CALIBRATOR 1,2, AND 3 MODELS: GEN-CAL1, GEN-CAL2, AND GEN-CAL3
K090283 · Genchem, Inc. · JIX · Jun 5, 2009 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K090283
Device Name
CALIBRATOR 1,2, AND 3 MODELS: GEN-CAL1, GEN-CAL2, AND GEN-CAL3
Applicant
Genchem, Inc.
Product Code
JIX · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jun 5, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Abbreviated
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1150
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
SYNCHRON® CX Multi-Analyte Mixture Calibrators 1, 2, and 3 are intended to calibrate the Beckman® SYNCHRON CX® Systems for quantitative determination of sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, glucose, creatinine, calcium, and total CO2
Device Story
SYNCHRON CX Multi-Analyte Mixture consists of three levels of ready-to-use aqueous calibrators containing synthetic inorganic chemicals. Used with Beckman SYNCHRON CX Systems to establish reference points for quantitative in vitro diagnostic testing of sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, glucose, creatinine, calcium, and total CO2. Calibrators are non-blood based. Healthcare providers use the system output to ensure accurate calibration of clinical chemistry analyzers, facilitating reliable patient test results for metabolic and electrolyte monitoring.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Stability testing confirmed shelf life and 30-day open-vial stability at 2-8°C. Value assignment performed via gravimetric addition and verified using two analyzers with 3 runs and 3 replicates per level, ensuring results remain within ±2SD of assigned values and Beckman Coulter specifications.
Technological Characteristics
Liquid multi-analyte mixture containing sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, glucose, creatinine, calcium, and total CO2. Designed for use with Beckman SYNCHRON CX systems. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use as a calibration tool for Beckman SYNCHRON CX systems to enable quantitative measurement of sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, glucose, creatinine, calcium, and total CO2 in clinical laboratory settings.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A calibrator is a device intended for medical purposes for use in a test system to establish points of reference that are used in the determination of values in the measurement of substances in human specimens. (See also § 862.2 in this part.)
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k090283
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Calibration material for Sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, glucose, creatinine, calcium, and total CO₂.
D. Type of Test:
Calibrator
E. Applicant:
Genchem, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
SYNCHRON CX Multi-Analyte Mixture
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section: 21 CFR 862.1150
2. Classification: Class II
3. Product code: JIX, Calibrator, Multi-Analyte Mixture
4. Panel: Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use statement below.
{1}
2. Indication(s) for use:
SYNCHRON CX Multi-Analyte Mixture Calibrators 1, 2, and 3 are intended to calibrate the Beckman SYNCHRON CX Systems for quantitative determination of sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, glucose, creatinine, calcium, and total $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ .
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For in vitro diagnostic use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
Beckman® SYNCHRON CX® Systems.
# I. Device Description:
SYNCHRON CX Multi-Analyte Mixture Calibrators 1, 2, and 3 are intended for use with the Beckman SYNCHRON CX Systems to establish reference points for In Vitro Diagnostic testing applications for multiple analytes. Each of the 3 calibrator mixtures (Level 1, 2, and 3) is supplied in ready to use $25~\mathrm{mL}$ bottles.
The calibrators are mixtures of synthetic inorganic chemicals in an aqueous based matrix and contain no blood based components.
# J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
HICHEM Calibrators 1, 2, and 3
2. Predicate $510(\mathrm{k})$ number(s):
k992845
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate (k992845) |
| Intended Use | SYNCHRON CX Multi-Analyte Mixture Calibrators 1, 2, and 3 are intended to calibrate the Beckman SYNCHRON CX Systems for quantitative determination of sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, glucose, creatinine, calcium, | HiChem Calibrators 1, 2, and 3 are intended to calibrate the Beckman SYNCHRON CX DELTA and CX CE Systems for the quantitative determination of sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, glucose, creatinine, calcium, |
| | to calibrate the Beckman SYNCHRON CX Systems for quantitative determination of sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, glucose, creatinine, calcium, and total $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ . | calibrators 1, 2, and 3 are intended to calibrate the Beckman SYNCHRON CX DELTA and CX CE Systems for the quantitative determination of sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, glucose, creatinine, calcium, and total $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ . |
{2}
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate (k992845) |
| | glucose, creatinine, calcium, and total CO_{2}. | and total CO_{2}. |
| Matrix | Aqueous | Aqueous |
| Analytes | Sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, glucose, creatinine, calcium, and total CO_{2}. | Sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, glucose, creatinine, calcium, and total CO_{2}. |
| Preparation | Liquid, ready-for-use | Liquid, ready-for-use |
| Number of Levels | 3 | 3 |
| Packaging | 25 mL/level | 25 mL/level |
| Stability | Unopened, until expiration
Opened, 30 days | Unopened, until expiration
Opened, 30 days |
| Storage | 2-8 °C | 2-8 °C |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Guidance for Industry – Abbreviated 510(k) Submissions for In Vitro Diagnostic Calibrators.
L. Test Principle:
Not Applicable.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Not Applicable
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not Applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability:
Sponsor claims traceability to NIST and other analytical standards.
Stability: Stability testing protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable. Test sets are stable unopened until the expiration date printed on the bottle and for 30 days after opening when stored at 2° to 8°C and handled according to instructions. It is recommended that they are not frozen.
{3}
Value assignment: The set point values were established based on the gravimetric addition of each of the chemicals to achieve specific concentration of each of the analytes. For value assignment two analyzers were used, with 3 runs, and 3 replicates run for each level. The mean and standard deviation were calculated and the results for each analyte must be within the specifications set by the instrument manufacturer (Beckman Coulter). The analysis for each calibrator constituent must be within $\pm 2\mathrm{SD}$ of the assigned value. Quality controls are included in each run of the value assignment process.
d. Detection limit:
Not Applicable
e. Analytical specificity:
Not Applicable
f. Assay cut-off:
Not Applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not Applicable
b. Matrix comparison:
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not Applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not Applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
{4}
Not Applicable
**N. Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
**O. Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports substantial equivalence decision.
5
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.
