ASSURE PRO BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEM, MODEL 46001
K090332 · Arkray Factory USA, Inc. · NBW · Aug 14, 2009 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K090332
Device Name
ASSURE PRO BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEM, MODEL 46001
Applicant
Arkray Factory USA, Inc.
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Aug 14, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The Assure Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). It is indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The Assure Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus, and is not intended for use on neonates.
Device Story
System uses biosensor technology to measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from fingertips; requires manual code chip entry per test strip vial. Sample applied to test strip; glucose oxidase (GOD) and Hexammineruthenium (III) chloride reaction produces electric current proportional to glucose concentration. Meter converts current to glucose value. Used by patients at home or healthcare professionals in clinics. Output displayed on meter; aids monitoring of diabetes control effectiveness. Benefits include rapid, quantitative glucose monitoring for diabetes management.
Clinical Evidence
Method comparison study performed with 143 capillary samples (106 patient, 37 spiked/glycolyzed) ranging 28-495 mg/dL. Accuracy: For glucose <75 mg/dL, 100% within ±10 mg/dL. For glucose ≥75 mg/dL, 99% within ±15% and 100% within ±20%. Precision testing (within-run and day-to-day) showed CVs ranging 1.15%–5.67%. Bench testing included interference, altitude (up to 10,000 ft), and hematocrit (30-55%) studies.
Technological Characteristics
In vitro diagnostic glucose monitoring system. Uses test strips and meter for electrochemical measurement. Includes two levels of control solutions for quality verification. System is designed for capillary whole blood samples.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative glucose measurement in fresh capillary whole blood from fingertips. For home (OTC) use by persons with diabetes or clinical use by healthcare professionals to monitor diabetes control. Contraindicated for neonates and not for diabetes diagnosis or screening.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
{0}
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k090332
B. Purpose for Submission:
New glucose test strips (glucose meter itself is unchanged)
C. Measurand:
Whole blood Glucose
D. Type of Test:
Whole blood glucose concentration through a quantitative amperometric assay (Glucose Oxidase)
E. Applicant:
ARKRAY USA
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Assure Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System
Assure Dose Control Solution
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 862.1345, Blood Glucose Test System
21 CFR 862.1660, Quality Control Material (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II
Class I, reserved
{1}
3. Product codes:
NBW, Blood Glucose Test System, Over-the-Counter
CGA, Glucose Oxidase, Glucose
JJX, Single (specified) analyte controls (assayed and unassayed)
4. Panel:
75 (Clinical Chemistry)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
Refer to indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Assure Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System:
The Assure Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). It is indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
The Assure Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus, and is not intended for use on neonates.
Assure Pro Blood Glucose Meter:
The Assure Pro Blood Glucose Meter is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). It is indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
Assure Pro Blood Glucose Test Strips:
Assure Pro test strips are intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips when used with the Assure Pro Blood Glucose Meter. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). They are indicated for use in home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
Assure Dose CONTROL:
{2}
For use with Assure Pro Blood Glucose Meter and Assure Pro Blood Glucose Test Strips as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood glucose test results. Control solutions are available in two levels – Level 1 (Normal) and Level 2 (High).
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
- Not intended for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
- For in vitro diagnostic use only
- Not intended for use on neonates
- Not for use on critically ill patients, dehydrated patients, patients in shock, or hyperosmolar patients
4. Special instrument requirements:
Assure Pro Blood Glucose meter
I. Device Description:
The Assure Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System consists of a meter, test strips, and two levels of control solutions. It uses biosensor technology to produce a quantitative glucose concentration from whole blood samples from the fingertip. Users are instructed to code the meter using the supplied code chip when first used and with each new box of test strips.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Assure Pro Glucose Monitoring System
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k053079
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device (Assure Pro meter with new test strips) | Predicate (Assure Pro meter with predicate test strips) |
| Sample | Same | Capillary Whole Blood from Fingertip |
| Code Chip | Same | Required |
| Test Time | Same | 10 seconds |
| Reference | Same | Plasma |
| Control Solutions | Same | Two Levels Supplied |
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device
(Assure Pro meter with new test strips) | Predicate
(Assure Pro meter with predicate test strips) |
| Operating Temperature Range | Same | 50 – 104° F |
| Hematocrit Range | Same | 30 – 55% |
| Maximum Altitude | Same | 10,000 feet |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Minimum Sample Volume | 0.5 μL | 1 μL |
| Double Dosing Capability | No | Yes |
| Enzyme and Associated Reagents | Glucose Oxidase (Aspergillus niger sourced) and Hexammineruthenium (III) chloride | Glucose Oxidase (Aspergillus niger sourced) |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- CLSI EP-07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, 2005
- CLSI EP06-A, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Methods, 2003
- ISO 15197, In vitro diagnostic test systems - Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus, 2003
## L. Test Principle:
The sample (whole blood) is drawn by capillary action at the tip of the test strip. Glucose in the sample reacts with glucose oxidase (GOD) and Hexammineruthenium (III) chloride in the test strip. This produces Hexammineruthenium (II) chloride. Hexammineruthenium (II) chloride is produced in proportion to the glucose concentration of the blood sample. Oxidation of the Hexammineruthenium (II) chloride produces an electric current. The meter converts the current to the glucose concentration and displays it as the test result:
$$
\beta\text{-D-glucose} + \text{Hexammineruthenium (III) chloride} \xrightarrow{\text{GOD}} \text{D-Glucono-}\delta\text{Lactone} + \text{Hexammineruthenium (II) chloride}
$$
Hexammineruthenium (II) chloride → Hexammineruthenium (III) chloride + e⁻
{4}
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Testing was performed consistent with ISO 15197 using fresh venous whole blood obtained from several non-diabetic volunteers and adjusted to a pO2 of 60 to 80 mm Hg and hematocrit of 42%. The whole blood was spiked to obtain 5 glucose concentrations encompassing the 20-600 mg/dL range.
Within-Day precision tests consisted of 10 measurements of each of the five spiked whole blood glucose samples using 10 meters for each sample for a total of 500 measurements. The within-run precision for all meters and concentrations tested was as follows:
| Glucose Conc. (mg/dL) | Standard Deviation (mg/dL) | Coefficient of Variation (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 41.0 | 2.33 | 5.67 |
| 83.6 | 2.85 | 3.41 |
| 125.0 | 3.08 | 2.47 |
| 208.9 | 6.20 | 2.97 |
| 344.5 | 10.64 | 3.09 |
The Day to Day precision testing was performed using three glucose levels of control solutions; ten individual users performed this evaluation using ten meters over a period of ten days. This was repeated with three lots of test strips. A total of nine hundred test strips were used from more than ten vials of each of the three different lots of the test strips.
| Lot A | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Level | Low | Mid | High |
| Mean | 44.39 | 116.06 | 352.00 |
| Standard Deviation (mg/dL) | 0.84 | 1.33 | 7.79 |
| Coefficient of Variation (%) | 1.89 | 1.15 | 2.21 |
| Lot B | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Level | Low | Mid | High |
| Mean | 45.71 | 119.21 | 355.95 |
| Standard Deviation (mg/dL) | 0.98 | 2.67 | 7.73 |
| Coefficient of Variation (%) | 2.14 | 2.24 | 2.17 |
{5}
| Lot C | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Level | Low | Mid | High |
| Mean | 43.26 | 119.44 | 360.77 |
| Standard Deviation (mg/dL) | 0.87 | 3.66 | 9.05 |
| Coefficient of Variation (%) | 2.01 | 3.06 | 2.51 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The measuring range of the device is $20 - 600\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . A linearity study was conducted consistent with CLSI EP6-A using venous whole blood collected in a $10\mathrm{mL}$ vacuum sample tube. Glucose was adjusted to 11 concentration levels ranging from 13 to $708\mathrm{mg / dL}$ (The Lo and Hi detection was disabled for this testing). Ten measurements were taken at each glucose concentration. The linear regression line for three lots was:
$$
y = 0. 9 9 2 6 x + 2. 6, r ^ {2} = 0. 9 9 7 5
$$
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The controls supplied with this device were previously cleared under k053079.
Shelf life studies show that the unopened test strips have a twenty-four month life-span and a three month shelf-life once a vial of strips is opened.
d. Detection limit:
The detection limit is $20\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . See linearity/assay reportable range above.
e. Analytical specificity:
A total of 15 readings were taken for each glucose level and concentration of interferent (5 unique test strips per each of 3 lots). Three glucose levels were tested for each interferent including a low $(50 - 80\mathrm{mg / dL}$ range), medium $(125 - 160\mathrm{mg / dL}$ range), and high $(310 - 400\mathrm{mg / dL}$ range). Bias was calculated as the mean difference in glucose reading between the test and control concentration groups.
Standard deviations and $95\%$ confidence intervals (CIs) for the mean bias were also calculated. Percent bias was calculated as the bias divided by the mean glucose level at the control concentration. Standard deviations and $95\%$ CIs for percent bias were also reported.
For glucose levels less than $75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , the sponsor defined acceptable bias as when the lower bound of the $95\%$ CI for bias was $\geq -10\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and the upper bound was $\leq 10\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . For glucose levels $75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , the sponsor defined acceptable bias as when the lower bound of the $95\%$ CI for percent bias was $\geq -10\%$ and the upper bound was $\leq 10\%$ .
{6}
Based on these criteria, the following substances were found to interfere:
- Ascorbic Acid at 6 mg/dL
- Dopamine at 0.09 mg/dL
- Ephedrine at 0.04 mg/dL
Interferents are noted in the labeling as follows:
Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C), when occurring in normal blood or normal therapeutic concentrations, does not significantly affect results. However, abnormally high concentrations in blood may cause inaccurately high results.
Externally taken drugs dopamine and ephedrine will not interfere with blood glucose results when taken at therapeutic concentrations. However, abnormally high concentrations in blood may cause inaccurate results.
Using the same criteria, the following substances were found not to interfere:
- Acetaminophen up to 20 mg/dL
- Acetyl-Salicylic Acid up to 65 mg/dL
- Cholesterol up to 665 mg/dL
- Conjugated bilirubin up to 40 mg/dL
- Creatinine up to 5.0 mg/dL
- Fructose up to 30 mg/dL
- Galactose up to 60 mg/dL
- Gentisic Acid up to 1.8 mg/dL
- Glutathione up to 3.00 mmol/L
- Hemoglobin up to 735 mg/dL
- Ibuprofen up to 50 mg/dL
- L-DOPA up to 13 mg/dL
- Lactose up to 30 mg/dL
- Maltose up to 450 mg/dL
- Maltotetraose up to 450 mg/dL
- Maltotoriose up to 240 mg/dL
- Mannitol up to 800 mg/dL
- Mannose up to 16 mg/dL
- Methyl-L-Dopa up to 1.5 mg/dL
- Salicylic Acid up to 50 mg/dL
- Sorbitol up to 10 mg/dL
- Tetracycline up to 1.5 mg/dL
- Tolazamide up to 70 mg/dL
- Triglyceride up to 3300 mg/dL
- Trubutamide up to 64 mg/dL
- Unconjugated Bilirubin up to 20 mg/dL
- Urea up to 280 mg/dL
{7}
Uric Acid up to 21 mg/dL
Warfarin up to 1.0 mg/dL
Xylitol up to 50 mg/dL
Xylose up to 80 mg/dL
## Altitude Study
A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of altitude on the Arkray Assure Pro meter using the new glucose strips. Venous blood was collected from a donor in a sodium heparin tube and allowed to undergo glycolysis at room temperature to lower the endogenous glucose to approximately 40 mg/dL. The sample was separated into 4 aliquots and spiked with glucose to levels of approximately 60, 125, 300 and 450 mg/dL. After spiking to obtain the 4 different levels, the glucose values were confirmed with the YSI glucose analyzer. The tests were performed at 967 feet and at 10,000 feet aboard an unpressurized small airplane. At each location, venous blood at each of the 4 levels of glucose was tested on the same test strip lot. The meter readings obtained at 10,000 feet were compared to the meter readings at sea level and the % bias was determined at each level.
Results recovered within ± 15 mg/dL at blood glucose levels of < 75 mg/dL and ± 15% at glucose levels > 75 mg/dL when compared to the readings near sea level. The labeling states that the Arkray Assure Pro test strips can be used at elevations up to 10,000 feet above sea level.
## Hematocrit Study
The sponsor performed hematocrit studies comparing the Assure Pro result at various hematocrits across the glucose measuring range to the Assure Pro at a normal hematocrit and to a reference analyzer. Hematocrit levels tested were 30, 37, 42, 53, and 55% and glucose levels tested were approximately 26, 52, 69, 119, 172, 335, 437, and 519 mg/dL. All of the comparisons to the reference analyzer and to a normal hematocrit showed a bias of less than ±15 mg/dL at glucose concentrations less than 75 mg/dL or less than ±15% at glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A method comparison study was performed with 106 capillary fingerstick patient samples. The distribution of gender, diabetes type, age, and education level were as follows:
{8}
| Gender | Number | % of Total |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Male | 56 | 53 |
| Female | 50 | 47 |
| Diabetes | Number | % of Total |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Type 1 | 18 | 17 |
| Type 2 | 88 | 83 |
| Age Group | Number | % of Total |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 18 – 30 | 5 | 5 |
| 31 – 45 | 15 | 14 |
| 46 – 55 | 28 | 26 |
| 56 and older | 58 | 55 |
| Education Level | Number | % of Total |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Some High School | 4 | 4 |
| High School Graduate | 18 | 17 |
| Some College or Technical School | 53 | 50 |
| 4-year College Degree | 18 | 17 |
| Graduate Courses or Degree | 13 | 12 |
An additional 37 values were obtained from capillary blood that was allowed to undergo glycolysis to lower glucose or was spiked with glucose to raise values, for a total of 143 measurements. The range of measurements was $28 - 495\mathrm{mg / dL}$ .
System accuracy results for glucose concentrations $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22/24 (92%) | 24/24 (100%) | 24/24 (100%) |
System accuracy results for glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 78/119 (66%) | 108/119 (91%) | 118/119 (99%) | 119/119 (100%) |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable. Only capillary whole blood samples can be used with this meter.
3. Clinical studies:
{9}
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
The method comparison study was performed by consumers (please see section 2.a. above).
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Expected values for people without diabetes¹:
Fasting: <100 mg/dL
1 – 2 hours after meals <140 mg/dL
¹ Joslin Diabetes Center: Goals for Blood Glucose Control. www.joslin.org
N. Instrument Name:
Assure Pro Blood Glucose meter
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Each test strip is single use and must be replaced with a new strip for each additional reading.
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types.
Yes ☐ or No ☑
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip
{10}
as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
This device is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger only. Since the whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip, there are no special handling or storage issues.
5. Calibration:
The user is instructed to insert the code chip when the meter is turned off, and then to insert a test strip, which turns the meter on. The meter automatically detects the code number when a test strip is inserted. The user must check to see if the code number the meter displays matches the number on the test strip vial. If the number matches, the user is instructed to begin testing. If the number does not match, the user is instructed not to test and to call customer service. No other calibration is required from the user.
6. Quality Control:
Two levels of control are supplied with the device. Users are instructed to run controls when the meter is first used in order to verify that they can use the meter correctly. In addition they are instructed to run a control when a new vial of test strips is opened, when they suspect the meter or strips are not working correctly, if test results appear to be abnormally high or low, or are not consistent with the patient's symptoms, if the meter is dropped, to check their technique, if the test strip bottle had been left open or stored outside its recommended temperature range, or when the meter has been stored outside its recommended temperature range, and each time the batteries are changed.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
The sponsor performed a readability assessment of the labeling and states that the user manual, strip insert, and control insert are at an eighth grade reading level or below. Note: the strip insert was determined to be at a reading level of 8.5 when the technical section targeting professional users was included. When this section was not included, the reading level drops to 7.4.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.