K081526 · Beckman Coulter, Inc. · GKZ · Aug 14, 2008 · Hematology
Device Facts
Record ID
K081526
Device Name
FLOWCARE TLG REAGENT
Applicant
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Product Code
GKZ · Hematology
Decision Date
Aug 14, 2008
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Abbreviated
Regulation
21 CFR 864.5220
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The FlowCARE TLG Reagent kit combines four fluorescent labeled monoclonal antibodies in a single reagent formulation. It is intended “For In Vitro Diagnostic Use” for the enumeration of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ absolute cell count and CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ lymphocyte percentage in combination with a White Blood Cell (WBC) Count from a hematology instrument as a dual platform measurement, or independently when used in combination with Flow-Count™ Fluorospheres as a single platform measurement. The FlowCARE TLG Reagent is designed for use on the COULTER® EPICS™ XL™/XL-MCL™ or a suitably equipped flow cytometer with a 488 nm laser capable of detecting light scatter (forward and side) and a minimum of four-color fluorescence emission detectable in the following ranges: 504 - 541 nm, 568 - 590 nm, 610 - 635 nm, and 660 - 680 nm. Users should refer to the manufacturer’s instrument manuals for specific instructions for setting PMT voltages and fluorescence compensation prior to analysis.
Device Story
FlowCARE™ TLG Reagent is a four-color monoclonal antibody cocktail (CD45-FITC, CD4-PE, CD8-ECD, CD3-PC5) for flow cytometry. It identifies T-lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+). The device is used in clinical laboratories on EPICS® XL-MCL™ or compatible flow cytometers. Input consists of blood samples labeled with the reagent; the cytometer detects light scatter and four-color fluorescence. Unlike the predicate, which uses automated software analysis, FlowCARE™ requires manual analysis via customer-created protocols. Output is absolute cell counts and percentages, used by clinicians to assess lymphocyte populations. It supports extended specimen stability up to 120 hours.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Method comparison study performed on 201 lysed normal and abnormal whole blood samples comparing FlowCARE TLG to the predicate. Results showed high correlation (R² ≥ 0.9882) and acceptable bias for CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+ counts. Precision evaluated over 20 days at 3 sites using control cells; results met acceptance criteria. Linearity established across reportable ranges (CD3+: 300–5000 cells/μL; CD3+CD4+: 50–3000 cells/μL; CD3+CD8+: 50–1100 cells/μL).
Technological Characteristics
Reagent: CD45-FITC, CD4-PE, CD8-ECD, CD3-PC5 monoclonal antibodies. Sensing: Flow cytometry (488 nm laser, 4-color fluorescence detection). Dimensions: 0.5 mL vials. Connectivity: Standalone reagent for use on compatible flow cytometers. Software: Manual analysis protocols (no automated software).
Indications for Use
Indicated for the enumeration of CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+ absolute cell counts and lymphocyte percentages in human blood samples. Used for dual platform measurement with a hematology analyzer or single platform measurement with Flow-Count™ Fluorospheres.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An automated differential cell counter is a device used to identify one or more of the formed elements of the blood. The device may also have the capability to flag, count, or classify immature or abnormal hematopoietic cells of the blood, bone marrow, or other body fluids. These devices may combine an electronic particle counting method, optical method, or a flow cytometric method utilizing monoclonal CD (cluster designation) markers. The device includes accessory CD markers.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is the FDA document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Premarket Notifications for Automated Differential Cell Counters for Immature or Abnormal Blood Cells; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA.”
Predicate Devices
tetraONE™ System for EPICS XL Flow Cytometry System (k990172)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k081526
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Lymphocytes CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative and Qualitative, Flow Cytometry
E. Applicant:
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Flow CARE™ TLG Reagent
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 864.5220, Automated Differential Cell Counter
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
GKZ, Counter, Differential Cell
4. Panel:
81 Hematology
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The FlowCARE TLG Reagent kit combines four fluorescent labeled monoclonal antibodies in a single reagent formulation. It is intended “For In Vitro Diagnostic Use” for the enumeration of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ absolute cell count and CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ lymphocyte percentage in combination with a White Blood Cell (WBC) Count from a hematology instrument as a dual platform measurement, or independently when used in combination with Flow-Count™ Fluorospheres as a single platform measurement.
The FlowCARE TLG Reagent is designed for use on the COULTER® EPICS™ XL™/XL-MCL™ or a suitably equipped flow cytometer with a 488 nm laser capable of detecting light scatter (forward and side) and a minimum of four-color fluorescence emission detectable in the following ranges: 504 - 541 nm, 568 - 590 nm, 610 - 635 nm, and 660 - 680 nm. Users should refer to the manufacturer’s instrument manuals for specific instructions for setting PMT voltages and fluorescence compensation prior to analysis.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as Intended Use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
Not applicable.
4. Special instrument requirements:
{1}
For use on the COULTER® EPICS™ XL™/XL-MCL™ or a suitably equipped flow cytometer with a 488 nm laser capable of detecting light scatter (forward and side) and a minimum of four-color fluorescence emission detectable in the following ranges: 504 - 541 nm, 568 - 590 nm, 610 - 635 nm, and 660 - 680 nm. Users should refer to the manufacturer's instrument manuals for specific instructions for setting PMT voltages and fluorescence compensation prior to analysis.
I. Device Description:
The FlowCARE™ TLG Reagent consists of a four-color antibody reagent composed of CD45-FITC, CD4-PE, CD8-ECD, and CD3-PC5. The assay is performed on the EPICS XL or suitably equipped flow cytometer (see intended use for specifications) using appropriate quality control reagents in combination with an optional absolute count reagent, Flow-Count™ Fluorospheres, for determination of CD3+, D3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+ absolute counts as a single platform measurement, or in combination with a White Blood Cell Count from a hematology analyzer as a dual platform measurement. The reagent is supplied in 0.5 mL vials.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s): tetraONE™ System for EPICS XL Flow Cytometry System
2. Predicate K number(s): k990172
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | tetraONE System for EPICS XL Flow Cytometry System | FlowCARE TLG Reagent |
| Intended Use | Enumeration of three major T-lymphocyte subset populations (CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+) | Same |
| Analytical Instrumentation | Deployed on EPICS® XL-MCL™ flow | Deployed on EPICS® XL™/XL-MCL™ or a suitably equipped flow cytometer with a 488 nm laser capable of detecting light scatter (forward and side) and a minimum of four-color fluorescence emission detectable in the following ranges: 504 - 541 nm, 568 - 590 nm, 610 - 635 nm, and 660 - 680 nm. |
| Analysis Reagents | Uses CYTO-STAT® tetraCHROME™ CD45-FITC/CD4-RD1/CD8-ECD/CD3-PC5 | CD45-FITC, CD4-PE (RD1), CD8-ECD, and CD3-PC5 monoclonal dye conjugates are identical to CD45-FITC/CD4-RD1/CD8-ECD/CD3-PC5 tetraCHROME™ reagent components. |
| Analysis Reagents | Uses Flow-Count™ Fluorospheres absolute count reagent | Same |
| Setup Reagents | • Flow-Set™ Fluorospheres • CYTO-COMP™ Cell Kit • CYTO-COMP™ Reagent Kit | Same or equivalent reagents |
{2}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | tetraONE System for EPICS XL Flow Cytometry System | FlowCARE TLG Reagent |
| QC Reagents | • IMMUNO-TROL™ Control Cells
• IMMUNO-TROL™ Low Control Cells | Same or equivalent reagents |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | tetraONE System for EPICS XL Flow Cytometry System | FlowCARE TLG Reagent |
| Analysis Software | System II™ Automated analysis using cellSTAT3D™ algorithm | Manual analysis using customer created protocols according to package insert |
| Specimen Age | • ≤ 6 hours (with automated software)
• ≤ 72 hours (without automated software, tetraCHROME CD45-FITC/CD4-RD1/CD8-ECD/CD3-PC5) | ≤ 120 hours (5 days)*
* The specimen age limit for dual platform measurement is dependent upon the claims for the hematology analyzer but not to exceed five days. |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Premarket Notifications for Automated Differential Cell Counters for Immature or Abnormal Blood Cells; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA, December 4, 2001.
EP9-A2 Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples, Approved Standard-Second Edition, NCCLS
EP5A Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Device Approved Guideline, NCCLS
International Council for Standardization in Haematology; Prepared by the ICSH Expert Panel on Cytometry. Clinical Lab Haematology, 16(2):157-174, 1994.
# L. Test Principle:
This test depends on the ability of a monoclonal antibody to bind to the surface of cells expressing discrete antigenic determinants. Specific cell staining is accomplished by incubating whole blood with the monoclonal antibody reagent. The FlowCARE TLG Reagent is a combination of four murine monoclonal antibodies, each conjugated to a specific fluorochrome and specific for different cell surface antigens.
Red blood cells are lysed with the COULTER IMMUNOPREPT™ Reagent System and COULTER TQ-Prep™ Workstation or equivalent. The remaining white blood cells are analyzed by flow cytometry using a sequential gating strategy. The total WBC gate is defined in the first histogram (log SS vs. CD45-FITC) by the inclusion of all CD45+ events with low, medium and high Side Scatter. A second histogram (CD3-PC5 vs. CD4-PE), gated on the lymphocytes defined in the first histogram, identifies CD3+CD4+ lymphocytes by setting a region to include dual positive events. A third histogram (CD3-PC5 vs. CD8-ECD), gated on the lymphocytes defined in the first histogram, identifies CD3+CD8+ lymphocytes by setting a region to include dual positive events. The CD3+ percent is obtained from either histogram 2
{3}
or 3. The CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and D3+CD8+ absolute count are calculated using Flow-Count Fluorospheres. Alternatively, the absolute counts may be calculated using the %lymphocytes obtained from the fourth histogram (log SS vs. CD45-FITC) gated on the total WBC. The total WBC count from the hematology analyzer is multiplied by the %lymphocytes and the % CD3+, D3+CD4+ or %CD3+CD8+.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
##### Within-Run Variability
The percent positive and absolute count values were determined using IMMUNO-TROL and IMMUNO-TROL Low Cells, run in duplicate, twice each day for up to 20 days at 3 geographically diverse sites using FlowCARE TLG Reagent. Measurements (% positive and absolute counts) for CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+ populations were within assay values as determined in the control package insert. See result below:
| | IMMUNO-TROL | | IMMUNO-TROL low | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | n | Mean ± 1 SD | n | Mean ± 1 SD |
| CD3+ Lymphocytes | | | | |
| % positive | 246 | 74.1 ± 0.7 | 245 | 55.8 ± 1.1 |
| Absolute counts | 246 | 781± 22 | 245 | 463 ± 15 |
| CD3+CD4 Lymphocytes | | | | |
| % positive | 246 | 51.8 ± 0.7 | 245 | 17.6 ± 0.6 |
| Absolute counts | 246 | 546± 17 | 245 | 146± 7 |
| CD3+CD4 Lymphocytes | | | | |
| % positive | 246 | 19.6 ± 0.6 | 245 | 34.9 ±1.3 |
| Absolute counts | 246 | 207± 8 | 245 | 290± 10 |
#### b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity testing was performed in accordance with Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Premarket Notifications for Automated Differential Cell Counters for Immature or Abnormal Blood Cell Types; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA. Three replicates measurements were made at each of 13 serial dilutions of a concentration preparation of COULTER CYTO-TROL Control Cells to achieve a range of CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+ lymphocytes concentrations. Cells were stained with the FlowCARE tetraPLG Reagent and analyzed by flow cytometry.
All acceptance criteria were met as defined in Table below.
#### Linearity Limits (absolute counts)
| Analyte/Units | Linearity | Range |
| --- | --- | --- |
| CD3+CD4+ count, cells/μL | r²≥ 0.95 | 50 – 3000 |
| CD3+CD8+ count, cells/μL | r²≥ 0.95 | 50 – 1100 |
| CD3+ count, cells/μL | r²≥ 0.95 | 300 – 5000 |
{4}
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): Not applicable.
d. Detection limit: Not applicable.
e. Analytical specificity: Not applicable.
f. Assay cut-off: Not applicable.
# 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device: Accuracy testing was performed in accordance with CLSI/NCCLS EP9-A, Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Sample; Approved Guideline. The comparison of FlowCARE TLG Reagent to the predicate device was studied in 201 lysed normal and abnormal whole blood samples (gated on lymphocytes) collected from three sites. All acceptance criteria were met as defined in the following table:
Accuracy Limits (absolute counts)
| Analyte/Units | Accuracy | Range |
| --- | --- | --- |
| CD3+CD4+ count, cells/μL | 0-300 ± 30 bias >300 ± 10% bias | 50 – 3000 |
| CD3+CD8+ count, cells/μL | 0-300 ± 30 bias >300 ± 10% bias | 50 – 1100 |
| CD3+ count, cells/μL | 0-300 ± 30 bias >300 ± 10% bias | 300 – 5000 |
Regression Analysis (Absolute counts)
| Marker | Slope | R2 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| CD3+CD4+, | 1.03 | 0.9922 |
| CD3+CD8+ | 1.04 | 0.9917 |
| CD3+ | 1.03 | 0.9882 |
(Single Platform)
b. Matrix comparison: Not applicable.
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity: Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity: Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable): Not applicable.
# 4. Clinical cut-off: Not applicable.
# 5. Expected values/Reference range:
Whole blood specimens were collected from apparently healthy males and females. The population was geographically diverse and included individuals
{5}
from the Eastern United States, Western and Central Canada who were unselected as to race or age (n=37). Samples were stained with FlowCARE TLG Reagent. Values determined by flow cytometry (COULTER EPICS XL-MCL flow cytometer gated on lymphocytes) represent total CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+ cells and are provided in the Normal Whole Blood Table below.
A white blood cell count and five-part differential were obtained for each sample. Absolute counts were determined using the Flow-Count (Direct) Method. Values are expressed as percentage (%) of the total lymphocyte count and as absolute counts (cells/μL).
The values below are intended as representative only. Each laboratory should establish its own expected values from the local population of normal donors.
Normal Whole Blood
| Measurement | n | Min. | Max | Mean ±ISD |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| % Lymphocytes | | | | |
| CD+3 | 37 | 53 | 91 | 74.6 ± 8.6 |
| CD3+CD4+, | 37 | 30 | 63 | 49.5 ± 7.5 |
| CD3+CD8+ | 37 | 12 | 40 | 22.3 ± 5.5 |
| Absolute Count (cells/μL) | | | | |
| CD+3 | 37 | 799 | 2494 | 1414.0 ± 471.4 |
| CD3+CD4+, | 37 | 395 | 1588 | 916.0 ± 302.4 |
| CD3+CD8+ | 37 | 189 | 821 | 415.6 ± 120.0 |
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.