K092600 · Immco Diagnostics, Inc. · MOB · Oct 7, 2010 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K092600
Device Name
IMMULISA PR3 ANTIBODY ELISA
Applicant
Immco Diagnostics, Inc.
Product Code
MOB · Immunology
Decision Date
Oct 7, 2010
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5660
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
An enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection and semi-quantitation of antibodies to proteinase 3 (PR3) in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of Wegener’s granulomatosis in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
Device Story
ImmuLisa™ PR3 Antibody ELISA is a solid-phase immunoassay for detecting human IgG antibodies to proteinase 3 (PR3) in serum. The device uses microwell strips coated with purified PR3 antigen. Patient serum, controls, and calibrators are incubated in the wells; specific antibodies bind to the antigen. After washing, an HRP-labeled anti-human IgG conjugate is added, followed by a TMB substrate. The resulting color change, proportional to antibody concentration, is measured via spectrophotometer at 450 nm. The test is performed in a clinical laboratory setting by trained personnel. Results are expressed in U/ml and reported as positive or negative. The assay aids clinicians in diagnosing Wegener’s granulomatosis by identifying specific autoantibodies, supporting clinical decision-making alongside other laboratory and clinical findings.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical performance was evaluated using 275 samples, including 59 confirmed Wegener’s granulomatosis cases and various disease/healthy controls. Clinical sensitivity was 96.6% (95% CI 87.3-99.4%) and clinical specificity was 98.1% (95% CI 95-99.4%). Method comparison against the predicate device showed 94.3% overall agreement (cut-off 10 U/ml). Analytical performance included precision (CV% 3.4-12.8%), linearity (2.2-156 U/ml), and LoD (2.2 U/ml). No significant interference was observed for hemoglobin, bilirubin, rheumatoid factor, or triglycerides.
Technological Characteristics
Solid-phase ELISA; microwells coated with purified PR3 antigen. Uses HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG and TMB substrate. Requires microplate reader (450 nm/600-650 nm reference). Calibrated in arbitrary U/ml. Standards referenced: CLSI EP5-A2, EP6-A, EP7-A2, EP9-A2, EP12-A2, and EP17-A.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the detection and semi-quantitation of anti-PR3 antibodies in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of Wegener’s granulomatosis. For prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A multiple autoantibodies immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the autoantibodies (antibodies produced against the body's own tissues) in serum and other body fluids. Measurement of multiple autoantibodies aids in the diagnosis of autoimmune disorders (disease produced when the body's own tissues are injured by autoantibodies).
Predicate Devices
Inova Quanta Lite PR3 Antibody ELISA (k981328)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k092600
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Anti-PR3 (proteinase 3)
D. Type of Test:
ELISA (Semi-quantitative)
E. Applicant:
Immco Diagnostics, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ImmuLisa™ PR3 Antibody ELISA
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 866.5660, Multiple Autoantibodies Immunological Test System
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product codes:
MOB, Test System, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA)
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
An enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection and semi-quantitation of antibodies to proteinase 3 (PR3) in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of Wegener’s granulomatosis in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as intended use
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
Microplate reader capable of measuring OD at 450 and a reference wavelength of 600-650 nm.
I. Device Description:
Each device contains the following: microwell strips (12x8) coated with PR3, Calibrators A-E (156, 62.5, 25, 10, 1 U/ml), HRP goat anti-human IgG conjugate, TMB enzyme substrate, positive control, negative control, serum diluent, wash buffer and sulfuric acid stop solution. All reagents are ready to use except for the wash buffer which requires reconstitution.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Inova Quanta Lite PR3 Antibody ELISA
{1}
2. Predicate K number(s):
k981328
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | ImmuLisa PR3 Antibody ELISA | Inova Quanta Lite PR3 ELISA |
| Intended use | An enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection and semi-quantitation of antibodies to proteinase 3 (PR3) in human serum, as an aid in the diagnosis of Wegener's granulomatosis in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. | Same |
| Methodology | ELISA | Same |
| Capture antigen | PR3 | Same |
| Analyte detected | Human IgG antibodies to PR3 | Same |
| Assay type | Semi-quantitative | Same |
| Component set | Includes positive control, negative control, calibrators, conjugate, substrate, diluent, wash buffer, stop solution, microplate | Same |
| Conjugate antibody | HRP | Same |
| Specimen type | Serum | Same |
| Substrate/chromogen | TMB | Same |
| Positive control | PR3 IgG antibody | Same |
| Stop solution | H2SO4 | Same |
| Screening dilution | 1:101 | Same |
| Signal detection | 450nm on spectrophotometer | Same |
| Storage | 2-8°C | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | ImmuLisa PR3 Antibody ELISA | Inova Quanta Lite PR3 ELISA |
| Cut-off | 10 U/ml | 20 EU/ml |
| Wash buffer | Powdered or liquid | Liquid concentrate |
{2}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | concentrate | |
| Positive control | Acceptance range printed on vial | No value/range assigned |
| Calibrators | Set of 5; values in U/ml
E: 1
D: 10
C: 25
B: 62.5
A: 156 | Single; value in units 25 EU/ml |
| Linear range | 2.2-156 U/ml | Not specified |
| Indeterminate range | 10-12.5 U/ml | None |
| Limit of detection | 2.2 U/ml | Not specified |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2, EP6-A, EP7-A2, EP9-A2, EP12-A2, and EP17-A
L. Test Principle:
The test is performed as a solid phase immunoassay. Microwells are coated with purified PR3 antigen followed by a blocking step to reduce non-specific binding during the assay run. Controls, calibrators and patient sera are incubated in the antigen coated wells to allow specific antibodies present in the serum to bind to the PR3 antigen. Unbound antibodies and other serum proteins are removed by washing the microwells. Bound antibodies are detected by adding an enzyme labeled anti-human IgG conjugate to the microwells. Unbound conjugate is removed by washing. Specific enzyme substrate (TMB) is then added to the wells and the presence of antibodies is detected by a color change produced by the conversion of TMB substrate to a colored reaction product. The reaction is stopped and the intensity of the color change, which is proportional to the concentration of antibody, is ready by a spectrophotometer at 450 nm. Results are expressed in arbitrary Units per milliliter (U/ml) and reported as positive or negative.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Per CLSI EP5-A2, precision of the assay was tested with seven specimens with values spanning the range of the assay. The linear range of the assay is 2.2-156 U/ml. The seven samples spanned concentrations 6.34 to 141.59. The percent total imprecision ranged from 5.0-12.8%. Averaged results are shown in table below. Multiple studies were conducted. Assay runs of three replicates of seven specimens were conducted using three different lots (n=63). Separately, assay runs of three replicates of seven specimens were conducted over five days, twice a day (n=189). Lastly, assay runs of six replicates of seven specimens were conducted. Repeatability was determined with 28 replicates of each of the seven specimens. Results are also shown in the table below (last column). Percent CVs ranged from 3.4-8.1%. Sponsor's pre-defined acceptance criteria for precision was 20%.
{3}
| | | | | | | Within run | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Total Imprecision | | Between days | | (Repeatability) | |
| | Mean | SD | | SD | | SD | |
| Sample | (IU/ml) | (IU/ml) | CV% | (IU/ml) | CV% | (IU/ml) | CV% |
| 1 | 6.34 | 0.808 | 12.8% | 0.964 | 15.2% | 0.517 | 8.1% |
| 2 | 8.50 | 0.750 | 8.8% | 0.818 | 9.7% | 0.643 | 7.5% |
| 3 | 12.26 | 1.215 | 9.9% | 1.220 | 9.8% | 1.167 | 9.8% |
| 4 | 27.27 | 2.627 | 9.6% | 3.112 | 11.4% | 1.711 | 6.3% |
| 5 | 56.94 | 3.088 | 5.4% | 3.485 | 6.1% | 2.390 | 4.2% |
| 6 | 111.06 | 5.518 | 5.0% | 6.406 | 5.8% | 3.789 | 3.4% |
| 7 | 141.59 | 7.763 | 5.5% | 8.205 | 5.8% | 6.850 | 4.8% |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
To determine the linear range of the assay, studies were performed per CLSI EP6-A using equidistant dilution series of positive samples with values throughout the calibrator range. Up to nine serial dilutions in sample diluent (low positive or negative samples) were made and run in duplicate. The linear range of the assay is 2.2-156 U/ml. Linear regressions are summarized in the table below. Samples producing results greater than the top calibrator are recommended to be diluted and retested.
| Sample | Test Range | Slope (95% CI) | Y-Intercept (95% CI) | R² | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 3.7 to 77.2 | 1.07 (0.94 to 1.20) | -0.031 (-0.134 to 0.071) | 0.986 | 89.8 to 111.9 |
| 2 | 3.8 to 158.2 | 1.012 (0.934 to 1.090) | -0.053 (-0.153 to 0.047) | 0.994 | 88.9 to 102.2 |
| 3 | 3.4 to 43.4 | 1.023 (0.929 to 1.118) | 0.009 (-0.045 to 0.063) | 0.991 | 100 to 112.3 |
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): An international reference material for anti-PR3 antibodies is not available. The assay is calibrated in relative arbitrary units (U/ml).
Stability
Accelerated, real-time and open kit/reagent stability studies were conducted as part of design control to assign expiration dating to components and as part of ongoing quality control/quality assurance analysis. Accelerated and open kit studies were performed on three lots of components/reagents. They included materials incubated at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ where one day is considered to equivalent to one month stored at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . Materials are removed from the incubator for testing at three day intervals for a minimum of 21 days. For open kit stability studies, materials are opened as required for bench-top usage, then assayed at 15, 45, and 90 day intervals. Based on these studies, the expiration date for this assay is 18 months. Real time stability studies are ongoing.
Positive control and calibrators were derived from the sera of subjects with autoimmune vasculitides obtained from a commercial source. For assignment of values, the samples were tested at various dilutions on at least two different lots of PR3 antigen coated plates.
{4}
d. Detection limit:
Per CLSI EP17-A, the limit of detection (LoD) for PR3 antibody using this assay was determined to be $2.2\mathrm{U / ml}$ based on 60 replicates of the blank and 10 replicates of each of the six low-level samples. The limit of blank is 2.1 U/ml.
e. Analytical specificity:
Interfering Substances:
Per CLSI EP7-A2, interference was studied by mixing sera with known PR3 antibody levels with potentially interfering serum samples and analyzing deviation from expected results. Interference was calculated as follows: 1 - (obtained/expected)%. Results are presented in table below. No significant interference was demonstrated for the following substances at the levels indicated: hemoglobin range of interference -9.6-10.6% (2 g/L), bilirubin range of interference -5.7-1.7% (342 umol/L), rheumatoid factor range of interference -13.4-4.2% (100 EU/ml), and triglycerides range of interference -4.4-8.5% (37 mmol/L). Interference study with triglycerides was conducted separately. The sponsor's acceptance criteria for interference was set at less than 20% for negative samples and less than 15% for positive samples. Testing of grossly hemolyzed or lypemic samples is not recommended as stated in the package insert.
| Sample | | Hemoglobin | | Bilirubin | | RF | | Sample | | Triglycerides | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | EU/ml | EU/ml | % Int | EU/ml | % Int | EU/ml | % Int | | EU/ml | EU/ml | % Int |
| 1 | 4 | 4.4 | -9.6 | 4.1 | -1.7 | 4.5 | -13.4 | 1 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 2.7 |
| 2 | 9.8 | 9.6 | 1.4 | 9.7 | 0.8 | 10 | -2 | 2 | 8.9 | 8.2 | 8.5 |
| 3 | 9.8 | 8.7 | 10.6 | 9.8 | 0 | 9.6 | 2 | 3 | 7.9 | 8.3 | -4.4 |
| 4 | 36 | 35.4 | 1.7 | 38 | -5.7 | 37 | -3 | 4 | 18.8 | 17.8 | 5.6 |
| 5 | 72 | 75.1 | -4.3 | 75.9 | -5.5 | 73.9 | -2.6 | 5 | 42.1 | 41.4 | 1.7 |
| 6 | 192.9 | 176.9 | 8.3 | 189.7 | 1.7 | 184.7 | 4.2 | 6 | 134.4 | 138.1 | -2.7 |
Cross-Reactivity:
A total of 136 potentially cross-reactive specimens from individuals with other autoimmune disorders or positive for other autoantibodies were tested for PR3 antibodies using the ImmuLisa PR3 Antibody ELISA. MPO positive samples were tested MPO positive by ELISA and confirmed for a pANCA positive reaction using FDA cleared IFA. Inflammatory bowel disease samples were also included. The results are presented in the table below. Overall cross-reactivity studies are within acceptance criteria (set by sponsor at $10\%$ ).
| Condition | n | Positive n |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Glomerulonephritis | 29 | 2 |
| Undifferentiated pANCA positive | 11 | 0 |
| Non-ANCA associated vasculitis | 24 | 1 |
{5}
6
| Crohn's disease | 10 | 0 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Ulcerative Colitis | 6 | 0 |
| Systemic lupus erythematosus | 32 | 0 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis | 8 | 0 |
| Other autoimmune disease | 16 | 0 |
| Total | 136 | 3 (2.2%) |
Hook effect:
Not applicable
f. Assay cut-off:
A normal range study was conducted using 64 normal human sera and 16 diseased controls on the assay. These samples were obtained from commercial sources. Based on ROC analysis, the mean plus 2.5 standard deviation of these values was established as the cut-off between normal and abnormal results at 0.250 OD. This value was assigned to 10 U/ml. An indeterminate range has been established 20% above the cut-off at 12.5 U/ml. Samples in this indeterminate range should be retested or confirmed using a secondary method such as IFA.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Per CLSI EP9-A2, the ImmuLisa PR3 Antibody ELISA was tested in comparison with Inova Quanta Lite PR3 ELISA using well-characterized sera of ANCA antibody positive subjects (53 cANCA positive), disease controls (28) and healthy individuals (24). Included were 12 samples near the cut-off of 10 U/ml. Only samples within the measuring range of the assay were included for method comparison analysis. The disease controls included Celiac Disease, ENA positive collagen vascular autoimmunity, Hashimoto's, and RA. Of the four samples that tested negative on the Inova assay and positive on the IMMCO assay, three were IFA positive Wegnener's cases and one was a disease control. The two samples that tested negative on the IMMCO assay and positive on the Inova assay were IFA positive Wegener's cases. The results are as follows for a cut-off of 10 U/ml using a 5 point calibrator (indeterminate results are considered positive):
| 5 point calibrator, indeterminate as positive | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | Inova | |
| | | Pos | Neg | Total |
| | Pos | 41 | 4 | 45 |
| IMMCO | Neg | 2 | 58 | 60 |
| | Total | 43 | 62 | 105 |
| | | | | |
| Positive % Agreement | | 95.3% | (95% CI 82.9% to 99.2%) | |
| Negative % Agreement | | 93.5% | (95% CI 83.5% to 99.2%) | |
| Overall % Agreement | | 94.3% | (95% CI 87.5% to 97.7%) | |
{6}
The following results are for a cut-off of 12.5 U/ml using a 5 point calibrator (indeterminate results are considered negative):
| 5 point calibrator, indeterminate as negative | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | Inova | |
| | | Pos | Neg | Total |
| | Pos | 38 | 0 | 38 |
| IMMCO | Neg | 5 | 62 | 67 |
| | Total | 43 | 62 | 105 |
| | | | | |
| Positive % Agreement | | 88.4% | (95% CI 74.1% to 95.6%) | |
| Negative % Agreement | | 100.0% | (95% CI 92.7% to 100%) | |
| Overall % Agreement | | 95.2% | (95% CI 88.7% to 98.2%) | |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical sensitivity and specificity:
A set of 75 clinical samples from various disease groups (see table below for breakdown of actual disease groups) confirmed IFA+ were tested with the ImmunoLisa PR3 Antibody ELISA and another commercially available PR3 antibody ELISA. Other autoimmune disease samples include Celiac Disease and Hashimoto's Thyroiditis. Results are presented in table below. When indeterminate results are considered positive, the calculated clinical sensitivity of the assay is 96.6% (95% CI 87.3-99.4%). The calculated clinical specificity of the assay is 98.1% (95% CI 95-99.4%).
| PR3 | Positive > Cutoff 10 IU/ml, 5 point Calibrator | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | Disease Status | |
| | | Pos | Neg | Total |
| | Pos | 57 | 4 | 61 |
| IMMCO | Neg | 2 | 212 | 214 |
| | Total | 59 | 216 | 275 |
| | | | | |
| Sensitivity | | 96.6% | (95% CI 87.3% to 99.4%) | |
| Specificity | | 98.1% | (95% CI 95.0% to 99.4%) | |
| Agreement | | 97.8% | (95% CI 95.1% to 99.1%) | |
| | IMMCO | | | Inova PR3 Ab ELISA | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Patient Group | n | n Pos | % Pos | n | n Pos | % Pos |
| Disease Associated | | | | | | |
| Wegener's granulomatosis | 59 | 57 | 96.6% | 59 | 56 | 94.9% |
| Glomerulonephritis | 29 | 2 | 6.9% | 29 | 2 | 6.9% |
| Undifferentiated ANCA positive | 11 | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Disease Control | | | | | | |
| Non-ANCA associated vasculitis | 24 | 1 | 4.2% | | | |
| Crohn's disease | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | | | |
| Ulcerative colitis | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | | | |
{7}
8
| Systemic lupus erythematosus | 32 | 1 | 3.1% | 32 | 0 | 0.0% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | 8 | 0 | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Other autoimmune disease | 16 | 0 | 0.0% | 16 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Healthy normals | 80 | 0 | 0.0% | 80 | 0 | 0.0% |
b. Other clinical supportive data (when a. is not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Expected values in a normal population are negative. However, 2-4% of apparently healthy, asymptomatic individuals may test positive for anti-PR3 antibodies. The following table depicts the frequency of PR3 and MPO specific ANCA in sera from 112 ANCA associated vasculitides patients.
Incidence of anti-PR3 and anti-MPO in ANCA associated vasculitides
| Antibody | Wegener's | Microscopic | Churg-Strauss |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| association | granulomatosis | polyangiitis | syndrome |
| ANCA positive by IFA | 78% | 59% | 67% |
| anti-PR3 positive | 90% | 0% | 10% |
| anti-MPO positive | 0% | 62% | 17% |
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.