K091061 · Implicitcare, LLC · GAT · Nov 13, 2009 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K091061
Device Name
IMPLICITGUIDE SURGICAL SUTURE SYSTEM
Applicant
Implicitcare, LLC
Product Code
GAT · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Nov 13, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.5000
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System is intended for use in soft tissue approximation and elevation of subdermis and underlying muscle.
Device Story
Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System facilitates soft tissue approximation and elevation of subdermis/underlying muscle. System includes USP size 4-0 braided nonabsorbable polyester suture and manual instruments: marking tape, lancet, clearing device, and two stainless steel Suturods™. Suturods™ feature internal light guides connecting to an LED Light Handle for trans-illumination of the distal tip. Used by plastic surgeons in clinical settings. Procedure involves creating entry points with lancet, clearing subcutaneous ligamentous attachments, and guiding suture through tissue using Suturods™. Light trans-illumination aids in accurate suture placement. Suture is tensioned and knotted to achieve elevation. Benefits include improved precision in tissue elevation procedures compared to traditional manual methods.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical testing was conducted. Evidence consists of bench testing and a cadaver study (n=4) performed by board-certified plastic surgeons to evaluate brow elevation, shaping, and tensile strength of facial ligaments. Bench testing included physico-chemical, biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1), and design verification (torque, puncture, bending, light intensity).
Technological Characteristics
System comprises USP 4-0 braided nonabsorbable poly(ethylene terephthalate) suture and stainless steel manual instruments. Features LED-based trans-illumination light source for Suturods™. Connectivity: None. Sterilization: Provided sterile for single use. Complies with IEC 60601-1-2:2002/A1:2004 and EN60601-1-2:2007 for electromagnetic compatibility.
Indications for Use
Indicated for soft tissue approximation and elevation of subdermis and underlying muscle in patients requiring such procedures.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Nonabsorbable poly(ethylene terephthalate) surgical suture is a multifilament, nonabsorbable, sterile, flexible thread prepared from fibers of high molecular weight, long-chain, linear polyesters having recurrent aromatic rings as an integral component and is indicated for use in soft tissue approximation. The poly(ethylene terephthalate) surgical suture meets U.S.P. requirements as described in the U.S.P. Monograph for Nonabsorbable Surgical Sutures; it may be provided uncoated or coated; and it may be undyed or dyed with an appropriate FDA listed color additive. Also, the suture may be provided with or without a standard needle attached.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Surgical Sutures; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 878.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
{0}------------------------------------------------
page 1/5
October 9, 2009
#### રે.0 510(k) SUMMARY
In accordance with Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR), Part 807, and in particular, §807.92, the following 510(k) summary is provided for ImplicitguideTM Surgical Suture System:
#### 5.1 Submitted By:
NOV 1 3 2009
Implicit Care, LLC 5920 Friars Road, Suite 102 San Diego, California 92108
Contact: Dionicia B. Reblando, Vice President, RA/QA
Date Prepared: 10/9/2009
#### 5.2 Device Name
Trade or Proprietary Name: Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System
Common or Usual Name: Nonabsorbable Polyester Suture
Nonabsorbable poly(ethylene terephthalate) surgical suture Classification Name:
#### 5.3 · Predicate Devices
The subject device is substantially equivalent, in whole or in part, to the following commercially available predicate device:
- TEVDEK® II Polyester Suture K001434, K021019; Genzyme Corp. ●
- Featherlift Extended Length Aptos Threads (Contour Threads) K041593; . Surgical Specialties Corporation
### Device Description 5.4
The ImplicitCare Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System combines USP size 4-0 braided nonabsorbable poly(ethylene terephthalate), or polyester, surgical suture with a set of manual instruments designed to efficiently and accurately place the suture for the purpose of performing approximation of tissue and elevation of subdermis/underlying muscle procedure. All components of the Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System are provided sterile, and are intended for single use only
The manual instruments consist of the following:
- Tape (marking tape) to aid in marking the skin for needle (Suturod) point of . entry locations)- if needed
{1}------------------------------------------------
- . Lancet to create a point of entry for needle (Suturod) and suture
- Clearing device to clear subcutaneous ligamentous attachments around the . puncture site
- Two (2) stainless steel Suturods™ which, like suture needles, guide the . suture through the tissue. Each Suturod™ has an internal light guide which, when connected to the Light Handle, illuminates the distal tip of the Suturod™M
- Light Handle which contains an LED light source to connect to Suturod™ .
#### ર્સ્ડ Intended Use
The Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System is intended for use in soft tissue approximation and elevation of subdermis and underlying muscle.
#### Comparison to Predicate Devices ર્ડ.6
- The Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System is equivalent in the intended use to a. the predicate device, the Featherlift Extended Length Aptos Threads (Contour Threads) except for the surgical technique. The Featherlift Aptos Threads tissue elevation is achieved by tacking to the temporal fascia. The Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System tissue elevation is achieved by the placement of the suture over the muscle and/or other soft tissues, with subsequent tensioning and knotting of the suture.
- b. Suture- The nonabsorbable polyester surgical suture contained in the Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System is exactly the same suture as the TEVDEK® II polyester suture currently distributed commercially by Teleflex (510[k] nos. K001434 and K021019 by Genzyme Corp.), and meets all requirements of the USP Monograph for Nonabsorbable Surgical Suture
- c. Device design, physical configuration and materials-Comparisons of design characteristics and physical configurations of the predicate devices have established that Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System is substantially equivalent in design, physical configuration and materials of composition. The predicate device has two needles, one needle attached at each end of suture. The Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System has two needles called Suturods, one attached to each end of the suture at the midpoint of the needle. Materials of construction are both stainless steel and materials that have long history of successful use in medical devices. See attachment 1, or Addendum 3, Section 10.4 Device Comparison table.
{2}------------------------------------------------
091061
page 3/5
§510(k) PreMarket Notification, K091061 ImplicitCare, LLC
October 9. 2009
#### 5.7 Summary of Non-Clinical Test
- The nonabsorbable polyester surgical suture contained in the Implicitguide™ a. Surgical Suture System is exactly the same suture as the TEVDEK® II polyester suture currently distributed commercially by Teleflex (510[k] nos. K001434 and K021019 by Genzyme Corp.).
Teleflex Medical has issued a certification to ImplicitCare, that tests on the Teleflex suture have been completed, test profile and results comply with AAMI/ISO 10993-1 requirements and FDA's Blue Book memorandum (G95-1) to assure safe patient contact of an Implant Device contacting Tissue, Bone, or Blood permanently. All results are acceptable. See attachment 2.
The following are the tests conducted:
- Physico-chemical: Plastics, USP ●
- Cytotoxicity:-ISO MEM Elution .
- Sensitization:-ISO Murine Lympth Node Asay ●
- Irritation: ISO Intracutaneous Reactivity Test .
- Systemic Toxicity: ISO Acute Systemic Injection Test �
- Genotoxicity: ISO Salmonella typhyimurium Reverse Mutation .
- . Hemocompatibility: Hemolysis test (NIH Method)
- Pyrogen: ISO Materials Mediated Rabbit Pyrogen .
- . Implantation: 7 day and 90 day Muscle implant
These tests demonstrate that the suture contained in the Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System is as safe as the predicated devices.
Since the nonabsorbable polyester surgical suture contained in the Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System is exactly the same suture as the TEVDEK® II, and, the subject device will meet all requirements of USP XXXI <871> Needle attachment - Sutures. As such, no additional non-clinical testing is necessary to further demonstrate substantial equivalence to other polyester sutures marketed in the U.S.
- b. Cadaver Tests. The study was conducted on four cadavers, two females and two males. The two males are both 58 years old and the females are 92 and 84 years old. The procedure was conducted by Board Certified plastic surgeons, Dr. Gregory Mueller and Dr. Sherrell Aston. Both of their CV's are on file. Procedure was conducted on August 31, 2009, in University of Maryland, State Anatomy Board, 655 West Baltimore Street Room B-023, Baltimore, MD 21201
{3}------------------------------------------------
K091061 Page 4/5
# ADDENDUM NUMBER 2-510(k) SUMMARY
October 9, 2009
Tests completed:
- 1. Brow elevation and shaping.
- 2. Suturod: Trans-Illumination and color of light.
- Tensile strength of medial platysmal border muscles, and facial retaining 3. ligaments.
Test results are acceptable and test reports are on file. See attachment 3 for summary. These tests were conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate device, Contour Threads, with added advantage of the Suturod light transillumination.
- EMC Evaluation for the (Surgical) Light tool of Suturod (Needle). ﻦ ﺗ
This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the specifications for medical electrical equipment as specified by International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC).
Test specification: Radio Frequency Emissions and Electromagnetic Immunity Tests in accordance with requirements of IEC 60601-1-2:2002/A1:2004 and EN60601-1-2:2007
Test Results: All test required passed requirements. See attachment 4 for Certificate and summary of test results. Complete test report on file.
This report demonstrates the safety of the Suturod.
- d. Design Verification Tests
Design Verification Tests have been completed. All test results are acceptable.
The following test report are on file. See attachment 5 for summary of Design validation
- -TR090109-01 Design Verification Clearing Tool Torque Test
- -TR090109-02 Design Verification Lancet Blade Puncture Test
- -TR090109-03 Design Verification Suture Length Test
- -TR090109-04 Design Verification Suture Attachment force Test
- Design Verification Suturod Bending Test -TR090109-05
- -TR090109-06 Design Verification Light Intensity Test
- -TR090109-07 Design Verification Light on- time Test
These tests demonstrate that the device meets design and USP requirements
{4}------------------------------------------------
K09 1061
page 5/5
October 9, 2009
### 5.8 Summary of Clinical Tests
No clinical testing was conducted to support this submission.
## 5.9 Conclusions
The results of our comparison demonstrated the substantial equivalence of the subject device to the identified predicate device.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of an eagle or other bird with outstretched wings, rendered in a simple, abstract design.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room W-066-0609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
NOV 1:3 2009
Implicit Care, LLC % Ms. Dionicia B. Reblando Vice President, RA/QA 5920 Friars Road, Suite 102 San Diego, California 92108
Re: K091061
Trade/Device Name: Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.5000 Regulation Name: Nonabsorbable poly(ethylene terephthalate) surgical suture Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GAT Dated: October 23, 2009 Received: October 28, 2009
Dear Ms. Reblando:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. Ilsting of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical
{6}------------------------------------------------
# Page 2 - Ms. Dionicia B. Reblando
device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/mdr/ for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
N. Melkerson
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):
K091061
Device Name:
Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System
Indications for Use:
The Implicitguide™ Surgical Suture System is indicated for use in soft tissue approximation and elevation of subdermis and underlying muscle.
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Daniel Krone for MXM
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
510(k) Number K091061
2
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.