DRI METHADONE METABOLITE (100/300) ASSAY, CALIBRATORS AND CONTROLS
Applicant
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Product Code
DJR · Clinical Toxicology
Decision Date
Jan 14, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.3620
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The DRI Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay is intended for the qualitative and semi-quantitative determination of the presence of Methadone Metabolite (2-ethylidene-1,5-dighenyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine or EDDP) in human urine at cutoffs of 100 and 300 ng/mL. The assay provides only a preliminary analytical test result. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used to obtain a confirmed analytical result. Gas chromatography / Mass spectrometry (GC/MS) is the preferred confirmatory method. Clinical and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly when preliminary results are used. Tests for methadone metabolite cannot distinguish between abused drugs and certain prescribed medications. Certain foods or medications may interfere with test for methadone metabolite and cause false positive results. The DRI Methadone Metabolite Calibrators are intended for use in calibration of the DRI Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay. The DRI Methadone Metabolite Controls are intended for use in the DRI Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay to detect and monitor systematic deviations from accuracy resulting from reagent or instrument defects.
Device Story
Assay uses liquid ready-to-use reagents for EDDP detection in human urine; utilizes homogeneous enzyme immunoassay principle; competition between drug-labeled G6PDH and free drug in sample for antibody binding sites; enzyme activity measured spectrophotometrically at 340 nm; direct relationship between drug concentration and enzyme activity; used on clinical chemistry analyzers (e.g., Hitachi 917) by professional laboratory personnel; provides preliminary results requiring GC/MS confirmation; aids in monitoring drug presence; clinical judgment required for interpretation.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies performed. Analytical performance established via bench testing. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP5-A (N=80 per concentration). Method comparison conducted on 100 clinical specimens against GC/MS; qualitative agreement 93-100% and semi-quantitative agreement 98-100% depending on cutoff. Linearity r=0.9990. Analytical specificity tested against numerous endogenous/exogenous substances and structurally related compounds; no significant interference observed.
Technological Characteristics
Homogeneous enzyme immunoassay; liquid ready-to-use reagents (R1: mouse monoclonal anti-EDDP, G6P, NAD; R2: EDDP-G6PDH conjugate); spectrophotometric detection at 340 nm; calibrators and controls liquid ready-to-use; traceable to Cerilliant methadone standard; validated on Hitachi 917 analyzer; sodium azide preservative.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of Methadone Metabolite (EDDP) in human urine at 100 and 300 ng/mL cutoffs. Intended for clinical toxicology use to provide preliminary results; requires confirmatory testing (e.g., GC/MS). Not for distinguishing between illicit abuse and prescribed medications.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A methadone test system is a device intended to measure methadone, an addictive narcotic pain-relieving drug, in serum and urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of methadone use or overdose and to determine compliance with regulations in methadone maintenance treatment.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A methadone test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (*e.g.,* programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).
MGC DAU Control Sets: Primary, Clinical, Select (K040758)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k081378
B. Purpose for Submission:
New product
C. Measurand:
2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP)
D. Type of Test:
Semi-quantitative and qualitative homogeneous enzyme immunoassay
E. Applicant:
ThermoFisher Scientific
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
DRI® Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay
DRI® Methadone Metabolite Urine Calibrators
DRI® Methadone Metabolite Urine Controls
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR §862.3620, Methadone Test System
21 CFR §862.3200, Clinical Toxicology Calibrator
21 CFR §862.3280, Clinical Toxicology Control Material
2. Classification:
Class II (Reagent, Calibrator)
Class I Reserved (Control)
3. Product code:
DJR; DKB; DIF
4. Panel:
Toxicology (91)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The DRI Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay is intended for the qualitative and semi-quantitative determination of the presence of Methadone Metabolite (2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine or EDDP) in human urine at cutoffs of 100 and 300 ng/mL.
The assay provides only a preliminary analytical test result. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used to obtain a confirmed analytical result. Gas chromatography / Mass spectrometry (GC/MS) is the preferred confirmatory method. Clinical and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly when preliminary results are used. Tests for methadone metabolite cannot distinguish between abused drugs and certain prescribed medications. Certain foods or medications may interfere with test for
{1}
methadone metabolite and cause false positive results.
The DRI Methadone Metabolite Calibrators are intended for the calibration of the DRI Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay.
The DRI Methadone Metabolite Controls are intended for use in the DRI Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay to detect and monitor systematic deviations from accuracy resulting from reagent or instrument defects.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
This device is for use by professional laboratory personnel. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Clinical chemistry analyzers. The Hitachi 917 analyzer was used to conduct performance studies below.
I. Device Description:
The DRI Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay utilizes liquid ready-to-use reagents. The Antibody/Substrate Reagent (R1) contains mouse monoclonal anti-EDDP antibody, glucose-6-phosphate (G6P), and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) in Tris buffer with sodium azide as a preservative. The Enzyme Conjugate Reagent (R2) contains EDDP-derivative labeled with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) in Tris buffer with sodium azide as a preservative.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
CEDIA DAU EDDP Assay
CEDIA DAU Multi-Drug Calibrators
MGC DAU Control Sets: Primary, Clinical, Select
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K980746; K980853; K040758,
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Comparison | DRI Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay | Predicate Device – CEDIA DAU EDDP Assay |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | Qualitative and semi-quantitative determination of the presence of Methadone Metabolite (2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine or EDDP) in human urine at cutoffs of 100 and 300 ng/mL. | Qualitative and semi-quantitative assay of EDDP (2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine or EDDP) in human urine. |
{2}
| Comparison | DRI Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay | Predicate Device – CEDIA DAU EDDP Assay |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Test Principle | Homogeneous
Enzyme
Immunoassay based on competition between a drug labeled with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) and free drug from the urine sample for a fixed amount of specific antibody binding sites.
Direct relationship between drug concentration in urine and enzyme activity.
Enzyme activity is determined spectrophotometrically at 340 nm by measuring its ability to convert nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) to NADH. | Homogeneous
Enzyme
Immunoassay based on competition between a drug labeled with β-galactosidase, and free drug from the urine sample for a fixed amount of specific antibody binding sites.
Direct relationship between drug concentration in urine and enzyme activity.
Enzyme activity is determined spectrophotometrically at 570 nm by measuring its ability to convert CPRG to CPR. |
| Cutoff | 100 and 300 ng/mL | 100 ng/mL |
| Matrix | Human urine | Human urine |
| Reagents | Liquid Ready-to-Use
Two reagent assay (R1 and R2) | Lyophilized (reconstitution required)
Two reagent assay (R1 and R2) |
| Calibrators | Liquid ready-to-use (0, 100, 300, 500, 1000 ng/mL) | Liquid ready-to-use (0, 100, 500, 2000 ng/mL) |
{3}
| Comparison | DRI Methadone Metabolite Control | Predicate Device – MGC Select DAU Control Set |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Controls | Liquid ready-to-use | Liquid ready-to-use |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods
L. Test Principle:
The DRI Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay utilizes liquid ready-to-use reagents and calibrators. The assay uses specific antibodies that can detect EDDP in human urine without cross-reactivity to the parent drug methadone. The assay is based on competition between a drug labeled with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) and free drug from the sample for a fixed number of specific antibody binding sites. In the presence of free drug from the sample, the free drug occupies the antibody binding sites, allowing the drug-labeled G6PDH to interact with the substrate, resulting in enzyme activity. In the absence of free drug from the sample, the specific antibody binds the drug labeled with G6PDH and causes a decrease in enzyme activity. This phenomenon creates a direct relationship between drug concentration in urine and enzyme activity. This enzyme activity is determined spectrophotometrically at 340 nm by measuring its ability to convert nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) to NADH.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
An EDDP solution (1 mg/mL) was added to each of four samples obtained from a human urine sample pool to achieve concentrations that span the assay range. The samples were tested for precision in qualitative and semi-quantitative modes. Following a CLSI (EP5A) precision protocol, samples were tested in 2 replicates per run, 2 runs per day for 20 days, total N=80.
Qualitative – 100 cutoff
| Drug | Concentration of sample, ng/mL | Number of determinations | Results
# Neg / # Pos |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EDDP | 0 | 80 | 80 Neg / 0 Pos |
| EDDP | 50 | 80 | 80 Neg / 0 Pos |
| EDDP | 75 | 80 | 80 Neg / 0 Pos |
| EDDP | 125 | 80 | 0 Neg / 80 Pos |
| EDDP | 225 | 80 | 0 Neg / 80 Pos |
Qualitative – 300 cutoff
| Drug | Concentration of sample, ng/mL | Number of determinations | Results
# Neg / # Pos |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
{4}
| Drug | Concentration of sample, ng/mL | Number of determinations | Results # Neg / # Pos |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EDDP | 0 | 80 | 80 Neg / 0 Pos |
| EDDP | 125 | 80 | 80 Neg / 0 Pos |
| EDDP | 225 | 80 | 80 Neg / 0 Pos |
| EDDP | 375 | 80 | 0 Neg / 80 Pos |
| EDDP | 750 | 80 | 0 Neg / 80 Pos |
Semi-quantitative - 100 cutoff
| Drug | Sample Conc., ng/mL | Number of determinations | Result # Neg / # Pos |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | |
| EDDP | 0 | 80 | 80/0 |
| EDDP | 50 | 80 | 80 / 0 |
| EDDP | 75 | 80 | 80 / 0 |
| EDDP | 125 | 80 | 0 / 80 |
| EDDP | 225 | 80 | 0 / 80 |
Semi-quantitative - 300 cutoff
| Drug | Sample Conc., ng/mL | Number of determinations | Result # Neg / # Pos |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | |
| EDDP | 0 | 80 | |
| EDDP | 50 | 80 | 80 / 0 |
| EDDP | 75 | 80 | 80 / 0 |
| EDDP | 125 | 80 | 80 / 0 |
| EDDP | 225 | 80 | 80 / 0 |
| EDDP | 375 | 80 | 0 / 80 |
| EDDP | 750 | 80 | 0 / 80 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The assay linearity was determined by testing the recoveries of a series of samples diluted from a high concentration EDDP sample. A high patient urine sample containing around $1000\mathrm{ng / mL}$ EDDP was serially diluted with analyte-free urine in $10\%$ increments and tested by 5 replicates in semi-quantitative mode. All samples were recovered within $\pm 10\%$ of the expected value and the r-value was 0.9990.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Calibrators and controls are tested on Hitachi 917 analyzers by two runs against a reference (primary) set of calibrators and controls, $N = 5$ for all samples. The acceptance criteria require that replicates have rate imprecision less than $1.5\%$ CV, rate difference between the secondary and the primary calibrators and controls must be within $3\%$ , and concentration of the calibrators and controls must be within $10\%$ error of the nominal values by GC/MS. Calibrators and controls are assigned nominal values if validation
{5}
results meet acceptance criteria. The assigned values for the calibrators and controls are traceable to the Cerilliant methadone standard catalogue E-022 and are verified by GC/MS. Real time and accelerated stability studies were conducted; protocols and acceptance criteria were described and found to be acceptable. These studies support the manufacturer's stability claims. Real time studies are ongoing.
d. Detection limit:
Not applicable. This assay is qualitative and semi-quantitative only.
Semiquantitative values should be used to estimate concentration for dilution purposes only.
e. Analytical specificity:
The cross-reactivity of parent drug, metabolites, and drugs commonly found in specimens was evaluated by adding known amounts of each substance to methadone metabolite-free urine. A compound producing negative results compared to the 100 ng/mL and 300 ng/mL cutoff calibrator was considered to have no cross-reactivity. The results of the study are presented below.
Methadone, its metabolite, and structurally related compounds produced a negative result at the concentrations listed below.
| Compound | Concentration, ng/mL |
| --- | --- |
| Methadone | 500,000 |
| EMDP | 200,000 |
| LAAM | 100,000 |
| Nor-LAAM | 10,000 |
Structurally unrelated compounds and/or concurrently used drugs produced a negative result at the concentrations listed below.
| Compound | Conc. ng/mL | Compound | Conc. ng/mL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 6-AM | 500,000 | Imipramine | 1,000,000 |
| Acetaminophen | 1,000,000 | Ketamine | 400,000 |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 1,000,000 | Levorphanol | 200,000 |
| Amitriptyline | 100,000 | Levothyroxine | 500,000 |
| Amoxicillin | 500,000 | Maprotiline | 1,000,000 |
| Amphetamine | 1,000,000 | Meperidine | 1,000,000 |
| Benzoylecgonine | 1,000,000 | d-Methamphetamine | 100,000 |
| Caffeine | 100,000 | l-Methamphetamine | 100,000 |
| Captopril | 500,000 | Metronidazole | 250,000 |
| Carbamazepine | 500,000 | Morphine | 1,000,000 |
| Chlordiazepoxide | 100,000 | Nalbuphine | 1,000,000 |
| Chlorpromazine | 100,000 | Naloxone | 3,000,000 |
| Cimetidine | 500,000 | Naltrexone | 3,000,000 |
| Clomipramine | 100,000 | Norcodeine | 1,000,000 |
| Cocaine | 200,000 | Normorphine | 1,000,000 |
{6}
The potential effect of endogenous and exogenous urine substances, pH, and specific gravity on the recovery of methadone metabolite using DRI Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay was assessed by spiking known amounts of potentially interfering substances into the negative and positive levels (± 25% of cutoffs of 100 and 300 ng/mL cutoff) for both cutoffs. The compounds were determined to not interfere at the concentrations shown below for the 100 and 300 ng/mL cutoffs:
| Compound | Cmpd. Conc. |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 100 ng/mL |
| Acetone | 1 g/dL |
| Ascorbic acid | 250 mg/dL |
| Aspirin | 100 μg/mL |
| Caffeine | 100 μg/mL |
| Creatinine | 500 mg/dL |
| Ethanol | 1 g/dL |
| Galactose | 10 mg/dL |
| γ-globulin | 500 mg/dL |
| Glucose | 3 g/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 150 mg/dL |
| Human serum albumin | 500 mg/dL |
| Ibuprofen | 100 μg/mL |
| Oxalic Acid | 100 mg/dL |
| pH range | 4-11 |
| Specific gravity range | 1.004-1.035 |
| Riboflavin | 7.5 mg/dL |
| Sodium chloride | 900 mg/dL |
| Urea | 1.25 g/dL |
| Codeine | 1,000,000 | Nortriptyline | 500,000 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Desipramine | 1,000,000 | Oxazepam | 500,000 |
| Dextromethorphan | 30,000 | Oxycodone | 500,000 |
| Diazepam | 30,000 | Phencyclidine | 50,000 |
| Dihydrocodeine | 1,000,000 | Phenobarbital | 1,000,000 |
| Diphenhydramine | 500,000 | Phentermine | 1,000,000 |
| Disopyramide | 1,000,000 | Promethazine | 100,000 |
| Doxepine | 200,000 | Propoxyphene | 50,000 |
| Doxylamine | 500,000 | Ranitidine | 500,000 |
| Ephedrine | 2,000,000 | Salicyluric acid | 500,000 |
| Fentanyl | 200,000 | Secobarbital | 1,000,000 |
| Fluoxetine | 1,000,000 | Talwin | 500,000 |
| Fluphenazine | 500,000 | 11-Nor-Δ⁹-THC-9- | 10,000 |
| Heroin | 1,000,000 | COOH | |
| Hydrocodone | 200,000 | Thebaine | 100,000 |
| Hydromorphone | 200,000 | Thioridazine | 150,000 |
| Ibuprofen | 1,000,000 | Tramadol | 500,000 |
{7}
f. Assay cut-off:
Analytical performance of the device around the claimed cutoffs is described in precision section (1 a.) above
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
One hundred unaltered clinical specimens were tested using the DRI Methadone Metabolite (100/300) Assay in both the qualitative and semi-quantitative modes, and GC/MS. The results are presented as follows:
Qualitative Stratified Results
| DRI | Low Negative by GC/MS (less than -50%) | Near Cutoff Negative by GC/MS (between -50% and cutoff) | Near Cutoff Positive by GC/MS (between cutoff and +50%) | High Positive by GC/MS (greater than +50%) | Percent Agreement with GC/MS |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 100 ng/mL Cutoff | | | | | |
| Positive | 0 | 1 | 6 | 50 | 93% |
| Negative | 30 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 98% |
| 300 ng/mL Cutoff | | | | | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 9 | 30 | 100% |
| Negative | 50 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 98% |
GC/MS Summary of Discordant Qualitative Results
| Cutoff Value (ng/mL) | DRI Result | GC/MS (ng/mL) | Major Drug Present by GC/MS |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 100 | POS | 96 | EDDP |
| 100 | NEG | 130 | EDDP |
| 100 | NEG | 131 | EDDP |
| 100 | NEG | 125 | EDDP |
| 100 | NEG | 128 | EDDP |
| 300 | NEG | 310 | EDDP |
{8}
Semi-quantitative Stratified Results
| DRI | Low Negative by GC/MS (less than -50%) | Near Cutoff Negative by GC/MS (between -50% and cutoff) | Near Cutoff Positive by GC/MS (between cutoff and +50%) | High Positive by GC/MS (greater than +50%) | Percent Agreement with GC/MS |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 100 ng/mL Cutoff | | | | | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 9 | 50 | 98% |
| Negative | 30 | 10 | *1 | 0 | 100% |
| 300 ng/mL Cutoff | | | | | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 10 | 30 | 100% |
| Negative | 50 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
*GC/MS Summary of Discordant Semi-quantitative Results
| Cutoff Value (ng/mL) | DRI Result | GC/MS (ng/mL) | Major Drug Present by GC/MS |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 100 | neg | 130 | EDDP |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable; this device is for use with urine only.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.