K072458 · Golden Bridge International, Inc. · JLW · Apr 10, 2008 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K072458
Device Name
GBI TSH NEONATAL SCREENING KIT
Applicant
Golden Bridge International, Inc.
Product Code
JLW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Apr 10, 2008
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1690
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The GBI TSH Neonatal Screening Kit is designed for the quantitative determination of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) concentrations in neonatal blood samples that have been collected onto Whatman 903 specimen collection paper. The results are used to screen newborns for congenital hypothyroidism.
Device Story
The GBI TSH Neonatal Screening Kit is an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the quantitative measurement of TSH in neonatal dried blood spots. The device uses a 96-well microplate coated with polyclonal goat anti-hTSH antibody. Sample discs punched from Whatman 903 specimen collection paper are incubated in the wells to elute TSH, which is captured by the immobilized antibody. A second, HRP-conjugated monoclonal anti-hTSH antibody is added to form a sandwich complex. After washing, TMB/H2O2 color developer is added, producing a blue color proportional to TSH concentration, which turns yellow upon addition of a stop reagent. The absorbance is measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader. The device is intended for use by clinical laboratory professionals. Results are used to screen newborns for congenital hypothyroidism, enabling early detection and treatment to prevent permanent mental retardation. The assay requires manual processing and interpretation of results against a standard curve.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP5-A2 (n=40 per sample, CV 7.9-13.9%). Linearity (r²=0.999) and analytical sensitivity (2.4 µIU/mL) established. Specificity testing showed no cross-reactivity with FSH, LH, or hCG. Interference testing confirmed no adverse effects from lipids, bilirubin, or hemoglobin. Method comparison with predicate (n=995) demonstrated concordance in screening classifications.
Technological Characteristics
Quantitative sandwich ELISA; 96-well microplate format. Reagents: goat polyclonal anti-hTSH capture antibody, HRP-conjugated monoclonal anti-hTSH detection antibody, TMB/H2O2 color reagent. Detection via spectrophotometry at 450 nm. Standardized to WHO 3rd IRP 81/565. Sample type: neonatal dried blood spots on Whatman 903 paper.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the screening of newborns for elevated TSH levels suggestive of congenital hypothyroidism using dried blood spot samples.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A thyroid stimulating hormone test system is a device intended to measure thyroid stimulating hormone, also known as thyrotrophin and thyrotrophic hormone, in serum and plasma. Measurements of thyroid stimulating hormone produced by the anterior pituitary are used in the diagnosis of thyroid or pituitary disorders.
Predicate Devices
Accuwell Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) ELISA
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k072458
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Golden Bridge International, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
GBI TSH Neonatal Screening Kit
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862. 1690
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
JLW
4. Panel:
Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The GBI TSH Neonatal Screening Kit is designed for the quantitative
determination of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) concentrations in neonatal
{1}
blood samples that have been collected onto Whatman 903 specimen collection paper. The results are used to screen newborns for congenital hypothyroidism.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use.
The package insert contains information that the kit is not to be used for confirmatory testing, prenatal testing or to monitor therapy. Additional diagnostic procedures, using serum as the sample, should be performed to confirm a diagnosis of congenital hypothyroidism.
4. Special instrument requirements:
None
I. Device Description:
The GBI TSH Neonatal Screening Kit consists of the following reagents:
TSH Capture Microplate-Goat polyclonal anti-alpha hTSH antibody coated onto 96-well microplate
TSH Elution Buffer-Borate buffer containing bovine albumin, surfactant, and preservatives
Anti-TSH PO Conjugate-Mouse monoclonal $\beta$-specific anti-TSH antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase in borate buffer containing bovine albumin, surfactant and preservatives
TSH Diluent Buffer- Borate buffer containing bovine albumin, surfactant, and preservatives
PO Wash Buffer (20X)-Concentrated solution of phosphate buffered saline containing a surfactant and preservatives.
PO Color Reagent- A colorless solution of $3,3'$, $5,5'$-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and hydrogen peroxide
PO Color Stopper- A solution containing $< 1\%$ hydrochloric acid
TSH Dried Blood Standards and Controls-
Prepared from human whole blood, adjusted to a hematocrit of $55\%$ and spotted onto Whatman 903 specimen collection paper. The six Standards contain concentrations of added TSH at approximately zero, 7.5, 15.0, 30.0, 60.0, and $120.0~\mu \mathrm{IU / ml}$ serum equivalent. The three Controls contain approximate TSH concentrations of 15, 30 and $80~\mu \mathrm{IU / ml}$ serum equivalent.
All human source materials used in the preparation of kit components was tested and found to be non-reactive for the presence of HBsAg, anti-HIV 1 and 2, and HCV by FDA approved methods.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Accuwell TSH ELISA
{2}
2. Predicate K number(s):
k001145
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended use | Quantitative determination of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) concentrations in neonatal blood samples that have been collected onto Whatman 903 specimen collection paper. The results are used to screen newborns for congenital hypothyroidism. | Same |
| Recommended reference range | Normal < 20 μIU/ml
Borderline 20 – 40 μIU/ml
Positive (Hypothyroid) > 40 μIU/ml | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Reportable range | 2.4-120 μIU/ml | 2.9-160 μIU/ml |
| Analytical sensitivity (limit of blank) | 2.4 μIU/ml | 2.9 μIU/ml |
| Detection method | Light absorbance of final reaction read at 450 nm with spectrophotometer | Light absorbance of final reaction read at 450 nm with spectrophotometer |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods;
Approved Guideline- Second Edition (CLSI EP5-A2)
L. Test Principle:
A polyclonal goat anti-hTSH (human) antibody is immobilized onto each well of the 96-well microplates provided with the kit. Sample discs punched from dried whole blood spot standards, controls and neonate specimens are added to the coated wells. An elution buffer is also added. The plate is incubated to elute TSH from the sample
{3}
disc and to allow capture of the eluted TSH by the antibody immobilized onto the microplate wells. Following incubation the plates are washed to remove the sample discs as well as the eluate.
A second antibody, a $\beta$ -specific anti-hTSH monoclonal conjugated to the enzyme horseradish-peroxidase (HRP), is then added to the wells and incubated. The eluted TSH of the sample already captured by the microplate-bound antibody is bound by the enzyme-conjugated monoclonal antibody added. An antibody-TSH-antibody bridge, or "sandwich", forms that is bound to the surface of the microplate wells. Any unbound complexes are removed with subsequent plate washings.
The final stage of the assay is the detection of the microwell-bound complexes by the addition of a color developing reagent. The enzyme (HRP) portion of the bound "sandwich" reacts with the color developer, 3, 3', 5, 5'-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide $(\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_2)$ . The TMB/ $\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_2$ liquid is converted from colorless to blue. The degree of color change is directly proportional to the amount of TSH antigen that is bound in the well. The color development is terminated with the addition of a color stopper that converts the blue to yellow.
The results are measured with a microplate reader at a wavelength of $450~\mathrm{nm}$ . The absorbance measured is directly proportional to the concentration of TSH in the sample. A standard curve is generated by plotting the light absorbance of each standard versus its known TSH concentration. The concentrations of TSH in the unknown samples are determined by interpolation from this standard curve.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The sponsor states that precision was evaluated following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Protocol EP5-A2.
Three Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Neonate Screening Quality Control Program samples (CDC 611, 612, and 613) and two other dried blood spot samples C1 and C2 with TSH values ranging from approximately 14 to 87 $\mu$ IU/mL were tested in duplicate, one run per day, for 20 days, for a total of $n = 40$ . Since the testing was performed using dried blood spots, the extraction procedure was captured in the testing process. The imprecision for these samples ranged from $7.9 - 13.9\%$ coefficient of variation (% CV). The results are presented in the table below.
| Sample ID: | | C1 | C2 | CDC611 | CDC612 | CDC613 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Precision Parameter | Count | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| | Mean | 14.6 | 28.3 | 30.6 | 46.3 | 86.8 |
| | SD | 1.2 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 12.1 |
{4}
| | %CV | 7.9 | 8.7 | 11.9 | 9.4 | 13.9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Min | 12.5 | 23.5 | 23.3 | 37.5 | 71.4 |
| | Max | 18.0 | 34.0 | 40.4 | 59.1 | 122.5 |
| Within-Run Standard Deviation: | Sr = | 0.9 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 6.5 |
| Between-Day Standard Deviation: | Sdd = | 1.0 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 10.3 |
| Within Device Standard Deviation: | ST = | 1.2 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 12.2 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The reportable range is stated to be 2.4-120 µIU/mL. The claim is supported by data from the sponsor’s linearity study and detection limit study. Samples were prepared from a commercially obtained, human, analyte-stripped serum-sample, supplemented with purified analyte weighed gravimetrically to produce a 1.5 µIU/mL, 25 µIU/mL, and 200 µIU/mL TSH concentrations. The range of low-level, mid-level and high-level samples were prepared by making multiple volume combinations of these. Then each prepared serum-sample was then combined with lysed, commercially obtained, human, red blood cells to achieve the equivalent of a 55% hematocrit. The resulting samples were then spotted onto blood collection filter paper and dried.
Observed values were compared to the expected values and the percent (%) recovery ranged from 88 to 114%, with a mean recovery of 95%. Linear regression analysis resulted in the following equation: y = 0.8997x + 0.6036, r² = 0.999.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Calibrators and controls are prepared from commercially available TSH analyte that is traceable to WHO 3rd IRP of human TSH 81/565. The target TSH levels for the controls 15, 30, and 80 µIU/mL are suitable given the clinical decision decision points for Normal, Borderline, and Abnormal (Hypothyroid).
Targeted values are verified by testing in the TSH assay standardized with CDC-issued TSH calibrators and Reference Standards traceable to WHO 3rd IRP of human TSH 81/565.
Control values and expected ranges are assigned by repeat analysis on multiple TSH assays.
To support shelf-life claims, dried blood spots used to prepare calibrator and
{5}
control materials are stored at 2-8°C for 18, 19, and 20 months. The sponsor's stability testing protocol and acceptance criteria were reviewed and determined to be adequate.
d. Detection limit:
The TSH test kit zero standard was used to prepare dried blood spots (n=20) that were then punched and tested in a single assay run. The sponsor defines Analytical Limit at Low Levels as the calculated concentration in µIU/mL serum equivalents that corresponds to the mean of the absorbance value of the zero standard plus two times the standard deviation (+2SD). This value was calculated to be 2.4 µIU/mL.
e. Analytical specificity:
The cross-reactivity of three structurally related compounds, Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH-WHO 2nd IRP HMG), Luteinizing Hormone (LH-WHO 1st IRP 68/40), and human Chorionic Gonadotrophic hormone (hCG-WHO 2nd IS 61/6), were evaluated. Each compound was added to TSH-free whole blood which had been adjusted to 55% hematocrit and then spotted on filter paper to create dried blood spots. FSH concentrations up to 500 µIU/mL, LH up to µIU/mL, and hCG concentration up to 100,000 µIU/mL were undetectable (< 2.4 µIU/mL) in the assay.
Interference by elevated lipid, bilirubin (conjugated and unconjugated) and hemoglobin was evaluated. The levels of lipid and bilirubin tested were based on recommendations in CLSI EP7-A. The sponsor defined interference as an observed test value is greater than ± 1 standard deviation of the mean of the matching control value.
Lipid at a concentration of 1350 mg/dL was added to whole blood specimens containing approximately 16, 46, and 85 µIU/mL TSH and tested along with the same specimens without added interferant. Specimens containing 1350 mg/dL lipid had TSH values within ± 1 standard deviation of the mean of the matching control value and did not adversely affect the interpretation of "Normal" or "Hypothyroid" (Abnormal) results.
Conjugated and unconjugated bilirubin at a concentration of 20 mg/dL were added separately to whole blood specimens containing approximately 14, 27, and 68 µIU/mL TSH and tested along with the same specimens without added interferant. Specimens containing 20 mg/dL bilirubin had TSH values within ± 1 standard deviation of the mean of the matching control value and did not adversely affect the interpretation of "Normal" or "Hypothyroid" (Abnormal) results.
6
{6}
The effect of hemoglobin up to 18.7 g/dL was evaluated. This level is the highest expected hemoglobin level in neonates, according to the sponsor's search of the literature. Specimens with TSH concentration of approximately 13, 27 and 68 µIU/mL were tested with and without additional hemoglobin, 17 and 18.7 g/dL respectively. Specimens containing 18.7 g/dL had TSH values within ± 1 standard deviation of the mean of the matching control value and did not adversely affect the interpretation of “Normal” or “Hypothyroid” (Abnormal) results.
The labeling contains a limitation that any physiological state that will cause marked alterations in hematocrit and/or protein concentration may adversely affect the validity of the TSH concentration obtained.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A total of 995 neonatal dried blood spot specimens were obtained from a state public health laboratory’s routine screening program bank of specimens. Nine-hundred eighty (980) were randomly selected from the (previously screened and presumed) normal population of banked specimens; and 15 were selected from patients confirmed as positive for hypothyroidism.
Testing of the samples was performed with the GBI TSH assay and the predicate method. The results are shown in the following table:
{7}
# Comparison of Result Interpretations Obtained by the GBI TSH EIA versus a Predicate TSH EIA
| Population N=995 | | GBI Results | | | (Predicate) Totals: |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Published Cut-off Ranges | Normal | Borderline | Positive | | |
| | | < 20 | 20 - 40 | > 40 | |
| Predicate Results | Normal | < 20 | 967 | 7 | 0 |
| | Borderline | 20 - 40 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
| | Positive | > 40 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| (GBI) Totals: | | | 969 | 11 | 15 |
Linear regression analysis of samples with numeric values within the reportable range of the devices (n=832) yielded the following equation:
$$
y (GBI TSH) = 1.07x (predicate) + 0.27, r^2 = 0.92
$$
Of the fifteen (15) confirmed hypothyroid samples, the majority exceeded the reportable range of the device. To further demonstrate performance at the Positive cut-off of 40 µIU/ml additional testing of fifteen (n=15) spiked samples ranging in TSH value from 40-60 µIU/ml was performed on the GBI TSH test and the predicate device. The results are summarized in the table below:
| Sample ID #: | Predicate Result (µIU/mL) | GBI TSH Result (µIU/mL) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 53.3 | 44.7 |
| 2 | 45.4 | 42.1 |
| 3 | 48.7 | 46.3 |
| 4 | 52.6 | 50.7 |
| 5 | 53.1 | 50.5 |
| 6 | 50.9 | 46.1 |
| 7 | 44.8 | 40.1 |
| 8 | 43.4 | 43.2 |
| 9 | 60.2 | 47.0 |
| 10 | 56.2 | 53.7 |
{8}
| Sample ID #: | Predicate Result (μIU/mL) | GBI TSH Result (μIU/mL) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 11 | 49.2 | 49.3 |
| 12 | 46.8 | 45.2 |
| 13 | 54.2 | 53.6 |
| 14 | 51.1 | 59.3 |
| 15 | 50.3 | 57.1 |
b. Matrix comparison:
The device is to be used only with neonatal whole blood.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity: Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity: Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Testing of archived Centers for Disease Control (CDC) proficiency program samples was performed with the GBI TSH test. Results with the GBI TSH test were similar to the predicate method and other commercially available methods as well as to CDC expected ranges.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The sponsor references the recommendations of the Academy of Pediatrics and the American Thyroid Association Committee on Public Health for interpretation of screening results as follows:
| Category | TSH μIU/ml Serum |
| --- | --- |
| Normal | < 20 |
| Borderline | 20 – 40 |
| Positive (Hypothyroid) | > 40 |
Their applicability to the GBI TSH assay was confirmed by comparison to the calculated rank and percentile values obtained from the normal neonate test population, n=980.
{9}
| TSH Result (uIU/ml serum equivalent) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GBI TSH EIA | 95th Percentile | 97.5th Percentile | 99th Percentile |
| N = 980 | 15.2 | 17.3 | 20.4 |
The package insert states that a variety of factors will determine the normal range for neonatal TSH concentrations. Demographic variations, the age and weight of the infant at sample collection, multiple births and infants born prematurely are all factors which can affect the cut-off values for normal concentrations of TSH in a neonatal screening program. For these reasons each laboratory should establish normal ranges and cut-off values for their individual application.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.