K083464 · Meridian Bioscience, Inc. · LQP · Jan 30, 2009 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K083464
Device Name
PREMIER CAMPY, MODEL 618096
Applicant
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
Product Code
LQP · Microbiology
Decision Date
Jan 30, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3110
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
Real-World Evidence, Pediatric
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K083464 · Jan 30, 2009
PREMIER CAMPY, MODEL 618096
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
Retrospective frozen patient stool samples
Retrospective clinical samples were used alongside prospective samples to establish clinical sensitivity and specificity of the Premier CAMPY EIA compared to bacterial culture.
Retrospective and prospective clinical evaluation; Study Period: 2008
Patients with signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis; Sample Size: 2073 total (166 retrospective, 1907 prospective); Number of Sites: 4
Bacterial culture
Clinical sensitivity and specificity
Indications for Use
Premier™ CAMPY enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is an in vitro qualitative procedure for the detection of specific Campylobacter antigens in stool samples from patients with signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis. Premier CAMPY detects C. jejuni and C. coli in human stool that may be either unpreserved or preserved in Cary Blair-based transport media. Test results are to be used in conjunction with information obtained from the patient's clinical evaluation and other diagnostic procedures. Premier CAMPY is intended for use in hospital, reference or state laboratory settings. The device is not intended for point-of-care use.
Device Story
Premier CAMPY is an in vitro diagnostic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) for detecting Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli antigens in human stool. The device utilizes microwells coated with mouse monoclonal capture antibodies. Stool samples are processed and added to the wells; if antigens are present, they bind to the capture antibodies. An enzyme conjugate (mouse monoclonal) is added, followed by a substrate solution. The presence of antigen is indicated by a color change (yellow), which can be read visually or via spectrophotometer. The device is used in hospital, reference, or state laboratories by trained personnel. Results are interpreted alongside clinical symptoms and other diagnostic tests to aid in the diagnosis of Campylobacteriosis. It provides a qualitative diagnostic output, assisting clinicians in identifying bacterial colonization and guiding patient management.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study conducted at four U.S. sites with 2,073 patient samples (166 retrospective, 1,907 prospective). Reference method: bacterial culture. Combined sensitivity: 96.3% (Site 3) to 100% (Site 4); Specificity: 94.6% (Site 3) to 100% (Site 2). 95% CIs provided for all sites. No performance differences observed based on age or sex.
Technological Characteristics
Microwell-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA). Components: microwells coated with mouse monoclonal capture antibodies, mouse monoclonal enzyme conjugate, sample diluent, wash buffer, substrate solution, stop solution, and positive/negative controls. Qualitative colorimetric readout (visual or spectrophotometric). No calibrators used. Manual or semi-automated laboratory equipment (washer/spectrophotometer) required.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of C. jejuni and C. coli antigens in human stool (unpreserved or Cary Blair-preserved) from patients of all ages presenting with signs/symptoms of gastroenteritis. For use in hospital, reference, or state laboratories; not for point-of-care use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Campylobacter fetus serological reagents are devices that consist of antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye used to identify Campylobacter fetus from clinical specimens or cultured isolates derived from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by this bacterium and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Campylobacter fetus is a frequent cause of abortion in sheep and cattle and is sometimes responsible for endocarditis (inflammation of certain membranes of the heart) and enteritis (inflammation of the intestines) in humans.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K083464
B. Purpose for Submission:
To determine substantial equivalence for the Premier™ CAMPY Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) used to detect Campylobacter (C. jejuni and C. coli) antigens
C. Measurand:
Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli antigens
D. Type of Test:
Enzyme Immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Premier™ CAMPY Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA)
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 866.3110, Campylobacter spp
2. Classification:
Class I
3. Product code:
LQP - Campylobacter spp.
{1}
4. Panel:
Microbiology (83)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use:
Premier™ CAMPY enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is an in vitro qualitative procedure for the detection of specific Campylobacter antigens in stool samples from patients with signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis. Premier CAMPY detects C. jejuni and C. coli in human stool that may be either unpreserved or preserved in Cary Blair-based transport media. Test results are to be used in conjunction with information obtained from the patient's clinical evaluation and other diagnostic procedures.
Premier CAMPY is intended for use in hospital, reference or state laboratory settings. The device is not intended for point-of-care use.
2. Indications for use:
Premier™ CAMPY enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is an in vitro qualitative procedure for the detection of specific Campylobacter antigens in stool samples from patients with signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis. Premier CAMPY detects C. jejuni and C. coli in human stool that may be either unpreserved or preserved in Cary Blair-based transport media. Test results are to be used in conjunction with information obtained from the patient's clinical evaluation and other diagnostic procedures.
Premier CAMPY is intended for use in hospital, reference or state laboratory settings. The device is not intended for point-of-care use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For Prescription Use Only
4. Special instrument requirements:
None
I. Device Description:
Premier CAMPY is an in vitro diagnostic, microwell-based, enzyme-linked immunoassay for the detection of common antigens found on Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli in stool samples from patients with signs and symptoms of Campylobacteriosis.
2
{2}
The assay kit contains the following components:
1. Premier CAMPY Microwells: Monoclonal antibody-coated microwells. The antibodies are specific to *C. jejuni* and *C. coli*
2. Premier CAMPY Enzyme Conjugate: HRP-conjugated monoclonal antibodies specific to *C. jejuni* and *C. coli* in a buffered protein solution containing 0.1% ProClin® and 0.03% gentamicin as preservatives
3. Premier 20X Wash Buffer III: Concentrated wash buffer containing 0.1% ProClin® and 0.3% gentamicin as preservatives
4. Premier Substrate I: Buffered solution containing urea peroxide and tetramethylbenzidine at pH 5.0
5. Premier Stop Solution I: 1M Phosphoric acid
6. Premier CAMPY Sample Diluent/Negative Control: Buffered protein solution containing 0.1% ProClin® and 0.03% gentamicin as preservatives.
7. Premier CAMPY Positive Control: Inactivated *C. jejuni* in a buffered protein solution containing 0.094% sodium azide and 0.03% gentamicin as preservatives
8. Transfer pipettes
9. Microwell strip holder
10. Microwell plate sealers
No calibrators are used with this device.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
ProSpecT Campylobacter EIA
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K982315
{3}
3. Comparison with predicate:
Similarities and Differences
| Item | Premier CAMPY | Predicate Device ProSpecT Campylbacter |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Assay type | EIA | EIA |
| Intended use | | |
| Qualitative/Quantitative | Qualitative | Qualitative |
| Screening, diagnostic or identification test | Diagnostic | Diagnostic |
| Calibrator | No | No |
| Monitoring therapy | No | No |
| Reagents/components | | |
| Microwells | Yes | Yes |
| Sample Diluent | Yes | Yes |
| Enzyme Conjugate | Yes | Yes |
| Wash Buffer | Yes | Yes |
| Substrate | Yes | Yes |
| Stop Solution | Yes | Yes |
| Positive Control | Yes | Yes |
| Negative Control | Yes | Yes |
| Species detected | | |
| C. jejuni | Yes | Yes |
| C. coli | Yes | Unk |
| C. lari | No | No |
| C. fetus | No | No |
| Reading method | | |
| Visual | Yes | Yes |
| Spectrophotometric | Yes | Yes |
| End point | Pos = definite yellow color
Neg = Colorless to very faint yellow | Pos = yellow color
Negative = Colorless |
| Calibrator | No | No |
| Equipment | General laboratory semiautomated washer (optional)
General laboratory spectrophotometer (optional) | General laboratory semiautomated washer (optional)
General laboratory spectrophotometer (optional)
StatFax microplate incubator/shaker (optional) |
{4}
| Item | Premier CAMPY | Predicate Device ProSpecT Campylobacter |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Antibody sources | | |
| Solid phase (microplate) | Mouse monoclonal | Rabbit polyclonal |
| Enzyme conjugate | Mouse monoclonal | Rabbit polyclonal |
| Sample Types | | |
| Human stool (direct) | Yes | Yes |
| Broth culture | No | Yes |
| Endpoint determinations | | |
| Positive (dual wavelength) | Yes ≥ 0.100 | Yes ≥ 0.140 |
| Negative (dual wavelength) | Yes < 0.100 | Yes < 0.100 |
| Indeterminant (dual wavelength) | None | Yes 0.100 to 0.139 |
Differences include Specific Detection of C. coli and Antibody Source.
The Premier™ CAMPY EIA kit can specifically detect C. coli and includes anti-mouse monoclonal antibodies, while the predicate (K982315- ProSpecT Campylobacter EIA) cannot distinguish between C. coli and C. jejuni and contains anti-rabbit polyclonal antibodies.
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced:
EPI2-A2, Vol. 28, No. 3. User protocol for evaluation of qualitative test performance, approved guideline. 2nd ed., CLSI (Section 8.3.1)
## L. Test Principle:
Premier CAMPY is an enzyme immunoassay for the direct detection of Campylobacter antigens in human stool samples. Breakaway microwells are coated with Campylobacter-specific monoclonal antibodies. Diluted patient specimen is added to the microwells and incubated. Upon completion of the incubation, a wash step is performed to remove unbound material and a Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP)-Anti-Campylobacter conjugate is added to the washed microwells. If Campylobacter antigens are present, an antibody-enzyme complex is formed. A second wash step is performed to remove unbound materials and a chromogen substrate is added to the microwells. A blue color develops in the presence of bound enzyme. Premier Stop
{5}
Solution I is added, changing the initial blue reaction to yellow. Test results are interpreted visually or spectrophotometrically.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Assay precision, intra-assay variability and inter-assay variability were assessed with a reference panel prepared from moderate positive (n = 2), negative (n = 2), high negative (n = 3) and low positive (n = 3) samples. High negative, low positive and moderate positive samples were prepared by inoculating negative stool matrix with known quantities of *C. jejuni*. In the case of low positive and high negative samples, the inoculum was added at concentrations that were at, or just below, the assay LoD. Aliquots of each panel were tested for five days, twice each day at three different test sites (Sites A, B and C). At least two technologists performed testing at each site. The expected results were obtained 100% of the time.
The sponsor’s pre-determined acceptance criteria were as follows:
- Premier™ Campylobacter and culture will result in performance values of 90% sensitive and 90% specific ± 10%, at 90% confidence
- Fewer than 10% false positive results
- Fewer than 10% false negative
#### b. Linearity/Assay Reportable Range
N/A
#### c. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (controls, calibrators or methods)
## Stability
To validate labeling claims regarding the use of preserved and/or frozen samples, the investigator subjected a panel of specimens, preserved in Cary Blair-based transport media, to two freeze-thaw cycles (at -20°C and 2-8°C). The sample panel included low positive and high negative samples prepared by spiking negative matrices with *C. jejuni*.
The sponsor’s interpretation of results for Premier CAMPY at OD₄₅₀/₆₃₀ was as follows:
Negative < 0.100
Positive ≥ 0.100
{6}
These results suggest that stool samples are stable whether preserved or frozen; thus, effectiveness of C. jejuni and C. coli detection in such samples is not compromised.
**Human stool samples, unpreserved:** Samples should be received in an airtight transport container and stored at 2–8⁰ C prior to testing. Samples should be tested as soon as possible, but may be held up to 96 hours at 2–8⁰ C. Samples that will not be tested within 96 hours should be frozen immediately upon receipt and stored at ≤ –20 C until tested. Specimens may be frozen and thawed twice.
**Human stool samples, preserved in Cary Blair-based media:** Samples should be stored at 2–8⁰ C prior to testing. Samples should be tested as soon as possible, but may be held up to 96 hours at 2–8 C⁰. Samples that will not be tested within 96 hours should be frozen immediately upon receipt and stored at ≤ –20 C until tested. Specimens may be frozen and thawed twice.
**Controls:** The controls are used to monitor reagent reactivity. Failure of the controls to produce the expected results can mean that one or more of the reagents are no longer reactive at the time of use that the test was not performed correctly, or that reagents or samples were not added. Repeat the control tests as the first step in determining the root cause of the failure.
**d. Detection limit:**
The following tables summarize the study design used to determine the Limit of Detection (LoD), for the Premier™ CAMPY kit, of C. jejuni and C. coli, respectively. The analytical sensitivity of these assays for C. jejuni and C. coli were based on 45 tests for each measurand and with a stated 95 % probability of obtaining positive responses (i.e., LoD) at the following levels of the measurands:
C. jejuni - 1.2 x 10⁶ cells/mL
C. coli - 8.0 x 10⁶ cells/ml
{7}
Measurand: Campylobacter coli
| | Sample #1 (2 dil. below LoB) | | Sample #2 (1 dil. below LoB) | | Sample #3 (LoB) | | Sample #4 (1 dil. above LoB) | | Sample #5 (2 dil. above LoB) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Organism concentration | 1.0 x 10^{6} | | 2.0 x 10^{6} | | 4.0 x 10^{6} | | 8.0 x 10^{6} | | 1.6 x 10^{7} | |
| Kit Lot Number | # Pos | # Neg | # Pos | # Neg | # Pos | # Neg | # Pos | # Neg | # Pos | # Neg |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Lot #1 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| Lot #2 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| Lot #3 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| Total (for 3 lots) | 0 | 45 | 0 | 45 | 20 | 25 | 45 | 0 | 45 | 0 |
| Meets requirement for final LoB? (yes/no) | No | | No | | Yes | | No | | No | |
| Meets requirement for LoD? (yes/no) | No | | No | | No | | Yes | | No | |
{8}
Measurand: Campylobacter jejuni
| | Sample #1 (2 dil. below LoB) | | Sample #2 (1 dil. below LoB) | | Sample #3 (LoB) | | Sample #4 (1 dil. above LoB) | | Sample #5 (2 dil. above LoB) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Organism concentration | 1.5 x 10^{5} | | 3.0 x 10^{5} | | 6.5 x 10^{5} | | 1.2 x 10^{5} | | 2.4 x 10^{5} | |
| Kit Lot Number | # Pos | # Neg | # Pos | # Neg | # Pos | # Neg | # Pos | # Neg | # Pos | # Neg |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Lot #1 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| Lot #2 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| Lot #3 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| Total (for 3 lots) | 0 | 45 | 0 | 45 | 27 | 18 | 45 | 0 | 45 | 0 |
| Meets requirement for final LoB? (yes/no) | No | | No | | Yes | | No | | No | |
| Meets requirement for LoD? (yes/no) | No | | No | | No | | Yes | | No | |
e. Analytical specificity:
Interference Testing
In this study, the sponsor added selected drugs, and other non-microbial substances that might be present in stool samples from healthy persons or patients with signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis, to three positive and three negative samples. They then inoculated the samples with C. jejuni near the limit of detection (LoD) of the assay. The final concentrations of the substances in the samples were as follows:
- Barium Sulfate (5 mg/mL)
- Fecal fat (equivalent to 2.65 mg stearic plus 1.3 mg palmitic acids per mL)
- Hemoglobin (as methhemoglobin) (3.2 mg/mL)
- Imodium AD® (0.00667 mg/mL)
- Kaopectate® (0.87 mg/mL)
- Mucin (3.33 mg/mL)
- Mylanta® (4.2 mg/mL), Pepto-Bismol® (0.87 mg/mL)
- Prilosec® (0.5 mg/mL)
- Tagamet® (0.5 mg/mL)
- TUMS® (0.5 mg/mL), whole blood (5% v/v)
Meridian Biosciences tested the spiked samples in parallel with an unspiked dilution control for reference. All samples were tested in triplicate. The sponsor provides the following interpretation of results for Premier CAMPY at OD₄₅₀/₆₃₀:
Negative test: <0.100
Positive Test: ≥ 0.100
The negative results observed suggest that none of the potentially interfering substances
{9}
meets the criteria for an interferent.
## Cross-reactivity Study
Microorganisms that were present as normal intestinal flora or associated with gastroenteritis were evaluated as to their effects on assay performance. Fungi and bacteria were tested at final concentrations in human stool of $1.1 \times 10^{8}$ CFU/mL. Viruses were tested at final concentrations of $1.3 \times 10^{4}$ to $3.1 \times 10^{6}$ TCID$_{50}$/mL. The sponsor provides the following interpretation of results for Premier CAMPY at OD$_{450/630}$:
Negative test: $< 0.100$
Positive Test: $\geq 0.100$
No cross-reactivity was observed.
These results suggest that none of the following organisms in stool reacts with Premier CAMPY.
10
{10}
| Normal/Gastritis Associated Intestinal Flora | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Bacteria | Fungi | Viruses |
| Aeromonas hydrophila | Candida albicans | Adenovirus Types 40 and 41 |
| Bacteroides fragilis | | Coxsackievirus |
| Campylobacter fetus | | Echovirus |
| C. lari | | Rotavirus |
| Clostridium difficile | | |
| C. perfringens | | |
| Enterobacter cloacae | | |
| Enterococcus faecalis | | |
| Escherichia coli | | |
| E. coli 0157:H7 | | |
| E. fergusonii | | |
| E. hermannii | | |
| Helicobacter pylori | | |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | | |
| Lactococcus lactis | | |
| Listeria monocytogenes | | |
| Peptostreptococcus anaerobius | | |
| Plesiomonas shigelloides | | |
| Proteus vulgaris | | |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | | |
| P. fluorescens | | |
| Salmonella Groups BE | | |
| Serratia liquefaci | | |
| S. marcescens | | |
| Shigella boydii | | |
| S. dysenteriae | | |
| S. Flexneri | | |
| S. sonnei, Staphylococcus aureus | | |
| S. epidermidis | | |
| Vibrio parahaemolyticus | | |
| Yersinia enterocolitica | | |
## Strain Reactivity Study
The sponsor tested the reactivity of the following Campylobacter stock cultures from different sources, at $1.1 \times 10^{8}$ CFU/mL with Premier CAMPY: C. coli strains 10956, 17755, 36994 and 53138 and C. jejuni strains 6951, 10940, 12081, 29411 and 38106. In this study, triplicates of each strain were spiked into a negative stool matrix. The negative sample matrix was confirmed nonreactive with the predicate device. The control was prepared by spiking the matrix with buffer instead of organism. Results
{11}
showed that the negative control was nonreactive when tested, while each of the stool specimens spiked with the above listed Campylobacter stock cultures was reactive.
e. Assay cut-off:
Interpretation of Results
Visual Reading
Negative = Colorless to very faint yellow
Positive = Definite yellow color
A very faint yellow color must be evaluated by a spectrophotometric reading.
Spectrophotometric Single Wavelength (450 nm)
Negative: < 0.150
Positive: ≥ 0.150
Negative Control: < 0.150
Positive Control: ≥ 0.600
Spectrophotometric Dual Wavelength (450/630 nm)
Negative: < 0.100
Positive: ≥ 0.100
Negative Control: < 0.100
Positive Control: ≥ 0.600
If a Negative Control is < 0.000, blank the plate reader again to air and reread the plate.
A positive result indicates the presence of Campylobacter antigens. A negative result indicates the absence of Campylobacter antigens, or that the level of antigens is below what can be detected by the assay. The magnitude of the OD above the cutoff is neither indicative of the severity or extent of Campylobacter infection, nor can it be correlated to an endpoint titer. Extremely strong positive samples may yield either an intense yellow color or a purple precipitate within a few minutes of stopping the reaction. In this case, the spectrophotometer may yield an "out" reading. This reading is considered a positive.
If the frequency of low positive results (OD between 0.150 and 0.200 for single wavelength and between 0.100 and 0.150 with dual wavelength) is greater than 5% of specimens tested, this may indicate insufficient washing, more, vigorous washing or increasing the washes to seven washes in step 5 of the procedure is recommended.
1. Comparison studies:
a. Method Comparison with Predicate:
N/A
{12}
b. Matrix comparison:
Specimen matrix interference has not been observed in this assay as samples are significantly diluted before testing in Sample Diluent. For this reason, the Positive and Negative Controls supplied as part of this assay are prepared in matrices similar to the Sample Diluent. If control materials that are identical in composition to test samples are preferred, the user can prepare these by diluting known positive and negative specimens in Sample Diluent according to the SPECIMEN PREPARATION section of the package insert.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity
Meridian Bioscience established the performance of Premier CAMPY in clinical trials using bacterial culture as the reference comparator method. They conducted their clinical studies at four independent test sites located in the Western, Midwestern and Southeastern regions of the United States. In total, they tested 2073 qualified patient samples. Of these, 166 were retrospective frozen samples and the remaining 1907 prospective. The sponsor collected the majority (1862/2073) of samples in a Cary Blair-based transport and preservative medium. They tested the remaining 211 samples in the unpreserved state. They collected stool from both males (41 %) and females (57%); however, they were unaware of the sex of 2% of their patients. The age groups of the patients ranged from less than one month of age to 97 years. No differences in test performance were observed based on patient age or sex. The following tables illustrate the assay performance by clinical site.
{13}
Table 3 (Suppl) Combined data - stratified by test site
| | Premier CAMPY | | | ProSpecT Campylobacter | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Site #1 | | | | | | | |
| Bacterial Culture | Positive | Negative | Total | Positive | Negative | Indeterminate | Total |
| Positive | 22 | 1 | 23 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 23 |
| Negative | 4 | 189 | 193 | 0 | 193 | 0 | 193 |
| Total | 26 | 190 | 216 | 22 | 194 | 0 | 216 |
| | | | 95% CI | | | 95% CI | |
| Sensitivity | 22/23 | 95.7 | 79.0 – 99.2 | 22/23 | 95.7 | 79.0 – 99.2 | |
| Specificity | 189/193 | 97.9 | 94.8 – 99.2 | 193/193 | 100.0 | 98.0 – 100.0 | |
| Correlation | 211/216 | 97.7 | 94.7 – 99.0 | 215/216 | 99.5 | 97.4 – 99.9 | |
| Site #2 | | | | | | | |
| Bacterial Culture | Positive | Negative | Total | Positive | Negative | Indeterminate | Total |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Negative | 0 | 51 | 51 | 0 | 51 | 0 | 51 |
| Total | 0 | 51 | 51 | 0 | 51 | 0 | 51 |
| | | | 95% CI | | | 95% CI | |
| Sensitivity | 0/0 | N/A | N/A | 0/0 | N/A | N/A | |
| Specificity | 51/51 | 100 | 93.0 – 100.0 | 51/51 | 100 | 93.0 – 100.0 | |
| Correlation | 51/51 | 100 | 93.0 – 100.0 | 51/51 | 100 | 93.0 – 100.0 | |
| Site 3 | | | | | | | |
| Bacterial Culture | Positive | Negative | Total | Positive | Negative | Indeterminate | Total |
| Positive | 26 | 1 | 27 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 27 |
| Negative | 82 | 1429 | 1511 | 36 | 1462 | 13 | 1511 |
| Total | 108 | 1430 | 1538 | 60 | 1465 | 13 | 1538 |
| | | | 95% CI | | | 95% CI | |
| Sensitivity | 26/27 | 96.3 | 81.7 - 99.3 | 24/27 | 88.9 | 71.9 – 96.1 | |
| Specificity | 1429/1511 | 94.6 | 93.3 - 95.6 | 1475/1511 | 96.8 | 95.7 – 97.5 | |
| Correlation | 1455/1538 | 94.6 | 93.4 – 95.6 | 1486/1538 | 96.6 | 95.6 – 97.4 | |
| Site 4 | | | | | | | |
| Bacterial Culture | Positive | Negative | Total | Positive | Negative | Indeterminate | Total |
| Positive | 11 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Negative | 2 | 255 | 257 | 2 | 255 | 0 | 257 |
| Total | 13 | 255 | 268 | 13 | 255 | 0 | 268 |
| | | | 95% CI | | | 95% CI | |
| Sensitivity | 11/11 | 100.0 | 74.1 – 100.0 | 11/11 | 100.0 | 74.1 – 100.0 | |
| Specificity | 255/257 | 99.2 | 97.2 – 99.8 | 255/257 | 99.2 | 97.2 – 99.8 | |
| Correlation | 266/268 | 99.3 | 97.3 – 99.8 | 266/268 | 99.3 | 97.3 – 99.8 | |
b. Clinical Specificity
See 3a above
c. Other Clinical Supportive data
N/A
4. Clinical cut-off:
N/A
5. Expected Values/Reference Range:
The performance of Premier CAMPY was evaluated during 2008 in several
{14}
geographic regions of the United States. The incidence of positive samples (C. jejuni or C. coli) during this period was approximately 1.5%. The expected frequency for an individual laboratory may differ from this number since it is dependent on factors such as locale, time of the year, and whether an outbreak has occurred.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
15
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.