FREESTYLE Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring System and Freestyle Freedom Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring System
K092602 · Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. · NBW · May 14, 2010 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K092602
Device Name
FREESTYLE Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring System and Freestyle Freedom Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring System
Applicant
Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
May 14, 2010
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The FreeStyle Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood from the finger, upper arm and palm; and venous blood. It is intended for use by healthcare professionals and people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. It is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus, and it is not intended for use on neonates or arterial blood. The FreeStyle Freedom Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood from the finger, upper arm and palm; and venous blood. It is intended for use by healthcare professionals and people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. It is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus, and it is not intended for use on neonates or arterial blood.
Device Story
System comprises blood glucose meter, test strips, control solution, and lancing device. Input: 0.3 μL capillary or venous whole blood applied to test strip. Principle: Coulometric biosensor technology; FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenase (GDH-FAD) enzyme on strip reacts with glucose; liberated electrons transferred via mediator to meter; electrical current measured; charge proportional to glucose level. Output: Quantitative glucose concentration (20-500 mg/dL) displayed on meter screen. Used at home or clinical settings by patients or healthcare professionals. Output informs diabetes management decisions. Benefits: Rapid (5s) glucose monitoring without user calibration.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing demonstrating the performance of the modified chemistry, including interference testing showing reduced reactivity with maltose, lactose, and galactose compared to the predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Electrochemical biosensor; GDH-FAD enzyme; MAP (n-methyl pyridine) mediator; DuPont carbon ink electrodes; Melinex substrate; silver/silver chloride ink; spacer tape with modified adhesive. Dimensions/form factor unchanged. Standalone test strip for use with existing handheld meters. No coding required.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative glucose measurement in capillary (finger, upper arm, palm) and venous whole blood. Intended for use by healthcare professionals and patients with diabetes mellitus to monitor diabetes control program effectiveness. Contraindicated for neonates and arterial blood; not for diabetes diagnosis or screening.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
FreeStyle Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring System (k070850)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k092602
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device – New glucose test strips with GDH-FAD methodology for marketed meters
C. Measurand:
Whole blood glucose
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative coulometric assay, glucose dehydrogenase (GDH-FAD)
E. Applicant:
Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
FreeStyle Lite and FreeStyle Freedom Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1345; Glucose test system
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
NBW, System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over The Counter
LFR, Glucose Dehydrogenase, Glucose
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
2. Indications(s) for use:
FreeStyle Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring System
The FreeStyle Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood from the finger, upper arm and palm, and venous whole blood. It is intended for use by healthcare professionals and people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. It is not intended for the diagnosis of or
{1}
screening for diabetes mellitus, and is not intended for use on neonates or arterial blood.
## FreeStyle Freedom Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring System
The FreeStyle Freedom Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood from the finger, upper arm and palm, and venous whole blood. It is intended for use by healthcare professionals and people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. It is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus, and is not intended for use on neonates or arterial blood.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
- Not intended for use on neonates
- Not for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus
- Not to be used for patients who are dehydrated, hypotensive or in shock
- Not for use for patients in a hyperglycemic-hyperosmolar state, with or without ketosis.
- Not for use on critically ill patients
- Alternative site testing can only be done during times of steady state
4. Special instrument requirements:
FreeStyle Lite and FreeStyle Freedom Lite Blood Glucose meters
I. Device Description:
The FreeStyle Lite and FreeStyle Freedom Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems contain a blood glucose meter (Lite and Freedom Lite, respectively), FreeStyle Lite test strips, FreeStyle control solution, lancing device and lancets. The only difference between the two meters is that the FreeStyle Lite meter has a backlight, with an additional button to operate it, while the FreeStyle Freedom Lite meter does not.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
FreeStyle Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring System
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k070850
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Subject Device | Predicate |
| Indications for use | The FreeStyle Lite and FreeStyle Freedom Lite Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems are | Same |
{2}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Subject Device | Predicate |
| | specifically indicated for use on
The FreeStyle Lite and FreeStyle Freedom Lite
Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems are intended
for use in the quantitative measurement of
glucose in capillary whole blood from the finger,
forearm and palm, and venous whole blood.
They are intended for use by healthcare
professionals and people with diabetes mellitus at
home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of
a diabetes control program. They are not intended
for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes
mellitus, and are not intended for use on neonates
or arterial blood. | |
| Test Principle | Coulometric biosensor technology | Same |
| Sample Type | Venous or capillary whole blood | Same |
| Sample volume | 0.3 μL | Same |
| Measurement range | 20-500 mg/dL | Same |
| AST | Upper arm and palm | Same |
| Calibration | None required | Same |
| Second sample
application | Within 60 seconds | Same |
| Measurement time | 5 seconds | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Subject Device | Predicate |
| Enzyme | GDH-FAD | GDH-PQQ |
| Shelf life | 12 months | 18 months |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- ISO 15197:2003- In vitro diagnostic test systems – Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus.
- ISO 14971:2007, Medical devices – Application of risk management to medical devices.
- EN 13640:2002, Stability testing of in vitro diagnostic medical devices.
- CLSI EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods.
- CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures, A Statistical Approach.
- CLSI EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry.
- CLSI EP9-A2: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples.
{3}
- FDA Guideline, Review criteria for assessment of portable blood glucose monitoring in vitro diagnostic devices using glucose oxidase, dehydrogenase or hexokinase methodology.
## L. Test Principle:
The FreeStyle Lite and FreeStyle Freedom Lite glucose meters, in conjunction with the Freestyle Lite test strips, utilize coulometric biosensor technology to quantitatively measure the glucose concentration in whole blood samples and in control solutions. The glucose biosensors recognize the glucose present in whole blood or control solutions by virtue of the specificity of the enzyme FAD dependent glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) present on the test strip. The electrons liberated by this reaction are transferred via a co-factor and mediator to the meter where they are read as a small electrical current. The magnitude of the charge measured over reaction time is directly proportional to the level of glucose in the applied sample.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The sponsor performed precision studies in accordance with the ISO 15197 guideline. Adjusted venous whole blood samples at 5 glucose levels (hematocrit range 35 to 50%) were used for within-day precision studies. Each concentration was tested 10 times each on 10 meters, using 3 test strip lots, for a total of 300 tests per blood glucose level. The reference value was determined by the YSI 2300 glucose analyzer. Results are summarized below:
| | Level 1
30-50 mg/dL | | | Level 2
51-110 mg/dL | | | Level 3
111-150 mg/dL | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot | Average | SD | %CV | Average | SD | %CV | Average | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 46.8 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 96.9 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 132.2 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| 2 | 44.8 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 92.9 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 131.3 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| 3 | 42.9 | 1.4 | 3.4 | 89.8 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 128.7 | 2.8 | 2..2 |
| | Level 4
151-250 mg/dL | | | Level 5
251-400 mg/dL | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot | Average | SD | %CV | Average | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 208.8 | 4.6 | 2.2 | 285.5 | 5.6 | 2.0 |
| 2 | 207.6 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 287.2 | 5.4 | 1.9 |
| 3 | 202.6 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 283.8 | 6.8 | 2.4 |
The sponsor also evaluated the day-to-day precision of the device using replicate measurements of glucose control solutions (low, normal, and high). Three different concentrations, using the same lot of control solutions, were tested on 10 meters, each tested in duplicate over 20 days with 3 strip lots. Results are summarized below:
{4}
| | Level 1
40-70 mg/dL | | | Level 2
83-125 mg/dL | | | Level 3
248-372 mg/dL | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot | Average | SD | %CV | Average | SD | %CV | Average | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 53.7 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 101.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 298.6 | 7.2 | 2.4 |
| 2 | 53.5 | 2.7 | 5.2 | 100.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 300.8 | 5.5 | 1.8 |
| 3 | 54.4 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 101.3 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 297.7 | 7.2 | 2.4 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The sponsor performed linearity studies using adjusted whole blood samples with 9 different glucose concentration ranges from 20 to 500 mg/dL. Duplicate measurements were made with each concentration on 6 meters and the results compared to those obtained using YSI 2300. Linear regression analysis resulted in: y = 0.97x + 10.7; r² = 0.996.
The claimed reportable range of the device is 20 to 500 mg/dL.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The method comparison was performed using the proposed device and YSI 2300 glucose analyzer.
Test strip stability was assessed in real-time and accelerated studies. The testing supported the claimed shelf life of 12 months when stored at 4-30°C with relative humidity of 5-90%.
The FreeStyle Control Solutions, Levels 1, 2, and 3 were previously cleared in k070850.
c. Detection limit:
The measuring range of the device is 20-500 mg/dL. This range was validated via the linearity study (see section M.1.b.).
d. Analytical specificity:
The sponsor performed interference studies with spiked venous blood samples at two glucose concentrations (100 and 300 mg/dL) that were prepared and divided into a test (dosed) pool and a control pool. The interferents were added to the sample and each sample was analyzed in duplicate using 3 test strip lots on six meters. The bias between control and dosed samples were calculated for each substance as well as the bias of the dosed sample from the control for each substance tested. With the exception of xylose, all biases (control to dosed sample and dosed sample to YSI) were within ± 10%. For xylose, a dose response study was conducted on 5 xylose levels (0-25 mg/dL) at two glucose concentrations (100 and 300 mg/dL). It was determined that the highest level of xylose at which no significant interference occurs is 6 mg/dL. A warning statement is included in the test strip insert that this device should not be used during xylose absorption testing. The table below lists all substances tested at concentrations with insignificant (<10%) interference:
{5}
| Substance | Concentration with <10% interference (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 20 |
| Ascorbate | 5 |
| B-hydroxybutyrate | 100 |
| Bilirubin | 20 |
| Cholesterol | 500 |
| Creatinine | 30 |
| Dopamine | 13 |
| Ephedrine | 10 |
| Galactose | 100 |
| Ibuprofen | 50 |
| Lactate | 100 |
| Lactose | 100 |
| L-dopa | 5 |
| Maltose | 100 |
| Methyl-dopa | 2.5 |
| Pyruvate | 10 |
| Salicylic acid | 50 |
| Tetracycline | 4 |
| Tolazamide | 100 |
| Tolbutamide | 100 |
| Triglyceride | 3000 |
| Uric acid | 40 |
| Xylose | 6 |
e. Assay cut-off: Not Applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The sponsor conducted a combined accuracy and consumer study. Testing was conducted at 3 sites, with trained operators and a total of 179 lay-users. Each lay user participant performed their own fingerstick and tested their blood on the FreeStyle Lite meter using only the instructions in the user's manual and test strip insert. A trained operator then performed a second fingerstick and tested the blood on the same meter. Blood was also collected and measured on an YSI analyzer. The total range of samples tested was 33-492 mg/dL, with a hematocrit range of 27-58%. A total of 36 samples <50 mg/dL and >395 mg/dL were glycolyzed or spiked, respectively and tested by trained operators only. Linear regression results are presented below:
{6}
Trained operator $\mathrm{y} = 0.94\mathrm{x} + 0.3,\mathrm{r}^2 = 1.00,\mathrm{x} = 215$
Lay user $\mathrm{y} = 0.96\mathrm{x} - 1.6,\mathrm{r}^2 = 0.99,\mathrm{x} = 179$
The study results met the ISO 15197 accuracy criteria where ninety-five percent (95%) of the individual glucose results fell within $\pm 15\mathrm{mg / dL}$ of the YSI results at glucose concentrations $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and within $\pm 20\%$ at glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ .
For glucose concentrations $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| | within ± 5 mg/dL | within ± 10 mg/dL | within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Trained operator | 23/29 (79.3%) | 29/29 (100%) | 29/29 (100%) |
| Lay user | 8/11 (72.7%) | 11/11 (100%) | 11/11 (100%) |
For glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| | within ± 5 % | within ± 10 % | within ± 15 % | within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Trained operator | 126/186 | 172/186 | 185/186 | 186/186 |
| | (67.7%) | (92.5%) | (99.5%) | (100%) |
| Lay user | 115/168 | 160/168 | 166/168 | 167/168 |
| | (68.5%) | (95.2%) | (98.8%) | (99.4%) |
The sponsor conducted alternative site studies on the palm and upper arm at 2 clinical sites with a total of 151 lay users. Each participant obtained samples from either their palm or upper arm and tested these samples on the FreeStyle Lite meter using only the instructions in the user's manual and test strip insert. A trained operator then obtained palm and upper arm samples from each participant and tested these samples on the same meter. Venous blood was also collected and measured on an YSI analyzer. Linear regression results are presented below:
palm trained operator $\mathrm{y} = 1.03 + 4.6, \mathrm{r}2 = 0.994, \mathrm{x} = 74$
lay user $\mathrm{y} = 1.03 + 4.5, \mathrm{r}2 = 0.990, \mathrm{x} = 74$
upper arm trained operator $\mathrm{y} = 0.96 + 8.1, \mathrm{r}2 = 0.981, \mathrm{x} = 77$
lay user $\mathrm{y} = 1.00 + 6.4, \mathrm{r}2 = 0.974, \mathrm{x} = 77$
Both the palm and upper arm alternative site results met the ISO 15197 accuracy criteria where ninety-five percent (95%) of the individual glucose results fell within $\pm 15\mathrm{mg / dL}$ of the YSI results at glucose concentrations $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and within $\pm 20\%$ at glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ .
For glucose concentrations $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| | | within ± 5 | within ± 10 | within ± 15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
{7}
For glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| | | within ± 5 % | within ± 10 % | within ± 15 % | within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Palm | Trained operator | 30/69 (43%) | 54/69 (78%) | 67/69 (97%) | 69/69 (100%) |
| | Lay user | 32/69 (46%) | 54/69 (78%) | 65/69 (94%) | 67/69 (97%) |
| Upper arm | Trained operator | 39/76 (51%) | 68/76 (88%) | 73/76 (95%) | 75/76 (97%) |
| | Lay user | 39/76 (51%) | 60/76 (79%) | 69/76 (91%) | 72/76 (95%) |
# b. Matrix comparison:
Venous blood samples from 107 subjects was collected in EDTA tubes and from 109 subjects was collected in heparin tubes and assayed 6 times each on the FreeStyle Lite meter and YSI using 3 strip lots. The glucose concentrations of the samples were $65-444\mathrm{mg/dL}$ and the hematocrit range was $25-51\%$ . Linear regression results are presented below:
EDTA $y = 0.92 + 9.8, r2 = 0.99, x = 642$
Heparin $y = 0.93 + 9.1, r2 = 0.99, x = 654$
The study results met the ISO 15197 accuracy criteria where ninety-five percent (95%) of the individual glucose results fell within $\pm 15\mathrm{mg / dL}$ of the YSI results at glucose concentrations $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and within $\pm 20\%$ at glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ .
For glucose concentrations $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| | within ± 5 mg/dL | within ± 10 mg/dL | within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EDTA | 5/12 (41.7%) | 11/12 (91.7%) | 12/12 (100%) |
| Heparin | 8/11 (72.7%) | 11/11 (100%) | 11/11 (100%) |
For glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| | within ± 5 % | within ± 10 % | within ± 15 % | within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EDTA | 500/630 (79.4) | 618/630 (98.1%) | 629/630 (99.8%) | 629/630 (99.8%) |
{8}
| Heparin | 523/642
(81.5%) | 623/642
(97.0%) | 635/642(98.9%) | 639/642
(99.5%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity: Not Applicable.
b. Clinical specificity: Not Applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable): Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off: Not Applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range: Expected blood glucose levels for a non-diabetic, non-pregnant adult (referenced from the American Diabetes Association, Clinical Practice Recommendations; Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 2005; 28 (Suppl. 1); S37-S42.
Time Range (mg/dL)
Fasting less than 100
Two hours after meals less than 140
N. Instrument Name:
FreeStyle Lite Blood Glucose Meter
FreeStyle Freedom Lite Blood Glucose Meter
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Each test strip is single use and must be replaced with a new strip for additional readings.
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?:
Yes ______ or No ☐
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?:
Yes ______ or No ☐
2. Software:
{9}
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X or No ☐
The applicant has provided documentation that indicates the device was designed and developed under good software life-cycle processes.
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
This device is intended to be used with capillary and venous whole blood, which can be applied directly to the test strip.
5. Calibration:
No calibration is required by the user.
6. Quality Control:
The sponsor provides a normal control solution with the device. Two other levels (low and high) are available for purchase from the sponsor. An acceptable range for each control level is printed on the test strip vial label. The user is referred to the troubleshooting section of the owner’s manual if control results fall outside these ranges.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
Hematocrit Study:
A study to evaluate the effect of hematocrit was conducted on samples with 5 glucose concentrations (36-44, 81-99, 162-198, 253-297, 324-396, and 400-500 mg/dL) at 7 hematocrit levels (15, 20, 25, 40, 55, 60, and 65%). Each glucose level/hematocrit combination was tested in duplicate on 6 meters using 3 lots of test strips. Results of samples at each hematocrit level were compared to samples with the same glucose concentration at normal (40%) hematocrit as well as to the corresponding YSI value. All results met the acceptance criteria of ±15% which supports the claimed hematocrit range of 15-65%.
Altitude study:
An altitude study was performed at elevations up to 10,000 feet with 60 tests each of 3 different concentrations of glucose spiked whole blood spanning 36 to 440 mg/dL. Sea level results were compared to results at higher elevations and to YSI values, with all results meeting the sponsor’s acceptance criteria of ±10%
10
{10}
Temperature and humidity studies:
Temperature and humidity studies were conducted that demonstrated that the devices can be used at temperatures of 4 to 40°C and at a relative humidity of 5 to 90%, and stored at temperatures of 4 to 30°C with a relative humidity of 5 to 90%.
The sponsor provided a readability study and obtained Flesch-Kincaid grade level scores of 8 or lower for the User's Manual and test strip insert.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
11
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.