K082683 · Standard Diagnostics, Inc. · NBW · Dec 8, 2009 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K082683
Device Name
SD CHECK GOLD
Applicant
Standard Diagnostics, Inc.
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Dec 8, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The SD CHECK GOLD blood glucose monitoring system is indicated for monitoring glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertip, palm, forearm or upper arm. SD CHECK GOLD meter must be used with SD CHECK GOLD blood glucose test strip and SD CHECK GOLD control solutions. The SD Check Gold control solutions Level M and Level H are for use with SD Check Gold test system as quality controls to verify the accuracy of blood glucose test results. Testing is done outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use). This system is indicated for home (over-the-counter: OTC) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. This system should not be used for the screening or diagnosis of diabetes or for testing newborns.
Device Story
System measures glucose in capillary whole blood; utilizes glucose oxidase enzyme on test strips. User applies blood to strip; meter applies voltage; calculates glucose concentration via amperometric current; displays plasma-equivalent result. Used in home or clinical settings by patients or healthcare professionals. Calibration via code chip provided with strips. Quality control performed using Level M/H solutions. Output aids monitoring of diabetes control effectiveness. System includes meter, strips, and control solutions.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided; bench testing only.
Technological Characteristics
Amperometric glucose oxidase biosensor. Measures capillary whole blood. Range 20-600 mg/dL. Hematocrit range 20-60%. Operates 10-40°C, 15-90% humidity. Calibration via code chip. Standalone meter. No connectivity specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for monitoring glucose in fresh capillary whole blood (fingertip, palm, forearm, upper arm) in persons with diabetes. For home (OTC) or clinical use. Contraindicated for diabetes screening/diagnosis and newborn testing.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
Roche Accu-Chek Advantage System (k032552)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k082683
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Whole blood glucose
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative-glucose oxidase
E. Applicant:
Standard Diagnostics
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Standard Diagnostics SD Check Gold BGMS
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1345, Glucose test system
21CFR 862.1660, Quality control material (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II
Class I, reserved
3. Product code:
NBW – System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over the Counter
{1}
CGA - Glucose Oxidase, Glucose
JJX - Quality Control Material (Assayed and Unassayed)
4. Panel:
Chemistry 75
## H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The SD CHECK GOLD blood glucose monitoring system is indicated for monitoring glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertip, palm, forearm or upper arm. SD CHECK GOLD meter must be used with SD CHECK GOLD blood glucose test strip and SD CHECK GOLD control solutions.
The SD Check Gold control solutions Level M and Level H are for use with SD Check Gold test system as quality controls to verify the accuracy of blood glucose test results.
Testing is done outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use). This system is indicated for home (over-the-counter: OTC) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
This system should not be used for the screening or diagnosis of diabetes or for testing newborns.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For over the counter use
Not for use in the screening or diagnosis of diabetes
Not for use in testing newborns
Not for use on critically ill patients, dehydrated patients, patients in shock, or hyperosmolar patients
4. Special instrument requirements:
SD Check Gold test strips must be used with the SD Check Gold blood glucose meter
{2}
3
I. Device Description:
The SD Check Gold Blood Glucose Monitoring System consists of glucose meter, blood glucose test strips and two levels of control solution, Level M (mid) and H (high).
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Roche Accu-Chek Advantage System
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k032552
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | SD Check Gold | Predicate |
| Indications for Use | As an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control, for over the counter use. | Same |
| Measurement range | 20 to 600 mg/dL | Same |
| Test principle | Amperometric | Same |
| Enzyme/assay | Glucose oxidase | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Altitude | Up to 11,351 feet | Up to 10,151 feet |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
ISO 15197: In vitro diagnostic test systems - Requirements for blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus - 2003
L. Test Principle:
Capillary whole blood is applied to the SD Check Gold test strip containing the enzyme glucose oxidase. A voltage is applied and the glucose concentration is calculated from the electrical current. The result is then shown on the meter display. The meters are calibrated to display plasma equivalent results.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
{3}
The repeatability was evaluated with one lot of test strips and ten (10) glucose meters. Venous blood samples at five glucose concentrations were measured 10 times each.
| Blood Concentration | Mean (mg/dL) | SD | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30-50 mg/dL | 44.2 | 1.1 | 2.4 |
| 51-110 mg/dL | 82.8 | 1.9 | 2.3 |
| 111-150 mg/dL | 144.9 | 3.5 | 2.4 |
| 151-250 mg/dL | 225.8 | 5.1 | 2.3 |
| 251-400 mg/dL | 337.2 | 8.3 | 2.5 |
The intermediate precision was evaluated with one lot of test strips and ten (10) glucose meters. Quality control material at three glucose concentrations was measured once a day for ten days.
| Quality Control | Mean (mg/dL) | SD | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Low ~40 mg/dL | 41 | 1.7 | 4.1 |
| Mid ~125 mg/dL | 128 | 2.8 | 2.2 |
| High 340 mg/dL | 345 | 8.8 | 2.6 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The linearity was evaluated with three glucose meters using blood samples at seven (7) glucose concentrations. The glucose samples were prepared from venous blood samples containing heparin anticoagulant at approximately $40\%$ hematocrit. The range of glucose concentrations used was 5 to $720~\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and the sponsor performed these studies using a version of the meter with the Hi and Lo glucose concentration flags disabled.
The results of meter readings vs. YSI Plasma Values were compared using linear regression analysis and are summarized in the table below:
{4}
| Meter | Slope | Intercept | R | R2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 0.982 | 0.127 | 0.9997 | 0.9994 |
| 2 | 0.978 | -0.684 | 0.9997 | 0.9995 |
| 3 | 0.979 | -1.141 | 0.9998 | 0.9996 |
Results equal to or below $20\mathrm{mg / dL}$ are reported as "Lo" and results greater than or equal to $600\mathrm{mg / dL}$ reported as "Hi." The measuring range is from 20 to $600\mathrm{mg / dL}$ .
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The test system was compared to the YSI. See the method comparison section 2 below.
Stability characteristics of the test strips were determined using real-time unopened and open-vial studies. When stored at the recommended storage temperature of $36^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ to $90^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ the unopened shelf-life is 18 months and once opened, the test strips are stable for up to 3 months.
Stability characteristics of the control solutions were determined using real-time unopened and open-vial studies. The unopened shelf-life is 24 months at the recommended storage of $46^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ to $86^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ . Once opened, the control solutions are stable for 3 months when stored at $46^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ to $86^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ .
d. Detection limit:
See linearity 1.b. above.
e. Analytical specificity:
Hematocrit:
The effect of different hematocrit levels was evaluated with one test strip lot and five glucose meters and using blood samples at five glucose concentrations (50, 160, 275, 390 and $500\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ). The glucose samples were prepared from venous blood containing heparin anticoagulant at five different hematocrit levels ranging from 15-65%. Glucose results for each concentration and hematocrit level were compared to the same samples tested on the YSI reference method. Additionally, the samples at 15, 20, 60, and $65\%$ hematocrit were compared to samples with $40\%$ hematocrit using the same SD Check Gold meter.
Samples with $20\%$ and $60\%$ hematocrit tested on the SD Check Gold meter were within $+ / 15\%$ of the same sample tested on YSI and the $40\%$ hematocrit sample. The sponsor claims an acceptable hematocrit range of 20 to $60\%$ .
{5}
6
# Endogenous compounds and drugs:
The sponsor evaluated the interference from different concentrations of the substances listed below. Three glucose levels were tested for each interferant, 70 mg/dL, 100 mg/dL and 300 mg/dL. The sponsor defined interference as when the test sample containing interferant does not recover within +/-10% of the control sample without interferant.
Studies demonstrated that all the interfering substances listed below did not significantly interfere with the glucose readings.
| Interferant tested | Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 6 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic acid (Vit. C) | 4 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin | 40 mg/dL |
| Uric acid | 9 mg/dL |
| Triglyceride (T.G) | 1026 mg/dL |
| Total Cholesterol | 506 mg/dL |
| Acetyl-salicylic acid | 120 mg/dL |
| Ibuprofen | 50 mg/dL |
| Fructose | 15 mg/dL |
| Galactose | 60 mg/dL |
| Tetracycline | 5 mg/dL |
| Tolbutamide | 4 mg/dL |
| Dopamine | 5 mg/dL |
| Methyl-dopa | 2 mg/dL |
| Creatinine | 30 mg/dL |
| Urea | 500 mg/dL |
| Tolazamide | 8.4 mg/dL |
| Warfarin | 1 mg/dL |
| Levodopa | 4 mg/dL |
| Sodium fluoride | 200 mg/dL |
| Maltotetraose | 120 mg/dL |
| Mannose | 5 mg/dL |
| Lactose | 25 mg/dL |
| Mannitol | 800 mg/dL |
| Sorbitol | 10 mg/dL |
| Xylitol | 25 mg/dL |
| Maltotriose | 240 mg/dL |
Warfarin at concentrations greater than 1 mg/dL affects the accuracy of the test and a warning appears in the labeling. Additionally, the labeling states that elevated levels ascorbic acid, uric acid, total bilirubin, triglycerides, acetaminophen, dopamine, methyl-dopa and levodopa may affect results.
{6}
7
# Altitude:
An altitude effect study was performed by testing each of six different venous samples with glucose values from 20-621 mg/dL (Hi and Lo settings disabled) at sea level and at elevated altitudes up to 11,351 feet.
At each altitude tested, results using the SD Check Gold meter were compared to results using the YSI glucose analyzer. At altitudes up to 11,351 feet, results with the SD Check Gold meter were within +/-7.5 mg/dL for results <75 mg/dL and within +/-15% for results >75 mg/dL.
Temperature and humidity studies were performed and showed that the meter can be used at temperatures from 10-40°C and at a relative humidity from 15-90%
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The system accuracy evaluation for the SD Check Gold Blood Glucose Monitoring System has been performed according to EN ISO 15197:2003.
Trained professionals obtained 90 natural samples from the fingertip of study participants. Ten samples were contrived in order to obtain samples <50 mg/dL and >400 mg/dL. Samples ranged in value from 20-600 mg/dL.
Testing was performed with 2 different meters and 1 lot of test strips over a two month period. For comparison, each sample was also tested using the YSI glucose analyzer. The results are summarized below:
For glucose concentrations ≤ 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 mg/dL | within ± 10 mg/dL | within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 73% (19/26) | 92% (24/26) | 100% (26/26) |
For glucose concentrations > 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 % | within ± 10 % | within ± 15 % | within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 39% (68/174) | 66% (115/174) | 88% (153/174) | 98% (171/174) |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable. Capillary whole blood is the only indicated sample matrix.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
{7}
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
A user study was performed to demonstrate that lay consumers could obtain accurate results using the SD Check Gold blood glucose monitoring system. The study was performed using capillary whole blood from fingertip, palm, forearm, and upper arm sample sites. A total of 171 individuals were recruited for the study. All were in "steady state." Fingertip sample results ranged in concentration from 72-488 mg/dL.
Using only the labeling intended to be provided with the marketed device and without assistance or coaching, each participant performed their own fingerstick testing on the SD Check Gold BGMS. They were then instructed to perform testing using samples obtained from alternative sites: palm, forearm, and upper arm. Laboratory professionals collected additional capillary blood from each participant for testing on both the SD Check Gold BGMS and the YSI glucose laboratory method.
Of the 171 participants, three individuals were not able to obtain a sample from the upper arm alternative site. One individual was not able to obtain a sample from forearm and upper arm.
The results of the user and alternative site studies are summarized below:
# Fingertip Sample Result vs. YSI with Fingertip sample
For glucose concentrations ≤ 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 mg/dL | within ± 10 mg/dL | within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1/3(33%) | 3/3(100%) | 3/3(100%) |
For glucose concentrations > 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 % | within ± 10 % | within ± 15 % | within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 84/168(50%) | 137/168(82%) | 160/168(95%) | 167/168(99%) |
# Palm Sample Result vs. YSI with Fingertip sample
For glucose concentrations ≤ 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 mg/dL | within ± 10 mg/dL | within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1/3(33%) | 3/3(100%) | 3/3(100%) |
For glucose concentrations > 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 % | within ± 10 % | within ± 15 % | within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 97/168(57%) | 147/168(88%) | 163/168(97%) | 168/168(100%) |
{8}
9
# Forearm Sample Result vs. YSI with Fingertip sample
For glucose concentrations ≤ 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 mg/dL | within ± 10 mg/dL | within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1/3(33%) | 3/3(100%) | 3/3(100%) |
For glucose concentrations > 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 % | within ± 10 % | within ± 15 % | within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 82/167(49%) | 131/167(78%) | 161/167(96%) | 165/167(99%) |
# Upper arm Sample Result vs. YSI with Fingertip sample
For glucose concentrations ≤ 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 mg/dL | within ± 10 mg/dL | within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3/3(100%) | 3/3(100%) | 3/3(100%) |
For glucose concentrations > 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 % | within ± 10 % | within ± 15 % | within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 74/164(45%) | 131/164(63%) | 153/164(93%) | 164/164(100%) |
## 4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
## 5. Expected values/Reference range:
The sponsor included the following expected values for non-diabetic normal glucose levels in their strip labeling:
| Time | Range, mg/dL |
| --- | --- |
| Fasting and Before Meals * | 74 – 106 |
| 2 hours after Meals ** | Less than 140 |
* Stedman, TL, Stedman’s Medical Dictionary, 27th Edition, 1999.
**American Diabetes Association, Clinical Practice Recommendation Guidelines 2003, Diabetes Care, Volume 26, Supplement1, p.22
## N. Instrument Name:
SD Check Gold Blood Glucose Meter
{9}
10
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Each test strip is single use and must be replaced with a new strip for each additional reading.
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
This device is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger, palm, forearm, or upper arm only. Since the whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip there are no special handling or storage issues.
5. Calibration:
A calibration code chip is provided with each vial of test strips.
6. Quality Control:
The sponsor is providing a one level of glucose control solution (Level M) with the starter kit for the device. A two level control set (Level M and Level H) is available for purchase, as stated in the labeling. When a test strip is inserted into the meter, a control can be run. An acceptable range for each control level is printed on the test strip vial label. The user is referred to the user manual and customer support for problems.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
The sponsor performed a readability assessment of the labeling and states that the user manual, strip insert, and control insert are written at 8th grade level or below.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
{10}
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
11
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.