To remove unwanted anesthetic gases from the patient breathing circuit
Device Story
Vapor-Clear is an anesthetic gas scavenging apparatus consisting of two activated charcoal adsorbent canisters. It is installed in the anesthesia breathing circuit between the anesthesia gas machine ports and the breathing circuit hoses. The device functions by adsorbing residual anesthetic vapors (isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane) from the circuit after the vaporizer is turned off. It is operated by clinicians in the operating room or surgical suite. By removing residual anesthetic gases, the device prevents unwanted vapors from reaching the patient. It does not add dead space to the circuit and does not rely on rebreathing. The device is designed to be rugged, with performance verified through bench testing for adsorption capacity, back pressure, and structural integrity under environmental stress.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Testing demonstrated >99% removal efficiency for isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane. In simulated use with Draeger Apollo and Ohmeda Aestiva machines, the device maintained inspired isoflurane concentrations below 1 ppm following vaporizer termination, compared to 58-78 minutes of residual vapor exceeding 5 ppm without the device. Capacity testing showed 1300 ml of isoflurane removal before efficiency dropped below 99%. Environmental, mechanical, burst, and leak testing (per ASTM F 1205) confirmed structural integrity and minimal impact on circuit back pressure and internal volume.
Technological Characteristics
Gas-scavenging apparatus using activated charcoal granules for adsorption. Dimensions: 3-inch diameter, 0.6-inch thick charcoal bed (4.25 cubic inches). Back pressure < 0.5 cm H2O at 30 L/min. Internal volume 92 ml; internal compliance 14 ml/kPa. Tested per ASTM F 1205 for back pressure and leakage. Non-powered, passive mechanical device.
Indications for Use
Indicated for surgical patients being ventilated by an anesthesia gas machine to remove unwanted anesthetic gases from the breathing circuit. For prescription use in operating rooms, surgical suites, or any environment where inhaled volatile anesthetics are administered.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A gas-scavenging apparatus is a device intended to collect excess anesthetic, analgesic, or trace gases or vapors from a patient's breathing system, ventilator, or extracorporeal pump-oxygenator, and to conduct these gases out of the area by means of an exhaust system.
{0}------------------------------------------------
# Appendix B, Revised 510K Summary
APR 1 8 2010
510(k) Summary K092031
Page 1 of 6 April 7, 2010
Axon Medical Inc. Tel - (801) 484-3820 2645 Sackett Drive Fax - (801) 581-4367 Park City, Utah 84098
Official Contact: Proprietary or Trade Name: Common/Usual Name: Primary Classification Name Primary Classification Code: Regulation:
Joseph Orr - President Vapor-Clear Breathing circuit anesthetic gas scavenger Gas Scavenging Apparatus CBN 868.5430
Predicate Device: K033028 Gas Scavenging Device (product code: CBN) AneFin 100, Anefin-100 Volatile anesthesia emergence device Manufacturer: Axon Medical Inc
(Note that the product code for this device in the clearance letter dated July 22, 2005 is CBN)
Device Description: This device uses two anesthetic vapor adsorbent canisters connected to an anesthesia delivery system to prevent unwanted anesthetic vapors emanating from within an anesthesia gas machine from reaching a patient.
Intended Use: To remove unwanted anesthetic gases from the patient breathing circuit
Environment of Use: Operating room, surgical suite, anywhere inhaled volatile anesthetics are administered.
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summary Page 2 of 6 April 7, 2010 .
# Summary of comparison between device and predicate(s)
| Attribute | Vapor-Clear (K092031) | AneFin (K033028) | Comparison |
|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| General indications for use | Remove unwanted<br>anesthetic gases | Remove unwanted<br>anesthetic gases | Identical |
| Specific indications for use | N/A | To speed emergence<br>from volatile inhaled<br>anesthetics and<br>increasing spontaneous<br>breathing through<br>partial rebreathing. | Vapor-Clear is not<br>intended to speed<br>emergence or increase<br>spontaneous breathing. |
| Patient population | Surgical patients being<br>ventilated by an<br>anesthesia gas machine | Surgical patients being<br>ventilated by an<br>anesthesia gas machine | Identical |
| Environment of Use | Operating Room | Operating Room | Identical |
| Rationale for use | To remove unwanted<br>residual anesthetic<br>vapor from the<br>breathing circuit when<br>the vaporizer is turned<br>off. | To remove unwanted<br>residual anesthetic<br>vapor from the<br>breathing circuit when<br>the vaporizer is turned<br>off. | Identical |
| Placement in the<br>anesthesia circuit | Near the anesthesia gas<br>machine ports between<br>the anesthesia gas<br>machine and the<br>breathing circuit hoses. | Between the patient<br>and the breathing<br>circuit wye. | The Vapor-Clear does<br>not rely on rebreathing<br>so there is no need to<br>place the device<br>between the patient<br>and the wye. Vapor-<br>Clear does not include<br>added dead volume. |
| Change in dead space | None as the device is<br>placed in circuit<br>between the anesthesia<br>gas machine and the<br>breathing circuit hoses<br><br>Placement is identical<br>to the use of a bacterial<br>filter at the machine<br>end of the circuit | Adds dead space<br>between the wye and<br>the patient.<br><br>Placement in the<br>breathing circuit is<br>similar to a heat-<br>moisture exchanger | Vapor-Clear does not<br>add dead space. AneFin<br>requires addition of<br>dead space to achieve<br>fast emergence and<br>increase spontaneous<br>breathing. |
| Equipment | Used with anesthesia<br>gas machine | Used with anesthesia<br>gas machine | Identical |
| Attribute | Vapor-Clear (K092031) | AneFin (K033028) | Comparison |
| Anesthetic removal material | Activated charcoal granules | Activated charcoal granules | Identical |
| Charcoal capacity | 0.6" thick, 3 inch diameter. 4.25 cubic inches of charcoal | 0.25" thick, 3inch diameter. 1.76 cubic inches of charcoal | Vapor-Clear contains 2.4 times as much charcoal as the AneFin |
| Anesthetic Removal | >99% of anesthetic gas removed | >95% of anesthetic gas removed | Similar, Vapor-Clear performance is superior |
| Rebreathing hose | None | Rebreathing hose placed between charcoal canister and breathing circuit wye | The rebreathing hose is used by the AneFin to achieve the additional (specific) intended use. Vapor-Clear does not include a rebreathing hose. |
| Back pressure | < 2.0 cm H2O at 60 L/min | <1.8cm H2O at 60 L/min | Similar |
| Internal compliance | 7 ml/kPa | 14 ml/kPa | Vapor-Clear has less internal compliance |
| Internal volume | 92 ml | 183 ml | Vapor-Clear has less internal volume |
| Anesthetic removal | 1300 ml before less than 99% of vapor removed | 400 ml before less than 50% of vapor is removed | Vapor-Clear removes more anesthetic gas |
| Method and timing of installation in breathing circuit | User must break the breathing circuit to install. Placed in breathing circuit when the anesthesia vaporizer has been turned off | User must break the breathing circuit to install. Placed in breathing circuit when the anesthesia vaporizer has been turned off. | Identical |
{2}------------------------------------------------
## 510{k) K092031 Summary Page 3 of 6 April 7, 2010
・
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) K092031 Summary Page 4 of 6 April 7, 2010
# Summary of Non-Clinical Testing
.
| Test Condition | Test Method | Test Results |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Anesthetic adsorption rate | Anesthetic gas removal using an analyzer capable of detection <0.5 ppm | Vapor-Clear scavenges >99.95% of isoflurane at a high flow rate |
| Scavenging residual vapor from 2 models of modern anesthesia gas machines | Saturate two modern anesthesia gas machines (Draeger Apollo and the Ohmeda Aestiva) with isoflurane for an extended period. Measure the time after the vaporizer has been turned off before the inspired isoflurane falls below 5 parts per million (ppm). Repeat the procedure with and without the Vapor-Clear in the breathing circuit. | Residual vapor exceeds the 5 ppm limit for 78 minutes in the Apollo and 58 minutes in the Aestiva following termination of vapor delivery without the Vapor-Clear. Using, the Vapor- Clear, inspired isoflurane concentration stays below 1 ppm for the duration of the test following termination of vapor delivery. The Vapor-Clear scavenger decreased the concentration of inspiratory isoflurane to less than 1 ppm throughout the tests in both the Draeger Apollo and the Ohmeda Aestiva anesthesia gas machines |
| Anesthetic removal capacity test | Pass isoflurane through the Vapor-Clear device at a known concentration (2%) and flow rate (5 L/min). Measure the total volume of isoflurane that passes through the device before less than 99% of isoflurane gas is being removed by the device. | A single Vapor-Clear canister removes 1300 ml of isoflurane before a removal rate of less than 99% is observed. |
| Test adsorption using various anesthetic vapors | Pass anesthetic gas through the device at a known inspired concentration. Measure the concentration entering and exiting the Vapor-Clear device. Repeat the test for each gas (isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane) | Greater than 99% of anesthetic is removed regardless of which of the three agents (isoflurane, sevoflurane or desflurane) is used. |
| Test Condition | Test Method | Test Results |
| Product life testing | Product containing activated<br>charcoal that has been aged<br>for 71months was tested for<br>initial anesthetic removal and<br>anesthetic removal capacity. | Initial adsorption of >99% was<br>observed. No degradation of<br>anesthetic gas removal<br>capacity was observed when<br>using the aged product. |
| Environmental testing | The Vapor-Clear device was<br>subjected to mechanical and<br>environmental stresses<br>including shock, vibration,<br>high and low temperature and<br>humidity. The stressed<br>product was then tested for<br>anesthetic removal, leakage<br>and increased back pressure | No change in device<br>performance was observed<br>following the environmental<br>stresses. |
| Internal volume testing | The internal compressible<br>volume was measured using a<br>direct volume measure. The<br>internal compliance was<br>tested by observing the<br>volume needed to achieve a<br>pressure change in a sealed<br>device. | The internal volume of the<br>device is 92 ml. The internal<br>compliance is 14 ml/kPa. |
| Burst testing | Increasing pressure was<br>applied to a sealed device in a<br>stepwise fashion until the<br>device burst was observed.<br>The pressure at which a burst<br>was observed was recorded. | The Vapor-Clear burst at a<br>pressure of 70 pounds per<br>square inch. |
| Back-pressure tests | Added back pressure caused<br>by placing the Vapor-Clear in<br>the breathing circuit was<br>measured per ASTM F 1205 | Added back pressure of 0.5<br>cm H₂O at 30 L/min was<br>observed |
| Leak test | A pressure of 30 cm H₂O was<br>applied to a sealed device.<br>The flow rate of air into the<br>sealed device was taken as<br>the leak rate per ASTM F 1205 | No leak (0.0 ml/min) was<br>detectable. |
:
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) K092031 Summary Page 5 of 6 April 7, 2010 :
{5}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) K092031 Summary Page 6 of 6 April 7, 2010
### Testing Summary Statement
The bench testing of the Vapor-Clear device demonstrates that the device is capable of removing unwanted anesthetic gases from the breathing circuit with greater efficiency and capacity than the predicate device. The testing also shows that the Vapor-Clear is capable of scavenging greater than 99% of the residual anesthetic vapors emitted by an anesthesia gas machine after the vaporizer has been turned off. Multiple gas removal testing demonstrated than 99% of anesthetic agent is removed for each anesthetic agent (desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane). Testing demonstrated that the activated charcoal used in the device is capable of capturing a volume of anesthetic gas that is well beyond what is emitted by an anesthesia gas machine after the vaporizer has been turned off. Testing using aged activated charcoal granules demonstrate that the device will perform as specified throughout the product lifetime. Environmental and mechanical testing demonstrates that the leak, back pressure and internal volume of the device are sufficiently small that installation of the device will not interfere with delivery of mechanical ventilation during an anesthetic and that the device is sufficiently rugged to withstand the rigors of shipping and storage.
These tests demonstrate that the subject device (Vapor-Clear) is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of an eagle or bird-like figure with three curved lines representing its wings or feathers.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Dr. Joseph Orr President Axon Medical, Incorporated 2645 Sackett Drive Park City, Utah 84098
APR 1 3 2010
Re: K092031 Trade/Device Name: Vapor-Clear Regulation Number: 21CFR 868.5430 Regulation Name: Gas-Scavenging Apparatus Regulatory Class: II Product Code: CBN Dated: April 5, 2010 Received: April 8, 2010
Dear Dr. Orr:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Page 2- Dr. Orr
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely vours.
Nh for
Anthony Watson, B.S., M.S., M.B.A. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{8}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use Statement
510(k) Number: K092031
Device Name: Vapor-Clear
Indications for Use: To remove unwanted anesthetic gases from the patient breathing circuit
Intended patient population: Surgical patients being ventilated by an anesthesia gas machine.
Environment of Use: Operating room, surgical suite, anywhere inhaled volatile anesthetics are administered.
Prescription Use: XX
OR
Over-The-Counter Use_
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE – CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
L. Schultheis
Tivision Sign-Off) ାsion of Anesthesiology, General Hospital ection Control, Dental Devices
3)(k) Number: k-092031
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.