MODIFICATION TO: RAMP INFLUENZA A/B ASSAY

K093116 · Response Biomedical Corp. · PSZ · Oct 21, 2009 · Microbiology

Device Facts

Record IDK093116
Device NameMODIFICATION TO: RAMP INFLUENZA A/B ASSAY
ApplicantResponse Biomedical Corp.
Product CodePSZ · Microbiology
Decision DateOct 21, 2009
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeSpecial
Regulation21 CFR 866.3328
Device ClassClass 2
AttributesReal-World Evidence

Real-World Evidence

SubmissionDeviceSponsorRWD SourcesRWE Use SummaryKey Tags
K093116 · Oct 21, 2009MODIFICATION TO: RAMP INFLUENZA A/B ASSAYResponse Biomedical Corp.Retrospective, frozen clinical specimensRetrospective clinical specimens were used to establish the performance characteristics (sensitivity) of the RAMP Influenza A/B Assay for Influenza B.Retrospective clinical specimens; Clinical performance; Influenza B

Clinical Evidence

Study DesignPopulationComparatorKey Endpoints
Retrospective studySymptomatic patientsNot applicable for this studySensitivity performance for Influenza B

Indications for Use

The RAMP® Influenza A/B Assay is a qualitative immunochromatographic assay used to identify the presence of Influenza A and Influenza B nucleoprotein antigens in nasal wash, nasal aspirate, nasopharyngeal aspirate, and nasopharyngeal swab specimens from symptomatic patients. It is an in vitro diagnostic assay that aids in the rapid differential diagnosis of influenza viral infections in symptomatic patients. A negative test is presumptive and it is recommended these results be confirmed by cell culture. Negative results do not preclude influenza virus infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other management decisions. The test performance characteristics for Influenza B were established primarily with retrospective, frozen specimens. Users may wish to further evaluate the sensitivity performance of this test for Influenza B using fresh samples.

Device Story

RAMP Influenza A/B Assay; lateral flow immunoassay for qualitative detection of Influenza A and B viral antigens in nasal swab specimens. Modification involves updated analytical reactivity table to include 2009 H1N1 Influenza strain A/Swine NY/02/2009. Device operation remains unchanged; no modifications to fundamental scientific technology. Used in clinical settings for rapid diagnostic testing. Output provides qualitative antigen presence/absence. Benefits include updated strain reactivity information for clinical diagnostic utility.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing only. Analytical reactivity studies performed to confirm reactivity with 2009 H1N1 Influenza strain A/Swine NY/02/2009. No clinical performance data modified or established.

Technological Characteristics

Qualitative immunochromatographic assay. Utilizes fluorescent-dyed latex particles coated with anti-Influenza A and anti-Influenza B antibodies. Requires RAMP 200 instrument for fluorescence measurement and ratio calculation. Sample types: nasal wash, nasal aspirate, nasopharyngeal aspirate, nasopharyngeal swab.

Indications for Use

Indicated for the qualitative detection of Influenza A and Influenza B viral antigens in nasal swab specimens.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

An influenza virus antigen detection test system is a device intended for the qualitative detection of influenza viral antigens directly from clinical specimens in patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection. The test aids in the diagnosis of influenza infection and provides epidemiological information on influenza. Due to the propensity of the virus to mutate, new strains emerge over time which may potentially affect the performance of these devices. Because influenza is highly contagious and may lead to an acute respiratory tract infection causing severe illness and even death, the accuracy of these devices has serious public health implications.

Special Controls

*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The device's sensitivity and specificity performance characteristics or positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement, for each specimen type claimed in the intended use of the device, must meet one of the following two minimum clinical performance criteria: (i) For devices evaluated as compared to an FDA-cleared nucleic acid based-test or other currently appropriate and FDA accepted comparator method other than correctly performed viral culture method: (A) The positive percent agreement estimate for the device when testing for influenza A and influenza B must be at the point estimate of at least 80 percent with a lower bound of the 95 percent confidence interval that is greater than or equal to 70 percent. (B) The negative percent agreement estimate for the device when testing for influenza A and influenza B must be at the point estimate of at least 95 percent with a lower bound of the 95 percent confidence interval that is greater than or equal to 90 percent. (ii) For devices evaluated as compared to correctly performed viral culture method as the comparator method: (A) The sensitivity estimate for the device when testing for influenza A must be at the point estimate of at least 90 percent with a lower bound of the 95 percent confidence interval that is greater than or equal to 80 percent. The sensitivity estimate for the device when testing for influenza B must be at the point estimate of at least 80 percent with a lower bound of the 95 percent confidence interval that is greater than or equal to 70 percent. (B) The specificity estimate for the device when testing for influenza A and influenza B must be at the point estimate of at least 95 percent with a lower bound of the 95 percent confidence interval that is greater than or equal to 90 percent. (2) When performing testing to demonstrate the device meets the requirements in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a currently appropriate and FDA accepted comparator method must be used to establish assay performance in clinical studies. (3) Annual analytical reactivity testing of the device must be performed with contemporary influenza strains. This annual analytical reactivity testing must meet the following criteria: (i) The appropriate strains to be tested will be identified by FDA in consultation with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and sourced from CDC or an FDA-designated source. If the annual strains are not available from CDC, FDA will identify an alternative source for obtaining the requisite strains. (ii) The testing must be conducted according to a standardized protocol considered and determined by FDA to be acceptable and appropriate. (iii) By July 31 of each calendar year, the results of the last 3 years of annual analytical reactivity testing must be included as part of the device's labeling. If a device has not been on the market long enough for 3 years of annual analytical reactivity testing to have been conducted since the device received marketing authorization from FDA, then the results of every annual analytical reactivity testing since the device received marketing authorization from FDA must be included. The results must be presented as part of the device's labeling in a tabular format, which includes the detailed information for each virus tested as described in the certificate of authentication, either by: (A) Placing the results directly in the device's § 809.10(b) of this chapter compliant labeling that physically accompanies the device in a separate section of the labeling where the analytical reactivity testing data can be found; or (B) In the device's label or in other labeling that physically accompanies the device, prominently providing a hyperlink to the manufacturer's public Web site where the analytical reactivity testing data can be found. The manufacturer's home page, as well as the primary part of the manufacturer's Web site that discusses the device, must provide a prominently placed hyperlink to the Web page containing this information and must allow unrestricted viewing access. (4) If one of the actions listed at section 564(b)(1)(A)-(D) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act occurs with respect to an influenza viral strain, or if the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) determines, under section 319(a) of the Public Health Service Act, that a disease or disorder presents a public health emergency, or that a public health emergency otherwise exists, with respect to an influenza viral strain: (i) Within 30 days from the date that FDA notifies manufacturers that characterized viral samples are available for test evaluation, the manufacturer must have testing performed on the device with those viral samples in accordance with a standardized protocol considered and determined by FDA to be acceptable and appropriate. The procedure and location of testing may depend on the nature of the emerging virus. (ii) Within 60 days from the date that FDA notifies manufacturers that characterized viral samples are available for test evaluation and continuing until 3 years from that date, the results of the influenza emergency analytical reactivity testing, including the detailed information for the virus tested as described in the certificate of authentication, must be included as part of the device's labeling in a tabular format, either by: (A) Placing the results directly in the device's § 809.10(b) of this chapter compliant labeling that physically accompanies the device in a separate section of the labeling where analytical reactivity testing data can be found, but separate from the annual analytical reactivity testing results; or (B) In a section of the device's label or in other labeling that physically accompanies the device, prominently providing a hyperlink to the manufacturer's public Web site where the analytical reactivity testing data can be found. The manufacturer's home page, as well as the primary part of the manufacturer's Web site that discusses the device, must provide a prominently placed hyperlink to the Web page containing this information and must allow unrestricted viewing access.

Predicate Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0} SPECIAL 510(k): Device Modification To: THE FILE RE: DOCUMENT NUMBER K093116 This 510(k) submission contains information/data on modifications made to the SUBMITTER'S own Class I device requiring 510(k). The following items are present and acceptable: 1. The name and 510(k) number of the SUBMITTER'S previously cleared device: RAMP Influenza A/B Assay (K071591) 2. Submitter's statement that the INDICATION/INTENDED USE of the modified device as described in its labeling HAS NOT CHANGED along with the proposed labeling which includes instructions for use and package labeling. 3. The modification of the device consisted of expanded reactivity table to include reactivity information for the 2009 H1N1 Influenza strain A/Swine NY/02/2009. This modification has not had any effect or caused any changes to the FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY of this device. 4. Comparison Information (similarities and differences): The RAMP Influenza A/B Assay was not modified in any way. Reactivity data for the 2009 H1N1 Influenza strain A/Swine NY/02/2009 was added to the analytical reactivity table. No performance characteristics were established, modified or removed based on this additional reactivity information. The intended use for this device remains the same. 5. Design Control Activities Summary was provided: a) The method used for risk analysis for the RAMP Influenza A/B Assay is Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). b) Other than the analytical reactivity studies submitted, no further design verification tests or revisions to the risk management file were required as a result of this modification. c) A declaration of conformity with design controls was provided. Sponsor provided a signed statement that: i) All verification and validation activities were performed by the designated individual(s) and the results demonstrated that the predetermined acceptance criteria were met, and ii) The manufacturing facility is in conformance with design control procedure requirements as specified in 21 CFR 820.30 and the records are available for review. 6. A Truthful and Accurate Statement, a 510(k) Summary or Statement and the Indications for Use Enclosure (and Class III Summary for Class III devices). The labeling for this modified subject device has been reviewed to verify that the indication/intended use for the device is unaffected by the modification. In addition, the submitter's description of the particular modification(s) and the comparative information between the modified and unmodified devices demonstrate that the fundamental scientific technology has not changed. I recommend the device be determined substantially equivalent to the previously cleared device.
Innolitics

Panel 1

/
Ready

Predicate graph will load when search results are available.

Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.

PDF viewer will load when search results are available.

Loading panels...

Select an item from Submissions

Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.

Section Matches

Results will appear here.

Product Code Matches

Results will appear here.

Special Control Matches

Results will appear here.

Loading collections...