DIMENSION VISTA SYSTEM IGG FLEX REAGENT CARTRIDGE, DIMENSION VISTA SYSTEM PROTEIN 1 CALIBRATOR, AND DIMENSION VISTA SYST
Applicant
Dade Behring, Inc.
Product Code
CFN · Immunology
Decision Date
Jul 28, 2008
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5510
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The IGG method is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative measurement of immunoglobulin G in human serum, heparinized plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and urine on the Dimension Vista® System. Measurements of IgG aid in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents.
Device Story
The Dimension Vista® System IGG Flex® reagent cartridge is an in vitro diagnostic assay for quantitative measurement of immunoglobulin G (IgG) in human serum, heparinized plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine. The device operates via immunochemical reaction: proteins in the sample form immune complexes with specific antibodies; these complexes scatter light passed through the sample. The intensity of scattered light is proportional to protein concentration, which is determined by comparison to a known standard. The system is used in clinical laboratory settings by trained personnel. Results assist clinicians in diagnosing abnormal protein metabolism and assessing immune function. The submission includes a modified Protein 1 Calibrator and Protein 3 Control to support the addition of urine sample matrices and a pre-reaction step for CSF analysis.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP5-A2 (20-day study). Linearity confirmed per CLSI EP06-A/EP17-A. Method comparison performed against predicate devices (IMMAGE for urine, BN ProSpec for CSF) using 53 urine and 104 CSF samples; results showed high correlation (R=0.976 for urine, R=0.994 for CSF). Interference testing per CLSI EP7-A2 showed no significant interference from hemoglobin, bilirubin, or common drugs.
Technological Characteristics
Nephelometric assay. Reagents: rabbit polyclonal antisera to human IgG, buffers, polyethylene glycol. Calibrators/Controls: human serum/rabbit albumin-based, traceable to ERM® DA 470 (CRM 470). Form factor: ready-to-use liquid reagent cartridges, lyophilized controls. Connectivity: integrated with Dimension Vista® Analyzer. Sterilization: not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative measurement of immunoglobulin G in human serum, heparinized plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine to aid in diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and immune deficiency. Prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, and E immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, an E (serum antibodies) in serum. Measurement of these immunoglobulins aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents.
Predicate Devices
Beckman Coulter IMMAGE® Immunochemistry System Urine Immunoglobulin G (k951635)
N Antisera to Human Immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM) (k042735)
Dimension Vista® System Protein 1 Calibrator (k073561)
Dimension Vista® System Protein 3 Control (k073561)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k081161
B. Purpose for Submission:
Urine sample matrix is added to existing devices. In addition, a pre-reaction step is added to modify the cerebrospinal fluid assay.
C. Measurand:
Immunoglobulin IgG
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, Nephelometry
E. Applicant:
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Dimension Vista® System Immunoglobulin G Flex® Reagent Cartridge
Dimension Vista® Protein 1 Calibrator
Dimension Vista® Protein 3 Control
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CFN: Method Nephelometric, Immunoglobulins (G, A, M) | Class II, Devices | 21 CFR § 866.5510, Immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, and E Immunological test system. | Immunology (82) |
| JIX: Calibrator, Multi-analyte Mixture | Class II, Calibrator | 21 CFR § 862.1150, Calibrator | Chemistry (75) |
| JJY: Multi-analyte Controls, All kinds (Assayed and Unassayed) | Class I, Quality Control Material | 21 CFR § 862.1660, QC material (Assayed and Unassayed | Chemistry (75) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
Dimension Vista® System Immunoglobulin G Flex® reagent cartridge:
The IGG method is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative measurement of immunoglobulin G in human serum, heparinized plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and urine on the Dimension Vista® System. Measurements of IgG aid in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents.
Dimension Vista® System Protein 1 Calibrator (PROT1 CAL):
PROT1 CAL is an in vitro diagnostic product for the calibration of the Dimension Vista® System for: $\alpha_{1}$ -Acid Glycoprotein (A1AG), $\alpha_{1}$ -Antitrypsin (A1AT), $\beta_{2}$ -Microglobulin
{1}
(B2MIC), C3 Complement (C3), C4 Complement (C4), Ceruloplasmin (CER), Haptoglobin (HAPT), Hemopexin (HPX), Homocysteine (HCYS), Immunoglobulin A (IgA), Immunoglobulin E (IgE), Immunoglobulin G (IgG) [serum/plasma], (IgG-C) [cerebrospinal fluid], (IgG-U) [urine], Immunoglobulin G Subclass 1 (IgG1), Immunoglobulin G Subclass 2 (IgG2), Immunoglobulin G Subclass 3 (IgG3), Immunoglobulin G Subclass 4 (IgG4), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), Prealbumin (PREALB), Retinol Binding Protein (RBP), soluble Transferrin Receptor (STFR), and Transferrin (TRF).
Dimension Vista® System Protein 3 Control (PROT3 CON):
PROT3 CON is an assayed, low level intralaboratory quality control for assessment of precision and analytical bias on the Dimension Vista® System in the determination of α₁-Microglobulin(A1MIC), specialty Albumin (sALB)*, Immunoglobulin G (IgG -C)*, Immunoglobulin U (IgG -U)** and Microalbumin (MALB).
* For Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
** For urine
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as Intended Use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For Prescription only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Dimension Vista® Analyzer (k051087)
I. Device Description:
Dimension Vista® System Immunoglobulin G Flex® reagent cartridge carton contains 2 cartridges (12 wells/cartridge). Wells 1 through 8 contain buffers and polyethylene glycol. Wells 9 through 12 contain liquid rabbit polyclonal antisera to human IgG. Reagent is in ready-to-use liquid form.
Dimension Vista® System Protein 1 Calibrator carton contains 6 vials with 2 mL per vial, with multi-analyte, liquid human serum based product containing A1AG, A1AT, B2MIC, C3, C4, CER, HAPT, HPX, IgA, IgE, IgG, IgM, PREALB, RBP, STRF, TRF, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 and HCYS. Reagent is in ready-to-use liquid form.
Dimension Vista® System Protein 3 Control carton contains 4 vials with 1 mL per vial, with multi-analyte, polygeline and rabbit albumin based product containing urinary α₁-A1AG and serum albumin and IgG of human origin. Reagent is in lyophilized form.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Beckman Coulter IMMAGE® Immunochemistry System Urine Immunoglobulin G N Antisera to Human Immunoglobulins on the BN Systems (IgG, IgA, and IgM)
Dade Behring Dimension Vista® System Protein 1 Calibrator
Dade Behring Dimension Vista® System Protein 3 Control
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k951635 (Beckman Coulter IMMAGE®)
k042735 (N Antisera on the BN Systems)
{2}
k073561 (Dade Behring Dimension Vista Calibrator, Control)
# 3. Comparison with predicates:
To demonstrate correlation and equivalent performance between the new device and predicate Beckman Coulter IMMAGE® Immunochemistry System Urine Immunoglobulin G for urine sample matrix:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate Device |
| Technology | Nephelometric | Same |
| Storage conditions | Refrigerate at 2-8°C until expired | Same |
| Components | Calibrators and Controls are sold separately | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use/Indication for Use: Reagent IgG Antisera | Dimension Vista™ IgG Flex® reagent cartridge: The IgG method is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative measurement of Immunoglobulin G in human serum, heparinized plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and urine on the Dimension Vista™ System. Measurements of IgG aid in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. | IGU reagent, when used in conjunction with IMMAGE® Immunochemistry Systems and Urine Protein Calibrator, is intended for the quantitative determination of Urine Immunoglobulin G (IGU) in human urine by rate nephelometry. |
| Sample type | Serum, heparinized plasma and CSF | Urine only |
| Analyzer | Dimension Vista® System | IMMAGE® Immunochemistry Systems |
| Measuring ranges | Serum/ plasma: 0.14-4.0 g/dL Undiluted CSF: 0.44-12.3 mg/dL Urine: 0.44-5.0 mg/dL | Urine: 0.3-6.0 mg/dL |
| IgG antisera mammal source | Rabbit polyclonal | Processed goat sera |
To demonstrate correlation and equivalent performance between the new device and predicate N Antisera to Human Immunoglobulins on the BN Systems (IgG, IgA, and IgM) for the addition of a pre-reaction step to the IGG-C assay:
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate Device |
| Technology | Nephelometric | Same |
| IgG antisera mammal source | Rabbit polyclonal | Same |
| Storage conditions | Refrigerate at 2-8°C until expired | Same |
| Components | Calibrators and controls are sold separately | Same |
| Expected values | ≤3.40 mg/dL | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use/Indication for Use: Reagent IgG Antisera | Dimension Vista™ IgG Flex® reagent cartridge: The IgG method is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative measurement of Immunoglobulin G in human serum, heparinized plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and urine on the Dimension Vista™ System. Measurements of IgG aid in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. | In vitro diagnostic reagents for the quantitative determination of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM) in human serum, heparinized and EDTA plasma as well as IgG in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by means of immunonephelometry on the BN Systems. |
| Sample type | Serum, plasma (lithium heparin), CSF and urine | Serum, plasma (EDTA; lithium heparin) and CSF |
| Measuring ranges | Undiluted CSF: 0.44-12.3 mg/dL | Undiluted CSF: 0.36-11.5 mg/dL |
| Analyzer | Dimension Vista® System | BN™ Systems |
To demonstrate correlation and equivalent performance between the new device and predicate Dimension Vista® System Protein 1 Calibrator and Protein 3 Control to include IGG-U (IGG in urine):
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate Device |
| Calibrator material source | Human serum | Same |
| Control material source | Human serum and rabbit albumin | Same |
| International Reference standard material | Traceable to ERM® DA 470 (CRM 470) | Same |
| Storage conditions | Refrigerate at 2-8°C until expired | Same |
{4}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use/Indication for Use: Calibrator | The PROT 1 CAL is an in vitro diagnostic product for the calibration of the Dimension Vista® System for: A1AG, A1AT, B2MIC, C3, C4, CER, HAPT, HPX, HCYS, IgA, IgE, IgG [serum/ plasma], (IgG-C) [cerebrospinal fluid], and (IgG-U) [urine], IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgM, PREALB, RBP, STFR and TRF | The PROT 1 CAL is an in vitro diagnostic product for the calibration of the Dimension Vista® System for: A1AG, A1AT, B2MIC, C3, C4, CER, HAPT, HPX, HCYS, IgA, IgE, IgG [serum/ plasma] and (IgG-C) [cerebrospinal fluid], IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgM, PREALB, RBP, STFR and TRF |
| Control | PROT3 CON is an assayed, low level intralaboratory quality control for assessment of precision and analytical bias on the Dimension Vista® System in the determination of A1MIC, sALB*, IgG-C*, IgG-U**, and MALB. *For CSF; **For urine | PROT3 CON is an assayed, low level intralaboratory quality control for assessment of precision and analytical bias on the Dimension Vista® System in the determination of A1MIC, sALB*, IgG-C* and MALB. *For CSF |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Standard Document:
CLSI/NCCLS, EP 9-A2: Method Comparison
CLSI/NCCLS, EP 5-A2: Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement
CLSI/NCCLS, EP 7-A: Interference Testing
CLSI/NCCLS, EP 6-A: Linearity of Quantitative Measurement
Guidance Document:
OIVD/ DIHD Guidance Document Number 785: 510(k) Submission for IgA,G,M,D,E
Immunological System IVD (9/1/1992)
OIVD Guidance Document Number 2231: For Industry and FDA Staff: Assayed and
Unassayed Control Material (6/7/2007)
L. Test Principle:
Proteins contained in human body fluids react with specific antibodies in the reagent, to form immune complexes in an immunochemical reaction. These complexes in the reaction mixture cause the scatter of a beam of light passed through the samples. The intensity of the scattered light is proportional to the concentration of IgG in the sample. The result is evaluated by comparison with a standard of known concentration.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
For urine:
{5}
Reproducibility testing was done in accordance with CLSI document EP5-A2. The intra-assay reproducibility was determined by testing two samples in duplicate twice a day for 20 days. The samples included two human source urine pools (1.0 mg/dL and 4.4 mg/dL), and one Protein 3 control (2.3 mg/dL). The urine pools had %CV of 1.62% and 2.22%; Protein 3 control 4.66%.
The inter-assay reproducibility was determined by testing the same three samples in duplicate twice a day for 20 days. The urine pools had %CV of 7.64% and 3.55%; Protein 3 control 6.71%. The data are summarized below:
| Material | Mean | Intra-assay | | Inter-assay | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Urine pool low | 1.0 mg/dL | 0.0159 | 1.62 | 0.0751 | 7.64 |
| Urine pool high | 4.4 mg/dL | 0.0996 | 2.22 | 0.1549 | 3.55 |
| PROT 3 CON | 2.3 mg/dL | 0.1047 | 4.66 | 0.1508 | 6.71 |
**For CSF:**
Reproducibility testing was done in accordance with CLSI document EP5-A2. The intra-assay reproducibility was determined by testing two samples in duplicate twice a day for 20 days. The samples included two human source CSF pools (1.1 mg/dL and 11.4 mg/dL). Both CSF pools had %CV of 2.73%.
The inter-assay reproducibility was determined by testing the same two samples in duplicate twice a day for 20 days. The CSF pools had %CV of 3.99% and 3.72%. The data are summarized below:
| Material | Mean | Intra-assay | | Inter-assay | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| CSF pool 1 | 1.1 mg/dL | 0.0293 | 2.73 | 0.0428 | 3.99 |
| CSF pool 2 | 11.4 mg/dL | 0.3105 | 2.73 | 0.4224 | 3.72 |
**b. Linearity/assay reportable range:**
**For Urine:**
Linearity across the assay range was confirmed by testing a human urine sample with high concentration (51.7 mg/L) of IgG. This sample was serially diluted 11 times with System Diluent down to the lower detectable measuring range (4.88 mg/L). Each dilution was tested in replicates of five. Data were analyzed in accordance to CLSI EP06-A and EP17-A. Percent recovery was calculated using the formula: (Mean of test/expected concentration) x 100. All dilutions met the acceptance criteria of 85 to 115%. The linear regression analysis was performed. Data showed a regression equation y = -0.542055 + 1.028992, r² = 0.999591.
Reportable range for IgG-U device was set at 4.4-50 mg/L.
**For CSF:**
Linearity across the assay range was confirmed by testing a human CSF sample with
{6}
high concentration (134 mg/L) of IgG. This sample was serially diluted 13 times with System Diluent down to the lower detectable measuring range (6.63 mg/L). Each dilution was tested in replicates of four or five. Data were analyzed in accordance to CLSI EP06-A and EP17-A. Percent recovery was calculated using the formula: (Mean of test/expected concentration) x 100. All dilutions met the acceptance criteria of 85 to 115%. The linear regression analysis was performed. Data showed a regression equation y = -0.244353 + 0.9993525, r² = 0.999112.
Reportable range for IgG-CSF device was set at 4.4-123 mg/L.
## Antigen Excess Effect:
The possibility of antigen excess occurring when using the device was evaluated with urine and CSF samples above the assay range. The samples were analyzed on the Dimension Vista™ instrument, indicating no antigen excess effect up to 5200 mg/L for CSF and 5770 mg/L for urine.
## c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The calibrator and controls are traceable to the reference material ERM® DA 470 (CRM 470).
### Stability
The expiration date claims for the reagents are as follows:
**Unopened reagent cartridges and closed vials:**
Dimension Vista™ IgG Flex® reagent cartridge (IGG) – 24 months
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Calibrator – 24 months
Dimension Vista™ Protein 3 Control – 24 months
**On-board Instrument products:**
Dimension Vista™ IgG Flex® reagent sealed wells – 90 days
Dimension Vista™ IgG Flex® open well reagent cartridge – 21 days
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Calibrator open vial – 9 days
Dimension Vista™ Protein 3 Control open vial – 14 days
## d. Detection limit:
Detection limit (4.4 mg/L) represents the lower limit of the reportable range of urine IgG. The analytical sensitivity is defined as the minimal detectable level of analyte, which can be distinguished from zero. The value was calculated as the mean value of fifteen replicates of three urine samples and system diluent. It was determined to be 4.47 mg/L.
## e. Analytical specificity:
Interference testing was performed according to CLSI document EP7-A2. No significant interference for urine sample matrix was observed in the presence of the following interferents: Hemoglobin up to 115 mg/dL; Bilirubin (unconjugated) up to 2 mg/dL; Bilirubin (conjugated) up to 2.4 mg/dL.
No significant interference for CSF sample matrix was observed in the presence of the following interferents:
Hemoglobin up to 1000 mg/dL; Bilirubin (unconjugated) up to 60 mg/dL; Bilirubin (conjugated) up to 60 mg/dL
7
{7}
Non-interfering substances section of the device package insert provides a list of 37 drugs and other exogenous substances that do not interfere with the assay at the concentrations indicated for CSF sample matrix and 14 for urine sample matrix.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
For Urine:
The table below shows the comparison of 53 urine samples ranging from 4.7-49.4mg/L IgG that were tested with the Dimension Vista™ IgG assay and the predicate Beckman Coulter IMMAGE® Immunochemistry Systems Urine Immunoglobulin G assay. Results were analyzed by Passing-Bablok regression analysis and are summarized below:
| | N | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95%CI) | R |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dimension Vista™ vs. Beckman Coulter IMMAGE® | 53 | 1.035 (0.977, 1.105) | 0.23 (-0.748, 0.916) | 0.976 |
For CSF:
The table below shows the comparison of 104 CSF samples ranging from 5.3-116mg/L IgG that were tested with the Dimension Vista™ IgG assay and the predicate BNProSpec® System. Results were analyzed by Passing-Bablok regression analysis and are summarized below:
| | N | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95%CI) | R |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dimension Vista™ vs. BN ProSpec® System | 104 | 0.956 (0.940, 0.974) | 0.392 (-0.874, 0.075) | 0.994 |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity and specificity:
Not applicable.
b. Other clinical supportive data (when a. is not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
A literature reference was used for the IGG Urine expected value of $< 9.60 \, \mathrm{mg/L}$ (Hofmann W, Guder WG. A diagnostic programme for quantitative analysis of proteinuria. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1989; 27:589-600). This was confirmed by performing a Reference Interval transference study.
{8}
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
9
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.