The study used a retrospective cohort of 321 patient samples to evaluate the clinical performance (sensitivity, specificity, and agreement) of the HemosIL AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG and IgM assays in diagnosing thrombotic disorders related to Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS).
321 individuals including patients with primary APS (PAPS), secondary APS (SAPS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), SLE-like disorders, cardiovascular disorders, and apparently healthy individuals.; Sample Size: 321
Not applicable for this study
Clinical sensitivity, clinical specificity, and overall percent agreement for the diagnosis of APS.
Indications for Use
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG: Fully automated chemiluminescent assay for the semi-quantitative measurement of anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgG antibodies in human citrated plasma and serum on the ACL AcuStar, as an aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders related to primary and secondary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgM: Fully automated chemiluminescent assay for the semi-quantitative measurement of anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgM antibodies in human citrated plasma and serum on the ACL AcuStar, as an aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders related to primary and secondary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG Controls: For the quality control of the Anti-Cardiolipin IgG assay performed on the ACL AcuStar. HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgM Controls: For the quality control of the Anti-Cardiolipin IgM assay performed on the ACL AcuStar.
Device Story
HemosIL AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG/IgM are chemiluminescent immunoassays for use on the ACL AcuStar instrument. Input: human serum or citrated plasma. Principle: two-step immunoassay using magnetic particles coated with cardiolipin and human purified B2GPI to capture aCL antibodies; tracer consists of isoluminol-labeled anti-human IgG or IgM. Emitted light (RLUs) measured by optical system is proportional to antibody concentration. Instrument uses a predefined, lot-dependent Master Curve stored via cartridge barcode, transformed into a 4 Parameter Logistic Curve (4PLC) working curve using calibrators. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Output: semi-quantitative antibody concentration. Results assist clinicians in diagnosing APS-related thrombotic disorders alongside other clinical findings.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study of 321 frozen citrated plasma samples from patients with primary APS (PAPS), secondary APS (SAPS), SLE, SLE-like disorders, cardiovascular disorders, and healthy controls. For IgG: Sensitivity 54.3%, Specificity 95.6%. For IgM: Sensitivity 33.7%, Specificity 94.8%. Method comparison against REAADS ELISA showed overall agreement of 76.5% for IgG. Precision studies reported total CVs ranging from 2.9% to 8.4% across various sample concentrations.
Technological Characteristics
Two-step chemiluminescent immunoassay. Reagents: magnetic particles coated with cardiolipin and human purified B2GPI; isoluminol-labeled anti-human IgG/IgM tracer. Instrument: ACL AcuStar optical system. Data reduction: 4 Parameter Logistic Curve (4PLC) fit. Connectivity: cartridge barcode for Master Curve data. Sample type: serum or citrated plasma.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the semi-quantitative measurement of anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgG and IgM antibodies in human citrated plasma and serum to aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders related to primary and secondary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A multiple autoantibodies immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the autoantibodies (antibodies produced against the body's own tissues) in serum and other body fluids. Measurement of multiple autoantibodies aids in the diagnosis of autoimmune disorders (disease produced when the body's own tissues are injured by autoantibodies).
Predicate Devices
REAADS Anti-Cardiolipin IgG/IgM Semi-Quantitative Test Kit (K022992)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k092181
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Analyte:
Anti-Cardiolipin IgG
Anti-Cardiolipin IgM
D. Type of Test:
Automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for semi-quantitative measurement of autoantibodies
E. Applicant:
Instrumentation Laboratory Co.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgM
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG Controls
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgM Controls
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21CFR§866.5660 – Multiple autoantibodies immunological test system
21CFR§862.1660 – Single (specified) analyte controls (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II (Assays)
Class I (Controls)
3. Product code:
MID – System Test, Anti-Cardiolipin Immunological
JJX – Controls
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG: Fully automated chemiluminescent assay for the semi-quantitative measurement of anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgG antibodies in human citrated plasma and serum on the ACL AcuStar, as an aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders related to primary and secondary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS).
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgM: Fully automated chemiluminescent assay for the semi-quantitative measurement of anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgM antibodies in human citrated plasma and serum on the ACL AcuStar, as an aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders related to primary and secondary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS).
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG Controls: For the quality control of the Anti-Cardiolipin IgG assay performed on the ACL AcuStar.
{1}
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgM Controls: For the quality control of the Anti-Cardiolipin IgM assay performed on the ACL AcuStar.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as intended use
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
Prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
For use on the ACL AcuStar automated chemiluminescent immunoassay analyzer (k083518).
I. Device Description:
HemoSIL AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin (aCL) IgG is a chemiluminescent two-step immunoassay consisting of magnetic particles coated with cardiolipin and human purified β2GPI which capture, if present, the aCL antiphospholipid antibodies from the sample. After incubation, magnetic separation and a wash step, a tracer consisting of an isoluminol-labeled anti-human IgG antibody is added and may bind with the captured aCL IgG on the particles. After a second incubation, magnetic separation, and wash step, reagents that trigger the luminescent reaction are added, and the emitted light is measured as relative light units (RLUs) by the ACL AcuStar optical system. The RLUs are directly proportional to the aCL IgG concentration in the sample.
The ACL AcuStar aCL IgG assay utilizes a 4 Parameter Logistic Curve (4PLC) fit data reduction method to generate a Master Curve. The Master Curve is predefined and lot dependent and it is stored in the instrument through the cartridge barcode. With the measurement of calibrators, the predefined Master Curve is transformed to a new, instrument specific 4PLC Working Curve. The concentration values of the calibrators are included in the calibrator tube barcodes.
The aCL IgG kit consists of:
- aCL IgG Cartridge for 50 determinations: 1 cartridge containing 1 vial of magnetic particle suspension coated with bovine cardiolipin and human purified β2GPI, 1 vial of assay buffer, 1 vial of tracer consisting of an anti-human IgG antibody labeled with isoluminol, and 1 vial of sample diluent used for regular predilution of the sample and automated dilution in the rerun. The reagents are in a phosphate or borate buffer containing bovine serum albumin, bovine cardiolipin, human β2GPI, mouse monoclonal IgG, stabilizers, and preservative.
- aCL IgG Calibrator 1: 1 × 1 mL barcoded tube of a solution with aCL IgG in saline solution containing bovine fetal serum, stabilizers and preservative.
- aCL IgG Calibrator 2: 1 × 1 mL barcoded tube of a solution with aCL IgG in saline solution containing bovine fetal serum, stabilizers and preservative.
HemoSIL AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin (aCL) IgM is a chemiluminescent two-step immunoassay consisting of magnetic particles coated with cardiolipin and human purified β2GPI which capture, if present, the aCL antiphospholipid antibodies from the sample. After incubation, magnetic separation and a wash step, a tracer consisting of an isoluminol-labeled anti-human IgM antibody is added and may bind with the
{2}
captured aCL IgM on the particles. After a second incubation, magnetic separation, and wash step, reagents that trigger the luminescent reaction are added, and the emitted light is measured as relative light units (RLUs) by the ACL AcuStar optical system. The RLUs are directly proportional to the aCL IgM concentration in the sample.
The ACL AcuStar aCL IgM assay utilizes a 4 Parameter Logistic Curve (4PLC) fit data reduction method to generate a Master Curve. The Master Curve is predefined and lot dependent and it is stored in the instrument through the cartridge barcode. With the measurement of calibrators, the predefined Master Curve is transformed to a new, instrument specific 4PLC Working Curve. The concentration values of the calibrators are included in the calibrator tube barcodes.
The aCL IgM kit consists of:
- aCL IgM Cartridge for 50 determinations: 1 cartridge containing 1 vial of magnetic particle suspension coated with bovine cardiolipin and human purified β2GPI, 1 vial of assay buffer, 1 vial of tracer consisting of an anti-human IgM antibody labeled with isoluminol, and 1 vial of sample diluent used for regular predilution of the sample and automated dilution in the rerun. The reagents are in a phosphate or borate buffer containing bovine serum albumin, bovine cardiolipin, human β2GPI, mouse monoclonal IgM, stabilizers, and preservative.
- aCL IgM Calibrator 1: 1 x 1 mL barcoded tube of a solution with aCL IgM in saline solution containing bovine fetal serum, stabilizers and preservative.
- aCL IgM Calibrator 2: 1 x 1 mL barcoded tube of a solution with aCL IgM in saline solution containing bovine fetal serum, stabilizers and preservative.
HemosIL AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG Controls: The Low and High Anti-Cardiolipin IgG Controls are prepared by means of a dedicated process and contain different concentrations of human aCL IgG antibodies.
- Low Anti-Cardiolipin IgG Control: Control intended for the assessment of precision and accuracy of the assay at the normal or around cut-off aCL IgG levels. 3 x 1 mL barcoded tubes of a solution with aCL IgG in saline solution containing bovine fetal serum, stabilizers and preservative.
- High Anti-Cardiolipin IgG Control: Control intended for the assessment of precision and accuracy of the assay at the abnormal aCL IgG levels. 3 x 1 mL barcoded tubes of a solution with aCL IgG in saline solution containing bovine fetal serum, stabilizers and preservative.
HemosIL AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgM Controls: The Low and High Anti-Cardiolipin IgM Controls are prepared by means of a dedicated process and contain different concentrations of human aCL IgM antibodies.
- Low Anti-Cardiolipin IgM Control: Control intended for the assessment of precision and accuracy of the assay at the normal or around cut-off aCL IgM levels. 3 x 1 mL barcoded tubes of a solution with aCL IgM in saline solution containing bovine fetal serum, stabilizers and preservative.
3
{3}
- High Anti-Cardiolipin IgM Control: Control intended for the assessment of precision and accuracy of the assay at the abnormal aCL IgM levels. 3 x 1 mL barcoded tubes of a solution
# J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device names:
REAADS Anti-Cardiolipin IgG Semi-Quantitative Test Kit
REAADS Anti-Cardiolipin IgM Semi-Quantitative Test Kit
2. Predicate $510(\mathrm{k})$ number:
k022992
3. Comparison with predicate:
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | Fully automated chemiluminescent assay for the semi-quantitative measurement of anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgG antibodies in human citrated plasma and serum on the ACL AcuStar, as an aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders related to primary and secondary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). | An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the semi-quantitative determination of anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgG antibodies in human citrated plasma and serum in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus-like disorders (anti-phospholipid syndrome) |
| Indications for Use | Same as Intended Use | Same as Intended Use |
| Sample type | Serum or Citrated Plasma | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Technology | Two-step chemiluminescent immunoassay | ELISA |
| Calibrator | Two calibrator levels (included in test kit) | Three calibrator levels (included in test kit) |
| Quality control | Low and high controls (sold separately) | Normal and positive controls (included in test kit) |
| Clinical cut-off | 20 U/mL | 23 GPL |
| Assay range | 2.6 –40,480 U/mL | Up to 100 GPL |
{4}
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgM
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | Fully automated chemiluminescent assay for the semi-quantitative measurement of anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgM antibodies in human citrated plasma and serum on the ACL AcuStar, as an aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders related to primary and secondary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). | An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the semi-quantitative determination of anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgM antibodies in human citrated plasma and serum in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus-like disorders (anti-phospholipid syndrome) |
| Indications for Use | Same as Intended Use | Same as Intended Use |
| Sample type | Serum or Citrated Plasma | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Technology | Two-step chemiluminescent immunoassay | ELISA |
| Calibrator | Two calibrator levels (included in test kit) | Three calibrator levels (included in test kit) |
| Quality control | Low and high controls (sold separately) | Normal and positive controls (included in test kit) |
| Clinical cut-off | 20 U/mL | 11 MPL |
| Assay range | 1.0-15,480 U/mL | Up to 60 MPL |
K. Standard/Guidance Documents Referenced (if applicable):
EP05-A2, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline, Second Edition
EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, Approved Guideline, Second Edition
L. Test Principle:
The test is a chemiluminescent two-step immunoassay consisting of magnetic particles coated with cardiolipin and human purified $\beta_{2}\mathrm{GPI}$ which capture, if present, the aCL antiphospholipid antibodies from the sample. After incubation, magnetic separation, and a wash step, a tracer consisting of an isoluminol-labeled anti-human IgG (or anti-human IgM, as appropriate) is added and may bind with the captured aCL IgG (or IgM) on the particles. After a second incubation, magnetic separation, and wash step, reagents that trigger the luminescent reaction are added, and the emitted light is measured as relative light units (RLUs) by the ACL AcuStar optical system. The RLUs are directly proportional to the aCL IgG (or IgM) concentration in
{5}
the sample. The instrument utilizes a 4 Parameter Logistic Curve (4PLC) fit data reduction method to generate a master curve.
The Low Controls are intended for the assessment of precision and accuracy of the assay at normal or around cut-off levels of aCL antibody. The High Controls are intended for assessment of precision and accuracy of the assay at abnormally high antibody levels.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility: Precision testing was performed in accordance with CLSI Approved Guideline EP05-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline—Second Edition.
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG
| | Mean (U/mL) | CV (%) (within run) | CV (%) (total) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Low anti-cardiolipin IgG Control | 16.4 | 6.8 % | 8.2% |
| High anti-cardiolipin IgG Control | 158 | 6.1% | 6.9% |
| Anti-cardiolipin IgG plasma sample | 47.2 | 4.8% | 7.2% |
An additional experiment was performed with two samples around the cut-off and two in the upper end of the reportable range.
| Instrument 1 | | | Instrument 2 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Mean (U/mL) | CV (%) (within run) | CV (%) (total) | Mean (U/mL) | CV (%) (within run) | CV (%) (total) |
| 13.5 | 4.9% | 5.9% | 13.8 | 4.0% | 4.4% |
| 19.0 | 2.8% | 4.8% | 19.1 | 3.7% | 4.2% |
| 511 | 2.5% | 3.2% | 515 | 3.7% | 5.4% |
| 958 | 3.9% | 5.5% | 1028 | 3.5% | 6.7% |
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgM
| | Mean (U/mL) | CV (%) (within run) | CV (%) (total) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Low anti-cardiolipin IgM Control | 6.79 | 3.3% | 4.9% |
| High anti-cardiolipin IgM Control | 86.1 | 3.5% | 4.0% |
| Anti-cardiolipin IgM plasma sample | 19.2 | 2.6% | 4.7% |
A second experiment: performed with two additional samples around the cut-off and two to cover the upper portion of the reportable range.
{6}
7
| Instrument 1 | | | Instrument 2 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Mean (U/mL) | CV (%) (within run) | CV (%) (total) | Mean (U/mL) | CV (%) (within run) | CV (%) (total) |
| 14.6 | 2.0% | 2.5% | 14.7 | 3.0% | 3.3% |
| 19.5 | 1.7% | 1.7% | 19.5 | 2.6% | 2.9% |
| 202 | 2.4% | 2.8% | 207 | 3.6% | 4.4% |
| 480 | 3.4% | 4.8% | 556 | 6.8% | 8.4% |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
When the rerun capability of the instrument is activated, the instrument makes an automatic dilution and corrects the final result for the dilution factor (20x), thereby expanding the test range 20-fold.
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG
| | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Linearity (Rerun Off) | 2.6 – 2024 U/mL |
| Linearity (Rerun On) | 2.6 –40,480 U/mL |
HemosIL™ AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgM
| | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Linearity (Rerun Off) | 1.0 – 774 U/mL |
| Linearity (Rerun On) | 1.0 – 15,480 U/mL |
Linearity of both the HemoSIL aCL IgG and IgM assays was assessed by preparing a series of dilutions of three different samples to cover the reportable range. The linearity tests were performed with two different lots of reagents. Overall, slope = 0.99-1.00 and r² >0.99 for both assays over this range.
Linearity data summary for AcuStar aCL IgG:
| | Lot 1 | Lot 2 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Range | 3.6 – 2213 U/mL | 4.4 – 2212 U/mL |
| Slope | 0.995 | 0.990 |
| R² | 0.999 | 0.997 |
Linearity data summary for AcuStar aCL IgM:
| | Lot 1 | Lot 2 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Range | 1.5 – 807 U/mL | 1.3 – 780 U/mL |
| Slope | 0.999 | 1.002 |
| R² | 0.995 | 1.000 |
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): An international reference material for anti-cardiolipin antibodies is not available. The assay is calibrated in relative arbitrary units (U/mL).
{7}
The two calibrator values are assigned using in-house standards and a four-parameter Master Curve. The assignment values of the two calibrators are used to create a lot-specific four-parameter logistic curve, using two stored parameters from the Master Curve and two lot-specific parameters based on the calibrator values.
Control values assignments are performed using two QC approved batches of reagents (with corresponding calibrators) and two different ACL AcuStar instruments. The controls are analyzed in replicates of 10 on both instruments, then the batches of reagent are switched between instruments and the controls are re-analyzed.
Stability studies were performed that support a shelf-life of 15 months at 2-8°C storage for the HemosIL AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG and the HemosIL AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgM reagent cartridges, as well as calibrators and controls for both assays.
The on-board stability of the reagent cartridge after opening on the AcuStar System was demonstrated to be at least 6 weeks. On-board stability of calibrators was shown to be 3.5h. A comparison of fresh and frozen samples showed no difference in the performance of these samples in the assay.
d. Detection limit:
The Limit of Detection (LOD) was determined to be 2.6 U/mL for the aCL IgG assay and 1.0 U/mL for the aCL IgM assay. The LOD was determined using the procedure described in CLSI EP17-A.
e. Analytical specificity:
Interference studies were performed using negative and positive samples, as well as a sample with results close to the assay cutoff. No significant interference was observed for either the HemoSIL AcuStar aCL IgG or IgM assay with hemoglobin (up to 500 mg/dL), bilirubin (complexed and free, 18 mg/dL), triglycerides (1250 mg/dL), rheumatoid factor (800 IU/mL), LMW heparin (2 IU/mL), and unfractionated heparin (2 IU/mL). Recoveries were all in the range 96-103%.
The analytical specificities of the two kits were also evaluated by testing 30 defined serum samples, 10 positive for Rheumatoid Factor (RF), 10 positive for Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA) and 10 positive for Syphilis by the rapid plasma reagin test (RPR). One ANA sample gave a positive result on both the HemoSIL AcuStar aCL IgG and IgM test. None of the RF or RPR samples were positive on the AcuStar aCL tests.
f. Assay cut-off:
252 citrated plasma samples obtained from apparently healthy blood donors were tested in the HemoSIL AcuStar Anti-Cardiolipin IgG and IgM assays. Based on the recommendations of the International Committee in Sydney, the threshold for positive aCL IgG and IgM antibodies was established in the 99th percentile. The cut-off for both assays was set at 20 U/mL.
8
{8}
9
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
HemoSIL AcuStar aCL IgG: 136 clinically defined patient samples with results in the reportable range of both the test and the predicate (REAADS) were compared. There is no equivocal range for either test.
Method Comparison—HemoSIL AcuStar aCL IgG to REAADS aCL IgG
| | Predicate Assay (REAADS aCL IgG) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | + | - | Total |
| HemoSIL | + | 28 | 25** | 53 |
| AcuStar aCL | - | 7* | 76 | 83 |
| IgG | Total | 35 | 101 | 136 |
*1 PAPS, 2 SAPS, 3 SLE and 1 control
**3 PAPS, 15 SAPS, and 7 SLE
Positive agreement (28/35) = 80.0% (95% CI: 63.1% to 91.6%)
Negative agreement (76/101) = 75.2% (95% CI: 65.7% to 83.3%)
Overall agreement (104/136) = 76.5% (95% CI: 68.4% to 83.3%)
HemoSIL AcuStar aCL IgM: 267 clinically defined patient samples with results in the reportable range of both the test and the predicate (REAADS) were compared. There is no equivocal range for either test.
Method Comparison—HemoSIL AcuStar aCL IgM to REAADS aCL IgM
| | Predicate Assay (REAADS aCL IgM) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | + | - | Total |
| HemoSIL | + | 32 | 4** | 36 |
| AcuStar aCL | - | 41* | 190 | 231 |
| IgM | Total | 73 | 194 | 267 |
*5 PAPS, 9 SAPS, 19 SLE, 2 others and 6 controls. It should be noted that the positive SLE and control samples with the predicate device are false positives
**1 PAPS, 1 SAPS, 1 SLE and 1 control
Positive agreement (32/73) = 43.8% (95% CI: 32.2% to 55.9%)
Negative agreement (190/194) = 97.9% (95% CI: 94.8% to 99.4%)
Overall agreement (222/267) = 83.1% (95% CI: 78.1% to 87.4%)
b. Matrix comparison:
HemoSIL AcuStar aCL IgG: 21 paired citrated plasma/serum samples with values spanning the linear range were assayed and the mean values were compared using a Passing-Bablok regression analysis. The slope was 1.04, intercept -0.22, and r = 1.000.
{9}
HemoSIL AcuStar aCL IgM: 61 paired citrated plasma/serum samples with values spanning the linear range were assayed and the mean values were compared using a Passing-Bablok regression analysis. The slope was 1.01, intercept 0.08, and $r = 0.999$ .
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity:
321 clinically defined patient samples (23 with primary APS, 69 with secondary APS, 120 with SLE, 103 controls, and 6 with other diagnoses) were tested by the HemoSIL AcuStar aCL IgG and IgM assays:
HemoSIL AcuStar aCL IgG:
| AcuStar aCL IgG | Clinical Diagnosis | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | POS | NEG | Total |
| POS | 50 | 10 | 60 |
| NEG | 42 | 219 | 261 |
| Total | 92 | 229 | 321 |
Sensitivity $(50 / 92) = 54.3\%$ (95% CI: 43.6% to 64.8%)
Specificity $(219 / 229) = 95.6\%$ (95% CI: 92.1% to 97.9%)
The results for each clinical subgroup are shown are shown in the table below:
| Disease category | N | N Positive | % Positive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PAPS | 23 | 13 | 56.5% |
| SAPS | 69 | 37 | 53.6% |
| SLE | 115 | 9 | 7.8% |
| SLE-like | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Others | 6 | 1 | 16.7% |
| Normals | 103 | 0 | 0.0% |
HemoSIL AcuStar aCL IgM:
| AcuStar aCL IgM | Clinical Diagnosis | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | POS | NEG | Total |
| POS | 31 | 12 | 43 |
| NEG | 61 | 217 | 278 |
| Total | 92 | 229 | 321 |
Sensitivity $(31 / 92) = 33.7\%$ (95% CI: 24.2% to 44.3%)
Specificity $(217 / 229) = 94.8\%$ (95% CI: 91.0% to 97.3%)
{10}
The results for each clinical subgroup are shown are shown in the table below:
| Disease category | N | N Positive | % Positive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PAPS | 23 | 8 | 34.8% |
| SAPS | 69 | 23 | 33.3% |
| SLE | 115 | 10 | 8.7% |
| SLE-like | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Others | 6 | 1 | 16.7% |
| Normals | 103 | 1 | 1.0% |
b. Other clinical supportive data (when a. is not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
See Assay cut-off.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
See Assay cut-off. The expected value in the normal population is negative.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.