ONE STEP HCG URINE PREGNANCY TEST (STRIP), MODEL B01-S, ONE STEP HCG URINE PREGNANCY TEST (CASSETTE) , MODEL B01C
K071930 · Blue Cross Bio-Medical Co., Ltd. · LCX · Dec 18, 2007 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K071930
Device Name
ONE STEP HCG URINE PREGNANCY TEST (STRIP), MODEL B01-S, ONE STEP HCG URINE PREGNANCY TEST (CASSETTE) , MODEL B01C
Applicant
Blue Cross Bio-Medical Co., Ltd.
Product Code
LCX · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Dec 18, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1155
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
One Step hCG Urine Pregnancy Test by Blue Cross is a visually-read, lateral flow immunoassay for the qualitative determination of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine to help in the early detection of pregnancy by visual. The device is designed for over-the-counter use as well as professional use. Additional clinical examination should be performed to confirm the pregnancy.
Device Story
One Step hCG Urine Pregnancy Test is a lateral flow immunoassay available in strip, cassette, and midstream formats. It detects human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine samples. The device utilizes mouse monoclonal anti-beta-hCG antibody colloidal gold conjugate pre-dried on a pad; monoclonal anti-alpha-hCG antibodies and goat anti-mouse IgG are immobilized on a membrane. When urine contacts the membrane, it dissolves the conjugate; if hCG is present, it binds to the conjugate and is captured by the anti-alpha-hCG antibody at the test zone, forming a visible pink line. A control line forms via goat anti-mouse IgG binding. The test is performed by the user (professional or patient) and read visually. A positive result indicates hCG levels at or above the 25 mIU/mL cutoff. Results assist in early pregnancy detection, though additional clinical examination is required for confirmation.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Analytical performance: detection limit 25 mIU/mL; no cross-reactivity with LH (500 mIU/mL), FSH (2000 mIU/mL), or TSH (1000 mIU/mL); no interference from common drugs/analytes. Method comparison: 360 professional samples (100% agreement with predicate) and 360 OTC samples (100% agreement with predicate). User study confirmed ease of use for laypersons.
Technological Characteristics
Lateral flow immunochromatographic assay. Materials include mouse monoclonal anti-beta-hCG antibody colloidal gold conjugate, mouse monoclonal anti-alpha-hCG antibodies, and goat anti-mouse IgG immobilized on a membrane. Formats: strip, cassette, midstream. Qualitative visual readout. Calibrated against WHO 3rd IS (75/537). No electronic components or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the qualitative detection of hCG in urine to aid in early pregnancy detection. Intended for use by both professional healthcare providers and lay users (over-the-counter) who suspect pregnancy or have missed menses.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system is a device intended for the early detection of pregnancy is intended to measure HCG, a placental hormone, in plasma or urine. A human chorionic goadotropin (HCG) test system is a device intended for any uses other than early detection of pregnancy (such as an aid in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of treatment of persons with certain tumors or carcinomas) is intended to measure HCG, a placental hormone, in plasma or urine.
Predicate Devices
WHPM One-Step Pregnancy Test (k041273, k012284)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k071930
B. Purpose for Submission:
new assay
C. Measurand:
human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)
D. Type of Test:
lateral flow immunoassay (three formats: strip, cassette, and midstream)
E. Applicant:
Blue Cross Bio-medical (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy Test
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section: 21 CFR 862.1155, chorionic gonadotropin test system
2. Classification: Class II
3. Product code: LCX, JHI
4. Panel: 75, Chemistry
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
One Step hCG Urine Pregnancy Test by Blue Cross is a visually-read, lateral flow immunoassay for the qualitative determination of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine to help in the early detection of pregnancy by visual. The device is
{1}
designed for over-the-counter use as well as professional use. Additional clinical examination should be performed to confirm the pregnancy.
2. Indication(s) for use:
See intended use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription and over-the-counter use
Additional clinical examination should be performed to confirm the pregnancy.
4. Special instrument requirements:
none
I. Device Description:
Blue Cross Biomedical’s One Step hCG Urine Pregnancy Test will be sold in three formats: test strip, cassette, and midstream. Each test device contains mouse monoclonal anti-beta-hCG antibody colloidal gold conjugate pre-dried on a pad. Mouse monoclonal anti-alpha-hCG antibodies (on test region) and goat anti-mouse IgG (on control region) are coated and immobilized on a membrane.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s): WHPM One-Step Pregnancy Test
2. Predicate K number(s): k041273 (professional use), k012284 (over the counter).
3. Comparison with predicate: The devices are similar in intended use, device design, material, test format, and principle. Specific reagents and antibodies vary.
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Guidance for Over-the-Counter (OTC) Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) 510(k)s
Review Criteria for Assessment of Professional Use Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) In Vitro Diagnostic Devices (IVDs)
L. Test Principle:
The assay is based on an immunochromatographic technology. Each test device contains monoclonal anti-β hCG antibody colloidal gold conjugate pre-dried on a pad. Monoclonal anti-α hCG antibodies (on the test region) and goat anti-mouse IgG (on the control region) are coated and immobilized on a membrane. Other absorbent pads at the end of the assay absorb excess sample fluid. As the urine sample contacts the membrane, it dissolves the lyophilized conjugate. In a reactive sample, the hCG antigen will attach to
{2}
the anti $\beta$ hCG monoclonal antibodies in the colloidal solution. As the conjugate moves forward on the membrane, anti- $\alpha$ hCG monoclonal antibody affixed on the test zone ("T") will bind the HCG-gold conjugate complex, forming a pink line. In addition, all samples will cause a pink colored line to appear in the control zone ("C"). This line is formed by the binding of the polyclonal antibodies (Anti-mouse IgG) affixed onto the control zone to the sample-colloidal gold conjugate. Presence of this line indicates sufficient sample volume was added.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Standard solutions of hCG with varying concentrations were tested using ten strips from each lot for each concentration. Results are tabulated below. An additional study evaluating concentrations between 0 and $25\mathrm{mIU / mL}$ is shown in the detection limit study, below.
| HCG concentration | Lot 1 | | Lot 2 | | Lot 3 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Pos | Neg | Pos | Neg | Pos | Neg |
| 0mIU/ml | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| 25mIU/ml | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| 50mIU/ml | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| 100mIU/ml | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| 100IU/ml | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity is not applicable since this is a qualitative test.
The test was evaluated for high dose hook effect. Negative urine specimens were spiked with high hCG concentration of 62,500; 125,000; 250,000; 500,000; 1,000,000 and 2,000,000 mIU/mL. Both the test line and the control line were visible at these concentrations. (However, at concentrations over 250,000mIU/ml, the test lines become lighter).
# c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
One Step hCG Urine Pregnancy Test has been calibrated against reference material traceable to WHO $3^{\mathrm{rd}}$ IS (75/537).
# d. Detection limit:
The detection limit was evaluated by testing 40 hCG-negative urine samples,
{3}
freshly collected, from healthy females. Each specimen was then divided into 7 portions and spiked to 0, 5, 12.5, 20, 25, 50 and 100 mIU/mL of hCG. Results of this testing are shown below.
| hCG concentration (mIU/mL) | 0 | 5 | 12.5 | 20 | 25 | 50 | 100 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| No. of Positive specimens | 0 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| No. of Negative specimens | 40 | 40 | 36 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total number | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
e. Analytical specificity:
To evaluate cross-reactivity, 20 fresh urine specimens obtained from healthy non-pregnant females were spiked with different concentrations of Lutenizing Hormone (LH), Follicle stimulating Hormone (FSH), and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) into negative (0 mIU/mL) and positive (25mIU/ml) samples. The results demonstrated no cross reaction with LH at 500mIU/ml, FSH at 2000 mIU/mL, and TSH at 1000 mIU/mL. Results are tabulated below.
| | 500 mIU/mL hLH | 1000 mIU/mL hFSH | 1000 mIU/mL hTSH |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| No. of Positive samples | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No. of Negative samples | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| | 500 mIU/mL hLH | 1000 mIU/mL hFSH | 1000 mIU/mL hTSH |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| No. of Positive specimens | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| No. of Negative specimens | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The standards used in this evaluation were: hLH, WHO 2nd IS (80/552); hFSH, WHO 2nd IRP (78/549); hTSH, WHO 2nd IRP (80/558).
Common prescription and OTC drugs, and chemical and biological analytes were added to negative (0 mIU/mL) and positive (25 mIU/mL) urine samples. The following substances, (or pH) at the indicated concentrations, were tested. No interference was observed. All hCG-negative urine specimens read negative and all hCG positive specimens read positive.
{4}
| Analytes | Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 20 mg/dl |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 20 mg/dl |
| Ascorbic acid | 20 mg/dl |
| Caffeine | 20 mg/dl |
| Gentisic acid | 20 mg/dl |
| Phenylpropanolamine | 20 mg/dl |
| Salicylic acid | 20 mg/dl |
| Thiophene | 20 mg/dl |
| Ampicillin | 20 mg/dl |
| Tetracycline | 20 mg/dl |
| EDTA | 80 mg/dl |
| Benzoylecgonine | 10 mg/dl |
| Atropine | 20 mg/dl |
| Cannabinol | 10 mg/dl |
| Ethanol | 1% |
| Methanol | 1% |
| Albumin | 2,000 mg/dl |
| Glucose | 2,000 mg/dl |
| Bilirubin | 1,000 μg/dl |
| Hemoglobin | 1,000 μg/dl |
| pH 9 | |
| pH 8 | |
| pH 6 | |
| pH 5 | |
| pH 4 | |
f. Assay cut-off:
The test cutoff is set at 25 mIU/mL.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The performance of the three formats of the One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy test was compared to the predicate device. Studies were performed to evaluate the devices for both professional and OTC users.
Professional Use
Studies were conducted at three hospital laboratories. A total of 360 fresh urine samples (120 samples from each site) were collected during any time of the day from patients who visited the ob-gyn department of three hospitals. Patients included women who suspected pregnancy, and who had late periods, as well as those later in pregnancy. There were over 30 positive samples from women in
{5}
early pregnancy (defined by the sponsor as 35 days or less since last menstrual period). Medical professionals from the hospitals read the package inserts and conducted assays with the new and predicate devices side by side. Overall results are tabulated below.
| All three hospitals | Currently marketed hCG device (+) | Currently marketed hCG device (-) | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy Test (+) | 213 | 0 | 213 |
| One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy Test (-) | 0 | 147 | 147 |
| Total | 213 | 147 | 360 |
Over the Counter Use
A total of 360 women were enrolled to conduct the Blue Cross Biomedical One Step hCG Urine Pregnancy Test and the predicate device. This included 120 using each of the 3 formats. The age of these subjects ranged from 15 to 56 years of age, and their education level range from middle school to PhD. This study group included women who were pregnant, women who had missed menses, women who were not pregnant, women who are postmenopausal, and women who are infertile. Each test was run and interpreted according to its package insert and was performed by the subject without supervision. A summary of the results is tabulated below:
| | Currently Marketed HCG device (+) | Currently Marketed HCG device (-) | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy Test strips (+) | 65 | - | 65 |
| One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy Test strips (-) | - | 55 | 55 |
| | | | |
| One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy Test cassette (+) | 66 | - | 66 |
| One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy Test cassette (-) | - | 54 | 54 |
| | | | |
| One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy Test midstream (+) | 67 | - | 67 |
| One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy Test midstream (-) | - | 53 | 53 |
| Grand Total | 198 | 162 | 360 |
After recording their results, participants were asked to evaluate the test. All participants thought the test was either "very easy" or "easy" to read and interpret (on a scale ranging from very difficult to very easy).
{6}
-b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable. The device is for use with urine samples only.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not typically provided for this device type.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not typically provided for this device type.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
4. Clinical cut-off:
The test cutoff is set at 25 mIU/mL.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable – this is a qualitative test.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.