K073416 · Arkray Factory USA, Inc. · CGA · Jun 13, 2008 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K073416
Device Name
ARKRAY GLUCOCARD 01 BLOOD MONITORING SYSTEM
Applicant
Arkray Factory USA, Inc.
Product Code
CGA · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jun 13, 2008
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The GLUCOCARD 01 Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, or palm. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). It is indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
Device Story
System comprises glucose meter, test strips, and control solutions. Input: capillary whole blood sample applied to test strip via capillary action. Principle: amperometric assay using glucose oxidase (GOD) and Hexaamineruthenium (III) chloride; reaction produces Hexaamineruthenium (II) chloride proportional to glucose concentration; oxidation of this byproduct generates electric current. Meter converts current to glucose concentration. Used at home by patients or in clinical settings by professionals. Output: digital glucose concentration displayed on LCD. Benefits: provides rapid, quantitative glucose monitoring to aid diabetes management. Meter automatically detects strip code upon insertion. Quality control checks verify accuracy.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical testing evaluated accuracy for both finger stick and alternate site testing. Bench testing included evaluation of interferences, linearity, linear range, altitude effects, control solution functionality, and analytical precision. Safety testing included EMC evaluation. Results support substantial equivalence.
Technological Characteristics
Glucose test system (21 CFR 862.1345). Components: meter, sensor test strips, control solutions. Principle: electrochemical measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood. Supports alternate site testing (palm).
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative glucose measurement in fresh capillary whole blood (fingertip/palm) for home (OTC) or clinical use by persons with diabetes to monitor glycemic control. Contraindicated for neonatal use, screening/diagnosis of diabetes, and patients who are dehydrated, in shock, critically ill, or in a hyperosmolar state.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
Advance Micro-draw BGM
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k073416
B. Purpose for Submission:
Clearance of a New Device
C. Measurand:
Capillary whole blood glucose
D. Type of Test:
Whole blood glucose concentration through a quantitative amperometric assay (Glucose Oxidase)
E. Applicant:
ARKRAY Factory USA, Inc
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ARKRAY GLUCOCARD™ 01 Blood Monitoring System
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 862.1345, Glucose Test System
21 CFR § 862.1660, Quality controls (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II, Class I (reserved)
3. Product code:
NBW, CGA, JJX
4. Panel:
75 (Clinical Chemistry)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for use.
2. Indication(s) for use:
GLUCOCARD™ 01 Blood Glucose Monitoring System:
The GLUCOCARD™ 01 Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, or palm. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). It is
{1}
indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
GLUCOCARD™ 01 Blood Glucose Meter:
The GLUCOCARD™ 01 Blood Glucose Meter is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, or palm. GLUCOCARD™ 01 SENSOR Blood Glucose Test Strips must be used with the GLUCOCARD™ 01 Blood Glucose Meter. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). It is indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
GLUCOCARD™ 01 SENSOR Blood Glucose Test Strips:
GLUCOCARD™ 01 SENSOR Blood Glucose Test Strips are intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, or palm. GLUCOCARD™ 01 SENSOR Blood Glucose Test Strips must be used with the GLUCOCARD™ 01 Blood Glucose Meter. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). They are indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
GLUCOCARD™ 01 CONTROL:
For use with GLUCOCARD™ 01 Blood Glucose Meter and GLUCOCARD™ 01 SENSOR Blood Glucose Test Strips as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood glucose test results. Control solutions are available in three levels - Low (L), Normal (N) and High (H).
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
- For over the counter use.
- Not for neonatal use
- Not for screening or diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
- Alternative site testing is for use at times of steady state only
- Not for patients who are dehydrated, in shock, critically ill, or in a hyperosmolar state
4. Special instrument requirements:
GLUCOCARD™ 01 Blood Glucose Monitoring System
I. Device Description:
The GLUCOCARD™ 01 system consists of the Glucose Meter, 01 SENSOR Blood Glucose Test Strip (glucose oxidase), and Control Solutions (low, normal, and high).
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Advance Micro-draw
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k041881
{2}
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device: GLUCOCARD 01 | Predicate: Advance Micro-draw |
| Enzyme | Glucose Oxidase (Aspergillus niger sourced) | Same |
| Measurement Range | 20 to 600 mg/dL | Same |
| Reference | Plasma | Same |
| Sample Type | Capillary whole blood | Same |
| Sample Application | Apply blood to end, capillary fill | Same |
| Maximum Altitude | 10,000 ft | Same |
| Operating T° Range | 50°F to 104°F | Same |
| Operating Humidity Range | 20% to 80% (relative humidity) | Same |
| Display | Liquid crystal display | Same |
| Test Start | Insert strip into meter | Same |
| Power Source | One 3V Lithium CR2032 | Same |
| Blood Source | Fingertip and Palm | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device: GLUCOCARD 01 | Predicate: Advance Micro-draw |
| Minimum Sample Volume | 0.3 μL | 1.5 μL |
| Test Time (sec.) | 7 | 15 |
| Units of Measurement | mg/dL only | mg/dL or mmol/L |
| Calibration Curve | Automatic with strip insertion | Automatic w/ keycode insertion |
| Hematocrit Range | 30-54% | 30-55% |
| Control Solution(s) | Three levels available | Two levels available |
| Memory Capabilities | 360 results | 250 results |
| Button number/pattern | Two buttons on side of meter | Three buttons on front of meter |
| Dimensions | 2” x 3.9” x 0.5” (50mm x 100mm x 12 mm) | 3.5” x 3” x 0.8” |
| Weight | 1.6 ounces | 1.4 ounces |
K. Standard/Guidance Document referenced (if applicable):
- Interference testing in Clinical Chemistry - CLSI EP7-A2
- Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Procedures - CLSI EP5-A2
- Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples - CLSI EP9-A
- In vitro diagnostic test systems – Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus – ISO 15197
L. Test Principle:
The sample (whole blood) is drawn by capillary action at the tip of the test strip. Glucose in
{3}
the sample reacts with glucose oxidase (GOD) and Hexaamineruthenium (III) chloride in the test strip. This produces Hexaamineruthenium (II) chloride. Hexaamineruthenium (II) chloride is produced in proportion to the glucose concentration of the blood sample.
Oxidation of the Hexaamineruthenium (II) chloride produces an electric current. The meter converts the current to the glucose concentration and displays it as the test result.
$\beta$-D-glucose + Hexammineruthenium (III) chloride $\xrightarrow{\mathrm{GOD}}$
D-Glucono-$\delta$Lactone + Hexammineruthenium (II) chloride
Hexammineruthenium (II) chloride $\rightarrow$ Hexammineruthenium (III) chloride + e⁻
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Analysis was performed using fresh venous whole blood obtained from 6 non-diabetic volunteers. Glucose concentrations in the whole blood were adjusted to obtain 6 glucose concentrations encompassing the $30-600\ \mathrm{mg/dL}$ range following CLSI EP5-A.
Within-Day precision tests consisted of twenty replicates of each of the six whole blood glucose samples. The Within-Day precision tests were performed within 4 hours of collection of the venous blood sample in each case, with exception of the very low blood glucose sample, which was permitted to undergo glycolysis with time to achieve a glucose level within the $30-50\ \mathrm{mg/dL}$ range. This, however, did not exceed 6 hours. The YSI 2300 reference blood glucose analyzer was used to obtain the target blood glucose values. Between-Day precision testing involved performing the same test over a period of six days. Three (3) separate Lots of test strips were tested.
Within- Run Precision Summary
| Test Strip Lot 1 | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Sample 4 | Sample 5 |
| Mean (mg/dL) | 32.7 | 62.4 | 128.8 | 235.7 | 557.5 |
| % CV | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Test Strip Lot 2 | | | | | |
| | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Sample 4 | Sample 5 |
| Mean (mg/dL) | 24.5 | 63.3 | 124.2 | 224.8 | 506.2 |
| % CV | 3.1 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Test Strip Lot 3 | | | | | |
| | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Sample 4 | Sample 5 |
| Mean (mg/dL) | 25.0 | 62.9 | 123.5 | 227.7 | 519.8 |
| % CV | 3.3 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.4 |
{4}
Between-Run Precision Summary:
Between-Run (Day-To-Day) Precision by Glucose Level [mg/dL] and Lot
| Test Strip Lot 1 | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Sample 4 | Sample 5 |
| Average | 35.0 | 61.6 | 125.9 | 241.0 | 531.5 |
| SD | 1.2 | 1.7 | 3.8 | 6.3 | 12.8 |
| CV% | 3.4 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.4 |
| Test Strip Lot 2 | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Sample 4 | Sample 5 |
| Average | 35.2 | 61.8 | 125.7 | 238.6 | 529.4 |
| SD | 1.3 | 2.1 | 3.7 | 6.9 | 12.4 |
| CV% | 3.5 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.3 |
| Test Strip Lot 3 | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Sample 4 | Sample 5 |
| Average | 35.5 | 61.7 | 125.2 | 238.3 | 533.2 |
| SD | 1.1 | 1.7 | 3.5 | 7.3 | 14.1 |
| CV% | 3.3 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 2.6 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
To assess the linearity range of the device, testing was performed using venous whole blood collected in a 10mL vacuum sample tube. Glucose was adjusted to 11 concentration levels ranging from 13 mg/dL to 712 mg/dL. Five 01 Meter measurements were performed at each glucose concentration. This process was repeated at three temperatures (10, 25, and 40 degrees centigrade). The five 01 Meter measurements were averaged and bias was calculated against the GA-1150 reference analyzer.
The regression equations were as follows:
$10^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ : $\mathrm{y} = 1.0838\mathrm{x} - 19.04$ with an R2 value of 0.9972
$25^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ : $\mathrm{y} = 1.0097\mathrm{x} - 3.3104$ with an R2 value of 0.9975
$40^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ : $\mathrm{y} = 1.0032\mathrm{x} - 7.7337$ with an R2 value of 0.9964
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The traceability for the Control Solution Glucose Assignment is described relating directly to the Hitachi Hexokinase reference, traceable to NIST Solution SRM 917a (Hexokinase Calibrator) and SRM 917b (Reference Standard).
Shelf life studies show that the unopened test strips have an 18 month life-span and 3 months shelf-life once a vial of strips is opened. Unopened controls have an 18-month
{5}
shelf life and are stable for 3 months after opening.
d. Detection limit:
The detection limit is 20 mg/dL. See linearity/assay reportable range section above.
e. Analytical specificity:
Hematocrit: A study was conducted to evaluate hematocrit interference at high hematocrit levels. All blood was fully oxygenated and adjusted to eight concentration levels (34, 52, 73, 121, 195, 264, 334, 528 mg/dL) and five hematocrit levels (30, 33, 36, 42, 50, 53, 54 and 55%). Table 1 summarizes the average percent bias deviation at each glucose level and each upper hematocrit level.
Bias calculation (%) from 42% nominal Hct.
| | HEMATOCRIT | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Nominal Glucose Level (mg/dL) | 30 | 33 | 36 | 42 | 49 | 50 | 53 | 54 | 55 |
| 35 | -4.9 | -2.8 | -4.6 | 0 | 0.6 | 0 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 5.2 |
| 55 | -1.4 | -2.1 | -3.2 | 0 | -7.5 | -3.7 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 1.3 |
| 77 | -4.5 | -2.6 | -4 | 0 | -7.6 | -3.6 | 1.6 | 3.3 | -1.7 |
| 127 | 1.6 | -0.9 | 2.2 | 0 | -8.4 | -6.4 | -6.5 | -8.6 | -8.6 |
| 191 | 7.8 | 5.9 | 2.6 | 0 | -9.9 | -6 | -10.5 | -10.6 | -12.7 |
| 258 | 11.2 | 7.4 | 4.3 | 0 | -7.4 | -10.5 | -13 | -14.6 | -14.3 |
| 337 | 11.2 | 8.9 | 3.4 | 0 | -10.9 | -10.5 | -12.3 | -13.5 | -15.7 |
| 510 | 13.4 | 10.4 | 9 | 0 | -11.2 | -12.4 | -12.7 | -14.9 | -17.6 |
The data for samples between 30 and 54% hematocrit were within ±15% and support a claim of 30%-54% hematocrit range.
Interference Testing:
Interfering substances were dissolved in venous blood at several concentrations each, then these were divided into three aliquots and spiked to nominal glucose concentrations of 60 mg/dL, 120 mg/dL or 320 mg/dL. These samples were tested against control samples which had a blank solvent added at the same volume as the interferent. Samples were tested n = 10 and the percent difference of the interfering samples were calculated compared to control samples. The following substances were tested.
Table 1: List of Tested Potential Interferents
| Compound | Concentrations tested |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 10, 20 mg /dl |
| Acetyl-salicylic acid | 13, 40, 65 mg/dl |
{6}
| Compound | Concentrations tested |
| --- | --- |
| Ascorbic Acid | 3 mg/dl |
| Bilirubin – unconjugated | 10, 20 mg/dl |
| Bilirubin – conjugated | 20, 40 mg/dl |
| Cholesterol | 150, 250, 300, 500 mg/dl |
| Creatinine | 1.5, 5.0 mg/dl |
| L-Dopa | 1.0, 3.4, 6.8, 13.0 mg/dl |
| L-Dopamine | 0.05, 0.10 mg/dl |
| Ephedrine | 0.014, 0.056 mg/dl |
| Fructose | 15, 30 mg/dl |
| Galactose | 30, 60 mg/dl |
| Gentisic acid | 1.0, 1.8 mg/dl |
| L-Glutathione | 0.79, 1.05, 3.00 mmol/L |
| Hemoglobin | 735, 1470 mg/dl |
| Ibuprofen | 1, 7, 10, 50 mg/dl |
| Lactose | 15, 30 mg/dl |
| Maltose | 150, 300, 450 mg/dl |
| Maltotetraose | 60, 120 mg/dl |
| Maltotriose | 120, 240 mg/dl |
| Mannitol | 100, 200, 400, 800 mg/dl |
| Mannose | 8, 16, mg/dl |
| Methyl-L-Dopa, | 0.10, 0.75, 1.50 mg/dl |
| Mono-iodoacetic acid | 1X, 2X, and 10X |
| Sorbitol | 5, 10 mg/dl |
| Tetracycline | 0.2, 0.5, 1.5 mg/dl |
| Tolazamide | 1.5, 3.0, 8.4 mg/dl |
| Tolbutamide | 5.4, 10.8, 64 mg/dl |
| Triglyceride | 500, 3000 mg/dl |
| Urea | 20, 40, 80, 260 mg/dl |
| Uric Acid | 6.35, 11.35, 21.35 mg/dl |
| Warfarin | 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/dl |
| Xylitol | 25, 50 mg/dl |
| Xylose | 40, 80 mg/dl |
When mono-iodo acetic acid was tested at 2X and 10X it showed between 19 and 29 mg/dl bias at low levels (56 mg/dl) of glucose and showed interferences of between 17% and 48% at normal glucose levels (122 mg/dl). At high glucose level (307 mg/dl), there was over 32% interference at 10X mono-iodacetic acid. Interference was also seen with EDTA and Flouride-oxalate anticoagulant. No interference was seen up to 5X heparin at all three levels of glucose tested.
A warning was included in the labeling to use only heparin treated samples of blood and no other preservatives.
All other compounds tested showed biases of <±15%
Altitude Study:
An altitude study was performed with venous whole blood adjusted to four different
{7}
glucose concentrations ranging from approximately 56 to 540 mg/dL. One aliquot of each sample was tested on the ground at 900 feet above sea level and the other was tested at 10,000 ±20 feet in a small non pressurized airplane. The result of each sample tested at 10,000 feet was within ±10% of the sample tested on the ground. This demonstrates that the meter may be used up to an altitude of 10,000 feet above sea level.
Temperature and humidity studies were performed and showed that the meter can be used at temperatures from 50°F to 104°F and at relative humidity ranging from 20% to 80%.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The method comparison study was performed with 113 capillary fingerstick patient samples. Testing included men and women, ages from 21 to 83 years with a wide range of educational levels. Participants also tested the Low, Normal, and High Control Solutions on either the 01 Meter or the X-METER (approximately half of Participants were tested on each type of meter)
Regression Statistics for Finger Stick Clinical Study as compared to YSI
| System | | Slope | Intercept | r |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 01 Meter | Participant | 0.96 | 1.1 | 0.97 |
| | Professional | 0.96 | -1.9 | 0.98 |
System accuracy results for glucose concentrations <75 mg/dl
| Within ±5mg/dl | Within ±10mg/dl | Within ±15mg/dl |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 10 of 30 (33%) | 21 of 30 (70%) | 30 of 30 (100%) |
System accuracy results for glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dl
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 46 of 111 (41%) | 88 of 111 (79%) | 106 of 111 (95%) | 109 of 111 (98%) |
Method comparison studies were performed using alternate site testing (AST) samples compared to professional fingerstick samples. The studies were performed using 104 samples by professional and participant taken from the palm and fingertip. The results are shown below:
Regression statistics for AST Data as compared to YSI
| System | Row # | Comparison | slope | y-intercept (mg/dL) | r |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | |
| 01 Meter | 3 | Part. Palm vs. Prof. Fingertip | 1.08 | -3 | 0.98 |
| | 4 | Prof. Palm vs. Prof. Fingertip | 1.07 | -5 | 0.99 |
{8}
System accuracy results for glucose concentrations <75 mg/dl
| Within ±5mg/dl | Within ±10mg/dl | Within ±15mg/dl |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2 of 3 (66%) | 3 of 3 (100%) | 3 of 3 (100%) |
System accuracy results for glucose concentrations >75 mg/dl
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 39 of 101 (39%) | 72 of 101 (72%) | 84 of 101 (84%) | 95 of 101* (95%) |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not Applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not Applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not Applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Expected blood glucose levels for non-diabetics 1,2
Fasting
70-110 mg/dL
1 to 2 hours after meals
<120 mg/dL
1. Burtis, C.A. Ashwood, E.R., eds.: Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. 2nd Edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders. (1994), 2190.
2. Krall, L.P. and Beaser, R.S.: Joslin Diabetes Manual. Philadelphia: Lea and Fibiger (1989), 138.
N. Instrument Name:
GLUCOCARD™ 01 Blood Glucose Monitoring System
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Each test strip is single use and must be replaced with a new strip for each additional reading.
{9}
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
This device is intended to be used with the capillary whole blood. Since the whole blood is applied directly to the test strip, there are no special handling or storage issues.
5. Calibration:
The meter automatically detects the code number when a test strip is inserted. The user must check to see if the code number the meter displays matches the number on the test strip vial. If the number matches, the user is instructed to begin testing. If the number does not match, or if no number appears, the user is instructed to try another test strip. If this fails the user is instructed to try a new vial of strips and to call customer service if this also fails. No other calibration is required from the user.
6. Quality Control:
One control level is provided with the device and two additional control levels are available. The user is instructed to call their supplier or pharmacy to obtain controls and to call Arkray customer service if the supplier or pharmacy does not stock the controls. The user is instructed to run controls when the meter is first used in order to verify that they can use the meter correctly. In addition they are instructed to run a control when a new vial of test strips is opened, when they suspect the meter or strips are not working correctly, when test results are not consistent with the patient’s symptoms or the patient does not think the results are accurate, if the meter is dropped, to check their technique, if the test strip bottle had been left open or stored outside its recommended temperature range, or when the Glucocard X-Meter has been stored outside its recommended temperature range. The acceptable results ranges are shown on the test strip vial label. If the results are outside the expected range, the user is instructed to repeat the test. If the repeated test falls outside the range the user is instructed to repeat the test using a new control solution or test strip. If the control continues to read outside the expected range the user is told not to use the test system until the control result reads within the acceptable range.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
10
{10}
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
11
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.