EASYPLUS MINI R2N SELF MONITORING GLUCOSE TEST SYSTEM
K081796 · Eps Bio Technology Corp. · NBW · Jan 23, 2009 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K081796
Device Name
EASYPLUS MINI R2N SELF MONITORING GLUCOSE TEST SYSTEM
Applicant
Eps Bio Technology Corp.
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jan 23, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The EasyPlus mini R2N Self Monitoring Blood Glucose Test System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips or forearm. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). It is indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The EasyPlus mini R2N Meter is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips or forearm. EasyPlus mini R2N Blood Glucose Test Strips must be used with the EasyPlus mini R2N Meter. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). It is indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The EasyPlus mini R2N Blood Glucose Test Strips are intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips or forearm. EasyPlus mini R2N Blood Glucose Test Strips must be used with the EasyPlus mini R2N Blood Glucose Meter. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). They are indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The EasyPlus mini R2N Glucose Normal/High Control Solution are for use with the EasyPlus mini R2N meter and EasyPlus mini R2N Blood Glucose Test Strips as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood glucose test results.
Device Story
System measures glucose in capillary whole blood via electrochemical biosensor. User applies blood to disposable test strip; glucose oxidase catalyzes oxidation of glucose; mediator transfers electrons to carbon electrode, generating current proportional to glucose concentration. Meter processes current to display result in 5 seconds. Used at home by patients or in clinics by professionals. Output aids diabetes management. System includes meter, test strips, auto-lancet, check strip, and control solutions. Benefits include rapid, quantitative monitoring of blood glucose levels.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision/reproducibility studies (N=200-400) showed CVs ranging from 2.10% to 4.44%. Linearity confirmed (R2=0.9950). Method comparison (N=165) against YSI 2300 analyzer met ISO 15197 accuracy requirements: 95% of results within ±15 mg/dL (for <75 mg/dL) or ±20% (for ≥75 mg/dL). Hematocrit interference tested (20-60% range).
Technological Characteristics
Amperometric glucose oxidase assay; carbon electrodes; potassium ferricyanide mediator. Dimensions: 3.5" x 2.1" x 0.97". Power: 3V (2x CR2032 batteries). No-code calibration. Standalone device; no wireless/data transmission. Standards: CLSI EP5-A, EP6-A, EP7-A; ISO 15197:2003; ISO 14971:2000; EN 13640:2002.
Indications for Use
Indicated for persons with diabetes (home/OTC) or clinical settings to monitor diabetes control effectiveness. Not for critically ill, dehydrated, hyperosmolar, or neonatal patients. Alternative site testing only during steady state.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
EasyPlus Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose System (k061992)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k081796
B. Purpose for Submission:
Clearance of a new device
C. Measurand:
Whole blood glucose
D. Type of Test:
Whole blood glucose concentration through a quantitative amperometric assay (Glucose Oxidase)
E. Applicant:
EPS Bio Technology Corp.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
EasyPlus mini R2N Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test System
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 862.1345, Glucose Test System
21 CFR § 862.1660, Quality control material (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II
Class I (reserved)
3. Product code:
NBW, CGA
JJX
4. Panel:
75 (Clinical Chemistry)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The EasyPlus mini R2N Self Monitoring Blood Glucose Test System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from
{1}
the fingertips or forearm. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). It is indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
The EasyPlus mini R2N Meter is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips or forearm. EasyPlus mini R2N Blood Glucose Test Strips must be used with the EasyPlus mini R2N Meter. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use).
It is indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
The EasyPlus mini R2N Blood Glucose Test Strips are intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips or forearm. EasyPlus mini R2N Blood Glucose Test Strips must be used with the EasyPlus mini R2N Blood Glucose Meter. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). They are indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
The EasyPlus mini R2N Glucose Normal/High Control Solution are for use with the EasyPlus mini R2N meter and EasyPlus mini R2N Blood Glucose Test Strips as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood glucose test results.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
- Not for use on critically ill patients, dehydrated patients or hyperosmolar patients
- Not for neonatal use
- Not for screening or diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
- Alternative site testing is for use at times of steady state only
4. Special instrument requirements:
EasyPlus mini R2N Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test System
I. Device Description:
The EasyPlus mini R2N Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose System consists of the EasyPlus mini R2N Blood Glucose Meter, EasyPlus mini R2N Glucose Test Strips, Auto-Lancet Device, Check Strip and Control Solution. The control solutions available are used to test the performance of the device.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
EPS Bio Technology Corp., EasyPlus Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose System
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k061992
{2}
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Detection method | Amperometry | Amperometry |
| Enzyme | Glucose oxidase (Aspergillus niger) | Glucose oxidase (Aspergillus niger) |
| Mediator | Potassium ferricyanide | Potassium ferricyanide |
| Electrode | Carbon electrode | Carbon electrode |
| Test time | 5 seconds | 5 seconds |
| Temperature range | 10-40°C | 10-40°C |
| Humidity range | R.H. ≤ 90% | R.H. ≤ 90% |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Sample volume | ≥ 0.6 uL | ≥ 2.0 uL |
| Test range | 20-600 mg/dL | 30-550 mg/dL |
| Coding | One Code | Code card |
| Hematocrit range | 20-60% | 30-55% |
| Memory capability | 480 tests with date and time | 100 tests with date and time |
| Power | 3V 2X CR2032 batteries | 1.5V (AAA) batteries |
| Battery life | Approx. 2000 tests | Approx. 1000 tests |
| Size L x W x H (inch) | 3.5”x 2.1”x 0.97” | 3.2”x 2”x 0.7” |
| Weight | 2.05 oz (without batteries) | 1.6 oz (without batteries) |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- CLSI EP5-A, Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices
- CLSI EP6-A, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Analytical Methods; Proposed Guideline
- CLSI EP7-A, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Proposed Guideline
- ISO 15197:2003, In Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems – Requirements for Blood Glucose Monitoring Test Systems for Self Managing Diabetes Mellitus
- ISO 14971:2000, Medical Devices – Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices
- EN 13640:2002 Stability Testing of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents
L. Test Principle:
Glucose measurement is based on electrical potential caused by the reaction of glucose with the reagents contained on the strip's electrodes. The glucose in the sample is oxidized by the enzyme glucose oxidase, and the current resulting from this enzymatic reaction is measured and converted to glucose concentration by the meter. The magnitude of the current is proportional to the concentration of glucose in the sample.
{3}
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Within-Run
The testing was conducted using venous blood, collected in a heparin blood collection tube. Glucose was added to the blood to prepare 6 different levels of glucose for the testing. The glucose concentration ranges were: 20-50 mg/dL, 51-110 mg/dL, 111-150 mg/dL, 151-250 mg/dL, 251-400 mg/dL, and 401~600 mg/dL. For each testing range, 10 Meters, 10 test strips for each meter, and 2 lots of test strips were used. (N=10 Meter x10 tests x 2 lots =200)
| Range (mg/dL) | N | Lot: 021074801 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| 20~50 | 100 | 53.8 | 1.57 | 2.92% |
| 51~110 | 100 | 76.0 | 1.98 | 2.61% |
| 111~150 | 100 | 126.8 | 3.28 | 2.59% |
| 151~250 | 100 | 214.6 | 7.05 | 3.29% |
| 251~400 | 100 | 363.0 | 8.17 | 2.25% |
| 401~600 | 100 | 561.6 | 12.39 | 2.21% |
| Normal control solution | 100 | 111.6 | 3.92 | 3.51% |
| Range (mg/dL) | N | Lot: 021075201 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| 20~50 | 100 | 55.9 | 2.48 | 4.44% |
| 51~110 | 100 | 77.5 | 2.80 | 3.62% |
| 111~150 | 100 | 132.3 | 3.27 | 2.47% |
| 151~250 | 100 | 221.2 | 5.92 | 2.67% |
| 251~400 | 100 | 368.9 | 7.74 | 2.10% |
| 401~600 | 100 | 563.4 | 13.96 | 2.48% |
| Normal control | 100 | 119.7 | 4.38 | 3.66% |
{4}
5
| solution | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
# Day-to-Day Precision
10 Meters, 2 lots of test strip, and 3 control solutions of Low, Normal and High were prepared. Each control was tested twice a day, once in the morning and once in the afternoon for 10 days. (N=10 Meter x 2 Lots x 2 tests x10 days =400)
| Control solution | N | mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Low | 40
0 | 47.1 | 1.67 | 3.54% |
| Normal | 40
0 | 122.2 | 4.62 | 3.78% |
| High | 40
0 | 398.5 | 10.57 | 2.65% |
## b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Testing was performed using whole blood supplemented with $\beta$-D-glucose to provide 630 samples at blood glucose levels between 14 and $613\,\mathrm{mg/dL}$. The range of samples tested on the meter that gave a numeric result was between 22 and $600\,\mathrm{mg/dL}$.
The linear regression was as follows:
| N= | 630 |
| --- | --- |
| Slope | 1.0263 |
| Y-intercept | -1.6952 |
| R² | 0.9949 |
The sponsor claims $20\,\mathrm{mg/dL}$ as the lowest detectable limit.
## c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The sponsor claims that the device is traceable to a laboratory analyzer which is calibrated to a glucose standard (NIST SRM 965a).
The two control solutions (normal and high levels) consist of buffered aqueous solutions of $\beta$-D-glucose and non-reactive ingredients. Lot-specific ranges are printed on the test strip bottle label.
Closed Vial Stability of Control Solution: Three lots of each glucose level of control solution were tested using an accelerated stability study. The results showed that during the simulated time frame of 19 months at room temperature, the controls were within the specified ranges (96 mg/dL – 144 mg/dL for normal level and 240 mg/dL – 420 mg/dL for high level).
{5}
Opened Vial Stability of Control Solution: The measured glucose levels of 2 lots of each level of control solution were tested during the use lifetime period (90 days) and were found to be within the specified ranges (96 mg/dL – 144 mg/dL for normal level and 240 mg/dL – 420 mg/dL for high level), and the average bias with respect to the mean value throughout the lifetime is less than ≤20% and a CV of 6%.
d. Detection limit:
The measuring range of the system is 20 - 600 mg/dL. This range was verified by the linearity study (above section M.1.b.).
e. Analytical specificity:
Spiked whole blood samples containing three levels of glucose (50, 250, and 500 mg/dL), with and without interfering substances, were prepared to test common endogenous and exogenous substances for interference. Levels tested for each interferant (in mg/dL) are summarized below:
| Interferent (mg/dL) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 2 | 8 | 15 |
| Ascorbic acid | 2.5 | 3.0 | |
| Dopamine | 2 | 13 | |
| Gentisic acid | 6 | 8 | |
| Ibuprofen | 4.2 | 40 | |
| L-Dopa | 2 | 10 | |
| Methyldopa | 1 | 2 | 2.5 |
| Sodium Salicylate | 30 | 40 | 50 |
| Tetracycline | 0.4 | | |
| Tolbutamide | 10 | 64 | 100 |
| Bilirubin – unconjugated | 1.2 | | |
| Cholesterol | 500 | | |
| Creatinine | 1.5 | 30 | |
| Triglycerides | 190 | 3000 | |
| Uric acid | 10 | 13 | 14 |
| Galactose | 10 | 20 | |
| Maltose | 5 | 10 | |
| Xylose | 10 | 20 | |
Interference testing showed that the system results in less than ±10% bias in the presence of high concentrations of interferants even beyond clinically significant ranges.
Positive errors greater than 10% were found in the presence of the following and are presented in the labeling under limitations for healthcare professionals:
- Acetaminophen (15 mg/dL at glucose levels ≤250 mg/dL)
- Ascorbic acid (3 mg/dL at glucose levels of 50 mg/dL)
- Dopamine (13 mg/dL at glucose levels ≥50 mg/dL)
{6}
- Gentisic acid (8 mg/dL at glucose levels of 50 mg/dL)
- L-Dopa (10 mg/dL at glucose levels ≥50 mg/dL)
- Methlydopa (1 mg/dL at glucose levels of 50 mg/dL and 2.5 mg/dL at glucose levels of 50 mg/dL)
- Triglycerides (3000 mg/dL at glucose levels of 250 mg/dL)
- Uric acid (14 mg/dL at glucose levels of 50 and 500 mg/dL)
An altitude study was performed with 9 blood samples ranging from 29 to 595 mg/dL and spiked whole blood samples of 60 and 310 mg/dL. Testing was performed at altitudes of 160 feet and 10,360 feet. The test data using capillary blood samples showed that the bias versus YSI at 10,360 feet is the same bias versus YSI as that observed at 160 feet. These data indicate no additional effect due to altitude up to the claimed altitude of 10,000 feet.
Hematocrit interference was evaluated by adjusting the glucose concentrations and hematocrit levels of venous blood samples from several donors. The venous blood samples were spiked to 4 glucose concentrations (50, 120, 260, and 500 mg/dL). The hematocrit levels were adjusted to 0%, 20%, 40%, 50%, 60% and 70%. Each sample was assayed n=10 for each of two strip lots and the maximum percent bias was calculated compared to the 40% hematocrit samples. The sponsor demonstrated that the bias did not exceed ±15 mg/dL when glucose concentration is ≤75 mg/dL and bias did not exceed ±15% when glucose concentration is >75 mg/dL for hematocrit concentrations within the claimed range of 20% to 60%.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not Applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
To demonstrate the accuracy performance of the EasyPlus mini R2N Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test System a total of 156 diabetes patients performed a finger stick and collected blood from the forearm using the EasyPlus mini R2N system at 3 sites. A healthcare professional then performed the test on the EasyPlus mini R2N and the YSI 2300 analyzer. The range of tested values for these samples was 74.2-486 mg/dL. In order to fully cover the measuring range, 9 of the samples were spiked with glucose or allowed to glycolyze. The total 165 (156+9) samples ranged in concentration from 32 to 591 mg/dL. Each sampling site met the ISO 15197 requirement of ninety-five percent (95%) of the individual glucose results falling within ±15 mg/dL of the results of the manufacturer's measurement procedure at glucose concentrations for samples <75 mg/dL and within ±20% at glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL. Results are summarized below:
| Linear Regression | Y=1.0263x – 1.6952 |
| --- | --- |
| R² | 0.9949 |
{7}
| Lay User | Fingerstick vs. YSI | Forearm vs. Fingerstick |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Total | 150/156 (96%) | 148/156 (95%) |
| Professional | Fingerstick vs. YSI | Forearm vs. Fingerstick |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Total | 160/165 (97%) | 150/156 (96%) |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable. Capillary whole blood is the only indicated matrix.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not Applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not Applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
The sponsor provided a readability study that indicated that the user manual, test strip labeling, and control solution labeling is at an 8th grade reading level or below.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The sponsor included the following expected values for normal glucose levels in their strip labeling:
70-110 mg/dL
Two-hours after meals: less than 120 mg/dL
American Diabetes Associations: Standards of Medical Care for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Care, 25(2002), p.S37.
N. Instrument Name:
EasyPlus mini R2N Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test System
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Each test strip is single use and must be replaced with a new strip for additional readings.
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?
{8}
Yes ______ or No ☐ X
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
Yes ______ or No ☐ X
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X or No ☐
9
{9}
10
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
This device is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger, palm, and forearm. Since the whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip there are no special handling or storage issues.
5. Calibration:
This meter is a no code meter. A single calibration code has been selected to be the code for all test strips for the meter which removes the need to manually code the meter.
6. Quality Control:
The sponsor has two levels of controls available for this meter with both levels coming with the kit and also being available through the distributor. When a test strip is inserted into the meter, a control can be run. An acceptable range for each control level is printed on the test strip vial label. The user is referred to a troubleshooting section at the end of the control test instructions of the owner's manual to identify possible reasons control results fall outside these ranges.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
None.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.