K092801 · Nimbic Systems, LLC · ORC · May 20, 2011 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K092801
Device Name
ABS BLOWER, ABS NOZZLE, MODEL 1001
Applicant
Nimbic Systems, LLC
Product Code
ORC · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
May 20, 2011
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.5070
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Air Barrier System is a portable device for use in a surgical operating room that produces a directed, non-turbulent flow of air to the surgical site. The air flow from the device is HEPA-filtered to reduce the presence of particulate matter and microorganisms at the surgical site during hip arthroplasty. The ABS Nozzle is intended to be used only where: (1) it can be placed on an anatomical surface with no gap between the bottom of the nozzle and the surface, (2) the incision plane is parallel to the direction of airflow, and (3) the incision dimensions are within: 6″ (15.2 cm) in width and 20" (50.8 cm) in length. Device effectiveness may not be reliably detectable at a distance of 20 inches from the Nozzle, and effectiveness depreciates beyond this specified area.
Device Story
Air Barrier System (ABS) provides localized air purification in surgical operating rooms. System consists of non-sterile, reusable Filter/Blower and sterile, single-use Air Delivery System (hose and nozzle). Filter/Blower draws ambient OR air through HEPA filter; filtered air travels through hose to nozzle. Nozzle placed directly on surgical drape adjacent to incision; delivers non-turbulent, HEPA-filtered air to surgical site. Used by surgical staff during hip arthroplasty. Reduces airborne particulate and microorganism counts at incision site; potentially lowers risk of surgical site contamination. Effectiveness limited to 20-inch range from nozzle.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective clinical study (n=29) during total hip arthroplasty compared three groups: active ABS, sham (present but inactive), and control (no device). Airborne particulate and microorganism samples collected at 10-minute intervals. Results: Active ABS group showed significantly lower (P<0.001) particulate and microorganism counts compared to sham and control. Mean microorganism density: 1.60 CFU/m³ (active) vs 10.73 CFU/m³ (outside area). Mean particulate: 524 particles/ft³ (active) vs 3853 and 4092 particles/ft³ (sham/control).
Technological Characteristics
System comprises HEPA-filtered blower and sterile, single-use air delivery hose/nozzle. Operates via directed, non-turbulent airflow. Materials, biocompatibility, and sterilization methods are equivalent to predicate. Bench testing included electrical safety, EMC, and microbial precipitation. No software algorithm or connectivity specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use in surgical operating rooms to provide directed, non-turbulent, HEPA-filtered airflow to the surgical site during hip arthroplasty to reduce particulate and microorganism presence. Restricted to incisions ≤ 6" wide and ≤ 20" long, with nozzle flush against anatomical surface and parallel to incision plane.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Air-handling apparatus for a surgical operating room is a device intended to produce a directed, nonturbulent flow of air that has been filtered to remove particulate matter and microorganisms to provide an area free of contaminants to reduce the possibility of infection in the patient.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an air handling bench apparatus, an air handling room apparatus, or an air handling enclosure apparatus, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 878.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
### APPENDIX B
### 510(k) SUMMARY - K092801
### The 510(k) Summary is submitted per 21 CFR Section 807.92(c)
Submitter's Name: Nimbic Systems, Inc.
Submitter's Address: 4910 Wright Road, Suite 170, Stafford, Texas 77477
125 Telephone: 281-565-5715
Fax: 281-565-5712
Contact Person: Sean D. Self
Date Prepared: 1 April 2011
Device Trade Name: Air Barrier System
130 Device Common Name: Air Barrier System or ABS
Device Classification Name: Air Handling Apparatus for Surgical Operating Room
Device Classification: Class II
Summary of Substantial Equivalence: The design, materials, mode of operation and intended use features and performance of the ABS System is substantially equivalent with regard to features and performance of the predicate device, SIBS (K831531).
Device Description: The Air Barrier System (ABS) is used in the surgical operating room. The Air Barrier System (ABS) has two components: a Filter/Blower and an Air Delivery System. The Filter/Blower is nonsterile and reusable. The Air Delivery System is sterile, single-use. The ABS Filter/Blower captures and filters ambient air found in a typical surgical operating room through a High Efficiency Particle Arresting (HEPA)
- The HEPA filtered air leaves the Filter/Blower via the exit port where it is connected to the Hose 140 filter. portion of the sterile, single-use Air Delivery System. The Hose ends in the Nozzle portion of the Air Delivery System; the Nozzle is gently applied to the incision drape adjacent to a surgical incision. The Nozzle delivers HEPA filtered air directly to the surgical site area to reduce the presence of airborne warticulate and microorganisms.
#### 145 Indications for Use:
150
135
The Air Barrier System is a portable device for use in a surgical operating room that produces a directed, non-turbulent flow of air to the surgical site. The air flow from the device is HEPA-fittered to reduce the presence of particulate matter and microorganisms at the surgical site during hip arthroplasty. The ABS Nozzle is intended to be used only where: (1) it can be placed on anatomical surface with no gap between the bottom of the nozzle and the surface, (2) the incision plane is parallel to the direction of airflow, and (3) the incision dimensions are within: 6″ (15.2 cm) in width and 20" (50.8 cm) in length. Device effectiveness may not be reliably detectable at a distance of 20 inches from the Nozzle, and effectiveness depreciates beyond this specified area.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/0 description: The image shows a handwritten string of characters. The string starts with the letter 'K', followed by the numbers '092801'. The characters are written in a cursive style, with the numbers being slightly slanted. The image has a white background.
- Technological Characteristics: Comparisons of the ABS System and predicate device show that technological 155 characteristics such as materials, biocompatibility, mode of operation, performance properties, sterilization and packaging are substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Non-clinical Performance Data: Bench testing included: medical electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, sterilization, biocompatibility, microbial precipitation testing, simulated use performance 160 testing, simulated worst-case use performance testing, cadaver surgical procedure testing, maximum air velocity testing in simulated and actual OR settings, turbulence testing at distances from simulated incision sites, and turbulence testing in clinical environment. Results of all bench and cadaver testing demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Air Barrier System and its substantial equivalence to the predicate device.
- Clinical Performance Data: A clinical study at a single investigator was conducted to demonstrate the performance characteristics of the Air Barrier System (ABS) during total hip arthroplasty 165 surgery. Twenty-nine (29) patients were randomized into one of three groups: with the ABS active (experiment), with the ABS present but not active (sham), and with no ABS device present (control). Airborne particulate and microorganism samples were collected simultaneously at a discrete single location at the surgical incision within the ABS area of effect and from a discrete single location within the sterile field,
- but not within the ABS area of effect. The airborne particulate and microorganism samples were the nt 170 ten-minute increments throughout the duration of the surgical procedures. The airborne particulate and microorganism counts observed in the experiment group (with the ABS device active) were significantly lower (P<0.001) than that observed in the sham and control groups. In the experiment group, with the ABS device active, the mean microorganism density at the discrete single sampling location within the ABS near S
- effect was 1.60 colony-forming units per cubic meter compared to 10.73 colony-forming units per cubic : 175 meter measured at a discrete single location outside the ABS area of effect. For particulate of size Sum sampled from single location points throughout each study group, the mean observed particulated for in the experiment group was 524 particles per cubic foot compared with 3853 and 4092 particles per cultic foot in the sham and control groups, respectively.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). The logo consists of a stylized caduceus symbol, which is a staff with two snakes entwined around it, and the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" arranged in a circular fashion around the symbol. The caduceus is a common symbol associated with healthcare and medicine.
Food and Drug Administration 1 0903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Mr. Sean Self President Nimbic Systems, LLC 4910 Wright Road, Suite 170 Stafford, Texas 77477
# MAY 2 0 2011
Re: K092801
Trade/Device Name: Air Barrier System (ABS) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.5070 Regulation Name: Air-handing Apparatus for a Surgical Operating Room Regulatory Class: II Product Code: ORC Dated: March 25, 2010 Received: March 26, 2010
Dear Mr. Self:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Self
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
Antony D. Natin
Anthony Watson, B.S., M.S., M.B.A. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
## APPENDIX A
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K092801 તેર
Device Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Indications For Use:
100
The Air Barrier System is a portable device for use in a surgical operating room that produces a directed, non-turbulent flow of air to the surgical site. The air flow from the device is HEPA-filtered to reduce the presence of particulate matter and microorganisms at the surgical site during hip arthroplasty. The ABS Nozzle is intended to be used only where: (1) it can be placed on an anatomical surface with no gap between the bottom of the nozzle and the surface, (2) the incision plane is parallel to the direction of airflow, and (3) the incision dimensions are within: 6″ (15.2 cm) in width and 20" (50.8 cm) in length. Device effectiveness may not be reliably detectable at a distance of 20 inches from the Nozzle, and effectiveness depreciates beyond this specified area.
110
ਹੈ ਹਵ
115 Prescription Use _
Over-The-Counter Use _
(Per 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
(21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Elizabeth & Clavie-Williams
(Division Sigh-Off)
Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital
Infection Control and Dental Devices
\$10(k) Number: K 092801
Page 6 of 8
# 000007
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.