APOLOWAKO HBA1C, GLUCOSE AND ANALYZER, MODELS 993-24601, 991-24401 AND 993-25201
K080123 · Wako Chemicals USA, Inc. · CFR · Jul 17, 2008 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K080123
Device Name
APOLOWAKO HBA1C, GLUCOSE AND ANALYZER, MODELS 993-24601, 991-24401 AND 993-25201
Applicant
Wako Chemicals USA, Inc.
Product Code
CFR · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jul 17, 2008
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The APOLOWAKO HbA1c and APOLOWAKO Glucose are for the quantitative determination on the APOLOWAKO analyzer of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) % and glucose in whole blood samples.
Device Story
APOLOWAKO system is a point-of-care analyzer for quantitative determination of glucose and HbA1c in whole blood. System includes automated liquid dispenser, temperature-controlled reagent carousel, analysis compartment, and display. Input: whole blood sample in measurement disk. Operation: analyzer performs automated centrifugation to separate plasma for glucose testing; HbA1c testing involves dilution and hemolysis. Glucose measured via hexokinase/G-6-PDH enzymatic colorimetric reaction (absorbance at 340 nm). HbA1c measured via immune inhibition turbidimetric assay using anti-HbA1c antibodies. Output: glucose concentration (mg/dL) and HbA1c percentage. Used in point-of-care settings by clinicians/operators. Reagent information tags on units manage calibration, shelf-life, and lot parameters. Results assist healthcare providers in monitoring long-term glycemic control and diagnosing carbohydrate metabolism disorders.
Clinical Evidence
Method comparison study against FDA-cleared reference methods. Sample size: at least 387 samples for glucose and 352 for HbA1c. Results showed statistically significant correlation with slopes approaching 1.0 and y-intercepts approaching zero. Correlation coefficients (r) were 0.99 or better for both assays. Non-clinical testing included within-day and between-day imprecision (HbA1c CV 1.2-3.0%; Glucose CV 0.6-1.8%), linearity, and interference testing.
Technological Characteristics
Table-top POC analyzer (31cm x 47.5cm x 56cm, 25kg). Uses liquid reagents with information tags for parameter control (calibration, shelf-life, lot). Sensing principle: colorimetric, enzyme-based (glucose) and absorbance, immune inhibition (HbA1c). Automated plasma separation for glucose. Integrated temperature-controlled carrousel and automated liquid dispenser.
Indications for Use
Indicated for monitoring long-term glucose control in individuals with diabetes mellitus (HbA1c) and for the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders, including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, idiopathic hypoglycemia, and pancreatic islet cell carcinoma (Glucose).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
CHOLESTECH LDX (k904082)
CHOLESTECH GDX (k011933)
Beckman Unicel DxC 800 (k042291)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k080123
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Whole blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative Colorimetric glucose and hemoglobin and Turbidimetric HbA1c
E. Applicant:
Wako Chemicals USA, Inc
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
APOLOWAKO GLU
APOLOWAKO HbA1c
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CFR – Glucose test system | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1345 | 75, Chemistry |
| LCP – Glycosylated hemoglobin assay | Class II | 21 CFR 864.7470 | 81, Hematology |
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The APOLOWAKO HbA1c and APOLOWAKO Glucose are for the quantitative determination on the APOLOWAKO analyzer of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c %) and glucose in whole blood samples.
HbA1c - Measurement of % HbA1c is used to monitor long-term glucose control in individuals with diabetes mellitus.
Glucose - Measurement of glucose is used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders, including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia and idiopathic hypoglycemia and pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription and point-of-care use
4. Special instrument requirements:
APOLOWAKO Analyzer
I. Device Description:
The APOLOWAKO test system contains the following:
APOLOWAKO Analyzer is a fully contained system, consisting of an automated liquid dispenser, temperature controlled reagent carousel, analysis compartment, sample holder and a display screen. The analyzer uses liquid reagents which are packaged into kits.
APOLOWAKO Glucose test kit contains 2 reagent units. Each unit contains three reagent bottles. Two of the bottles are ready to use liquid reagents and are Enzyme containing good's buffer at pH6.5, hexokinase (HK Yeast), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PGH microorganism), β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide oxidized form (NAD yeast) and sodium azide. The liquid calibrator contains 300 mg/dL of glucose and sodium azide.
APOLOWAKO HbA1c test contains one packaged kit which contains 3 reagent units for HbA1c and 2 reagent units for Hemoglobin. HbA1c are liquid ready to use reagents and are 1) anti-HbA1c containing good's buffer at pH of 6.2 and anti-human
2
{2}
HbA1c antibody (sheep, polyclonal), 2) Polyhapten containing good's buffer at pH 6.2 and HbA1c polyhapten and 3) the calibrator contains hemolysate and sodium azide. The Hemoglobin is a liquid ready to use reagent. It includes a hemolyzing reagent containing tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide and a buffer containing phosphate buffer at pH of 7.4.
All reagents have a reagent information tag on the back of each unit. The information contained on the tag controls the reagent parameters and conditions such as calibration, reagent quantity, shelf-life and lot number.
Other materials required:
APOLOWAKO Color standard, a one package kit containing 2 reagent units. Each unit contains two reagent bottles. The standard is liquid and ready to use. Reagent 1 – Diluent contains sodium chloride and Reagent 2 – Color Solution contains dye. This standard is used to evaluate the accuracy of the on-board pipetting and detection systems.
APOLOWAKO washing solution
APOLOWAKO measurement disk
APOLOWAKO pure water
Quality control material (sold separately).
All human source materials were tested by FDA approved methods and found to be negative for HIV-1, HIV-2, HCV, and HBsAg.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
CHOLESTECH LDX, Cholestech Corporation
CHOLESTECH GDX, Cholestech Corporation
Beckman Unicel DxC 800
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k904082, k011933 and k042291, respectively
{3}
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities/Differences | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | LDX/GDX | Beckman Unicel DxC 800 |
| Indications for use | Measurement of percent HbA1c is used to monitor long-term glucose control in individuals with diabetes mellitus. Measurement of glucose is used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders, including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia and idiopathic hypoglycemia | Same | Measurements of HbA1c are accepted as a method to measure long-term glucose control in patients with diabetes mellitus. Elevated levels of HbA1c% suggest the need for more aggressive treatment of glycemia. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia and idiopathic hypoglycemia. |
| Sample | Whole blood | Whole blood | Whole blood (HbA1c) and Serum/plasma (glucose) |
| Testing Environment | Point-of-Care | Point-of-Care | Professional |
| Reagent format | Liquid | Dry | Liquid |
| Methodology | Colorimetric, enzyme-based (glucose), absorbance, immune inhibition (HbA1c) | Colorimetric, affinity chromatography | Colorimetric, enzyme based and Absorbance immune inhibition (HbA1c) |
{4}
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- FDA Guidance: Format for Traditional and Abbreviated 510(k)s Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff (2005)
- FDA Draft Guidance for 510(k) Submission of Glycohemoglobin (Glycated or Glycosylated) Hemoglobin for IVDs (1991)
- FDA Guidance for Industry In Vitro Diagnostic Glucose Test System; Final (1998)
- CLSI EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline-Second Edition (2004)
- CLSI EP17-A: Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation; Approved Guideline (2004)
L. Test Principle:
Glucose – The analyzer automatically separates the plasma from whole blood for testing. The plasma is separated using centrifugation carried out in a measurement disk on the instrument. The plasma is then transferred to another cell on the measurement disk where the reaction takes place. When a sample is mixed with the enzyme and ATP reagent, the glucose in the sample yields glucose-6-phosphate (G-6-P) and adenosine-5′-diphosphate (ADP). The G-6-P is converted in the presence of NAD. By measuring the increase in absorbance at 340 nm, the glucose concentration in the sample is determined.
HbA1c - A whole blood sample is dispensed onto the measurement disk. The sample is then diluted and hemolyzed. The hemolyzed solution is transferred to another cell on the measurement disk where the reaction takes place. When the sample is mixed with anti-HbA1c reagent a soluble antigen-antibody complex is formed. HbA1c polyhapten binds with excess antibodies and the resulting agglutination complex is measured turbidimetrically. The degree of turbidity is proportional to the concentration of excess anti HbA1c antibody and is inversely proportional to the concentration of HbA1c in the sample. Hemoglobin concentration is determined in a second cell by measuring the absorbance of Hemoglobin diluted with buffer reagent.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Within-run precision was conducted in-house using three heparinized whole blood samples. Samples 1 and 2 were naturally occurring whole blood samples. Sample 3 was a whole blood sample spiked with analyte. Each sample was tested 21 times in one day. Results are presented in the table below:
{5}
6
| | Within-run | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean | SD | CV% |
| Glucose | | | |
| Sample 1 | 56 mg/dL | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Sample 2 | 97 mg/dL | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Sample 3 | 348 mg/dL | 1.6 | 0.5 |
| HbA1c | | | |
| Sample 1 | 4.8 mg/dL | .07 | 1.5 |
| Sample 2 | 7.7 mg/dL | .09 | 1.2 |
| Sample 3 | 16.7 mg/dL | .22 | 1.3 |
Between-day precision was conducted using two levels of control for glucose and three hemolysate samples. The samples were tested in-house twice a day for 21 days by multiple operators, instruments and reagent lots. Results are presented in the table below:
| | Between-day | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean | SD | CV% |
| Glucose | | | |
| Sample 1 | 72 mg/dL | 0.8 | 1.1 |
| Sample 2 | 185 mg/dL | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| HbA1c | | | |
| Sample 1 | 4.8 mg/dL | 0.7 | 1.5 |
| Sample 2 | 7.0 mg/dL | .21 | 3.0 |
| Sample 3 | 15.2 mg/dL | .40 | 2.6 |
Point-of-Care precision studies:
Precision studies were conducted at three POC sites with 10 operators typically found in these settings. Two control samples were tested once per day, over 33 days on four instruments. The results are presented below:
{6}
7
| | Site 1 | | | Site 2 | | | Site 3 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean | SD | % CV | Mean | SD | % CV | Mean | SD | % CV |
| Glucose | | | | | | | | | |
| Level 1 | 59.8 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 58.1 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 59.0 | 1.6 | 2.7 |
| Level 3 | 357 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 349.4 | 4.8 | 1.4 | 354.9 | 7.1 | 2.0 |
| HbA1c | | | | | | | | | |
| Level 1 | 5.2 | 0.2 | 4.2 | 5.2 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 5.0 | 0.2 | 4.9 |
| Level 2 | 10.8 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 10.4 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 10.3 | 0.3 | 2.9 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The linearity range for each assay was assessed by diluting whole blood samples for each analyte. Sample one for each analyte covered the assay's low range and was diluted with saline to obtain 5 additional samples. The second sample for each analyte was used to cover the assay's high range. A whole blood sample was spiked then diluted with whole blood to obtain additional samples. The dilutions were assayed and the percent recovery was calculated. The measuring range for each assay is Glucose 18-370 mg/dL and HbA1c 3.0%-16.5%. The results are presented below:
Glucose
| Measured Conc. mg/dL | Expected Conc. mg/dL | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0 | 0 | |
| 19 | 18 | 106 |
| 36 | 35 | 103 |
| 54 | 53 | 102 |
| 71 | 70 | 101 |
| 90 | 88 | 102 |
| 90 | 91 | 99 |
| 193 | 196 | 98 |
| 299 | 302 | 99 |
| 398 | 407 | 98 |
| The resulting linear regression is y= 0.979x + 1.4689(R2 = 0.9999) | | |
HbA1c
| Measured Conc. mg/dL | Expected Conc. mg/dL | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2.9 | 2.9 | 100 |
| 3.6 | 3.5 | 103 |
| 4.0 | 4.1 | 98 |
{7}
| 4.8 | 4.7 | 102 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5.3 | 5.3 | 100 |
| 5.7 | 5.9 | 97 |
| 5.9 | 5.9 | 100 |
| 8.2 | 8.0 | 103 |
| 10.7 | 10.1 | 106 |
| 13.3 | 12.3 | 108 |
| 15.0 | 14.4 | 104 |
| 16.5 | 16.5 | 100 |
| The resulting linear regression is y=1.0441x - 0.1526 (R2 = 0.998) | | |
# Spiked Recovery
Unspiked heparinized whole blood samples at three different concentrations for GLU 45, 56 and $186\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and for HbA1c 3.5, 5.9 and $5.9\%$ were used. The base samples were assayed to obtain the concentration of glucose and HbA1c in the samples. Increasing amounts of HbA1c coming from a high sample and glucose were added to the samples and were assayed. The concentrations were measured and the percent recovery was calculated. The recovery for glucose ranged from $96 - 104\%$ and HbA1c from $100 - 110\%$ .
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
APOLOWAKO HbA1c assay is traceable to the Diabetes control and Complications Trail (DCCT) Method for measurement of HbA1c. HbA1c values are reported according to the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) at the DCCT level.
The sponsor has documented traceability to the NGSP's recommended accuracy base for Hgb A1c by performing a direct comparison with a Secondary Reference Laboratory (SRL) using 40 fresh human specimens. NGSP certifications expire after one year.
APOLOWAKO glucose assay is traceable to the NIST SRM917B standard.
The sponsor recommends using commercially available assayed liquid controls..
Real time stability studies have been conducted. Protocols and acceptance criteria were described and found to be acceptable. The manufacturer claims the following expiration date:
When stored unopened at $2 - 10^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ , the assay reagent is good until the expiration date.
{8}
After opening, the assay reagent is good on board for 28 days when stored at 2-10 °C.
d. Detection limit:
The Limit of Blank and the Limit of Detection for each analyte was determined by running a true blank sample and four low samples. Each sample was assayed in 15 replicates in one day. The testing was performed on one instrument by one operator. The detection limits are 0.7 mg/dL glucose and .099% for HbA1c. See the linearity section above for the measuring range of each analyte.
e. Analytical specificity:
Studies were performed to assess common or known substances that could interfere with the each method. Sponsor states that a substance was considered to show no significant interference if the difference between test sample and the blank sample was <10%. Each analyte was found to have no significant interference at the concentration listed below:
| | Glucose | HbA1c |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Highest Level Tested with <10% Interference | Highest Level Tested with <10% Interference |
| Hemoglobin | 500 mg/dL | N/A |
| Bilirubin | 50 mg/dL | 50 mg/dL |
| Conjugated bilirubin | 40 mg/dL | 40 mg/dL |
| Intrafat | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Ascorbic acid | 50 mg/dL | 50 mg/dL |
| EDTA-2NA | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Heparin sodium | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Sodium fluoride | 2.0% | N/A |
To study the interference from labile A1c on the assay, two heparinized whole blood samples representing normal and diabetic A1c levels were split into aliquots. Each sample was spiked with glucose to various concentrations ranging from 200-1000 mg/dL. The samples were incubated for three hours at 37°C to facilitate formation of labile A1c. The samples were assayed on the APOLOWAKO analyzer. Sponsor states that the potential interferents tested showed <10% interference at the concentrations tested.
The sponsor claimed that Hemoglobin variants such as Hgb S, C, E and Chicago do not affect their device. Their method does not have interference on these Hgb variants according to the literature. Reference: National
{9}
Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program. In Factors that interfere with GHB (HbA1c) Test results.” http://www.ngsp.org/prog/factors.htm.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Performance for the APOLOWAKO Glucose and APOLOWAKO HbA1c was evaluated at three Point-of-Care sites and with a total of ten operators. Operators assayed 302 unaltered clinical samples collected with heparin as the anticoagulant over the three sites as well as an additional 86 spiked samples for glucose and 106 leftover samples for HbA1c. The additional samples were included to help cover the assays ranges. The ALPOLOWAKO System test results were compared to the Beckman UniCel DxC 800 results. Operators were provided instructions from Quick Reference Guide and Package insert. The results are presented below:
| | Slope | Intercept | R2 | Sample range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| APOLOWAKO GLU | 0.972 | 0.469 | 0.995 | 18-359 mg/dL |
| APOLOWAKO HbA1c | 1.003 | 0.226 | 0.988 | 4.1-15.7 % |
b. Matrix comparison:
A Heparin/EDTA comparison test was performed for the APOLOWAKO Glucose and HbA1c assays. Thirty-five paired heparin and EDTA whole blood samples were compared. The correlation is:
| | n | Slope | Intercept | r | Device range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose Heparin vs. EDTA | 42 | 1.002 | 2.3 | 0.999 | 18-339 mg/dL |
| HbA1c Heparin vs. EDTA | 45 | 0.9771 | 0.1 | 0.999 | 4.7-15.8 % |
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
{10}
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Reference ranges are provided in the labeling from literature as follows:
Glucose – Serum Fasting Adult 74-100 mg/dL, Child 60-100 mg/dL
HbA1c – Whole blood (EDTA or Heparin) – 4.0-6.0% (NGSP)
Burtis, C.A., Ashwood, E.R., and Bruns, D.E.: Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, 4th Edition, Elsevier Saunders.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
11
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.