K080272 · Boston Scientific Corp · ITX · Mar 11, 2008 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K080272
Device Name
ATLANTIS PVIMAGING CATHETER, MODEL H749364560
Applicant
Boston Scientific Corp
Product Code
ITX · Radiology
Decision Date
Mar 11, 2008
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.1570
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Atlantis™ PV Imaging Catheter is intended for ultrasound examination of peripheral pathology only. Intravascular ultrasound imaging is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures.
Device Story
Atlantis™ PV Imaging Catheter is a sterile, single-use, over-the-wire (OTW) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) catheter. Device features 8F distal crossing profile and 15MHz radial-looking ultrasonic transducer at distal tip. Operates with Boston Scientific IVUS systems (iLab™, Galaxy2/Galaxy™, Clearview™ Ultra). Catheter body includes dual-lumen section for imaging core and guidewire, and telescoping shaft for 25 cm linear transducer movement. Proximal end connects to Motor Drive Unit (MDU) via electro-mechanical interface. Used by clinicians during peripheral vascular interventional procedures to visualize vessel pathology. Output is real-time ultrasound imagery displayed on compatible BSC imaging systems, assisting physicians in assessing vessel anatomy and guiding interventional therapy.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance testing included bench, biocompatibility, and sterility evaluations to confirm the device meets requirements for its intended use.
Indicated for patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures requiring ultrasound examination of peripheral pathology.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A diagnostic ultrasonic transducer is a device made of a piezoelectric material that converts electrical signals into acoustic signals and acoustic signals into electrical signals and intended for use in diagnostic ultrasonic medical devices. Accessories of this generic type of device may include transmission media for acoustically coupling the transducer to the body surface, such as acoustic gel, paste, or a flexible fluid container.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K080272
### CONFIDENTIAL
MAR 1 1 2008
# 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
## Boston Scientific Corporation
# Atlantis™ PV Imaging Catheter
| Submitted By | Boston Scientific Corporation<br>49700 Bayside Parkway<br>Fremont, CA 94538 |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person | Janice Brown<br>Director, Regulatory Affairs<br>Tel: (510) 624-2582<br>Fax: (510) 624-2569<br>janice.brown@bsci.com |
| Date Prepared | January 31, 2008 |
| Proprietary Name | AtlantisTM PV Imaging Catheter |
| Common Name(s) | Ultrasonic Diagnostic Transducer<br>Ultrasonic Intravascular Catheter |
| Classification<br>Name(s) | 21 CFR 892.1570 (ITX)<br>Transducer, Ultrasonic, Diagnostic<br>21 CFR 870.1200 (OBJ)<br>Catheter, Ultrasound Intravascular |
### Predicate Device
.
The Atlantis™ PV Imaging Catheter is substantially equivalent to the following predicate device:
| Name | Manufacturer | 510(k) Number |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------|---------------|
| Atlantis™ PV Imaging<br>Catheter | Boston Scientific Corporation | K050684 |
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### Description of the Device
The Atlantis™ PV imaging catheter (H749364560) is a sterile, single use, over-the-wire (OTW) imaging catheter with a 8F distal crossing profile and a transducer capable of producing a frequency of 15MHz and a 8F distal crossing profile. This imaging catheter is designed to be operated with Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC) Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging Systems: iLab™ (K072517), Galaxy2/Galaxy™ (K980851), and Clearview™ Ultra (K921750).
The Atlantis™ PV catheter consists of two main assemblies:
- . Catheter body
- Imaging Core .
The catheter body is comprised of two sections:
- . Dual lumen
- Telescoping section (shaft) .
The dual lumen section is the "working length" of the catheter. The dual lumen is an over-the-wire (OTW) design containing an imaging core lumen and a guidewire lumen. The telescoping section remains outside of the introducer sheath. The telescoping shaft allows the imaging core to be advanced and retracted for 25 cm of linear movement. The corresponding movement of the transducer occurs inside the imaging core lumen. The catheter body is attached to the telescope shaft via a y-manifold with male/female luer connection. The straight leg of the y-manifold is the guidewire exit port with a female luer thread. The luer thread allows flushing of the guidewire lumen.
The imaging core is composed of a hi-torque, flexible, rotating drive cable with a radial looking ultrasonic transducer at the distal tip. The distal ends of the imaging core and the catheter body are radiopaque for visualization of the imaging plane and the catheter tip. An electro-mechanical connector interface at the proximal end makes the connection to the Motor Drive Unit (MDU) / Instrument. The MDU-catheter interface consists of an integrated mechanical drive hub and electrical connection.
#### Intended Use/Indications for Use
The Atlantis™ PV Imaging Catheter is intended for ultrasound examination of peripheral pathology only. Intravascular ultrasound imaging is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures.
#### Device Technology Characteristics and Comparison to Predicate Device
The Atlantis™ PV Imaging Catheter and its predicate device are comprised of a catheter body and an imaging core. They are similar in terms of their intended use, fundamental technology, operating principle, and catheter design. Modifications to the Atlantis™ PV
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### Boston Scientific Corporation
Imaging Catheter, the subject of this submission, include design, material, and labeling changes.
#### Non-Clinical Test Results
The performance test results for bench, biocompatibility and sterility testing of the Atlantis™ PV Imaging Catheter demonstrate that the device meets or exceeds the performance requirements for the specified intended use.
#### Conclusion
The modified Atlantis™ PV Imaging Catheter is substantially equivalent to its predicate device. The test results support the determination that the two devices are substantially equivalent, and confirm the device is safe and effective for its intended use.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is circular, with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles an eagle or bird in flight, composed of three curved lines.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
MAR 1 1 2008
Boston Scientific Corporation c/o Ms. Janice Brown Director, Regulatory Systems IVUS Technology Center 47900 Bayside Parkway Fremont, CA 94538-6515
Re: K080272
Atlantis PV Imaging Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1570 Regulation Name: Diagnostic Ultrasound Transducer Regulatory Class: Class II (two) Product Code: ITX, OBJ Dated: January 31, 2008 Received: February 1, 2008
Dear Ms. Brown:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
This determination of substantial equivalence applies to the following transducers intended for use with the iLab™, Galaxy2/Galaxy™, and Clearview™™ Ultra Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging Systems, as described in your premarket notification:
Atlantis TM PV Imaging Catheter, Model H749364560
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 -- Ms. Janice Brown
be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807): labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This determination of substantial equivalence is granted on the condition that prior to shipping the first device, vou submit a postclearance special report. This report should contain complete information, including acoustic output measurements based on production line devices, requested in Appendix G, (enclosed) of the Center's September 30, 1997 "Information for Manufacturers Seeking Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers." If the special report is incomplete or contains unacceptable values (e.g., acoustic output greater than approved levels), then the 510(k) clearance may not apply to the production units which as a result may be considered adulterated or misbranded.
The special report should reference the manufacturer's 510(k) number. It should be clearly and prominently marked "ADD-TO-FILE" and should be submitted in duplicate to:
> Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health Document Mail Center (HFZ-401) 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville, Maryland 20850
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus permits your device to proceed to market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 3 – Ms. Janice Brown
If you have any questions regarding the content of this letter, please contact Lisa E. Leveille at (240) 276-4095.
Sincerely yours,
Pam D. Zuckerman, M.D.
am D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number: Ko80272
Device Name: Atlantis™ PV Imaging Catheter
Indications for Use:
The Atlantis™ PV Imaging Catheter is intended for ultrasound examination of peripheral pathology only. Intravascular ultrasound imaging is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures.
Prescription Use ਨ (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Devices 51000 Numbe
Traditional 510(k) Atlantis ™ PV Imaging Catheter January 31, 2008
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Attachment 2.0 Diagnostic Indications for Use Form Atlantis™ PV Imaging Catheter
Intended Use: Diagnostic ultrasound imaging of fluid flow analysis of the human body as follows:
| Clinical<br>Application | A | B | M | PWD | CWD | Color<br>Doppler | Amplitude<br>Doppler | Color Velocity<br>Imaging | Combined<br>(specify) | Other<br>(specify) |
|----------------------------------|---|---|---|-----|-----|------------------|----------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------|
| Ophthalmic | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fetal | | | | | | | | | | |
| Abdominal | | | | | | | | | | |
| Intraoperative<br>(specify) | | | | | | | | | | |
| Intraoperative<br>Neurological | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pediatric | | | | | | | | | | |
| Small Organ<br>(specify) | | | | | | | | | | |
| Neonatal Cephalic | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adult Cephalic | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cardiac | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transesophageal | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transrectal | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transvaginal | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transurethral | | | | | | | | | | |
| Intravascular | | P | | | | | | | | |
| Peripheral<br>Vascular | | | | | | | | | | |
| Laparoscopic | | | | | | | | | | |
| Musculo-skeletal<br>Conventional | | | | | | | | | | |
| Musculo-skeletal<br>Superficial | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other (specify) | | | | | | | | | | |
N = New indication; P = Previously cleared by FDA; E = Added under Appendix E Additional Comments: Cleared under K022860 (November 21, 2002), K041727 (cleared July 23, 2004) and K050684 (cleared May 20, 2005)
#### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE -- CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED
#### Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Traditional 510(k) Atlantis ™ PV Imaging Catheter January 31, 2008
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.