N ANTISERA TO HUMAN IMMUNOGLOBULINS (IGG, IGA AND IGM) AND N/T PROTEIN CONTROL LC
Applicant
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics
Product Code
CFN · Immunology
Decision Date
Mar 24, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5510
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
N Antisera to Human Immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM) – In vitro diagnostic reagents for the quantitative determination of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA and IgM) in human serum, heparinized and EDTA plasma, and IgG in human urine and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by means of immunonephelometry on the BN™ Systems. Measurement of immunoglobulins aid in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. N/T Protein Control LC is intended for use as an assayed intralaboratory quality control for assessment of precision and analytical bias in immunochemical determination of the proteins IgG in CSF, IgA in CSF, IgM in CSF, IgG in urine, transferrin in urine, albumin in urine and CSF, α1-microglobulin in urine and total protein in urine and CSF, using the BN™ Systems.
Device Story
N Antisera reagents and N/T Protein Control LC are used on BN Systems for immunonephelometric protein analysis. Reagents react with proteins in human body fluids (serum, plasma, urine, CSF) to form immune complexes; these complexes scatter light. Scattered light intensity is proportional to protein concentration; results are determined by comparison to known standards. N/T Protein Control LC is a multi-analyte, lyophilized, polygeline and rabbit albumin-based product used by laboratory personnel to monitor assay precision and analytical bias. The device aids clinicians in diagnosing abnormal protein metabolism and immune system function. The system provides quantitative protein measurements, enabling clinical decision-making regarding patient metabolic and infectious disease status.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance validated via precision (CLSI EP5-A), linearity (CLSI EP06-A), interference (CLSI EP7-A2), and limit of detection (CLSI EP17-A). Method comparison study (N=76) against predicate yielded Passing-Bablok slope 0.926, intercept -0.339 mg/L, and r=0.985. No clinical studies performed.
Indicated for quantitative determination of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM) in human serum, plasma, urine, and CSF to aid diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and immune resistance. N/T Protein Control LC is indicated for use as an assayed intralaboratory quality control for precision and bias assessment of specific protein assays on BN Systems.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, and E immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, an E (serum antibodies) in serum. Measurement of these immunoglobulins aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents.
Predicate Devices
IMMAGE® Immunochemistry Systems IGU (k951635)
Protein 3 Control (k072435)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k083445
B. Purpose for Submission:
Device modification (addition of urine as a sample matrix)
C. Measurand:
Immunoglobulin IgG
D. Type of Test:
Nephelometry, Quantitative and Semi-quantitative
E. Applicant:
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
N Antisera to Human Immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM)
N/T Protein Control LC
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation
21 CFR § 866.5510, Immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, and E Immunological test system
21 CFR § 862.1660, Quality Control material (Assayed and Unassayed)
2. Classification
Class II
Class I
3. Product Code
CFN, Method Nephelometric, Immunoglobulins (G, A, M)
JJY, Multi-analyte Controls, All kinds (Assayed and Unassayed)
4. Panel
Immunology (82); Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
N Antisera to Human Immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM) – In vitro diagnostic reagents for the quantitative determination of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA and IgM) in human serum, heparinized and EDTA plasma, and IgG in human urine and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by means of immunonephelometry on the BN™ Systems. Measurement of immunoglobulins aid in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents.
N/T Protein Control LC is intended for use as an assayed intralaboratory quality control for assessment of precision and analytical bias in immunochemical determination of the proteins IgG in CSF, IgA in CSF, IgM in CSF, IgG in urine, transferrin in urine, albumin in urine and CSF, α1-microglobulin in urine and total protein in urine and CSF, using the BN™ Systems.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as Intended Use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For Prescription only.
{1}
4. Special instrument requirements:
BN ProSpec® Analyser (k001647)
I. Device Description:
N Antisera to Human Immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM) reagent is packaged in either 2 mL or 5 mL bottles and ready for use.
N/T Protein Control LC consists of 3 lyophilized vials containing human urine and serum proteins, polygeline and rabbit albumin.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
IMMAGE® Immunochemistry Systems IGU
Protein 3 Control
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k951635, k072435
3. Comparison with predicate:
N Antisera to Human Immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM)
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate Device |
| Technology | Nephelometry | Same |
| Storage conditions | 2-8 °C | Same |
| Components | Calibrators and Controls are sold separately | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use/Indication for Use:Reagent IgG Antisera | In vitro diagnostic reagents for the quantitative measurement of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM) in human serum, heparinized and EDTA plasma, and IgG in human urine and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by means of nephelometry on the BN™ Systems.Measurements of these immunoglobulins aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. | IGU reagent, when used in conjunction with IMMAGE® Immunochemistry Systems and Urine Protein Calibrator, is intended for the quantitative determination of Urine Immunoglobulin G (IGU) in human urine by rate nephelometry. |
{2}
3
| Sample type | Heparinized and EDTA plasma, and IgG in human urine and cerebrospinal fluid | IgG in serum, cerebrospinal fluid and urine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Analyzer | Dade Bearing BN ProSpec® | Beckmann Coulter IMMAGE® Immunochemistry Systems |
| Antibody source | Rabbit polyclonal | Processed goat sera |
| IgG reporting Units | mg/L | mg/dL |
| IgG Urine Reference Interval | <9.6 mg/L | <0.80 mg/dL |
| Assay Range Differences | 3.6 to 58 mg/L
No hook effect to 648.4 mg/L | Initial: 0.3 to 6.0 mg/dL
Extended: 0.3 to 1296 mg/dL |
| Packaging | 1 vial at 2 mL
1 vial at 5 mL | IGU antibody - 3.9 mL
IGU Antigen Excess Solution - 1.2 mL |
N/T Protein Control LC
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Control | N/T Protein Control LC | Protein 3 Control |
| Composition | Multi-analyte, lyophilized, human urine and serum based product with polygeline and rabbit albumin | Same |
| Traceability | Traceable to ERM®-DA470(CRM 470) | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | N/T Protein Control LC is intended for use as an assayed intralaboratory quality control for assessment of precision and analytical bias in immunochemical determination of the proteins IgG in CSF, IgA in CSF, IgM in CSF, IgG | PROT3 CON is an assayed intralaboratory quality control for the assessment of precision and analytical bias on the Dimension Vista® System in the quantitative determination of: α1-Microglobulin |
{3}
4
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | in urine, transferrin in urine, albumin in urine and CSF, α1-microglobulin in urine and total protein in urine and CSF, using the BN™ Systems. | (A1MIC), specialty Albumin (sALB*), Immunoglobulin G (IGG-C*, IGG-U**) Transferrin (TRF-U**), Microalbumin (MALB), * For cerebrospinal fluid(CSF), ** For urine |
| Packaging | 3 vials, lyophilized (1 ml each reconstituted) | 4 vials, lyophilized (1 ml each reconstituted) |
| Analyzer | BN ProSpec® Analyser | Dimension Vista® system |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Standards:
CLSI EP05-A2 Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
NCCLS EP6-A Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP7-A2 Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP17-A Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation
Guidance Documents:
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Assayed and Unassayed Quality Control Material Draft Guidance Document for 510(k) Submission of Immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, and E Immunoglobulin System in Vitro Devices
## L. Test Principle:
Proteins contained in human body fluids react with specific antibodies in the reagent, to form immune complexes in an immunochemical reaction. These complexes in the reaction mixture cause the scatter of a beam of light passed through the sample. The intensity of the scattered light is proportional to the concentration of IgG in the sample. The result is evaluated by comparison with a standard of known concentration. This is the same well established nephelometric principle as the predicate.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Reproducibility testing was done in accordance with CLSI EP5-A, on ten days with four replicates per day (N=40)
| Material | Total Mean | Intra-assay | Run-to Run | Inter-assay |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | mg/L | CV | CV | CV |
| NT Prot 3 Control | 18.7 | 1.1% | 0.8% | 1.3% |
{4}
| Urine pool low | 5.5 | 2.9% | 3.2% | 4.1% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Urine pool high | 19.9 | 1.2% | 2.5% | 2.8% |
Additional low and high end reproducibility testing was done in accordance with CLSI EP5-A, on five days, with two runs per day, with four replicates per run $(N = 40)$
| Material | Total Mean | Intra-assay | Run-to Run | Inter-assay |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | mg/L | CV | CV | CV |
| Urine pool low | 3.9 | 2.1% | 1.4% | 2.3% |
| Urine pool high | 51.3 | 1.7% | 2.8% | 3.0% |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity:
Linearity across the assay range was confirmed by testing a human urine sample with high concentration (59.7 mg/L) of IgG. This sample was serially diluted with System N Diluent down to the lower detectable measuring range (3.33 mg/L). Each dilution was tested in replicates of five. Data were analyzed in accordance to CLSI EP06-A and EP17-A. Percent recovery was calculated using the formula: (Mean of test/expected concentration) x 100. All dilutions met the acceptance criteria of 85 to 115%. Test results that fall outside the measuring range are flagged. The linear regression analysis was performed. Data showed a regression equation: $y = 0.9824x + 0.0891$ , $r = 0.9994$ . Reportable range for IgG-U device is approximately 3.6 to 58.0 mg/L for urine samples.
# Hook Effect:
The possibility of antigen excess occurring when using the device was evaluated with sample (pool concentration) above the assay range. The samples were analyzed, indicating no antigen excess effect observed up to at least $648.4\mathrm{mg / L}$ .
b. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The calibrator and controls are traceable to the reference material Calibrator ERM® - DA470 (CRM 470).
# Stability:
Data was provided to support shelf life, open vial, and on-board storage. When stored at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ , the data supported a 24 month shelf life. Open vial stability for the N Antiserum was 4 weeks and 14 days for the N/T Protein Controls LC and N Protein Standard. On-board stability data supported 4 and 2 weeks for the $5\mathrm{mL}$ and $2\mathrm{mL}$ vial of N Antiserum reagent, respectively, and 7 days for the N/T Protein Controls LC.
# c. Detection limit:
Data were analyzed according to EP17-A.Detection limit represents the lower limit of the reportable range of urine IgG. The analytical sensitivity is defined as the minimal detectable level of analyte, which can be distinguished from zero. The value was calculated as the mean value of fifteen replicates of three human urine samples and sample diluent. It was determined to be $3.6\mathrm{mg / L}$ .
# e. Analytical specificity:
Interference testing was performed according to CLSI EP7-A2. No interference for
{5}
urine sample matrix was observed in the presence of the following interferents: Hemoglobin up to 10 mg/dL; Bilirubin (unconjugated) up to 2 mg/dL; Bilirubin (conjugated) up to 3 mg/dL. Additional substances (listed below) also demonstrated no interference at the concentrations listed:
| Substance | Substance Test Concentration | IgG Concentration |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Acetone | 1000 mg/dL | 7.70 mg/L |
| Ascorbic acid | 900 mg/dL | 20.9 mg/L |
| Ethanol | 1000 mg/dL | 7.70 mg/L |
| Oxalic acid | 10 mg/dL | 24.9 mg/L |
| Riboflavin | 6.75 mg/dL | 28.5 mg/L |
| Sodium Chloride | 6000 mg/dL | 7.37 mg/L |
| Bovine albumin | 500 mg/dL | 23.6 mg/L |
| Boric Acid | 4500 mg/dL | 21.6 mg/L |
| Sodium Azide | 20000 mg/dL | 23.6 mg/L |
| Sodium Fluoride | 16000 mg/dL | 21.4 mg/L |
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The table below shows the comparison of 76 urine samples ranging from 3.3 to 59.20 mg/L IgG that were tested on the BN ProSpec® System and the Beckman Coulter IMMAGE® using the respective IgG assays. Results were analyzed by Passing-Bablok regression, yielded a slope of 0.926 with an intercept of -0.339 mg/L and a correlation coefficient of 0.985, and are summarized below:
| | N | Slope (95% CI) | Intersept (95% CI) | R | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BN ProSpec® vs. Beckman Immage | 76 | 0.926 (0.882,0.185) | -0.339 (-0.921, 0.120) | 0.985 | 0.970 |
b. Matrix comparison:
Both use urine as a matrix.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
{6}
A Literature Reference was used, and a transference study was conducted, for the IgG Urine Expected Values of < 9.6 mg/L (Hofmann W, Guder WG. A diagnostic programme for quantitative analysis of proteinuria. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1989; 27: 589-600). This was confirmed by performing a Reference Interval transference study.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
7
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.