LIAISON HSV-1 TYPE SPECIFIC IGG ASSAY, CONTROL HSV-1 IGG
K081685 · DiaSorin, Inc. · MXJ · Nov 18, 2008 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K081685
Device Name
LIAISON HSV-1 TYPE SPECIFIC IGG ASSAY, CONTROL HSV-1 IGG
Applicant
DiaSorin, Inc.
Product Code
MXJ · Microbiology
Decision Date
Nov 18, 2008
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3305
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K081685 · Nov 18, 2008
LIAISON HSV-1 TYPE SPECIFIC IGG ASSAY, CONTROL HSV-1 IGG
DiaSorin, Inc.
Retrospective clinical serum samples from patients seen at clinics
Retrospective clinical samples were used to compare the performance of the LIAISON HSV-1 assay against an FDA-cleared predicate device to establish clinical sensitivity and specificity.
Retrospective clinical samples; Clinical performance; Sensitivity and specificity
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Comparative Clinical Trials; Retrospective comparative study
Sexually active adults, expectant mothers, and low prevalence patients; Sample Size: 951; Number of Sites: 2
FDA cleared Immunoblot
Sensitivity and specificity
Indications for Use
The LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG assay is a chemiluminescent immunoassay to be used with the LIAISON® Analyzer for the qualitative determination of type specific lgG antibodies to Herpes simplex virus Type 1 (HSV-1) in human serum. The assay is indicated for testing sexually active adults or expectant mothers to aid in the presumptive diagnosis of HSV-1 infection. The LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG assay has not been established for use in the pediatrics population, for neonatal screening, or for testing immunocompromised patients. The assay is neither FDA cleared nor approved for testing blood or plasma donors. The LIAISON® Control HSV-1 (negative and positive) are intended for use as assayed quality control samples to monitor the performance of the LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IqG assay.
Device Story
Indirect chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) for qualitative detection of HSV-1 specific IgG antibodies in human serum. Uses magnetic particles coated with recombinant HSV-1 gG1 antigen and mouse monoclonal antibody linked to isoluminol derivative. Process: patient sample incubated with solid phase; antibody conjugate added; unbound material washed away; starter reagents added to induce flash chemiluminescence. Photomultiplier measures relative light units (RLU) proportional to HSV-1 IgG concentration. Performed on LIAISON® Analyzer in clinical laboratory settings by trained technicians. Output aids clinicians in presumptive diagnosis of HSV-1 infection.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study of 951 samples (401 sexually active adults, 430 expectant mothers, 120 low prevalence) compared to FDA-cleared immunoblot. Sexually active adults: 96.9% sensitivity, 91.3% specificity. Expectant mothers: 98.7% sensitivity, 93.7% specificity. Low prevalence: 96.8% sensitivity, 100% specificity. CDC panel testing showed 100% positive agreement and 93.7% negative agreement.
Technological Characteristics
Indirect chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). Solid phase: magnetic particles coated with recombinant HSV-1 gG1 antigen. Conjugate: mouse monoclonal antibody linked to isoluminol derivative. Energy source: flash chemiluminescence reaction measured by photomultiplier. System: LIAISON® Analyzer. Software: automated signal processing and RLU quantification.
Indications for Use
Indicated for sexually active adults or expectant mothers to aid in the presumptive diagnosis of HSV-1 infection. Not for pediatric, neonatal, immunocompromised, or immunosuppressed populations; not for blood/plasma donor screening.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Herpes simplex virus serological assays are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in various serological tests to identify antibodies to herpes simplex virus in serum. Additionally, some of the assays consist of herpes simplex virus antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye (immunofluorescent assays) used to identify herpes simplex virus directly from clinical specimens or tissue culture isolates derived from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by herpes simplex viruses and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Herpes simplex viral infections range from common and mild lesions of the skin and mucous membranes to a severe form of encephalitis (inflammation of the brain). Neonatal herpes virus infections range from a mild infection to a severe generalized disease with a fatal outcome.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II (special controls). The special control for the device is FDA's revised guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 and 2 Serological Assays.” For availability of the guidance revised document, see § 866.1(e).
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number: K081685
B. Purpose for Submission: Initial Premarket Notification
C. Measurand: Anti-HSV1 IgG Antibodies
D. Type of Test: Qualitative, Chemiluminescent Immunoassay (CLIA)
E. Applicant: Diasorin, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names: LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MXJ & JJX : Herpes Simplex Virus (IgG Antibody) | Class II | 21CFR 866.3305 | Microbiology (83) |
## H. Intended Use:
The LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG assay is a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) technology to be used with the LIAISON® Analyzer for the qualitative determination of type specific IgG antibodies to Herpes simplex virus Type 1 (HSV-1) in human serum. The assay is indicated for testing sexually active adults or expectant mothers to aid in the presumptive diagnosis of HSV-1 infection.
The LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG assay has not been established for use in the pediatrics population, for neonatal screening, or for testing immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients. The assay is neither FDA cleared nor approved for testing blood or plasma donors.
Caution: U.S. Federal Law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician.
3) Special conditions for use statement(s): For Prescription use only
4) Special instrument requirements: LIAISON® Analyzer with Chemiluminescence reader
I. Device Description: The LIAISON® HSV-1 type specific IgG assay is an in vitro diagnostic device consisting of reagents provided within a plastic container/kit called the
{1}
Reagent Integral. The reagent integral kit contains magnetic particles, calibrators, specimen diluent, and conjugate for 100 tests. Controls are required to run the assay and sold separately. The LIAISON® HSV-1 IgG immunoassay is performed on the LIAISON® Analyzer (Model 15970) that was cleared on Feb. 8, 2006 (K052499). The magnetic particles are beads coated with HSV-1 IgG recombinant antigen. During first incubation, the magnetic particles are incubated with serum to capture IgG antibodies to HSV-1. During the second incubation, HSV-1 IgG and antigen complex bound to the magnetic particles are mixed with the detector antibody conjugate. The detector antibody conjugate is mouse monoclonal to human IgG conjugated to an isoluminol derivative. The unbound material is removed with a wash cycle after each incubation. Subsequently, a flash chemiluminescence reaction is induced by adding the starter reagents. The light signal, and hence the amount of isoluminol-antibody conjugate, is measured by a photomultiplier as relative light units (RLU).
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
a) Predicate device name (s):
The HerpeSelect® 1 and 2 immunoblot
b) Predicate Numbers (s):
K000238
Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | LIAISON® HSV-1 Specific IgG Assay | FOCUS Diagnostic HSV 1 and 2 Immunoblot IgG |
| Intended Use | The LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG assay is a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) technology to be used with the LIAISON® Analyzer for the qualitative determination of type specific IgG antibodies to Herpes simplex virus Type 1 (HSV-1) in human serum. The assay is indicated for testing sexually active adults or expectant mothers to aid in the presumptive diagnosis of HSV-1 infection
The LIAISON® HSV-1Type | Focus Diagnostics' HerpeSelect® 1 and 2 Immunoblot IgG test is intended for qualitatively detecting the presence or absence of human IgG class antibodies to HSV-1 and HSV-2 in human sera. The test is indicated for testing sexually active adults or pregnant women for aiding in the presumptive diagnosis of HSV-1 and HSV-2 infection. The predictive value of a positive or negative result depends on the population's prevalence and the pretest likelihood of HSV-1 |
{2}
| | Specific IgG assay has not been established for use in the pediatrics population, for neonatal screening, or for testing immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients. The assay is neither FDA cleared nor approved for testing blood or plasma donors. | and HSV-2 infection. The performance of this assay has not been established for use in a pediatric population, for neonatal screening, for testing of immuno-compromised patients, for use by a point of care facility or for use with automated equipment. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Controls | 2 (Negative and Positive) | 2 (Negative and Positive) |
| Sample Matrix | Serum | Serum |
| Reagent Storage | 2-8°C, On-board or in Refrigerator | 2-8°C Refrigerator only |
| Differences | | |
| Item | LIAISON® HSV-1 Specific IgG Assay | FOCUS Diagnostic HSV 1 and 2 Immunoblot IgG |
| Type of Assay | Indirect Chemiluminescence Immunoassay | Immunoblot |
| Sample Handling/processing | Automated | Manual |
| Cutoff | Index Value 1.0 | Dark band on the Cutoff/Positive control strip |
| Calibrators | Two | Cutoff/Positive control |
| Detector | Mouse Monoclonal antibody to human IgG conjugated to an isoluminol derivative | Alkaline phosphate-conjugated goat antihuman IgG |
| Capture Reagent | Magnetic particles coated with HSV-1 IgG1 recombinant antigen | A blend of HSV-1 and HSV-2 native virus antigens, a recombinant gG1 and a recombinant gG2 antigen |
| Equivocal zone | Index Value of >0.90 and <1.1 | Positive anti-human serum, positive HSV common antigen, negative gG-1 and gG-2 |
| Unit of Measure | Index | Positive or Negative reading |
| Measurement System | Photomultiplier (flash chemiluminescence reader) | Visual manual reading |
| Total incubation | 35 minutes | 2 hours 20 minutes |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
1. Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 & 2 Serological Assays, April 3, 2007 (http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/guidance/1305.pdf).
{3}
2. Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices, May 11, 2005 (http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/guidance/337.pdf).
L. Test Principle: The method for qualitative determination of specific IgG to HSV-1 is an indirect chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). HSV-1 gG1 recombinant antigen is used for coating magnetic particles (solid phase) and a mouse monoclonal antibody is linked to an isoluminol derivative (isoluminol-antibody conjugate). During the first incubation, HSV-1 antibodies present in calibrators, samples or controls bind to the solid phase. During the second incubation, the antibody conjugate reacts with HSV-1 IgG already bound to the solid phase. After each incubation, the unbound material is removed with a wash cycle. Subsequently, the starter reagents are added and a flash chemiluminescence reaction is thus induced. The light signal, and hence the amount of isoluminol-antibody conjugate, is measured by a photomultiplier as relative light units (RLU) and is indicative of HSV-1 IgG present in calibrators, samples or controls.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility: A reproducibility/precision study was conducted at two external and one internal. Each site used a different lot of the LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG for the study. A coded panel comprised of 8 frozen "engineered" serum samples was prepared by DiaSorin S.p.A. and provided to the sites. The coded panel samples were prepared by spiking positive samples into negative samples to achieve high negative, low positive and high positive results.
The coded panel was tested at all three sites, using four replicates per run in two runs per day with different operators performing each run during five operating days. The mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (%CV) of the results were computed for each of the tested specimens for each of the sites and across sites. The Inter/Intra-operator and Inter/Intra-site reproducibility results are summarized in the following table.
| Sample ID | N | Mean Index | Within run %CV | Between run %CV | Total (by site) %CV | Between site %CV | Overall SD | Overall %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NC | 120 | 0.15 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 7.0 | 14.4 | 0.02 | 14.9 |
| PC | 120 | 2.31 | 3.6 | 5.6 | 6.2 | 11.2 | 0.28 | 12.0 |
| HSV1A | 120 | 1.92 | 5.2 | 7.5 | 8.3 | 10.6 | 0.25 | 12.9 |
| HSV1B | 120 | 1.29 | 2.6 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 13.5 | 0.18 | 13.8 |
| HSV1C | 120 | 1.09 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 12.5 | 0.14 | 12.7 |
| HSV1D | 120 | 63.8 | 3.8 | 4.7 | 6.4 | 8.4 | 6.43 | 10.1 |
| HSV1E | 120 | 0.85 | 2.7 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 10.8 | 0.10 | 11.3 |
| HSV1F | 120 | 0.88 | 2.8 | 5.7 | 6.1 | 11.6 | 0.11 | 12.3 |
| HSV1G | 120 | 1.20 | 4.1 | 6.6 | 7.9 | 12.8 | 0.17 | 14.4 |
| HSV1H | 120 | 1.35 | 3.4 | 5.8 | 6.7 | 13.6 | 0.19 | 14.3 |
| HSV1I | 120 | 1.00 | 3.0 | 5.7 | 6.5 | 12.7 | 0.16 | 14.0 |
| HSV1J | 120 | 0.95 | 2.3 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 11.9 | 0.15 | 13.7 |
| HSV1K | 120 | 0.90 | 2.2 | 5.6 | 5.8 | 11.8 | 0.15 | 13.6 |
| HSV1L | 120 | 0.85 | 2.1 | 5.6 | 5.8 | 11.7 | 0.15 | 13.5 |
| HSV1M | 120 | 0.80 | 2.0 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 11.7 | 0.15 | 13.4 |
{4}
b. Linearity/assay reportable range: NA
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): NA
d. Detection limit: This device is for the HSV-1 antibody detection and was not tested for the limit of detection. There is no standard available for measuring the HSV antibody units in the serum.
e. Analytical sensitivity:
1. Cross Reactivity: Cross reactivity studies for the HSV-1 Type Specific IgG assay were designed to evaluate potential interference directed against closely related members of the Herpes virus family (EBV, CMV, VZV) and other conditions that may mimic an HSV-1 infection. Serological cross-reactivity has been noted in the specimens containing antibody to Treponema pallidum and Candida albicans. Caution should be used when interpreting positive results in patients with these antibodies. Possible cross reactivity with Saccharomyces cerevisae, the recombinant vector for the gG1 antigen, has not been evaluated
| Organism/Condition | N | Reference HSV-1 Assay | LIAISON® HSV-1 Positive | LIAISON® HSV-1 Negative | LIAISON® HSV-1 Equivocal |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Epstein Barr Virus (IgG) | 107 | Negative | 2 | 104 | 1 |
| Cytomegalovirus (IgG) | 30 | Negative | 1 | 29 | 0 |
| Toxoplasmosis (IgG) | 18 | Negative | 0 | 18 | 0 |
| Rubella (IgG) | 79 | Negative | 1 | 78 | 0 |
| HSV-2 IgG | 92 | Negative | 3 | 88 | 1 |
| Varicella-Zoster (IgG) | 108 | Negative | 1 | 106 | 1 |
| HAMA Samples | 3 | Negative | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Chlamydia trachomatis | 2 | Negative | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Human Papilloma Virus | 4 | Negative | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Treponema pallidum | 10 | Negative | 2 | 8 | 0 |
| Gardnerella vaginalis | 3 | Negative | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Candida albicans | 3 | Negative | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Rheumatoid Factor (RF) | 15 | Negative | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| Anti-Nuclear Antibody (ANA) | 12 | Negative | 1 | 11 | 0 |
| Total | 487 | | 13 | 471 | 3 |
2. Interference: The device performance was evaluated with the presence of interferents. The assay performance was not affected by hemolysis (at 138.5 mg/dL Hemoglobin), lipemia (at 3000 mg/dL triglycerides), icterus (at 20 mg/dL of bilirubin), cholesterol (at 500 mg/dL) and serum Albumin at (10,000 mg/dL).
{5}
f. Assay cut-off: NA
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with reference method:
The HerpeSelect® 1 and 2 immunoblot
b. Matrix comparison: NA
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity: NA
b. Clinical specificity: NA
## Performance Characteristics
## Summary of Clinical Studies
DiaSorin tested 951 samples collected in the Northeastern United States and compared with the LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG assay to an FDA cleared Immunoblot. The samples were classified as “At risk” samples (n=401) from sexually active adults (at risk for a Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD)), Expectant Mothers (n=430) and “Low risk” samples (n=120) from patients seen at the clinic for anything other than an STD. The studies were conducted at two (2) independent external laboratories.
The sample populations were divided between the sites. Site 1 tested a total of 460 samples (201 At risk, 199 Expectant Mothers and 60 Low risk). Site 2 tested a total of 491 samples (200 At risk, 231 Expectant Mothers and 60 Low risk). Site 3 tested a total of 951 samples (401 At risk, 430 Expectant Mothers and 120 Low prevalence). Equivocal samples were repeat tested as per the Instructions for Use. Any repeat equivocal samples on the predicate device were sent to a Reference Laboratory in the Pacific Northwest for Western Blot testing.
## Sexually Active Adults (401)
Four Hundred one (401) samples were obtained from Sexually Active Adults who were seen at STD clinics in the Northeastern U.S. were tested with the LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG assay and the HSV-1 predicate method Immunoblot.
6
{6}
7
| LIAISON®
HSV-1 Type
Specific IgG | Predicate Device | | | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Equivocal | Negative | |
| Positive | 222 | 1 | 12 | 235 |
| Equivocal | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Negative | 7 | 0 | 157 | 164 |
| Total | 229 | 1* | 171 | 401 |
| | Percent | 95% Confidence Intervals |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sensitivity | 96.9% (222/229) | 94.3 – 98.6% |
| Specificity | 91.3% (157/172) | 86.9 – 94.6% |
* This sample was Indeterminate with Western Blot testing.
## Expectant Mother Population (430)
Four hundred thirty (430) samples collected from Expectant Mothers in the Northeastern U.S. were tested with the LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG assay and the HSV-1 predicate method Immunoblot.
| LIAISON®
HSV-1 Type
Specific IgG | Predicate Device | | | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Equivocal | Negative | |
| Positive | 236 | 0 | 10 | 246 |
| Equivocal | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Negative | 3 | 0 | 179 | 182 |
| Total | 239 | 0 | 191 | 430 |
| | Percent | 95% Confidence Intervals |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sensitivity | 98.7% (236/239) | 96.8 – 99.7% |
| Specificity | 93.7% (179/191) | 90.0 – 96.3% |
{7}
8
# Low Prevalence Population (120)
One Hundred twenty (120) "Low Prevalence" samples were obtained from patients who were seen at clinics (not for STD) in the Northeastern U.S. were tested with the LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG assay and the HSV-1 predicate method Immunoblot.
| LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG | Predicate Device | | | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Equivocal | Negative | |
| Positive | 60 | 0 | 0 | 60 |
| Equivocal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Negative | 1 | 0 | 58 | 59 |
| Total | 62 | 0 | 58 | 120 |
| | Percent | 95% Confidence Intervals |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sensitivity | 96.8% (60/62) | 90.1 - 99.4% |
| Specificity | 100.0% (58/58) | 94.9 – 100.0% |
# Agreement with a CDC Panel
A serum panel was obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and tested by the LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG assay. The panel consisted of 52% positive and 48% negative samples. The LIAISON® HSV-1 Type Specific IgG assay demonstrated 100% positive agreement (52/52) and 93.7% negative agreement (45/48) with the CDC positive results. There were three false positive results obtained with the Liaison HSV-1 Type specific assay.
## 4. Clinical cut-off: NA
## 5. Expected values/Reference range:
The prevalence may vary depending upon geographical location, age, gender, type of test employed, specimen collection and handling procedures as well as clinical history of the patient. The observed and the hypothetical predictive values for the sexually active adults, expectant mothers, and low prevalence populations are shown below. The positive predictive value (PPV) will decrease proportionally to the prevalence of HSV-1 infection as reflected in the table. The calculations are based on LIAISON® HSV-1 positive and negative agreements of 96.9% and 91.3%, respectively, in a sexually active adult population, 98.7% and 93.7%, respectively, in an expectant mothers population, and 96.8% and 100%, respectively, in a low prevalence population.
{8}
Observed Prevalence with Sexually Active Adults, Expectant Mothers and Low Prevalence populations
| Population | Sero-Status | Observed Prevalence | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | LIAISON | Predicate |
| Sexually Active Adultsa | HSV-1 Negative | 41.0% (164/400) | 42.8% (171/400) |
| | HSV-1 Positive | 58.5% (234/400) | 57.3% (229/400) |
| Expectant Mothersb | HSV-1 Negative | 42.5% (182/428) | 44.2% (189/428) |
| | HSV-1 Positive | 57.5% (246/428) | 55.8% (239/428) |
| Low Prevalencec | HSV-1 Negative | 49.6% (59/119) | 48.7% (58/119) |
| | HSV-1 Positive | 50.4% (60/119) | 51.3% (61/119) |
a Excludes 1 Indeterminate by Predicate
b Excludes 2 Equivocal by LIAISON
c Excludes 1 Equivocal by LIAISON
HSV-1 Prevalence vs. Hypothetical Predictive Values
| Prevalence | Sexually Active Adults | | Expectant Mothers | | Low Prevalence | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | PPV | NPV | PPV | NPV | PPV | NPV |
| 80% | 97.8% | 88.0% | 98.4% | 94.7% | 100% | 88.7% |
| 70% | 96.3% | 92.7% | 97.3% | 96.9% | 100% | 93.1% |
| 60% | 94.4% | 95.2% | 95.9% | 98.0% | 100% | 95.4% |
| 50% | 91.8% | 96.7% | 94.0% | 98.6% | 100% | 96.9% |
| 40% | 88.1% | 97.8% | 91.3% | 99.1% | 100% | 97.9% |
| 30% | 82.7% | 98.6% | 87.0% | 99.4% | 100% | 98.6% |
| 20% | 73.6% | 99.2% | 79.7% | 99.7% | 100% | 99.2% |
| 10% | 55.3% | 99.6% | 63.5% | 99.8% | 100% | 99.6% |
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion: The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.