VIRAMED BIOTECH AG BORRELIA B31 IGG VIRASTRIPE, MODEL V-BBSGUS
K092693 · Viramed Biotech AG · LSR · Nov 25, 2009 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K092693
Device Name
VIRAMED BIOTECH AG BORRELIA B31 IGG VIRASTRIPE, MODEL V-BBSGUS
Applicant
Viramed Biotech AG
Product Code
LSR · Microbiology
Decision Date
Nov 25, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3830
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® is an in vitro qualitative assay for the detection of IgG antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in human serum. It is intended for use in the testing of human serum samples which have been found positive or equivocal using an EIA or IFA test procedure for B. burgdorferi antibodies. Positive results from this line blot assay are supportive evidence of infection with B. burgdorferi, the causative agent for Lyme disease. The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® can be used anytime after onset provided the EIA or IFA are positive or equivocal. It should also be used for follow-up when: 1) Only IgM antibodies were found positive in a line blot assay or Western blot, 2) IgG antibodies were found by line blot or Western blot but were not considered significant by the CDC criteria for a positive IgG Western blot, 3) previously tested sero-negative individuals are shown to develop antibodies by an EIA or IFA test.
Device Story
Line blot assay for qualitative detection of IgG antibodies to B. burgdorferi antigens in human serum; utilizes B31 strain antigens purified via electrophoresis and chromatography, then line-striped onto nitrocellulose membrane. Procedure involves incubating serum with strip; washing; adding alkaline-phosphatase anti-human IgG conjugate; adding substrate to induce precipitation/color change at specific antigen locations. Visualized bands compared to Cut-off control band intensity. Used in clinical laboratories; results interpreted by healthcare providers to support Lyme disease diagnosis. Benefits include standardized identification of specific B. burgdorferi antibodies compared to traditional Western blot.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided in the document.
Technological Characteristics
Line blot assay using purified B. burgdorferi B31 antigens fixed to nitrocellulose membrane. Qualitative visual readout based on colorimetric precipitation. Integrated control system (function and conjugate controls). Cut-off control band used for intensity comparison. Complies with CLSI EP5-A2 and M34-A guidelines.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of IgG antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in human serum. Intended for follow-up testing of samples previously found positive or equivocal by EIA or IFA. Not studied in pediatric or adolescent patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Treponema pallidum treponemal test reagents are devices that consist of the antigens, antisera and all control reagents (standardized reagents with which test results are compared) which are derived from treponemal sources and that are used in the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (FTA-ABS), the Treponema pallidum immobilization test (T.P.I.), and other treponemal tests used to identify antibodies to Treponema pallidum directly from infecting treponemal organisms in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of syphilis caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Treponema and provides epidemiological information on syphilis.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
K092693
B. Purpose for Submission:
Substantial equivalence determination for a new device
C. Measurand:
IgG antibodies to *Borrelia burgdorferi*
D. Type of Test:
Western blot test
E. Applicant:
Viramed Biotech AG
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
*Borrelia* B31 IgG *ViraStripe®*
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866. 3830, Treponema pallidum treponemal test reagents
2. Classification:
Class: II
3. Product code:
LSR; Reagent, Borrelia Serological Reagent
4. Panel:
83- Microbiology
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® is an in vitro qualitative assay for the detection of IgG antibodies to *Borrelia burgdorferi* in human serum. It is intended for use in the testing of human serum samples which have been found positive or equivocal using an EIA or IFA test procedure for *B. burgdorferi* antibodies. Positive results from this line blot assay are supportive evidence of infection with *B. burgdorferi*, the causative agent for Lyme disease. The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® can be used anytime after onset provided the EIA or IFA are positive or equivocal. It should also be used for follow-up when: 1) Only IgM antibodies were found positive in a line blot assay or Western blot, 2) IgG antibodies were found by line blot or Western blot but were not considered significant by the CDC criteria for a positive IgG Western blot, 3) previously tested sero-negative individuals are shown to develop antibodies by an EIA or IFA test.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® is an in vitro qualitative assay for the detection of IgG antibodies to *Borrelia burgdorferi* in human serum. It is intended for use in the testing of human serum samples which have been found positive or equivocal using an EIA or IFA test procedure for *B. burgdorferi* antibodies. Positive results from this line blot assay are supportive evidence of infection with *B. burgdorferi*, the causative agent for Lyme disease. The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® can be used anytime after onset provided the EIA or IFA are positive or equivocal. It should also be used for follow-up when: 1) Only IgM antibodies were found positive in an line blot assay or Western blot, 2) IgG antibodies were found by line blot or Western blot but were not considered significant by the CDC criteria for a positive IgG Western blot, 3) previously tested sero-negative individuals are shown to develop antibodies by an EIA or IFA test.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use
4. Special instrument requirements:
None
I. Device Description:
This is a line blot assay to detect IgG to individual *B. burgdorferi* antigens. *B. burgdorferi* antigens from a B31 passage tick strain are purified by
{2}
electrophoretic and chromatographic methodologies and line striped on a nitrocellulose membrane. B. burgdorferi antigens are bound and fixed to the solid phase nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane is blocked, dried and cut into individual test strips.
For each test to be performed, the line blot strip and diluted test serum is added to a line blot strip well. If specific antibodies that recognize an antigen are present, they will bind to the specific antigens on the strip. After incubation the line blot strip is washed to remove unbound antibodies. Alkaline-phosphatase anti-human IgG conjugate is then added to each strip and incubated. If antibody is present, the conjugate will bind to the antibody attached to the specific antigens. The strip is washed to remove unbound conjugate and the substrate solution is added. If the enzyme/antibody complex is present, the substrate will undergo a precipitation and color change. After an incubation period, the reaction is stopped and the presence of precipitated substrate is visualized at specific locations on the strip. The presence of a colored precipitation at various locations on the line blot strip is an indirect measurement of Borrelia burgdorferi specific antibodies in the patient specimen. A uniform band locator is given on the evaluation protocol and used to locate and identify specific Borrelia burgdorferi B31 antibodies on the line blot test strip. Every strip has an integrated control system including function control and conjugate control. Visualized bands from the reaction are compared for intensity with a separate strip containing the Cut-off control band for evaluation. Any band found having a visual intensity equal to or greater than the Cut-off control band intensity is considered as a significant band.
Positivity: The criteria for a positive Western blot result defined by the CDC are followed. For B. burgdorferi IgG positivity, the blot should be positive for at least 5 of 10 bands: 93, 66, 58, 45, 41, 39, 30, 28, 23, and 18kDa
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgG ViraBlot
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K051071
{3}
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® is an in vitro qualitative assay for the detection of IgG antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in human serum. It is intended for use in the testing of human serum samples which have been found positive or equivocal using an EIA or IFA test procedure for B. burgdorferi antibodies. | The Viramed Biotech Borrelia B31 IgG ViraBlot® is an in vitro qualitative assay for the detection of IgG antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in human serum. It is intended for use in the testing of human serum samples which have been found positive or equivocal using an EIA or IFA test procedure for B. burgdorferi antibodies. |
| Assay | Western blot | Western blot |
| Specimen Type | Serum | Serum |
| Procedure | Qualitative; B. burgdorferi IgG antibodies to specific protein bands | Qualitative; B. burgdorferi IgG antibodies to specific protein bands. |
| Differences | | |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Protein antigens | Blot with purified proteins (line blot) | Blot with proteins separated by electrophoresis |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline—Second Edition and CLSI M34-A, Western Blot Assay for Antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi, Approved Guidance
# L. Test Principle:
Western blot
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Eight serum samples (low negative, high negative, low positive and
{4}
moderate positive) were tested in duplicate over 5 working days (twice) by separate technicians at a single site (Viramed Biotech AG) using one lot. The serum panel specimens were selected to represent negative to high-positive immune-reactivity levels. For this study, two different readers within the three different laboratories assessed the band identification for each sample on the same blot. There was identical testing of all bands by each reporter for each sample.
| Study Summary | Day 1-5 | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample ID | Tech 1 | | Tech 2 | | All Technicians |
| | Rep 1 | Rep 2 | Rep 1 | Rep 2 | Agreement |
| Low negative | - | - | - | - | 100% |
| High negative (1) | 41, 23, 18 | 41, 23, 18 | 41, 23, 18 | 41, 23, 18 | 100% |
| High negative (2) | 41, 23, 18 | 41, 23, 18 | 41, 23, 18 | 41, 23, 18 | 100% |
| Low Positive (1) | 66, 41, 39, 28, 23, 18 | 66, 41, 39, 28, 23, 18 | 66, 41, 39, 28, 23, 18 | 66, 41, 39, 28, 23, 18 | 100% |
| Low Positive (2) | 93, 45, 41, 28, 18 | 93,45,41,28,18 | 93,45,41,28,18 | 93,45,41,28,18 | 100% |
| Low Positive (3) | 66, 58, 45, 41, 39, 23, 18 | 66, 58, 45, 41, 39, 23, 18 | 66, 58, 45, 41, 39, 23, 18 | 66, 58, 45, 41, 39, 23, 18 | 100% |
| Moderate Positive (1) | 93, 66, 58, 45, 41, 39, 30, 28, 23, 18 | 93, 66, 58, 45, 41, 39, 30, 28, 23, 18 | 93, 66, 58, 45, 41, 39, 30, 28, 23, 18 | 93, 66, 58, 45, 41, 39, 30, 28, 23, 18 | 100% |
| Moderate Positive (2) | 93, 66, 58, 41, 39, 30, 28, 18 | 93, 66, 58, 41, 39, 30, 28, 18 | 93, 66, 58, 41, 39, 30, 28, 18 | 93, 66, 58, 41, 39, 30, 28, 18 | 100% |
The Precision/Reproducibility study was satisfactory for this type of assay.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Not applicable
d. Detection limit:
Not applicable
e. Analytical specificity:
CROSS REACTIVITY
Seventy-five sera determined to contain antibodies to other infectious disease
{5}
agents were tested. Cross-reactivity data for Ehrlichia chafeensis and Babesia microti may represent an actual co-infection with B. burgdorferi. All three tick borne organisms have been found to reside in the geographic location where the 12 clinical specimens were obtained. Both of the specimens found positive by the Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® were also found to be positive in a commercially available Lyme Western blot test system.
The proposed insert includes the following, which is slightly altered from the text of the submission: "Seventy-five sera determined to contain antibodies to other infectious disease agents are presented in Table 8. Cross-reactivity data for Ehrlichia chafeensis and Babesia microti may represent an actual co-infection with B. burgdorferi. All three tick borne organisms have been found to reside in the geographic location these 12 clinical specimens were obtained. Both of the specimens found positive in the Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® were also found to be positive in a commercially available Lyme Western blot test system. See Limitations for list of untested, potentially cross-reactive organisms."
| Disease State Sera | Number | Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® Positive | Percent cross-reactivity |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ehrlichia chafeensis | 7 | 1 | 14% |
| Babesia microti | 5 | 1 | 20% |
| Borrelia hermsii | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| Leptospira interrogans | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| Helicobacter pylori | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| Epstein Barr Virus | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| ENA Autoimmune | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| Treponema pallidum | 15 | 0 | 0% |
## INTERFERING SUBSTANCES
There is no discussion regarding interfering substances in the submission. The proposed package insert contains the following:
"Haemolysed, lipemic, or icteric sera should not be used for testing, in addition sera with elevated bilirubin, and triglycerides were not tested. The performance of this assay when testing sera from patients with any immune-deficient diseases such as HIV, HTLV, etc. and sera from patients that have had immune-suppressive therapy with drugs or medications is not known because no studies were conducted to assess the performance. Do not use heat-inactivated sera."
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
{6}
7
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
i. Correlations to the CDC Lyme Disease Panel
A Lyme Disease Clinical panel containing 44 clinically defined positives and negative samples was obtained from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado.
| | | Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Time after Onset | Total | Positive | Negative | % Agreement |
| Normals | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| Clinically Undefined | 3 | 1 | 2 | 100% |
| Early Localized | 27 | 6 | 21 | 93% |
| Disseminated Disease | 9 | 8 | 1 | 89% |
| Total | 44 | 15 | 29 | 93% |
ii. College of American Pathologists 2003 Tick-borne Disease Proficiency Panel
The CAP Tick-borne Proficiency Panel for the year 2003 was tested:
| | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | CAP Published | | Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® | | Borrelia B31 IgG ViraBlot® | |
| | IgG Pos | IgG Neg | IgG Pos | IgG Neg | IgG Pos | IgG Neg |
| LY-A 2003 TTD01-05 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| LY-B 2003 TTD06-10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| LY-C 2003 TTD11-15 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Total | 4 | 11 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 13 |
According to the sponsor, there was 100% concordance (15/15) with the CAP panel (95% Confidence Interval 78.2-100), and 86% (13/15) concordance with the predicate device (95% Confidence Interval 59.5-98.3).
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Sensitivity:
{7}
A total of 435 samples were prospectively collected and found to be EIA positive were sent to laboratories in California, Wisconsin, and Minnesota for Lyme disease testing. Samples were tested with the Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® and the predicate device (Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgG ViraBlot® Western Blot). Results are presented in the tables below.
Subjects Sent to the Laboratory for Lyme Disease Testing
| Predicate | Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® | | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Negative | |
| Positive | 58 | 3 | 61 |
| Negative | 1 | 373 | 374 |
| Total | 59 | 376 | 435 |
| Percent Agreement | | Exact 95% Confidence Intervals |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Positive | 98.3% (58/59) | (91.0% – 100%) |
| Negative | 99.7% (373/374) | (98.5% - 100%) |
| Overall | 99.1% (431/435) | (97.7% - 99.7%) |
Clinically-defined Lyme disease samples
One hundred (100) sera were obtained from patients that were clinically defined (culture confirmed) with Lyme borreliosis. Of these 100 sera, 40 were paired (20 acute and 20 convalescent) sera from patients diagnosed with Erythema migrans (EM), 20 with early-disseminated Lyme Disease/Carditis/Acute Neuroborreliosis, and 40 with late stage Lyme arthritis. Results are presented in the tables below.
| Stage | Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Total | Positive | Negative | Sensitivity (95% Confidence Intervals) |
| Acute EM 1-21 days from Onset | 20 | 5 | 15 | 25% (8.6%- 49.1%) |
| Convalescent EM 4 weeks after Onset | 20 | 5 | 15 | 25% (8.6%- 49.1%) |
| Early Neurologic | 20 | 13 | 7 | 65% (40.8% – 84.6%) |
| Late Arthritis | 40 | 37 | 3 | 92.5% (79.6% – 98.4%) |
| Total | 100 | 60 | 40 | |
{8}
| Borrelia B31 IgG ViraBlot® | Borrelia B31 IgG ViraStripe® | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 59 | 1 | 60 |
| Negative | 1 | 39 | 40 |
| Total | 60 | 40 | 100 |
| | Percent Agreement | 95% Confidence Intervals |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Positive | 98.3% (59/60) | 91.1% - 100% |
| Negative | 97.5% (39/40) | 86.8% - 99.9% |
| Overall | 98.0% (98/100) | 93.0% - 99.8% |
b. Clinical specificity:
The sponsor notes the following for analytic specificity (there is no description of clinical specificity): "For determination of analytical specificity, two hundred of the sera from normal blood donor individuals representing endemic and non-endemic geographic regions of the United States were tested for IgG Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies by the Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe®
Analytical Specificity
| | N | Negative | Positive | % Positive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Endemic | 100 | 98 | 2 | 2% |
| Non-endemic | 100 | 99 | 1 | 1% |
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable
N. Proposed Labeling:
{9}
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
**O. Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.