S40 CLINICAL ANALYZER, S TEST ALP, S TEST AMYLASE, S TEST AST
K072142 · Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies, Inc. · CKF · Jun 26, 2008 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K072142
Device Name
S40 CLINICAL ANALYZER, S TEST ALP, S TEST AMYLASE, S TEST AST
Applicant
Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies, Inc.
Product Code
CKF · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jun 26, 2008
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1050
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The S-Test Alkaline Phosphatase Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of alkaline phosphatase activity in serum or heparin plasma using the S40 Clinical Analyzer. Measurements of alkaline phosphatase are used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver, bone, parathyroid, and intestinal diseases. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The S-Test Amylase Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of amylase activity in serum or heparin plasma using the S40 Clinical Analyzer. Amylase measurements are used primarily for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas). This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The S-Test Aspartate Aminotransferase Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of aspartate aminotransferase activity in serum or heparin plasma using the S40 Clinical Analyzer. Aspartate aminotransferase measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of certain types of liver and heart disease. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
Device Story
Single-use reagent cartridges for S40 Clinical Analyzer; contain specific chemical reagents for ALP, AMY, and AST assays. Input: serum or heparin plasma samples. Operation: cartridges include 2-D code label for lot-specific calibration; analyzer performs photometric reaction measurement (405 nm for ALP/AMY; 340/546 nm for AST). Output: quantitative enzyme activity levels (U/L). Used in clinical/physician office labs by trained operators. Healthcare providers use results to diagnose/monitor liver, bone, parathyroid, intestinal, pancreatic, and heart conditions. Benefits: rapid, automated quantitative assessment of enzyme activity to support clinical decision-making.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision/reproducibility evaluated at in-house and three POL sites (n=3 samples/analyte). Linearity confirmed using 5-11 levels per analyte (r²=0.999). Method comparison against ACE analyzer (n=177-196 samples) showed high correlation (r=0.997-0.998). Interference studies identified hemolysis/icterus sensitivity. Reference range transfer validated using 81 normal samples.
Indicated for quantitative determination of ALP, amylase, and AST activity in serum or heparin plasma for diagnosis/treatment of liver, bone, parathyroid, intestinal diseases, and pancreatitis. Intended for use in clinical or physician office laboratories.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An alkaline phosphatase or isoenzymes test system is a device intended to measure alkaline phosphatase or its isoenzymes (a group of enzymes with similar biological activity) in serum or plasma. Measurements of alkaline phosphatase or its isoenzymes are used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver, bone, parathyroid, and intestinal diseases.
Predicate Devices
ACE plus ISE/Clinical Chemistry System (k931786)
Alfa Wassermann Piccolo xpress Chemistry Analyzer (k950164)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k072142
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Amylase (AMY), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative
E. Applicant:
Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technology, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
S Test Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Reagent cartridge
S Test Amylase (AMY) Reagent cartridge
S Test Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Reagent cartridge
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CKF-Alkaline Phosphatase | Class II | 21 CFR § 862.1050 | 75-Chemistry |
| CIJ – Amylase | Class II | 21 CFR § 862.1070 | 75-Chemistry |
| CIT- Aspartate Aminotransferase | Class II | 21 CFR § 862.1100 | 75-Chemistry |
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The S-Test Alkaline Phosphatase Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of alkaline phosphatase activity in serum or heparin plasma using the S40 Clinical Analyzer. Measurements of alkaline are used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver, bone, parathyroid, and intestinal diseases. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physicians office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The S-Test Amylase Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of amylase activity in serum or heparin plasma using the S40 Clinical Analyzer. Amylase measurements are used primarily for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas). This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The S-Test Aspartate Aminotransferase Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of aspartate aminotransferase activity in serum or heparin plasma using the S40 Clinical Analyzer. Aspartate aminotransferase measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of certain types of liver and heart disease. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
S40 Clinical Analyzer
{2}
3
I. Device Description:
The ALP, AMY and AST are single use reagent cartridges having two reagent cells, Photometric reaction cuvette, film seal and a 2-D code label. The reagent cells contain the following reagents:
ALP Reagent 1 – ethyl amino ethanol buffer and magnesium chloride, Reagent 2 – p-nitrophenyl phosphate
AMY Reagent 1 – Sodium chloride, Calcium chloride and Good’s buffer, Reagent 2 – α-2-chloro-3-nitrophenyl galactopyranosyl maltoside, Potassium thiocyanate and Good’s buffer
AST Reagent 1 – Nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide (reduced form), Malate dehydrogenase, 2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-propanediol buffer and L-aspartic acid, Reagent 2 – L-aspartic acid α-ketoglutaric acid and 2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-propanediol buffer.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
ACE plus ISE/Clinical Chemistry System, Alfa Wassermann Piccolo xpress Chemistry Analyzer, Abaxis Inc.
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k931786 and k950164 respectively
3. Comparison with predicate:
Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP):
The device and the predicate devices share a similar intended use, analytes measured, test principle, reaction type and sample type.
| Differences | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | S40 Clinical Analyzer S Test ALP Reagent | ACE plus ISE Clinical Chemistry System | Piccolo xpress Chemistry Analyzer |
| Sample Volume | 5 μL | 4 μL | 100 μL |
| Measuring Range | 20-896 U/L | 2-1400 U/L | 5-2400 U/L |
| Detection Limit | 20 U/L | 2 U/L | 5 U/L |
{3}
Amylase (AMY):
The device and the predicate devices share a similar intended use, analytes measured, test principle, reaction type and sample type.
| Differences | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | S40 Clinical Analyzer S Test ALP Reagent | ACE plus ISE Clinical Chemistry System | Piccolo xpress Chemistry Analyzer |
| Sample Volume | 8 μL | 8 μL | 100 μL |
| Measuring Range | 8-1594 U/L | 0-1900 U/L | 5-4000 U/L |
| Detection Limit | 8 U/L | 0 U/L | 5 U/L |
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST):
The device and the predicate devices share a similar intended use, analytes measured, test principle, reaction type and sample type.
| Differences | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | S40 Clinical Analyzer S Test ALP Reagent | ACE plus ISE Clinical Chemistry System | Piccolo xpress Chemistry Analyzer |
| Sample Volume | 15 μL | 14μL | 100 μL |
| Measuring Range | 8-354 U/L | 7-450 U/L | 3-1000 U/L |
| Detection Limit | 8 U/L | 7 U/L | 5 U/L |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline-Second Edition (2004)
CLSI EP10-A: Preliminary Evaluation of Quantitative Clinical Laboratory Methods; Approved Guideline -Second Edition (2002)
CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures, A Statistical Approach: Approved Guideline (2003)
CLSI EP7-A: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline (2002)
CLSI EP17-A: Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation; Approved Guideline (2004)
CLSI EP9-A2: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline (2002)
CLSI C28-A2: How to Define and Determine Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline-Second Edition (2000), Section 8.2: Transference and Validation
{4}
L. Test Principle:
S Test ALP – Alkaline Phosphatase in the sample catalyzes the cleavage of p-nitrophenylphosphate substrate to form the visible product, p-nitrophenyl which is measured spectrophotometrically at 405 nm. The rate of increase in absorbance is directly proportional to the alkaline phosphatase activity in the sample.
S Test AMY – Amylase in the sample catalyses the cleavage of α-2-chloro-4-nitrophenol-α-galactopyranosyl maltoside substrate to form the visible product 2-choro-p-nitrophenol which is measured spectrophotometrically at 405 nm. The rate of increase in absorbance is directly proportional to the α-amylase activity in the sample.
S Test AST – AST in the sample converts the L-aspartate and α-ketoglutarate in the reagent to oxaloacetate and L-glutamate. The oxaloacetate undergoes reduction with simultaneous oxidation of NADH to NAD in malate dehydrogenase catalyzed indicator reaction. The rate of decrease in absorbance from NADH to NAD, monitored bichromatically at 340 nm/546 nm, is proportional to the AST activity in a sample.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision studies were conducted in-house and at three Physician Office Laboratories (POL) (with three trained operators typically found in these settings) by testing three serum samples. The samples were run once a day, three times per run for five days using one instrument at each site. The results are presented below:
{5}
| | ALP U/L | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | % CV | |
| Lab | Sample | Mean | Within Run | Total |
| In-House | 1 | 43 | 4.2% | 4.7% |
| POL 1 | 1 | 44 | 2.3 | 5.0% |
| POL 2 | 1 | 45 | 4.0% | 4 |
| POL 3 | 1 | 41 | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| | | | | |
| In-House | 2 | 136 | 1.8% | 2.4% |
| POL 1 | 2 | 142 | 2.4% | 4.0% |
| POL 2 | 2 | 144 | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| POL 3 | 2 | 137 | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| | | | | |
| In-house | 3 | 733 | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| POL 1 | 3 | 783 | 3.6% | 3.6% |
| POL 2 | 3 | 768 | 3.7% | 4.1% |
| POL 3 | 3 | 796 | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| | AMY U/L | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | %CV | |
| Lab | Sample | Mean | Within Run | Total |
| In-House | 1 | 47 | 4.7% | 4.7% |
| POL 1 | 1 | 48 | 2.9% | 3.3% |
| POL 2 | 1 | 48 | 6.5% | 6.7% |
| POL 3 | 1 | 49 | 3.5% | 3.9% |
| | | | | |
| In-House | 2 | 170 | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| POL 1 | 2 | 172 | 4.3% | 4.6% |
| POL 2 | 2 | 178 | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| POL 3 | 2 | 175 | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| | | | | |
| In-House | 3 | 1424 | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| POL 1 | 3 | 1491 | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| POL 2 | 3 | 1520 | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| POL 3 | 3 | 1527 | 1.4% | 1.7% |
{6}
| | AST U/L | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | %CV | |
| Lab | Sample | Mean | Within Run | Total |
| | | | | |
| In-House | 1 | 26 | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| POL 1 | 1 | 26 | 4.6% | 7.0% |
| POL 2 | 1 | 27 | 4.8% | 4.7% |
| POL 3 | 1 | 27 | 3.7% | 3.8% |
| | | | | |
| In-House | 2 | 142 | 2.0% | 2.8% |
| POL 1 | 2 | 145 | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| POL 2 | 2 | 145 | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| POL 3 | 2 | 146 | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| | | | | |
| In-House | 3 | 306 | 2.2% | 2.5% |
| POL 1 | 3 | 307 | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| POL 2 | 3 | 312 | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| POL 3 | 3 | 313 | 0.8% | 0.9% |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity across the assay range was confirmed by testing commercial linearity standards, 5-11 levels each with known commercial concentrations of ALP, AMY and AST. Each level was tested in replicates of four. Results are presented below:
| ALP U/L | Assigned Value | Measured Value | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 | 28 | 27 | 96% |
| Sample 2 | 53 | 55 | 104% |
| Sample 3 | 78 | 82 | 105% |
| Sample 4 | 104 | 108 | 104% |
| Sample 5 | 128 | 131 | 98% |
| Sample 6 | 133 | 131 | 98% |
| Sample 7 | 255 | 262 | 103% |
| Sample 8 | 264 | 265 | 100.% |
| Sample 9 | 511 | 517 | 101% |
| Sample 10 | 724 | 744 | 103% |
| Sample 11 | 896 | 896 | 100% |
| Linear Regression – y = 1.009x + 1.17 r² = 0.999 | | | |
{7}
| AMY U/L | Assigned Value | Measured Value | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 | 17 | 18 | 104% |
| Sample 2 | 177 | 181 | 102% |
| Sample 3 | 354 | 363 | 102% |
| Sample 4 | 708 | 735 | 104% |
| Sample 5 | 885 | 932 | 105% |
| Sample 6 | 1240 | 1277 | 103% |
| Sample 7 | 1594 | 1594 | 100% |
| Linear Regression – y = 1.011 x + 10.1, r² = 0.999 | | | |
| AST U/L | Assigned Value | Measured Value | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 | 7.0 | 8 | 112.1% |
| Sample 2 | 71 | 70 | 100.6% |
| Sample 3 | 141 | 140 | 100.6% |
| Sample 4 | 283 | 281 | 99.9% |
| Sample 5 | 354 | 354 | 100% |
| Linear Regression – y = 0.997x - 0.29, r² = 0.999 | | | |
The reportable ranges are 20-896 U/L for ALP, 8-1594 U/L for AMY and 8-354 U/L for AST.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The S Test ALP, S Test AMY and S Test AST cartridges are factory calibrated and traceable to the Japanese Certified Enzyme Reference Materials (JC ERM 20327 ALP, AMY) and (JCCLS CRM 003a AST). The 2-D barcode printed on each cartridge provides the analyzer with lot-specific calibration data.
Real time stability studies have been conducted. Protocols and acceptance criteria were described and found to be acceptable. When stored at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ the assay reagent is good until the expiration date on the label.
d. Detection limit:
The Limit of Blank and Limit of Detection were determined for each analyte by running a low sample and a BSA sample, (7.5% in saline) for 3 days, 20 replicates/day for a total of 60 results. The testing was split between two instruments. The detection limits were determined to be $20\mathrm{U / l}$ for ALP, 8 U/L for AMY and 8 U/L for AST.
{8}
e. Analytical specificity:
Interference studies to determine the effects of Unconjugated Bilirubin, Hemolysis and Lipemia were performed. Seven serum pool containing approximately 62 U/L ALP, 66 U/L AMY and 17 U/L AST were spiked with various concentrations of unconjugated bilirubin (0-50 mg/dL), hemoglobin (0-1000 mg/dL) and Intralipids (0-2000 mg/dL). Sponsor states that interference is considered to be significant if the analyte recovery changes by more than 10%.
ALP – There was no significant interference (no change greater than 10%) from bilirubin or lipemia at the tested concentrations. Hemolysis showed a positive interference of (~15%) at 31 mg/dL. Any level of hemolysis may cause interference. The sponsor states that users should not use hemolyzed specimens.
AMY – There was no significant interference (no change greater than 10%) from bilirubin or Lipemia at the tested concentrations. Hemolysis showed a positive interference of (~17%) 31 mg/dL. Any level of hemolysis may cause interference. The sponsor states that users should not use hemolyzed specimens.
AST – There was no significant interference (no change greater than 10%) for Lipemia at the tested concentrations. Positive interference (12-17%) occurred at 1.6, 3.1, 6.3 and 12.5 mg/dL bilirubin, the four lowest levels tested. Any level of icterus may cause interference. The sponsor states that users should not use icteric specimens. Hemolysis showed a positive interference (>14%) occurred at all levels tested. The sponsor states that users should not use hemolyzed specimens.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
{9}
10
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Clinical correlation studies were performed comparing the S-Test ALP, AMY and AST results generated on the S40 Clinical analyzer against the results from the ACE Clinical analyzer using totaling of 180 ALP samples, 196 AMY samples and 177 AST samples. Of the 180 ALP serum samples (15 were diluted and 17 were spiked samples), 196 AMY serum samples (20 were diluted and 29 were spiked samples) and 177 AST serum samples (13 were diluted and 27 were spiked samples). All the samples were measured in singlet. The correlation study between the device and the predicate yielded the following results
| Test | n | Slope | Intercept | r | Sample range (U/L) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| S Test ALP | 182 | 0.969 | -1.2 | 0.997 | 28 - 733 |
| S Test AMY | 196 | 0.969 | 3.19 | 0.997 | 9 - 1461 |
| S Test AST | 177 | 1.014 | -0.83 | 0.998 | 10 - 333 |
Performance for the S Test ALP, S Test AMY and S Test AST was evaluated at four Physician Office Laboratories and with a total of four operators. Operators ran for ALP 46 unaltered clinical serum samples and 8 diluted samples, AMY 41 unaltered clinical samples, 10 diluted and 12 spiked samples and AST 41 unaltered clinical samples, 8 diluted and 12 spiked samples. The S Test ALP, AMY and AST test results were compared to the ACE results. All operators had experience running chemistry instruments. The correlation study between the device and the predicate for serum yielded the following results.
{10}
| | | n | Slope | Intercept | r | Range (U/L) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ALP | Lab A | 54 | 0.990 | 2.2 | 0.998 | 21-848 |
| | Lab B | 55 | 0.987 | 10.6 | 0.996 | 21-848 |
| | Lab C | 52 | 0.991 | 1.1 | 0.998 | 21-848 |
| | Lab D | 54 | 0.987 | 4.3 | 0.998 | 21-848 |
| AMY | Lab A | 61 | 0.94 | 5.1 | 0.997 | 20-1565 |
| | Lab B | 61 | 0.94 | 7.6 | 0.997 | 20-1565 |
| | Lab C | 60 | 0.94 | 3.7 | 0.997 | 20-1565 |
| | Lab D | 63 | 0.93 | 10.2 | 0.997 | 20-1565 |
| AST | Lab A | 60 | 1.06 | 2.9 | 0.998 | 10-317 |
| | Lab B | 61 | 1.08 | -2.1 | 0.998 | 10-317 |
| | Lab C | 60 | 1.07 | -0.8 | 0.998 | 10-317 |
| | Lab D | 60 | 1.09 | -5.5 | 0.998 | 10-317 |
# b. Matrix comparison:
A serum / plasma comparison test was performed for the S-Test ALP, S-Test AMY and S-Test AST assays. Paired samples were assayed on the S40 System. Samples were spiked with the analyte to help cover the assay range. The correlation is as follows:
ALP - y = 0.921x + 3.8, r = 0.997, range 49-847 U/L, n=30
AMY - y = 1.028x - 6.2, r = 0.996, range 31-292 U/L, n = 32
AST - y = 0.994x + 5.2, r = 0.998, range 10-351 U/L, n = 31
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
{11}
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Eighty-one (81) normal serum samples for ALP, AMY and AST were evaluated on the S40 Clinical Analyzer to determine if the reference range of the predicates (ACE Clinical Analyzer and Piccolo) could be transferred to the new assays. The sponsors' acceptance criterion is 90% of the assay results for the normal samples are within the predicate range. Analysis confirmed sufficient agreement (7.4% ALP, 4.8% AMY and 8.6% AST non-congruent results, sponsor specification ≤10%) to transfer the reference range.
ALP – 35-123 U/L
AMY – 25-125 U/L
AST – 11-38 U/L
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
12
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.