IDEAL LIFE GLUCO-MANAGER GMM 0001 BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEM
Applicant
Taidoc Technology Corporation
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jun 27, 2008
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The IDEAL LIFE Gluco-Manager GMM Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger and the following alternative sites: the palm, the forearm, the upper-arm, the calf and the thigh. It is intended for use by healthcare professionals and people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of diabetes control program. It is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus. The alternative site testing in this system can be used only during steady-state blood glucose conditions. This system offers Bluetooth wireless communication function which is able to transfer historical data in the memory to other devices, such as PC or a compatible device validated by the manufacturer.
Device Story
System comprises electrochemical meter and dry reagent biosensor test strips. Measures glucose concentration in fresh capillary whole blood via current proportional to glucose level. Used by patients at home or healthcare professionals in clinical settings. Features Bluetooth wireless connectivity to transfer historical memory data to PCs or IDEAL LIFE POD™ devices. Provides quantitative glucose readings to assist in monitoring diabetes control program effectiveness.
Clinical Evidence
Performance evaluated in laboratory and clinical settings by both healthcare professionals and lay users. Studies demonstrated system performance meets intended use requirements.
Technological Characteristics
Electrochemical meter with dry reagent biosensor test strips. Quantitative measurement based on current proportional to glucose concentration. Bluetooth wireless communication for data transfer. Class II device (21 CFR 862.1345).
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative glucose measurement in fresh capillary whole blood (finger, palm, forearm, upper-arm, calf, thigh) for diabetes mellitus patients at home or healthcare professionals. Not for diabetes diagnosis or screening. Alternative site testing restricted to steady-state glucose conditions.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
ACHTUNG TD-4207 Blood Glucose Monitoring System (k061181)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k080283
B. Purpose for Submission:
Modification of a cleared device by changing the appearance and adding Bluetooth capability for transmission to a personal computer or a compatible device validated by the manufacturer.
C. Measurand:
Capillary whole blood glucose
D. Type of Test:
Blood Glucose Concentration through a Quantitative Amperometric Assay (Glucose Oxidase)
E. Applicant:
TaiDoc Technology Corporation
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
IDEAL LIFE Gluco-Manager GMM 0001 Blood Glucose Monitoring System
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 862.1345, Glucose Test System
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
NBW, CGA
4. Panel:
75 (Clinical Chemistry)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for use.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The IDEAL LIFE Gluco-Manager GMM Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger and the following alternative sites: the palm, the forearm, the upper-arm, the calf and the thigh. It is intended for use by healthcare professionals and people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of diabetes control program. It is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus.
The alternative site testing in this system can be used only during steady-state blood glucose conditions.
This system offers Bluetooth wireless communication function which is able to transfer historical data in the memory to other devices, such as PC or a compatible device validated by the manufacturer.
{1}
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
- Not for neonatal use
- Not for screening or diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
- Alternative site testing is for use at times of steady state only
- Not for patients who are dehydrated, in shock, critically ill, or in a hyperosmolar state
4. Special instrument requirements:
IDEAL LIFE Gluco-Manager GMM 0001 Blood Glucose Monitoring System
I. Device Description:
The IDEAL LIFE Gluco-Manager GMM 0001 Blood Glucose Monitoring System is based on an electrochemical biosensor technology (electrochemical) and the principle of capillary action. Capillary action at the end of the test strip draws the blood into the action chamber and the blood glucose result is displayed in 7 seconds. The control solutions available are used to test the performance of the device and were cleared under k012430.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
ACHTUNG TD-4207 Blood Glucose Monitoring System
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k061181
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Detection Method | Amperometry | Amperometry |
| Enzyme | Glucose Oxidase | Glucose Oxidase |
| Test Range | 20 – 600 mg/dL | 20 – 600 mg/dL |
| Test Time | 7 seconds | 7 seconds |
| Volume Required | 0.7 μL | 0.7 μL |
| Meter Coding | Test Strip Insertion/Code Selection | Test Strip Insertion/Code Selection |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Wireless Data Transmission | Yes | No |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- ISO 15197: In vitro diagnostic test systems - Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus.
- CLSI EP5-A: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices
- CLSI EP9-A: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
L. Test Principle:
Glucose measurement is based on electrical potential caused by the reaction of glucose with
{2}
the reagents contained on the strip's electrodes. The glucose in the sample is oxidized by the enzyme glucose oxidase, and the current resulting from this enzymatic reaction is measured and converted to glucose concentration by the meter. The magnitude of the current is proportional to the concentration of glucose in the sample.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
For performance of the glucose meter and test strips, see k061181. The performance from k061181 is provided below:
The sponsor evaluated the precision of the device using replicate measurements of glucose control solutions and anticoagulated venous whole blood. In order to determine that the change in sample volume does not affect precision, the sponsor tested four volume levels (0.5, 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8 μL) of venous whole blood collected from 10 volunteers. The ten samples were pooled together, depleted of glucose, and then separated into three groups. Each group was spiked with a dextrose solution to within the desired concentration range: low 60-92 mg/dL, normal 109-165 mg/dL and high 259-389 mg/dL. Different testing volumes (0.5μL, 0.6μL, 0.7μL and 0.8 μL) of each sample were evaluated for repeatability. Since the volume claimed is 0.7 μL, only the 0.7 μL data is presented below.
| Patient | Low Control Level (60-92 mg/dL) | | | Mid Control Level (109-165 mg/dL) | | | High Control Level (259-389 mg/mL) | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Lot 1 | Lot 2 | Lot 3 | Lot 1 | Lot 2 | Lot 3 | Lot 1 | Lot 2 | Lot 3 |
| 1 | 68 | 68 | 72 | 139 | 139 | 144 | 309 | 309 | 300 |
| 2 | 68 | 68 | 65 | 132 | 132 | 141 | 310 | 310 | 297 |
| 3 | 70 | 70 | 71 | 130 | 130 | 133 | 314 | 314 | 307 |
| 4 | 68 | 68 | 71 | 136 | 136 | 137 | 308 | 308 | 300 |
| 5 | 72 | 72 | 70 | 133 | 133 | 141 | 311 | 311 | 297 |
| 6 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 133 | 133 | 134 | 312 | 312 | 313 |
| 7 | 70 | 70 | 74 | 137 | 137 | 131 | 306 | 306 | 305 |
| 8 | 69 | 69 | 71 | 135 | 135 | 134 | 313 | 313 | 302 |
| 9 | 65 | 65 | 69 | 134 | 134 | 141 | 310 | 310 | 301 |
| 10 | 64 | 64 | 74 | 137 | 137 | 145 | 305 | 305 | 305 |
| Total CV(%) | 3.98 | | | 2.85 | | | 1.60 | | |
#### b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The linearity of the device was originally demonstrated in k041107. The sponsor verified accuracy of the device over the reportable range (20 - 600 mg/dL) against a standard detection method (see Method Comparison below).
#### c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The controls supplied with this device were previously cleared under k012430. The
{3}
sponsor has shown traceability of the meter to a laboratory analyzer. The sponsor has described their strip stability testing protocol and acceptance criteria which were found to be acceptable.
d. Detection limit:
The measuring range of the IDEAL LIFE Gluco-Manager GMM 0001 Blood Glucose Monitoring System is 20 - 600 mg/dL. This range was verified by the linearity study (referenced from k041107).
e. Analytical specificity:
The specificity of the device was assessed in k041107. Given that the fundamental technology has not changed from k041107, the sponsor claims that elevated blood triglycerides and the following substances do not affect results: acetaminophen, dopa, methyldopa, L-dopa and tolbutamide occurring in expected blood concentrations. Due to the change in read time of the glucose oxidase reaction, the sponsor provided studies of reducing substances along with an altitude study for the new strips. Reducing substances such as uric acid and ascorbic acid occurring in expected blood concentrations (0-3 mg/dL and 5-20 mg/dL respectively) were shown not interfere with glucose measurements. The altitude study also showed that the percentage of mean difference between strips is within the acceptable range (as defined by ISO 15197: within ±15 mg/dL when glucose concentration <75mg/dL and within ±20% when glucose concentration ≥75mg/dL) indicating that the new test strips are equivalent to the predicate strips at the same altitude (up to 10,744 feet).
f. Assay cut-off:
Not Applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The sponsor demonstrated that the GMM 0001 Blood Glucose Monitoring System for finger stick is equivalent to a standard method (YSI-2300) by having 121 patients for the standard method compared to finger stick
The studies are summarized below:
| | YSI vs. Finger |
| --- | --- |
| N | 121 |
| Slope | 0.9609 |
| Intercept | 5.4984 |
| r | 0.9917 |
Finger versus YSI and each site met the ISO 15197 standard of ninety-five percent (95%) of the individual glucose results falling within ±15 mg/dL of the results of the comparator method at glucose concentrations for samples <75 mg/dL and within ±20
{4}
% at glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . The samples that met the ISO 15197 requirement are summarized in the table below:
| Patient | Fingerstick vs. YSI |
| --- | --- |
| Samples < 75 mg/dL within ±15 mg/dL YSI | 37/38 (97%) |
| Samples ≥ 75 mg/dL within ± 20% YSI | 80/83 (96%) |
| Total | 117/121 (97%) |
For performance of the glucose meter and test strips, see also k061181. The performance from k061181 (with alternate site testing) is provided below:
The sponsor demonstrated that the ACHTUNG TD-4207 Blood Glucose Monitoring System for finger stick is equivalent to a standard method (YSI-2300) and can be used on alternate sites (specifically the capillary blood from finger compared to the palm, forearm, upper arm, calf, and thigh) by having 120 patients for the standard method compared to finger stick and 100 patients for each alternate site test the meter. For the finger stick against the standard method, samples ranged as follows: $10\%$ of samples were $20 - 50\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , $35\%$ of samples were $51 - 110\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , $30\%$ of samples were $111 - 150\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , $10\%$ of samples were $151 - 250\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , $10\%$ of samples were $251 - 400\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , and $5\%$ of samples were $401 - 600\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . For the AST sites, the samples ranged as follows: $40\%$ of samples were $51 - 110\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , $30\%$ of samples were $111 - 150\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , $20\%$ of samples were $151 - 250\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , and $10\%$ of samples were $251 - 400\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . All patients blood glucose levels were in a steady state for these studies. The studies are summarized below:
| | YSI vs. Finger | Finger vs. Palm | Finger vs. Forearm | Finger vs. Upper arm | Finger vs. Calf | Finger vs. Thigh |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| N | 120 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Slope | 1.0052 | 1.0057 | 0.8716 | 0.9102 | 0.9173 | 0.9842 |
| Intercept | 1.7264 | 1.8744 | 9.1884 | 6.2178 | 5.3413 | 0.7822 |
| r | 0.9948 | 0.9889 | 0.9839 | 0.9822 | 0.9822 | 0.9805 |
Finger versus YSI and each site met the ISO 15197 standard of ninety-five percent (95%) of the individual glucose results falling within $\pm 15\mathrm{mg / dL}$ of the results of the comparator method at glucose concentrations for samples $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and within $\pm 20\%$ at glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . The samples that met the ISO 15197 requirement are summarized in the table below:
| Site | Finger | Palm | Forearm | Upper arm | Calf | Thigh |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| N | 120 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Percentage That Met ISO Requirement | 100% (120/120) | 99% (99/100) | 100% (100/100) | 98% (98/100) | 98% (98/100) | 98% (98/100) |
{5}
The sponsor also has labeling indicating the conditions under which AST can be used and when AST should not be used.
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable. Capillary whole blood is the only indicated matrix.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not Applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not Applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
The sponsor provided a readability study that indicated that the user manual, test strip labeling, and control solution labeling is at an 8th grade reading level or below.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The sponsor included the following expected values for normal glucose levels in their strip labeling:
Fasting and before meals - 70-110 mg/dL (3.9-6.1 mmol/L)¹
Hours after meals - Less than 140 mg/dL (7.8mmol/L)²
¹Sacks, DB in "Carbohydrates", Burtis, CA, Ashwood, ER(ed), Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company, 1999.
²ADA Clinical Practice Recommendations 2003.
N. Instrument Name:
IDEAL LIFE Gluco-Manager GMM 0001 Blood Glucose Monitoring System
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Each test strip is single use and must be replaced with a new strip for additional readings. The IDEAL LIFE Gluco-Manager GMM 0001 Blood Glucose Monitoring System is capable of data transmission to a PC or a compatible device validated by the manufacturer.
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly
{6}
to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
This device is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger, palm, forearm, upper arm, calf, and thigh only. Since the whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip there are no special handling or storage issues.
5. Calibration:
A code number is provided with each batch of test strips to calibrate the meter for that batch. The code number must be entered into the meter to match the number found on the test strip vial. No further calibrations are required of the user.
6. Quality Control:
The sponsor is providing a low, medium, high glucose control solutions with this device. When a test strip is inserted into the meter, the control mode can be activated. This prevents control results from being stored in the internal memory. An acceptable range for each control level is printed on the test strip vial label.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
None.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.