K080673 · Vertebral Technologies, Inc. · MAX · Jun 10, 2008 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K080673
Device Name
INTERFUSE INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICE
Applicant
Vertebral Technologies, Inc.
Product Code
MAX · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jun 10, 2008
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3080
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The InterFuse™ Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is indicated for intervertebral spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). The InterFuse device is to be used in patients who have had at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment. These patients may have had a previous non-fusion surgery at the involved spinal level(s). The InterFuse device is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft, and to be used with supplemental internal spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use by the FDA in the lumbosacral spine.
Device Story
Modular intervertebral body fusion device; composed of PEEK segments with embedded tantalum beads for radiographic visualization. Segments feature integral rails/slots for assembly within the disc space; vertical slots allow for autogenous bone graft packing to facilitate fusion. Device implanted by surgeons during spinal fusion procedures; provides structural support and maintains disc space height. Modular design allows 3-6 segments per patient; available in various heights and lordotic angles. Used in conjunction with supplemental internal spinal fixation systems. Benefits include stabilization of the vertebral segment and promotion of bone growth for fusion.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by bench testing, including load deflection, cyclic fatigue resistance, material consistency, and stability testing. Cadaver evaluations verified surgical technique and instrument performance. Biocompatibility verified per ISO 10993; sterility verified per EN550.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: PEEK polymer, tantalum (radiopaque markers). Modular design with rail/slot assembly. Dimensions: 4 heights, 2 anterior-posterior sizes, flat and lordotic configurations. Biocompatibility: ISO 10993. Sterilization: EN550. Energy source: None (mechanical).
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1, including those with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis, who have failed at least 6 months of non-operative treatment. May be used in patients with prior non-fusion surgery at the involved level(s).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
*Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 3
# 510(k) Summary
JUN 1 0 2008
# Vertebral Technologies, Inc.
# InterFuse™ Intervertebral Body Fusion Device
510(k) Notification_ KO 806 73
#### MANUFACTURER INFORMATION
- Name & Vertebral Technologies, Inc. (VTI) Address: 5909 Baker Road, Suite 550 Minnetonka, MN 55345 USA
Summary Prepared: March 7, 2008
Contact: Philip B. Jarvi Vice President, Q.A. / Regulatory Affairs 952-912-5400 phone 952-912-5410 fax
#### DEVICE INFORMATION
Trade Name: InterFuse™ Intervertebral Body Fusion Device (IFD)
Classification Name: 21CFR 888.3080 - Intervertebral Fusion Device with Bone Graft, Lumbar
Product Code: MAX
Common / Usual Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device
Substantial equivalence: The Vertebral Technologies, Inc (VTI) InterFuse™
Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is substantially equivalent to FDA approved predicate devices with regard to materials, technological characteristics, indications for use and surgical techniques. These predicate devices are:
Zimmer / Spine Tech; BAK Vista - (P95002) Synthes Spine; SynFix™-LR - (K072253) RSB Spine; InterPlate - (K071922)
{1}------------------------------------------------
080673 ge 20f 3
## Device Description:
VTI's IFD device is made of PEEK, a polymer with a history of use in interbody fusion device designs, and which has modulus similar to bonc. Each segment of the device has embedded metal beads (tantalum) that aid in visualizing the implanted device under x-ray and to aid in position retention when assembled in the disc space. Each segment has an integral rail and / or slot which slides through the rail or slot in the adjacent segment to complete the device. Each segment incorporates a stop to help ensure that it is properly aligned with the adjacent segment. The exposed rail of each segment is removed after the adjacent segment is installed. The modular system allows for as few as three segments to be used, although most patients will require between four and six segments for optimum coverage of the vertebral end plate. Each segment has a vertical slot through the device for the surgeon to fill with autogenous bone that will provide a path for solid bone growth during the fusion process. The device is produced in four heights and two anterior-posterior dimensions to fit a range of potential disc spaces. The device will also be produced in flat and angled (lordotic) shapes to fit the angular geometry of the disc at each disc level.
## Intended Use:
The InterFuse™ Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is indicated for intervertebral spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). The InterFuse device is to be used in patients who have had at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment. These patients may have had a previous non-fusion surgery at the involved spinal level(s). The InterFuse device is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft, and to be used with supplemental internal spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use by the FDA in the lumbosacral spine.
{2}------------------------------------------------
KOYOG
Substantial Equivalence: The VTI InterFuse™ IFD is substantially equivalent to FDA approved predicate devices with regard to indications for use, materials, technological characteristics and surgical techniques. The InterFuse™ IFD offers no additional risks to the patient and the materials and manufacturing methods add no new or additional safety concerns. The InterFuse™ IFD, as well as the predicates, is submitted without clinical information. The substantially equivalent predicate devices are:
> Zimmer / Spine Tech: BAK Vista - (P95002) Synthes Spine; SynFix™-LR - (K072253) RSB Spine; InterPlate - (K071922)
Testing: The InterFuse™ Implant has been developed, verified and validated in compliance with a comprehensive design process. The corresponding Bench Testing has been accomplished according to a Master Test Plan for the device. The test plan shows the required test, the source of the requirement, the protocol and the report. If the method is from a standard, the voluntary standard is referenced.
The bench testing has demonstrated the physical attributes and durability of the InterFuse™ IFD by load deflection, cyclic fatigue resistance, material consistency and stability and processing control. Cadaver testing has verified the surgical technique and instrument performance. Bench testing and cadaver evaluations have also verified the desired performance requirements of device stability, as defined by the resistance of the device to expulsion from the disc space or disassembly in the joint space and resistance to subsidence.
The InterFuse™ IFD also demonstrated that it meets internationally recognized standards for biocompatibility (ISO 10993) and sterility (EN550).
Clinical testing was not used to determine substantial equivalence.
Summary: Based on the evidence of substantial equivalence the InterFuse™ IFD is considered to be safe and effective and will perform as well or better than the referenced predicate devices.
{3}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) of the United States. The seal features a stylized depiction of an eagle with outstretched wings, symbolizing protection and care. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle, indicating the department's name and national affiliation.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
## JUN 1 0 2008
Vertebral Technologies, Incorporated % Philip B. Jarvi and Associates Mr. Philip B. Jarvi Vice President, Quality Assurance/Regulatory Affairs 14289 Yellowpine Andover, Minnesota 55304
Re: K080673
> Trade/Device Name: InterFuse" Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral body fusion device Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MAX Dated: March 07, 2008 Received: March 12, 2008
Dear Mr. Jarvi:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. Iisting of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Philip B. Jarvi
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding postmarket surveillance, please contact CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometric's (OSB's) Division of Postmarket Surveillance at (240) 276-3474. For questions regarding of device adverse events (Medical Device Reporting (MDR)), please contact the Division of Surveillance Systems at (240) 276-3464. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or the Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Mark M. Mulhearn
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: InterFuse™ Intervertebral Body Fusion Device
Indications for Use:
The InterFuse™ Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is indicated for intervertebral spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). The InterFuse device is to be used in patients who have had at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment. These patients may have had a previous non-fusion surgery at the involved spinal level(s). The InterFuse device is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft, and to be used with supplemental internal spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use by the FDA in the lumbosacral spine.
Prescription Use Yes Over-The-Counter Use No AND/OR (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Neil R. Ogle for mem
Sion of General, Restorative, and Neurological Devices
510(k) Number: K080673
Page 1 of 1
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.