K082329 · Viramed Biotech AG · LSR · Aug 5, 2009 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K082329
Device Name
VIRAMED BIOTECH AG BORRELIA B31 IGM VIRASTRIPE
Applicant
Viramed Biotech AG
Product Code
LSR · Microbiology
Decision Date
Aug 5, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3830
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® is an in vitro qualitative assay for the detection of IgM antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi in human serum. It is intended for use in the testing of human serum samples which have been found positive or equivocal using an ElA or IFA test procedure for B. burgdorferi antibodies. Positive results from this line blot assay are supportive evidence of infection with B. burgdorferi, the causative agent for Lyme disease. The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® can be used during the acute phase (0-4 weeks of symptoms onset) of B. burgdorferi infection. Patients who are positive by IgM but not IgG should have the test repeated a few weeks later if they remain ill. If they are still positive only by IgM and have been ill longer than one month, this is likely a false positive.
Device Story
Line blot assay for qualitative detection of IgM antibodies to B. burgdorferi antigens; utilizes nitrocellulose membrane with purified B. burgdorferi B31 antigens. Patient serum incubated with strip; specific antibodies bind to antigens; alkaline-phosphatase anti-human IgM conjugate added; substrate causes precipitation/color change at specific band locations. Visualized bands compared to Cut-off control band intensity. Used in clinical laboratories; interpreted by technicians. Positive results support Lyme disease diagnosis; negative results do not rule out infection. Aids clinical decision-making during acute phase (0-4 weeks).
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided in the document. The document focuses on the regulatory determination of substantial equivalence for an in vitro diagnostic assay.
Technological Characteristics
Line blot assay; B. burgdorferi B31 antigens purified via electrophoretic/chromatographic methods; antigens fixed to nitrocellulose membrane. Manual visual interpretation using a uniform band locator and Cut-off control band. Integrated control system (function and conjugate controls). Complies with CLSI EP5-A2 and M34-A guidelines.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of IgM antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi in human serum. Intended for patients with positive or equivocal EIA/IFA screening results for B. burgdorferi. Used during acute phase (0-4 weeks post-symptom onset) of Lyme disease. Contraindicated for diagnosis of patients ill longer than one month who remain IgM positive only (likely false positive).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Treponema pallidum treponemal test reagents are devices that consist of the antigens, antisera and all control reagents (standardized reagents with which test results are compared) which are derived from treponemal sources and that are used in the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (FTA-ABS), the Treponema pallidum immobilization test (T.P.I.), and other treponemal tests used to identify antibodies to Treponema pallidum directly from infecting treponemal organisms in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of syphilis caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Treponema and provides epidemiological information on syphilis.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
K082329
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain a Substantial Equivalence determination for a new device
C. Measurand:
IgM antibodies to *Borrelia burgdorferi* (B. burgdorferi)
D. Type of Test:
Line blot assay
E. Applicant:
Viramed Biotech AG
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
*Borrelia* B31 IgM *ViraStripe®*
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866. 3830, Treponema pallidum treponemal test reagents
2. Classification:
Class: II
3. Product code:
LSR; Reagent, Borrelia Serological Reagent
4. Panel:
83- Microbiology
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® is an in vitro qualitative assay for the detection of IgM antibodies against *Borrelia burgdorferi* in human serum. It is intended for use in the testing of human serum samples which have been found positive or equivocal using an EIA or IFA test procedure for *B. burgdorferi* antibodies.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® is an in vitro qualitative assay for the detection of IgM antibodies against *Borrelia burgdorferi* in human serum. It is intended for use in the testing of human serum samples which have been found positive or equivocal using an EIA or IFA test procedure for *B. burgdorferi* antibodies. Positive results from this line blot assay are supportive evidence of infection with *B. burgdorferi*, the causative agent for Lyme disease. The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® can be used during the acute phase (0-4 weeks of symptoms onset) of *B. burgdorferi* infection. Patients who are positive by IgM but not IgG should have the test repeated a few weeks later if they remain ill. If they are still positive only by IgM and have been ill longer than one month, this is likely a false positive.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
None
I. Device Description:
The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® is a line blot assay to detect IgM to individual *B. burgdorferi* antigens. Isolated cultures of *B. burgdorferi* B31 spirochetes were harvested, concentrated, washed, and extracted to produce antigen fractions. Antigens were purified by electrophoretic and chromatographic methodologies and line striped on a nitrocellulose membrane. *B. burgdorferi* antigens are bound and fixed to the solid phase nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane is blocked, dried and cut into individual test strips.
For each test to be performed, the line blot strip and diluted test serum is added to a line blot strip well. If specific antibodies that recognize an antigen are present, they will bind to the specific antigens on the strip. After incubation the line blot
{2}
strip is washed to remove unbound antibodies. Alkaline-phosphatase anti-human IgM conjugate is then added to each strip and incubated. If antibody is present, the conjugate will bind to the antibody attached to the specific antigens. The strip is washed to remove unbound conjugate and the substrate solution is added. If the enzyme/antibody complex is present, the substrate will undergo a precipitation and color change. After an incubation period, the reaction is stopped and the presence of precipitated substrate is visualized at specific locations on the strip. The presence of a colored precipitation at various locations on the line blot strip is an indirect measurement of Borrelia burgdorferi specific antibodies in the patient specimen. A uniform band locator is given on the evaluation protocol and used to locate and identify specific Borrelia burgdorferi B31 antibodies on the line blot test strip. Every strip has an integrated control system including function control and conjugate control. Visualized bands from the reaction are compared for intensity with a separate strip containing the Cut-off control band for evaluation. Any band found having a visual intensity equal to or greater than the Cut-off control band intensity is considered as a significant band.
Positivity: The criteria for a positive Western blot result defined by the CDC are followed. For B. burgdorferi IgM positivity, the blot should be positive for at least 2 of the 3 protein bands: p41, p39, p23kDa
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgM ViraBlot
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K051169
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | The Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® is an in vitro qualitative assay for the detection of IgM antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi in human serum. It is intended for use in the testing of human serum samples which have been | The Viramed Biotech Borrelia B31 IgM ViraBlot® is an in vitro qualitative assay for the detection of IgM antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in human serum. It is intended for use in testing human serum samples which have been found positive or |
{3}
4
| | found positive or equivocal using an EIA or IFA test procedure for B. burgdorferi antibodies. | equivocal using an EIA or IFA test procedure for B. burgdorferi antibodies. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Assay | Line blot | Line blot |
| Specimen Type | Serum | Serum |
| Differences | | |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Procedure | Qualitative; B. burgdorferi IgM antibodies to specific protein bands for the elution, purification and concentration of the membrane proteins | Qualitative; B. burgdorferi IgM antibodies to specific protein bands. |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline—Second Edition and CLSI M34-A, Western Blot Assay for Antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi, Approved Guidance
L. Test Principle:
Line blot
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Eight serum samples (low negative, high negative, low positive and moderate positive) were tested in duplicate over 5 working days (twice) by separate technicians at three laboratory sites using the same kit lot number. The serum panel specimens were selected to represent negative to high-positive immune-reactivity levels. For this study, two different readers within the three different laboratories assessed the band identification for each sample on the same blot. Six qualified technicians at the three sites assessed the Western blot bands from the same master lot kit number of Western blot kit. All samples were correctly interpreted by the 3 laboratories and 6 readers with 100% concordance for IgM.
{4}
| Study Summary | Day 1-5 | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample ID | Tech 1 | | Tech 2 | | All Technicians |
| | Rep 1 | Rep 2 | Rep 1 | Rep 2 | Agreement |
| Low negative | - | - | - | - | 100% |
| High negative (1) | 39 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 100% |
| High negative (2) | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 100% |
| Low Positive (1) | 41,23 | 41,23 | 41,23 | 41,23 | 100% |
| Low Positive (2) | 41,39,23 | 41,39,23 | 41,39,23 | 41,39,23 | 100% |
| Low Positive (3) | 39,23 | 39,23 | 39,23 | 39,23 | 100% |
| Moderate Positive (1) | 41,23 | 41,23 | 41,23 | 41,23 | 100% |
| Moderate Positive (2) | 41,23 | 41,23 | 41,23 | 41,23 | 100% |
The Reproducibility study was satisfactory for this type of assay.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Not applicable
d. Detection limit:
Not applicable
e. Analytical specificity:
# Cross-Reactivity
Seventy-five sera determined to contain antibodies to other infectious disease agents were tested. Cross-reactivity data for Ehrlichia chafeensis and Babesia microti may represent an actual co-infection with $B$ burgdorferi. All three tick borne organisms have been found to reside in the geographic location from which these 15 clinical specimens were obtained. Both of the specimens found positive in the Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® were also found to be positive in a commercially available Lyme Western blot test system. Potential cross-reactivity due to circulating antibodies from infections with Treponema phagedenis, Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenza, Yersinia enterocolitica, Campylobacter jejuni, Listeria
{5}
monocytogenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coli, Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium, Shigella flexneri, and Legionella micdadei have not been challenged, therefore the performance of this device is unknown if the specimen contains any of these circulating antibodies. See the Limitations section of the package insert for a list of untested, potentially cross-reactive organisms.
| Disease State Sera | Number | Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® Positive | Percent cross-reactivity |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ehrlichia chaffeensis | 7 | 0 | 0% |
| Babesia microti | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| Borrelia hermsii | 6 | 2 | 33% |
| Leptospira interrogans | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| Helicobacter pylori | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| Epstein Barr Virus | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| ENA Autoimmune | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| Treponema pallidum | 15 | 0 | 0% |
## INTERFERING SUBSTANCES
The following substances had an effect on test results when present in sera: hemolyzed, lipemic, or icteric sera and should not be used for testing. Because the firm did not test any sera from patients with immune-deficient diseases, elevated bilirubin, triglycerides, and heat-inactivated sera, the following statements will be added to the package insert: "The performance of this assay when testing sera from patients with any immune-deficient diseases such as HIV, HTLV, etc. and sera from patients that have had immune-suppressive therapy with drugs or medications is not known because no studies were conducted to assess the performance. Do not use heat-inactivated sera. Sera with elevated bilirubin, and triglycerides were not tested.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Correlations to the CDC Lyme Disease Panel
{6}
A Lyme Disease Clinical panel containing 44 clinically defined positives and negative samples was obtained from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado.
| | | Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Time after Onset | Total | Positive | Negative | % Agreement |
| Normals | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| Clinically Undefined | 3 | 1 | 2 | 100% |
| Early Localized | 27 | 13 | 14 | 85% |
| Disseminated Disease | 9 | 1 | 8 | 89% |
| Total | 44 | 15 | 29 | 89% |
# College of American Pathologists 2003 Tick-borne Disease Proficiency Panel
The CAP Tick-borne Proficiency samples for the year 2003 were tested.
Samples tested: Positive 2 Negative 13
Correlation to Published CAP results proficiency $= 93\%$ (14/15)
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Sensitivity:
A total of 436 samples were prospectively collected and found to be EIA positive were sent to laboratories in California, Wisconsin, and Minnesota for Lyme disease testing. Samples were tested with the Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® and the predicate. Results are presented in the tables below.
Subjects Sent to the Laboratory for Lyme Disease Testing
| Predicate | Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® | | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Negative | |
| Positive | 55 | 7 | 62 |
| Negative | 4 | 370 | 374 |
| Total | 59 | 377 | 436 |
| Percent Agreement | | Exact 95% Confidence Intervals |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Positive | 88.7% (55/62) | (78.1% – 95.3%) |
| Negative | 98.9% (370/374) | (97.3% - 99.7%) |
| Overall | 97.5% (425/436) | (95.5% - 98.7%) |
{7}
One hundred and eighty five sera were obtained from patients that were clinically defined (culture confirmed) with Lyme borreliosis. Of these 185 sera, 158 were paired (79 acute and 79 convalescent) sera from patients diagnosed with Erythema migrans (EM), 11 with early-disseminated Lyme Disease/Carditis/Acute Neuroborreliosis and 16 with late stage Lyme arthritis. These samples were tested with the Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® and the predicated. Results are presented in the tables below.
## Clinically-defined Lyme disease samples
| Stage | Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Total | Positive | Negative | Sensitivity (95% Confidence Intervals) |
| Acute EM
1-21 days from Onset | 79 | 30 | 49 | 38% (27.3% – 49.6%) |
| Convalescent EM
4 weeks after Onset | 79 | 53 | 26 | 67% (55.6% – 77.3%) |
| Early Neurologic | 11 | 9 | 2 | 82% (48.2% – 97.7%) |
| Late Arthritis | 16 | 6 | 10 | 38% (15.2% – 64.6%) |
| Total | 185 | 98 | 87 | |
| Borrelia B31 ViraBlot® IgM | Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 91 | 15 | 106 |
| Negative | 7 | 72 | 79 |
| Total | 98 | 87 | 185 |
| | Percent Agreement | 95% Confidence Intervals |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Positive | 92.8% (91/98) | 85.8% - 97.1% |
| Negative | 82.7% (72/87) | 73.2% - 90.0% |
| Overall | 88.1% (163/185) | 83.4% - 92.8% |
## b. Clinical specificity:
For determination of analytical specificity, two hundred of the sera from normal blood donor individuals representing endemic and non-endemic geographic regions of the United States were tested for IgM Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies by the Viramed Biotech AG Borrelia B31 IgM ViraStripe® - see table below:
## Analytical Specificity
| | N | Negative | Positive | % Positive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Endemic | 100 | 98 | 2 | 2% |
| Non-endemic | 100 | 99 | 1 | 1% |
{8}
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
9
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.