AXIS-SHIELD LIQUID STABLE (LS) 2-PART HOMOCYSTEINE REAGENT, MODEL FHRK100
Applicant
Axis-Shield Diagnostics, Ltd.
Product Code
LPS · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jul 31, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1377
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Liquid Stable (LS) 2-Part Homocysteine Reagent is intended for in vitro quantitative determination of total homocysteine in human serum and plasma. The device can assist in the diagnosis and treatment of patients suspected of having hyperhomocysteinemia and homocystinuria.
Device Story
In vitro diagnostic reagent kit for quantitative determination of total homocysteine in human serum and plasma. Principle: enzymatic assay; dimerized/protein-bound homocysteine reduced to free homocysteine via TCEP; free homocysteine converted to cystathionine by cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) and serine; cystathionine broken down by cystathionine beta-lyase (CBL) to homocysteine, pyruvate, and ammonia; pyruvate converted to lactate by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) using NADH as coenzyme. Output: rate of NADH conversion to NAD+ measured at 340 nm (Δ A340 nm), directly proportional to homocysteine concentration. Used in clinical laboratory settings by trained personnel. Results assist clinicians in diagnosing and managing hyperhomocysteinemia and homocystinuria.
Clinical Evidence
Method comparison study performed on 94 plasma specimens (range 6.5–49.0 µmol/L). Passing-Bablok regression vs. predicate showed slope 0.99 (95% CI 0.98–1.00), intercept 0.3165 (95% CI 0.10–0.29), and r=1.00. Average bias was 0.01% (95% CI -0.10% to 0.07%).
Indicated for in vitro quantitative determination of total homocysteine in human serum and plasma to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of patients suspected of having hyperhomocysteinemia and homocystinuria.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A urinary homocystine (nonquantitative) test system is a device intended to identify homocystine (an analogue of the amino acid cystine) in urine. The identification of urinary homocystine is used in the diagnosis and treatment of homocystinuria (homosystine in urine), a heritable metabolic disorder which may cause mental retardation.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k083222
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Homocysteine (HCT)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, enzymatic assay
E. Applicant:
Axis-Shield Diagnostics Ltd.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Axis-Shield Liquid Stable (LS) 2-Part HOMOCYSTEINE REAGENT
Axis-Shield Homocysteine Calibrators
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 862.1377, Urinary Homocysteine (Nonquantitative) Test System.
21 CFR § 862.1150, Calibrator
2. Classification:
Class II for assay reagents and calibrator
3. Product code:
LPS, Urinary Homocysteine (Nonquantitative) Test System
JIT, Calibrator, Secondary
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indication(s) for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Axis-Shield Liquid Stable (LS) 2-Part Homocysteine Reagent is intended for in vitro quantitative determination of total homocysteine in human serum and plasma. The device can assist in the diagnosis and treatment of patients suspected of having hyperhomocysteinemia and homocystinuria.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use; For Prescription Use Only; The labeling contains
{1}
the following black-box warning:
Note: Specimens from patients who are on drug therapy involving S-adenosylmethionine may show falsely elevated levels of homocysteine. Patients who are taking methotrexate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, nitrous oxide, anticonvulsants, or 6-azauridine triacetate, may have elevated levels of homocysteine due to their effect on the pathway.
# 4. Special instrument requirements:
For use on the Olympus AU400 System
# I. Device Description:
The Liquid Stable (LS) 2-Part Homocysteine Reagent Test System contains one vial of each component (Reag1, Reag2, Cal 0 and Cal 28) in ready-to-use configuration.
- Reag 1: One amber vial (30 mL) which includes Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (38 KU/L), Serine (0.76 mM), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide reduced di-sodium salt (NADH) (0.47 mM), tris [2-carboxyethyl] phosphine (TCEP) reductant (2.9 mM), with buffers and stabilizers (Trizma Base 1-10%; Trizma Hydrochloride 1-10%). Preservative: Sodium Azide (<1%).
- Reag 2: One amber vial (5.0 mL) which includes Cystathionine beta-Synthase (CBS) (0.748 KU/L) and Cystathionine beta-Lyase (CBL) (16.4 KU/L) cycling enzymes. Preservative: Sodium Azide (<1%).
- Cal 0: One Opaque Vial (3.0 mL) of aqueous HCT blank. Concentration: 0 μmol/L.
- Cal 28: One Opaque Vial (3.0 mL) of aqueous HCT solution. Concentration: 28 μmol/L.
The calibrators are prepared gravimetrically and are traceable to NIST SRM 1955, confirmed by a designated measurement procedure (HPLC).
# J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
CATCH Incorporated, Liquid Stable (LS) 2-Part Homocysteine Reagent
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k062808
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Item | Device | Predicate (k062808) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Similarities | | |
| Intended use | In vitro quantitative determination of total HCT in human serum and plasma. The device can assist in the diagnosis and treatment of patients suspected of having hyperhomocysteinemia and homocystinuria. | In vitro quantitative determination of total HCT in serum and plasma. |
| Assay technology | 2 reagent enzymatic assay | same |
| Enzyme conversion | Cystathionine beta-synthase and cystathionine beta-lyase | same |
{2}
| Reductant | TCEP (tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine) | same |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Detection method | The rate of NADH conversion to NAD+ is directly proportional to the concentration of HCT (Δ A340 nm). | same |
| Storage conditions | Reagents and calibrators must be stored at 2 – 8 °C | same |
| On-board reagent stability | 30 days on the Olympus AU400 | same |
| Calibrator traceability | Traceable to NIST SRM 1955 Standard Reference Material | same |
| Units of measurement | μmol/L | same |
| Calibration | Quantitative assay using 2 gravimetrically prepared L-HCT (dimerized HCT) calibrators | same |
| Interference | No interference (≤ ± 10%) from bilirubin 20 mg/dL, cysteine 200 μmol/L, methionine 800 μmol/L | same |
| Differences | | |
| Formulation of reagent 2 | 0.748 KU/L cystathionine beta-synthase | >20 KU/L cystathionine beta-synthase |
| Calibration frequency | 30 days | 14 days |
| Specimen type | EDTA plasma, lithium heparin plasma, serum, serum separator tubes | EDTA plasma, lithium heparin plasma, serum separator tubes |
| Limit of detection | 0.33 μmol/L | ≤ 1 μmol/L |
| Assay range | 1 to 46 μmol/L | 1 to 50 μmol/L |
| Interference | No interference (≤ ± 10%) from hemoglobin (500 mg/dL) triglyceride (500 mg/dL) red blood cells (0.4 %) glutathione (1000 μmol/L) pyruvate (1250 μmol/L) | No interference (< 10%) from hemoglobin (400 mg/dL) triglyceride (1000 mg/dL) red blood cells not reported No interference (< 7%) from glutathione (20 μmol/L) pyruvate (500 μmol/L) |
| Imprecision | Within run % CV: 1.0% to 2.6%, total % CV: 2.0% to 4.4% for samples from 6.3 μmol/L to 48.3 μmol/L HCT | Within run % CV: 1.3% to 2.3%, total % CV: 2.4% to 4.3% for samples from 7.11 μmol/L to 27.64 μmol/L HCT |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline (EP5-A2)
- Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline (EP6-A)
- Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline (EP7-A2),
- Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline (EP09-A2)
- Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation; Approved Guideline (EP17-A)
- Format for Traditional and Abbreviated 510(k)s - Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff.
{3}
L. Test Principle:
Bound or dimerized HCT (oxidised form) is reduced to free HCT, which then reacts with serine catalyzed by cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) to form cystathionine. Cystathionine in turn is broken down by cystathionine beta-lyase (CBL) to form HCT, pyruvate and ammonia. Pyruvate is then converted by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to lactate with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) as coenzyme. The rate of NADH conversion to NAD⁺ is directly proportional to the concentration of HCT (Δ A340 nm).
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision was determined following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document EP5-A2. Axis-Shield HCT controls (low, medium and high) and 3 quality control panel members were assayed (in duplicate), using 2 lots of reagents and calibrators, at 2 separate times per day for 20 days on one instrument (therefore n=80 for each control and QC panel member). For each run, freshly dispensed controls and QC panel members were used and the order sequence for each run was randomized. A calibration curve was generated for each reagent lot on the first day of testing. The results are summarized below:
| Sample | Lot | Mean (μmol/L) | Within run | | Between run | | Between day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | % CV | SD | % CV | SD | % CV | SD | % CV |
| Low | 1 | 6.3 | 0.17 | 2.6 | 0.11 | 1.7 | 0.20 | 3.1 | 0.28 | 4.4 |
| | 2 | 6.3 | 0.13 | 2.1 | 0.11 | 1.7 | 0.19 | 3.1 | 0.26 | 4.1 |
| Medium | 1 | 12.3 | 0.18 | 1.5 | 0.15 | 1.2 | 0.29 | 2.4 | 0.37 | 3.0 |
| | 2 | 12.2 | 0.16 | 1.3 | 0.16 | 1.3 | 0.31 | 2.5 | 0.39 | 3.2 |
| High | 1 | 25.5 | 0.38 | 1.5 | 0.35 | 1.4 | 0.39 | 1.5 | 0.65 | 2.5 |
| | 2 | 25.3 | 0.41 | 1.6 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.60 | 2.4 | 0.73 | 2.9 |
| Panel 1 | 1 | 7.0 | 0.13 | 1.9 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.19 | 2.7 | 0.23 | 3.3 |
| | 2 | 7.0 | 0.15 | 2.2 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.26 | 3.8 | 0.31 | 4.4 |
| Panel 2 | 1 | 36.0 | 0.46 | 1.3 | 0.40 | 1.1 | 0.66 | 1.8 | 0.89 | 2.5 |
| | 2 | 35.5 | 0.40 | 1.1 | 0.23 | 0.7 | 0.67 | 1.9 | 0.82 | 2.3 |
| Panel 3 | 1 | 48.3 | 0.53 | 1.1 | 0.42 | 0.9 | 0.69 | 1.4 | 0.97 | 2.0 |
| | 2 | 47.7 | 0.47 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 0.8 | 0.88 | 1.8 | 1.07 | 2.2 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Six EDTA plasma sample pools were obtained from healthy volunteers. Sample pools 1 and 5 were spiked with L-HCT (dimerized HCT) to give HCT values within the upper range of the assay (46.43 and 43.79 μmol/L respectively). Sample pools 2 (8.80 μmol/L), 3 (10.43 μmol/L), 4 (13.75 μmol/L) and 6 (17.78 μmol/L) were unaltered samples. All 6 sample pools were diluted with Cal 0 (0 μmol/L) according to the following scheme:
| Dilution | Expected value |
| --- | --- |
| 1 | 0 |
{4}
| 2 | 10% of neat sample value |
| --- | --- |
| 3 | 20% of neat sample value |
| 4 | 30% of neat sample value |
| 5 | 40% of neat sample value |
| 6 | 50% of neat sample value |
| 7 | 60% of neat sample value |
| 8 | 70% of neat sample value |
| 9 | 80% of neat sample value |
| 10 | 90% of neat sample value |
| 11 | 100% |
Sample pools were tested in replicates of 2 with one lot of reagents, calibrators and Axis-Shield HCT controls (low, medium and high) on the Olympus AU400. Testing was performed over 2 days. The % recovery for all samples across the range of the assay ranged from 91 -104%.
To determine dilution linearity, an analysis was carried out in accordance with CLSI document EP6-A. 1st, 2nd and 3rd order polynomial least squares regressions analysis was performed for all 6 sample pools. Using this analysis, sample pools 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 were found to be linear.
For sample pool 1, the p-value for the non-linear co-efficient for the 2nd-order (b2) polynomial was significant (i.e. p < 0.05). The degree of non linearity was assessed by calculating the difference and % difference between the linear and non-linear model at each concentration. These values were within the acceptance criterion pre-determined by the sponsor. Therefore, the data for sample pool 1 was considered linear.
The reportable or measurable range of the proposed assay is 1.0 to 46 µmol/L.
## Recovery of samples above the upper limit of the assay:
Five EDTA plasma samples with HCT levels of approximately 70, 100, 150, 300 and 500 µmol/L were prepared by spiking with L-HCT. Neat samples were assayed in duplicate using the proposed device and the mean values were calculated. Samples containing up to 500 µmol/L HCT gave results above the upper limit of the assay (50 µmol/L). The samples were also manually diluted and assayed in duplicate on the proposed assay. The mean µmol/L value of each sample was calculated and this value was corrected by the dilution factor and compared to results obtained using a reference method. The results are summarized below:
| μmol/L verified by reference method | μmol/L when assayed neat in proposed assay | Sample dilution | μmol/L when assayed diluted in proposed assay | μmol/L when corrected for dilution | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 75.45 | 72.6 | 1:3 | 24.35 | 73.05 | 97 |
| 101.94 | 102.7 | 1:3 | 33.30 | 99.90 | 98 |
{5}
| 155.70 | 154.1 | 1:10 | 15.40 | 154.00 | 99 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 295.00 | 217.7 | 1:9 | 35.40 | 318.60 | 108 |
| 476.50 | 103.2 | 1:10 | 50.00 | 500.00 | 105 |
The sponsor included the following statement under Limitations of Use:
The linear range of the Liquid Stable (LS) 2-Part Homocysteine Reagent when run as directed is 1-46 μmol/L. Specimens > 46 μmol/L should be diluted 1 part specimen to 2 parts Cal 0 μmol/L or 1 part specimen to 9 parts Cal 0 μmol/L as appropriate.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Controls: Controls were cleared under k980907 and are sold separately.
## Calibrators
Traceability and value assignment: The calibrators are prepared gravimetrically and are traceable to NIST SRM 1955. Twenty replicates of test calibrators and 20 replicates of Reference calibrators were tested using one lot of the proposed device for value assignment. The mean must meet specifications. The assigned values were confirmed by a designated measurement procedure (HPLC) and must meet release specifications.
Stability: The stability characteristics of the calibrators were determined using real-time studies. The unopened shelf-life was determined to be 24 months and the open vial stability was 15 months at the recommended storage of 2 to 8 °C. The claimed stability of the assay for both unopened and opened shelf life when stored at 2 to 8 °C is 12 months.
Calibration Frequency: The calibration curve is valid for 30 days on the Olympus AU400.
d. Detection limit:
The Limit of Blank (LoB) and Limit of Detection (LoD) studies were conducted according to the recommendations of the CLSI document EP17-A.
## LoB
Sixty replicates of Calibrator 0 (0 μmol/L) were run for each lot of reagents and calibrators. Fresh calibrators and controls were used in each run and all runs were valid. The mean and the standard deviation (SD) were calculated for the 60 replicates for both lots. The data sets were normally distributed and the LoB was calculated as follows: LoB = Mean Cal A result + 1.645 x SD The LoB for lot 1 was 0.20 μmol/L and 0.18 μmol/L for lot 2.
## LoD
At least 60 replicates of 5 low-level HCT EDTA plasma samples (for lot 1) and 6 low-level HCT EDTA plasma samples (for lot 2) were assayed. Fresh controls were used for each run and all runs were valid. The samples for both lots did not follow a Gaussian distribution and could not be transformed to
{6}
achieve a Gaussian distribution. Therefore, per EP17-A, the following non-parametric LoD calculation was used: $\mathrm{LoD} = \mathrm{LoB} + \mathrm{Diff}$ , where $\mathrm{Diff} = \mathrm{Mean}$ target concentration - 5th percentile concentration of the replicates from the sample between the LoB and $4^{*}\mathrm{LoB}$ , and Target concentration is estimated as the median of the replicates from the sample between the LoB and $4^{*}\mathrm{LoB}$ . The LoD for lot 1 was $0.33\mu \mathrm{mol / L}$ . The LoD for lot 2 was $0.32\mu \mathrm{mol / L}$ .
The sponsor states in the package insert that the LoD is $0.33\mu \mathrm{mol} / \mathrm{L}$ . The claimed measuring range for this assay is $1 - 46\mu \mathrm{mol} / \mathrm{L}$ .
# e. Analytical specificity:
Each of the interference studies were performed using 4 EDTA plasma samples ranging from 5.9 to $47.2\mu \mathrm{mol} / \mathrm{L}$ HCT. Some of these samples were spiked with L-HCT to give samples at the higher end of the measuring range. The HCT samples containing the potential interferent (test samples) and the HCT samples not containing the interferent (control samples) were tested in replicates of 3 using the proposed assay. The following calculation was then applied to the results:
$\%$ Interference (diff) $=$ Mean Conc (test)-Mean conc (control) x 100 Mean Conc (control)
No significant interference was defined as $\%$ difference (interference) less than $\pm 10\%$ . The results of the studies are summarized below:
| Substance | Concentrations tested | No significant interference was observed at: |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Bilirubin | 20 mg/dL | 20 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 500 & 1000 mg/dL | 500 mg/dL |
| Red Blood Cell | 5% & 0.4% | 0.4 % |
| Triglyceride | 500 & 1000 mg/dL | 500 mg/dL |
| Glutathione | 1000 μmol/L | 1000 μmol/L |
| Methionine | 800 μmol/L | 800 μmol/L |
| Cysteine | 200 & 500 μmol/L | 200 μmol/L |
| Pyruvate | 375 & 1250 μmol/L | 1250 μmol/L |
Other Limitations: The sponsor included the following limitations in the package insert:
- Cystathionine is measured with homocysteine, but in the general population the cystathionine level (0.065 to $0.3\mu \mathrm{mol} / \mathrm{L}$ ) has a negligible effect. In very rare cases, end stage renal disease and patients with severe metabolic disturbances, cystathionine levels may rise dramatically and in severe cases cause greater than $20\%$ interference.
- Hydroxylamine, present in several iron reagents may carryover (reagent probe or reaction cuvette) and cause falsely low results. Routine rinsing procedures are not adequate to eliminate this problem in most cases. Possible solutions would include special washing protocols, changing to
{7}
an iron assay that used ascorbic acid as reductant or running iron and homocysteine assays on separate instruments.
- Carbamazepine, methotrexate, phenytoin, nitrous oxide, or 6-azauridine triacetate may affect the homocysteine concentration.
- Samples with raised protein levels show >10% difference compared to results obtained from normal samples and should be avoided.
The labeling contains the following black-box warning. The sponsor also included the statement under "Limitations of use":
- Note: Specimens from patients who are on drug therapy involving S-adenosyl-methionine may show falsely elevated levels of homocysteine. Patients who are taking methotrexate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, nitrous oxide, anticonvulsants, or 6-azauridine triacetate, may have elevated levels of homocysteine due to their effect on the pathway.
f. Assay cut-off:
No cut-off established/required.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
One hundred EDTA plasma samples from apparently healthy donors were collected. Twenty of the samples were spiked with L-HCT to obtain samples across the assay range (6.5 to 49.0 μmol/L for the proposed device and 6.3 to 49.3 μmol/L for the predicate assay). The samples were assayed in duplicate using the predicate assay and in one replicate using the proposed device on the Olympus AU400. The mean result of the predicate and the single replicate of the proposed device were used in all subsequent analysis. Passing-Bablok linear regression method comparison was performed on 94 EDTA plasma samples. Pearson correlation was used to determine the correlation coefficient. The results are summarized below:
| Slope of regression line | 0.991 (95% confidence interval 0.980 to 1.001) |
| --- | --- |
| Y-intercept | 0.165 (95% confidence interval 0.031 to 0.290) |
| Correlation coefficient | 1.00 (95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.00) |
| Average percent bias | 0.01% (95% confidence interval -0.10 to 0.07%). |
Six samples of the 100 samples tested were identified as outliers following the outlier testing recommended in the CLSI guideline and were removed from the final analysis. The outliers contained particulate matter and were lipemic.
The sponsor included the following statement in the package insert:
- Specimens containing particulate matter (fibrin, red blood cells or other matter) and visibly lipemic specimens should not be used with the assay. Results from these specimens may be inaccurate.
8
{8}
b. Matrix comparison:
One collection tube of each of the following types was collected from 30 volunteers: EDTA plasma, lithium heparin plasma, serum and serum separator tube (SST). Six samples were then spiked with L-HCT to obtain HCT concentrations which covered the measurable range of the proposed assay. Each sample was tested in replicates of 3 for each of the selected tube types on the Olympus AU400. The mean concentration of each sample was calculated for all collection tubes. The percent recovery for each sample was calculated by comparing the mean value of the EDTA tube type (control tube type) to the mean value for the corresponding serum, SST, and lithium heparin tube types for the same sample. The mean % recoveries across all samples for each of the collection tubes ranged from 94 - 108 %. Therefore, each of the selected collection tube types is considered suitable for use with the assay.
The sponsor included the following statement in the package insert:
- Serum (collected in serum or serum separator tubes) and plasma (collected in potassium EDTA or lithium heparin tubes) may be used for the measurement of homocysteine. However, it is not recommended to use individual patient results from serum, heparinized plasma and EDTA plasma interchangeably. Additionally matrix differences between serum and serum separator tubes and plasma tubes have been reported.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not Applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not Applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not Applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Reference ranges are based on literature references provided in the package insert. Total HCT values in plasma/serum from 5 to 15 µmol/L are considered normal. However, total HCT values in plasma/serum differ with age, gender, stress and other physical conditions. Total HCT values in plasma/serum > 15 µmol/L are considered abnormal.
The sponsor included the following statement in the package insert:
- The reference range should be determined by each laboratory to confirm the characteristics of the population being tested.
{9}
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.