1c, ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Calibrator Set, ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Pretreatment Solution, ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Control Set
G. Regulatory Information:
| Device | Regulation | Class | Product Code | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ST AIA-PACK HbA1c | 21 CFR § 864.7470, Glycosylated hemoglobin | II | LCP | Hematology (81) |
| ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Calibrator Set | 21 CFR § 862.1150, Calibrator | II | JIT | Chemistry (75) |
| ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Control Set | 21 CFR § 862.1660, Quality control material, (assayed and unassayed) | I, reserved | JJY | Chemistry (75) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
{1}
See H.2. indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
ST AIA-PACK HbA1c is designed for In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only for the quantitative measurement for percent concentration of Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in EDTA whole blood on Tosoh AIA System Analyzer. HbA1c measurement is used in the management and treatment of diabetes.
The ST AIA-PACK HbA1c CALIBRATOR SET is intended for In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only for the calibration of ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Assay.
The ST AIA-PACK HbA1c CONTROL SET is intended for In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only for performing quality control procedures with the ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Assay.
The ST AIA-PACK HbA1c PRETREATMENT SOLUTION is intended for In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only for the pretreatment of the patient samples or ST AIA-PACK HbA1c CONTROL SET for the ST AIA-PACK HbA1c assay.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use
Not for use with persons with hemoglobin < 7.0 g/dL or hemoglobin F concentrations greater than 10%.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Tosoh AIA 1800 System Analyzer
I. Device Description:
The ST AIA-PACK HbA1c reagents, pretreatment solution, calibrators, and controls are in vitro diagnostic devices for use exclusively on Tosoh AIA System analyzers. The ST AIA-PACK HbA1c contains magnetic beads in test cups that are coated with polyclonal sheep antibody conjugated to bovine alkaline phosphatase. The ST AIA-PACK HbA1c CALIBRATOR SET is a set of 6 calibrators traceable to IFCC reference material. The calibrators are in ready-to-use form.
The AIA-PACK HbA1c CONTROL SET contains two levels of HbA1c. The control materials are lyophilized materials and should be reconstituted with the pretreatment solution. Both the calibrators and controls are derived from human blood. Both devices have been tested by FDA-cleared methods and found negative for the presence of HBsAg and antibody to HIV-1 and HCV. Because no test method can offer complete assurance that products derived from human blood will not transmit infectious agents, it is recommended that this product be handled
2
{2}
with the same precautions as used for patient samples. ST AIA-PACK HbA1c PRETREATMENT SOLUTION contains a buffered detergent for lysing cells. All components are purchased separately.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Tosoh Automated Glycohemoglobin Analyzer HLC-723G7 (k011434)
2. Predicate K number(s):
k011434
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate (k011434) |
| Indications for Use | Same | Glycosylated hemoglobin measurements obtained by this device are used in the management and treatment of diabetes. |
| Cross reactivity to hemoglobin variants | Same | No significant cross reactivity to HbC & HbD |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate (k011434) |
| Cross reactivity to hemoglobin variants | Some crossreactivity was shown for HbS and HbE, (see section M1e, below) | No cross reactivity with HbS, some cross-reactivity with HbE |
| Cross reactivity with HbF | Cross reactivity at > 10% HbF | Cross reactivity at >14% HbF |
| Test Method | Immuno-enzymometric assay (IMEA) using fluorescence detection | HPLC |
| Assay Range | 3.0-14.0% | 3.0-18.4% |
| Calibrator Set | ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Calibrator Set 6 point aligned to IFCC reference material and NGSP | Hemoglobin a1c Calibrator Set 2 point aligned to IFCC reference material and NGSP |
| Reference Range | 4.0 to 6.0% | 4.2 to 5.8% |
| Assay time | 38 minutes (10 min. incubation time and 20 min. pretreatment) | 2.2 minutes |
{3}
4
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods
CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach
CLSI EP9-A2: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
CLSI C28-A3: Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory
L. Test Principle:
HbA1c present in the pretreated test sample is captured on the magnetic beads along with hemoglobin and bound with enzyme-labeled sheep anti-HbA1c polyclonal antibody in the AIA-PACK test cup. The beads are washed to remove the unbound materials and are then incubated with a fluorogenic substrate, 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (4MUP). The amount of enzyme-labeled polyclonal antibody that binds to the beads is directly proportional to the HbA1c concentration in the test sample. HbA1c percent concentrations are calculated from a curve generated by using the ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Calibrator Set.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision for the ST AIA-PACK HbA1c assay was evaluated using three AIA-1800 analyzers and three lots of reagents according to CLSI EP5-A2. One calibration curve was used throughout the precision study. Three levels of pooled EDTA whole blood specimens were run in duplicate twice daily for 20 days (N=80). Specimens were aliquoted and stored at -30°C and thawed once/day. Results are below:
Within Run Precision
| Specimen | Reagent Set # 1 | | | Reagent Set # 2 | | | Reagent Set # 3 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean (%)* | Pooled SD (%)* | CV (%) | Mean (%)* | Pooled SD (%)* | CV (%) | Mean (%)* | Pooled SD (%)* | CV (%) |
| HWB-1 | 5.3 | 0.096 | 1.8 | 5.5 | 0.099 | 1.8 | 5.5 | 0.090 | 1.6 |
| HWB-2 | 8.1 | 0.093 | 1.1 | 8.2 | 0.137 | 1.7 | 8.2 | 0.122 | 1.5 |
| HWB-3 | 13.1 | 0.244 | 1.9 | 13.0 | 0.192 | 1.5 | 13.0 | 0.204 | 1.6 |
{4}
Total Precision
| Specimen | Reagent Set # 1 | | | Reagent Set # 2 | | | Reagent Set # 3 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean (%)* | Pooled SD (%)* | CV (%) | Mean (%)* | Pooled SD (%)* | CV (%) | Mean (%)* | Pooled SD (%)* | CV (%) |
| HWB-1 | 5.3 | 0.175 | 3.3 | 5.5 | 0.120 | 2.2 | 5.5 | 0.109 | 2.0 |
| HWB-2 | 8.1 | 0.256 | 3.2 | 8.2 | 0.161 | 1.9 | 8.2 | 0.158 | 1.9 |
| HWB-3 | 13.1 | 0.528 | 4.0 | 13.0 | 0.314 | 204 | 13.0 | 0.310 | 2.4 |
b. Linearity
A recovery study for linearity was performed according to CLSI Protocol EP6-A. 11 specimens with concentrations from 2.2%-15.3% HbA1c were assayed in triplicate using one reagent lot on one AIA 1800. The percent recoveries between the observed values and the expected values were 97.8-104.9%. The regression was: $y = 1.024x - 0.104$ , $r = 0.999$ .
The results of the study support the claimed reportable range of $3.0\% - 14.0\%$ HbA1c.
High dose hook effect was evaluated on one AIA-1800 by analyzing the fluorescence rate of a control solution containing $25\%$ HbA1c in triplicate with one lot of reagents. The fluorescence rate is greater than that of the highest calibrator (approximately $16\%$ HbA1c). No hook effect was observed up to $25\%$ HbA1c.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability:
The ST AIA-PACK HbA1c assay has met the requirements of the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP). The NGSP certification requires annual renewal. The current list of NGSP certified methods is available on the NGSP website at: http://www.ngsp.org/prog/index.
ST AIA-PACK, HbA1c Calibrators contain 6 levels and are traceable to IFCC reference materials.
Assignment of control values:
AIA-PACK HbA1c Control Set contains Level 1 (approximately $5.5\%$ ) and Level 2 (approximately $9.5\%$ ). A master pool is diluted to pre-determined HbA1c concentrations for Level 1 and Level 2 controls. Values are assigned by analyzing the two diluted pools using multiple reagent lots and multiple analyzers. A grand mean, SD and CV are calculated from the data. The control ranges are set at $\pm 10\%$ of the grand mean.
{5}
6
# Stability, closed-vial:
Real time closed vial shelf life stability study for the AIA-PACK HbA1c assay reagents (ST AIA-PACK HbA1c, ST AIA-PACK, HbA1c Calibrator Set, AIA-PACK HbA1c Control Set, ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Pretreatment Solution) was conducted using a single AIA-1800 analyzer and four lots of each reagent (four reagent sets). All reagents were stored at $8 - 12^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for up to 13 months. Stability was determined to be 12 months at $8 - 12^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$.
# Stability, open vial:
Real time open vial stability testing was performed for the AIA-PACK HbA1c Control Set, Levels 1 and 2 at $10^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 8 days and $30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 7 days. Recoveries of five replicates for each control were evaluated at various time points using one AIA-1800 and one reagent lot. Open vial control stability is 7 days at $10^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ and 6 hours at $30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$.
Real time open vial recovery studies for stability were performed for the ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Calibrator Set at $10^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 2 days and $30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 7 hours. Calibrators are stable for 1 day at $10^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ and 6 hours at $30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$. Pretreated calibrators were also evaluated at the same temperature ranges. Pretreated calibrators are stable for up to 2 hours prior to analysis at $30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ and up to 1 day at $10^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$.
Real time ST AIA-PACK HbA1c Pretreatment Solution stability was evaluated daily for 91 days stored at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$. The Pretreatment Solution met the sponsor's stability criteria. Stability was determined to be 90 days at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$.
The in-use open test cup real time stability study was conducted by opening the ST AIA-PACK and storing the individual test cups at $10^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 8 days and $30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 2 days. At each stability time point, five replicates of three unaltered EDTA whole blood specimens and AIA-PACK HbA1c CONTROL Level 1 and Level 2 were assayed for $\%$ HbA1c using a single set of reagents on the AIA-1800. The AIA-1800 was calibrated on Day 0. Recovery data supports the sponsor's claims that reagent packs are stable for 1 day at $30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ and 7 days at $10^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$.
Recovery studies were performed for sample stability before pretreatment using 3 EDTA whole blood samples stored at $30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 2 days, $10^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 8 days and $-20^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 197 days. Samples are stable before pretreatment for 1 day at $30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$, 7 days at $10^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ and 60 days at $-20^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$.
d. Detection limit:
See item M.1.b., Linearity, above.
e. Analytical specificity:
{6}
Endogenous and Exogenous Interference:
Interference was evaluated on the AIA-1800 using three whole blood samples with HbA1c concentrations of approximately 5.3%, 8.0%, and 13%. Each sample was spiked with various concentrations of interfering substance and evaluated against a sample with no interferences added. Samples were run in triplicate. Interference was defined as >10% difference in recovery between the spiked sample and the non-spiked sample. Results were as follows:
| Interfering Substance | Conclusion |
| --- | --- |
| Bilirubin, conjugated | No interference up to 18 mg/dL conjugated bilirubin |
| Bilirubin, free | No interference up to 16 mg/dL free bilirubin |
| Lipemia | No interference up to 1666 mg/dL triglyceride |
| Albumin | No interference up to 50 mg/mL albumin |
| Ascorbic Acid | No interference up to 20 mg/mL ascorbic acid |
| Trisodium citrate | No interference up to 20 mg/mL trisodium citrate |
| EDTA – 2K | No interference up to 10 mg/mL EDTA-K2 |
| Rheumatoid Factor | No interference up to 550 IU/mL Rh Factor |
# Hemoglobin Variant Interference:
Cross-reactivity to Hemoglobin Variant F was studied on ST AIA-PACK HbA1c. Specimens at varying HbF levels were prepared by mixing high (14.7% HbF) and low (0.3% HbF) 1 EDTA whole blood specimens to prepare a eleven samples containing 0.3 – 14.7% HbF as measured on the predicate, the Tosoh Automated Glycohemoglobin Analyzer HLC-723G7 (G-7) Variant Analysis Mode. Samples were tested in singlicate on the AIA-1800 and the G-7. Recoveries were calculated against the predicate. Recoveries ranged from (96%-104%). Interference was defined as % HbA1c recovery >10%. Up to 10% Hemoglobin F does not significantly interfere with the assay result of ST AIA-HbA1c. More than 10% Hemoglobin F does interfere with the ST AIA-HbA1c result.
EDTA whole blood specimens containing hemoglobin variants C, D, E and S were obtained from an outside NGSP certified laboratory. All specimens were analyzed for %HbA1c using the ST AIA-PACK HbA1c assay on the AIA-1800 analyzer. Samples were tested in singlicate for all of the Hb variants. The % HbA1c value from the NGSP laboratory's boronate affinity method was used as the reference and the % recovery was calculated for each specimen. Recovery of the Variant Hemoglobin C, D, S and E specimens should be within 100 ± 10 %. All interference study results are included in the labeling.
The results are summarized below.
{7}
| Hb Variant | TOSOH AIA-1800 %HbA1c | Boronate affinity | % recovery |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| A/C | 5.4 | 5.9 | 91.5 |
| | 6.7 | 6.8 | 98.5 |
| | 7.4 | 6.8 | 108.8 |
| | 7.4 | 7.6 | 97.4 |
| | 8.6 | 8.7 | 98.9 |
| | 10.8 | 11.0 | 98.2 |
| | 14.8 | 13.7 | 108.0 |
| A/D | 5.4 | 5.6 | 96.4 |
| | 6.2 | 6.3 | 98.4 |
| | 6.9 | 7.5 | 92.0 |
| | 9.7 | 9.4 | 103.2 |
| | 9.8 | 10.0 | 98.0 |
| A/S | 4.7 | 5.0 | 94.0 |
| | 6.4 | 6.7 | 95.5 |
| | 8.5 | 10.0 | 85.0 |
| | 10.6 | 10.2 | 103.9 |
| | 11.1 | 11.3 | 98.2 |
| A/E | 5.1 | 5.7 | 89.5 |
| | 6.9 | 7.4 | 93.2 |
| | 5.1 | 5.7 | 89.5 |
| | 6.4 | 6.8 | 94.1 |
| | 9.6 | 10.9 | 88.1 |
| | 10.3 | 10.9 | 94.5 |
There was no significant interference from HbA/C or HbA/D. One out of five variant HbS specimens was outside the criteria of $\pm 10\%$ recovery. Three out of six variant HbE specimens were outside the criteria of $\pm 10\%$ recovery.
## Labile, Carbamyl and Acetaldehyde Hemoglobins
Three unaltered EDTA whole blood samples with HbA1c levels at low, mid and high levels were spiked with glucose up to $1000\mathrm{mg/dL}$. Similarly, three unaltered EDTA whole blood samples with HbA1c levels at low, mid and high were spiked with sodium cyanate up to $50\mathrm{mg/dL}$ or acetaldehyde up to $50\mathrm{mg/dL}$. The specimens were incubated at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 4 hours and then assayed with ST AIA-PACK HbA1c in triplicate. The mean was calculated.
{8}
The specimen value with no added glucose or sodium cyanate or acetaldehyde was used as the reference value. No interference was defined as recovery of 100% ± 10%. There was no interference from sodium cyanate or acetaldehyde up to 50 mg/dL, nor glucose up to 1000 mg/dL.
## Effect of Low Hemoglobin
90 whole blood samples with hemoglobin concentrations ranging from 6.9-16 g/dL and HbA1c concentrations from 4.4-12.95% were evaluated for recovery by the predicate and the AIA 1800. Recoveries ranged from 87.8% to 106.3%. The sponsor has the following statement in the labeling “Hemoglobin levels less than 7.0 g/dL yielded falsely decreased HbA1c results.”
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
## 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
126 EDTA whole blood specimens were assayed in singlicate utilizing the ST AIA-PACK HbA1c assay on the AIA-1800 analyzer and the Tosoh G-7 Variant Analysis Mode at a single site following CLSI EP9-A2. HbA1c values ranged from 3.0% to 13.9% HbA1c. Both Deming regression and linear regression analyses were performed. Results are summarized below:
| | Deming Regression (95% CI) | Linear Regression |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Slope | 1.027 (1.006, 1.047) | 1.020 (1.000, 1.040) |
| Intercept | -0.168 (-0.326, -0.011) | -0.120 (-0.277, -0.037) |
| R | 0.99 | 0.99 |
The sponsor provided a bias plot for the data.
{9}

Bias
b. Matrix comparison:
This device is for EDTA whole blood only.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) expected values range is 4.0 to 6.0 % for people without diabetes $^{1-4}$ .
{10}
11
1 Parnes B., Niebauer L., Holcomb S., Dichinson M., Vanvorst B., Pace W., Provider Deferred Decisions on Hemoglobin A1c Report from the Colorado Research Network (CaR) the High Plains Research Network (HPRN). J. Am. Fam. Med., 19(1); 20-23 (2006).
2 American Diabetes Association Position Statement, Test of Glycemia in Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 27(Suppl 1); 91-93 (2004).
3 Little R. R., Rohlfing C., Wiedmeyer H. M., Myers G. L., Sacks B. D., Goldstein D. E., The National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP): a five year progress report. Clin. Chem., 47; 1985-1992 (2001).
4 Rohlfing C. L., Wiedmeyer H. M., Little R. R., England J. D., Tennill A., Goldstein D. E. Defining the relationship between plasma glucose and HbA1c: analysis of glucose profiles and HbA1c in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care, 25; 275-278 (2002).
The sponsor used CLSI C28-A3 to verify the expected range values with a 120 sample study from non-diabetic patients and obtained a range of 3.8-6.0%.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.